Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Karnataka High Court265
+ Supreme Court Of India45
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court36
+ Central Administrative Tribunal34
+ Gauhati High Court34
+ Delhi High Court33
+ Allahabad High Court30
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court30
+ Patna High Court27
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court27
+ Bombay High Court24
+ Madras High Court19
+ Kerala High Court18
+ National Green Tribunal16
+ Jharkhand High Court15
+ Rajasthan High Court14
+ Uttarakhand High Court8
+ Orissa High Court6
+ Telangana High Court6
+ Chhattisgarh High Court5
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court5
+ Tripura High Court5
+ Central Information Commission4
+ Gujarat High Court4
+ Manipur High Court4
+ Meghalaya High Court3
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court2
+ National Company Law Tribunal2
+ Armed Forces Tribunal1
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1
+ SEBI1
+ Sikkim High Court1
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Calcutta High Court0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards334
From 2011 To 2020273
From 2001 To 201041
From 1991 To 200021
From 1981 To 19904
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Lokayukta Act, 1984, findings and recommendations were furnished to the State. Considering the report of the Lokayukta, the State has passed an order dated 06.10.2016, for holding an enquiry...recommendations etc. The Lokayukta has, accordingly, recorded its findings and has made recommendations. The recommendations are purely within the discretion of Lokayukta. Whether the ...accepted and to what extent are within the purview of the State. Therefore, to contend that the Lokayukta has no power to make recommendations is opposed to Section 12(3) of the...

...dismissed. 2. The challenge in the writ petition, inter alia, was against the Report dated 4-10-2011 of the Lokayukta, U.P containing the following recommendations...within a month.” 3. As the aforesaid recommendations of the Lokayukta, U.P have been implemented and necessary action in terms thereof has been taken, the relief prayed for...legitimacy of the procedure adopted by the Lokayukta, U.P in making the recommendations set out in the Report dated 4-10-2011. 12. To appreciate the arguments advanced by the rival...

...” as defined in Section 2(1) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 (for short “the KL Act”).3. To appreciate the contentions of Mr K.R Nagaraja, the learned counsel for the...the Registrar, Lokayukta for taking necessary action. The Upa-Lokayukta referred the allegations against the respondent to the police wing of the Upa-Lokayukta for preliminary inquiry under Section 7(2...) of the KL Act. Apropos to the preliminary inquiry, the Upa-Lokayukta by letter dated 18-5-1993, called for comments of the respondent under Section 9(3) of the Lokayukta Act. The respondent...

...summoned to face the proceeding before the Lokayukta and also the recommendations of Lokayukta dated 19th July, 2013 whereby Lokayukta had recommended several actions to be taken up against the...petitioner. The appellant had challenged the recommendations of Lokayukta inter alia on the grounds that the complaint dated 15.04.2013 was defective as it had not followed with the affidavit, therefore, in...submitted that the findings of the learned Single Judge itself discloses that the grounds taken by the appellant/petitioner to challenge the summoning order as well as recommendations of Lokayukta has not...

..., normally, does not entertain public interest litigations for executing the recommendations/orders of the Lokayukta as there is sufficient provision under the Act itself to get the recommendations/order of...3 to implement the recommendation/report dated 22.02.2012 of the Lokayukta, Uttar Pradesh, arrayed as respondent no. 4.2. We have heard the petitioner, who appeared in person. He...submits that a complaint was made in respect of certain illegalities, improprieties and financial bungling committed by respondents no. 5 and 6 and the Lokayukta, having examined the complaint and being...

...the basis of the recommendations made by the Lokayukta U.P. dated 11.6.2012. He further submits that within next two weeks the crime will be registered and further investigation... date of registration of the FIR. It is needless to mention that the State Government shall also take all steps that may be necessary to implement the recommendations made by the...Lokayukta. Order Date :- 3.1.2018 VMA (Suneet Kumar, J) (Dilip B Bhosale, CJ) Neutral Citation No. - 2018:AHC:1248-DB ...

...-Lokayukta is satisfied with the action taken or proposed to be taken on his findings and recommendations referred to in sub-section (1), he shall close the case under intimation to the complainant, the...satisfied that the allegations are proved, he shall submit his recommendations to the competent authority who has to take action within a prescribed period of time and report back to the Lokayukta. Till...forward a special report to the Governor. Therefore, we are of the considered view that Lokayukta has no enforcing power except to make recommendations to the competent authority and seeks its report...

...and accordingly, the recommendations made by the Hon'ble Lokayukta for lodging the FIR and taking appropriate departmental actions against the petitioner, are absolutely misconceived and illegal, and...predecessors and on this allegation, upon due enquiry, the impugned recommendations have been made by the Hon'ble Lokayukta, the respondent No. 5. The allegation against the petitioner appears to be...Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Vigilance as also learned counsel for the respondent No. 5, Hon'ble Lokayukta...

...Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, State of Haryana had filed the instant writ petition assailing the order dated 12.02.2019 (Annexure P-15) passed by the Lokayukta, Haryana and in which...recommendations had been made to initiate departmental action against the petitioner. A copy of the writ paper book already stood furnished to learned State counsel. During the course of hearing today..., Mr. N.K. Parmar, learned AAG, Haryana apprises the Court that the recommendations contained in the impugned order dated 12.02.2019 (Annexure P-15) have been considered by the Department and a decision...

...1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner.2. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order/recommendation made by the Lokayukta. According to him, before...making this recommendation, the Petitioner was neither heard nor he was given an opportunity of referring the documents. We have perused the order passed by the Lokayukta. In paragraph No. 12 of the...said order, it is clearly mentioned that the Petitioner was given a personal hearing and the Lokayukta has observed that he could not give any satisfactory answer.3. The Lokayukta has...

...submitted his report dated 22.11.2011 (Annexure P-10). On the basis of the aforesaid report, the Lokayukta, Haryana vide his recommendations dated 3.4.2012, found that though serious allegations against...ground that the recommendations of the lokayukta are against the landmark judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan...further be noticed at this stage that respondent No. 5 had also filed CWP No. 8389 of 2012, challenging the recommendations of the Lokayukta dated 3.4.2012, which was dismissed by this Court vide judgment...

...ble Lokayukta has been invested with the power of investigation, and while doing so, as required under Section 12 of the Act, a report has to be prepared, by recording findings and recommendations...Lokayukta to investigate the matter finally and record the findings and recommendations, if any, by submitting a report to the competent authority. We desire that this entire exercise shall be completed...Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, C.J.:-- 1. In this Writ Petition, portion of the order of the Hon ble Lokayukta has been challenged basically by way of modification before this...

...deals with the following aspects:(i) The Lokayukta or Upa-Lokayukta can sent a report with certain recommendations and findings as envisaged in sub-sections (1) and...recommendations to be given by the Lokayukta or Upa-Lokayukta under sub-section (3) of Section 12, include those as contemplated under Section 13 of the Act...appeals is whether the views expressed by the Chief Justice of the High Court of Karnataka has got primacy while making appointment to the post of Lokayukta or Upa-Lokayukta by the Governor of...

...scheme.3. The first information report was lodged on 14 March, 2013 as per the recommendations of Lokayukta, Uttarakhand. The investigation is in progress. The petitioners are directed to...first information report is the finding dated 4th July, 2012, given by Lokayukta, Uttarakhand, whereby it was recommended that a suitable action against the erring officers be taken in respect of...(petitioner in criminal writ petition no. 390 of 2013) are Government servants therefore it appears, prima facie, that Lokayukta has jurisdiction over them. The complaint was in relation to implementation...

...directions of the Chief Minister and he was not in any way at fault in issuing the order (Annexure 6).”5. The Lokayukta made his recommendations to the Government to...accordingly done.4. It would appear that subsequently, the same was withdrawn and recorrected as 28-6-1938. One S.S Tiwari made a complaint to the Lokayukta alleging fabrication...of actual date of birth of the respondent. The Lokayukta while conducting an elaborate enquiry like the trial of a suit, considered the stand of the respondent that he had studied in the primary...

..., issued interim directions that till the next date of hearing no further action pursuant to the recommendations made by Lokayukta, Haryana, for registration of FIR against the respondent/writ...order dated 22.01.2016 passed by the Division Bench is that the appellant-State, regardless of the fact that the matter was still sub-judice, accepted the recommendations made by Lokayukta and has...learned Single Judge the State Government could not have accepted or rejected the report of the Lokayukta and resultantly no FIR could be registered. But as a consequence effect of the ex parte interim...

...."5. The complaint having been examined and dealt with has led to the passing of the impugned order dated 13.08.2019 by the Lokayukta, Haryana, whereby the following recommendations have been...report on the above recommendations be sent to this Authority of Lokayukta within three months.With the above recommendations this complaint stands disposed of."6. Counsel submits...passing of the impugned order by the Lokayukta and the recommendations contained therein is on the presumption that the petitioner is guilty in the MANREGA scam for the years 2007-08 and the money...

...Authority under the Delhi Lokayukta and Upalokayukta Act, 1995, rejecting the recommendations contained in the reports of the Lokayukta, Delhi with respect to the respondents no. 1 to 8 i.e (i) Shri...findings and recommendations to the Competent Authority being the Lieutenant Governor; in majority of the cases, the finding of the Lokayukta was that the Municipal Councillor had been eager and willing...to reject the course of action proposed by the Lokayukta in each of the cases;(v) that the orders of the Lieutenant Governor rejecting the recommendations of the Lokayukta are...

...which is the preliminary enquiry report, the notice dated 18.08.2012 and the final recommendations made by the Ld. Lokayukta on 24.01.2013 At the outset it may be noticed that this writ petition was filed...that the Lokayukta only makes recommendations to the State Govt. It is for the State Govt. to accept or reject the said recommendations. If the criminal proceedings or departmental proceedings as...opinion on the merits of the case and we have gone only by the recommendations of the Ld. Lokayukta which are recommendations of facts and which we cannot set aside in writ petition.14. We...

....”30. Though elaborate arguments have been made by Mr K.K Venugopal as well as Mr Desai about the merits of the various recommendations/orders passed by Respondent 2 Lokayukta in...India, has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of quo warranto against Mr Justice N.K Mehrotra (Retd.), Lokayukta for the State of Uttar Pradesh, Respondent 2 herein, for continuing as...Lokayukta after 15-3-2012. The petitioner is also challenging the constitutional validity of the U.P Lokayukta and Up-Lokayuktas (Amendment) Act, 2012 (for short “the Amendment Act”) to the extent being...