Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court23788
+ Central Administrative Tribunal18809
+ Madras High Court12973
+ Bombay High Court7640
+ Armed Forces Tribunal7085
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court5387
+ Allahabad High Court4856
+ Gujarat High Court4597
+ Kerala High Court4581
+ Calcutta High Court4549
+ Delhi High Court4202
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court4099
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission3821
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal3709
+ Rajasthan High Court3414
+ Patna High Court3206
+ Karnataka High Court2967
+ Supreme Court Of India2651
+ Jharkhand High Court2143
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court2089
+ Gauhati High Court2007
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1991
+ Central Information Commission1648
+ Telangana High Court1426
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1294
+ Uttarakhand High Court1253
+ CESTAT1250
+ Orissa High Court1038
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court640
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST560
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission549
+ Tripura High Court512
+ National Green Tribunal494
+ National Company Law Tribunal303
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission295
+ Meghalaya High Court286
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity217
+ SEBI212
+ Manipur High Court196
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal132
+ Sikkim High Court95
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal95
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal90
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal84
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board54
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal44
+ Privy Council41
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange40
+ Competition Commission Of India40
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act35
+ Company Law Board35
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST30
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority17
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal15
+ District Court13
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India10
+ Authority For Advance Rulings10
+ Commissioner (Appeals)10
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India8
+ Settlement Commission5
+ RERA4
+ Trade Marks Registry2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction1
+ Board of Revenue1
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission1
+ Railway Claims Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Right to Information0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards72628
From 2011 To 202047962
From 2001 To 20109184
From 1991 To 20003112
From 1981 To 19901444
From 1971 To 1980828
From 1961 To 1970564
From 1951 To 1960234
Before 1950126

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...suffers from such physical disability which prevents him from earning his livlihood and for this purpose provisions of Rule 47(6) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 were invoked...petition and the supportive annexures found the petitioner to be not entitled to the benefits under Rule 47(6) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 primarily due to failure of petitioner to...petitioner under Rule 47(6) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant is unable to point out any material to show that physical disability certified...

...petitioner was made to retire w.e.f. 30-10-94. His pension has been determined under the provisions of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. The petitioner filed O..... 2255/97 before the Tribunal contending inter alia, that the pension ought to have been determined with reference to Rule 35 of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976.... 3. The stand of the petitioner was combatted on the base that under Rule 43 (4) of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 in no case a ...

....4 is directed to decide the claim of the petitioner with regard to grant of benefit under Rule 42(1) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 by a speaking order within.... Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 is not considered and therefore, he is suffering adversely in the matter of receiving benefit after his retirement. Even though various...averments are made in this petition, record indicates that Directorate of Pension, M.P. Bhopal vide Annexure P/6 has recommended for grant of benefit to the petitioner and matter...

..., whereby amendment was carried out in M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, it has been provided in rule 15A that ad-hoc service shall qualify if the ad-hoc appointment was against a...M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 by a speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. (V...Assistant on 11.12.1985 and the authorities have regularised his services on 31.8.1989. According to the petitioner, in terms of Government of M.P. Finance Department notification dated 17th April, 1996...

...impugned order has not even referred to Rule 48(6)(b)(iv) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. Therefore, the Authority ought to have dealt with the said statutory provisions while dealing with...issued by the this Court in previous round of litigation i.e. W.P.No.1633/2025. However, counsel does not dispute that the impugned order nowhere refers to Rule 48(6)(b)(iv) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) ...Resource Department, Bhopal/respondent No.1 with a direction to take decision on the petitioner's grievance while keeping in view the provisions of Rule 48(6)(b)(iv) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules,...

...no stay on conviction, therefore the petitioner is not entitled for pension in view of provision of Rule 8 of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. On perusal of Rule 8 of .... Civil Services(Pension)Rules, it transpires that pension sanctioning authority may, by order in writing withhold or withdraw a pension or part thereof, whether permanently or for a specified per...KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the Rule 8 of the M.P.Civil Services (Pension) Rules, this Court finds that...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...the deceased employee and was fully dependent upon the deceased employee therefore, in terms of Rule 48(6)(b)(iv) of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 she is...(6)(b)(iv) of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months from the date of receipt of such representation.7. It...light of the aforesaid Rules.6. Hence, the present writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to file an appropriate fresh representation before the concerned Authority...

...pensionary benefits under M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. The aforesaid judgment was subsequently followed in the case of Ram Jatan Singh v. State of ...the entire period of service rendered by the petitioner in Janpad Sabha School towards pensionary benefits under M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, subject to...(1987 MPLJ 509) wherein the claim put-forth by the petitioner therein for counting the services rendered in Janpad Sabha School was directed to be treated for the purposes of...

...name of petitioner for extending the benefits of family pension as per Rule 47 of the M.P. Civil Services Pension Rules. Father of the petitioner was working as Assistant Professor retired from...) of M.P. Civil Services Pension Rules and has considered that in pursuance to the aforesaid rule. Looking to the disability, he submitted a detail representation to the respondents by registered Post...services on 01.03.1994. The petitioner is suffering from Myotic Choroidal disease and his vision was lost day by day. The disability be extend up to 40% to the petitioner. He has relied upon the Rule 47(6...

...with in accordance with M.P. Civil Services (Pension)Rules and shall take appropriate decision in the matter. 3. Considering the rival contention, the petition is disposed of...in the matter of payment of gratuity of the petitioner taking note of the entitlement of the petitioner as per provisions of Rule 64 of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules and if there is no.... ORDER The petitioner is a retired employee of the Department of Food and Civil Supplies and he retired on 31.10.2023 and his grievance is that despite...

...Rule 42 of the M.P Civil Services Pension Rules, which is in pari materia with Rule 56-J of the Fundamental Rules. On the basis of the entries in the annual confidential character roll, the Screen...official work, and therefore it cannot be said to be violation of the Rules. The very service record and the annual character roll for the year 1991-92 that was placed before us record his integrity...Order1. M.P Electricity Board is in appeal against the impugned judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh setting aside an order of compulsory retirement passed under...

...reduced. Such a course of action is available to the State or its functionaries only when the prerequisites of Rule 9 of M.P Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 are followed...functionaries have not adopted this course available to them under the law but have rather tried to circumvent the statutory procedure provided under Rule 9 of M.P Civil Services Pension ...in terms of the Recruitment Rules. Thus learned counsel for State contends that by order dated 08/06/2007 (order impugned in the writ petition) the said promotion granted to the petitioner on 18/07...

...order. So far as pension and other retiral benefits are concerned, the respondents are already paying him anticipatory pension as per Rule 64 of The M.P. Civil Services (Pension), Rules, ...full pension and another benefit as per and another benefit as per Rule 64 of The M.P. Civil Services (Pension), Rules, 1976, hence, he is rightly getting the provisional pension. A recom...superannuation. During the suspension period no order under Rule 8 of M.P. Civil Services (Pension), Rules, 1976 has been passed withholding his pension by the competent authority, although in vie...

...Shri Jagannath Gupta. His submission is that as per the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, there was a dispute about the payment of the pension in favour of the ...of Biharilal Gupta is 16.12.1952 as per service record and as per Clause (C) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 the son is only entitled to family, pension up ...the age of 25 years. Since the age of Biharilal Gupta is more than 25 years, therefore, as per the rules, he is not entitled to family pension. This fact is not disputed, therefore, it is clear that...

...view the M.P Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 and they shall be passing a final order after concluding the Departmental Enquiry.4. This Court has...carefully gone through the Rule 9 of M.P Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976. Rule 9(2)(b)(ii) of the Rules of 1976 provides that in respect of cause of action which ar..., in the considered opinion of this Court, the respondents keeping in view the the Rules of 1976 has rightly released 90% of the pension in the petitioner's case.5. In light of the...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...Ravindra Singh on behalf of respondent Board revealing that two charge-sheets were issued against petitioner; one under Rule 16 and the other under Rule 14 of M.P. Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1966...inconsequential since petitioner has attained the age of superannuation on 31.12.2015 and thus cannot be punished under Rule 9 of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 for...petitioner ought not to have been withheld save for justifiable reasons sustainable under M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, which has not been done by the employer...

...Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and not under the provisions of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976....Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and not under the provisions of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976...of MP. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 and not under the provisions of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. In...

..., whereby Writ Petition No.7124 of 2023 has been allowed and the petitioner therein was directed to be paid the pension under M.P. (Work Charges & Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979 (in short 'the ..., 1976 (in short 'the Pension Rules...recruitment rules and pension rules are different. NPS scheme shall not apply for the Work Charged & Contingency Paid employees. This Court has granted pension to the petitioner under the Rules of 1979...