Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court17199
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal10951
+ Madras High Court4758
+ Central Administrative Tribunal3971
+ CESTAT3871
+ Delhi High Court3624
+ Karnataka High Court2538
+ Gujarat High Court2367
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court2279
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court2057
+ Kerala High Court2016
+ Allahabad High Court1770
+ Supreme Court Of India1608
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1546
+ Rajasthan High Court1477
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court1413
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court1307
+ Calcutta High Court988
+ Patna High Court934
+ Jharkhand High Court752
+ Chhattisgarh High Court739
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission724
+ Telangana High Court718
+ National Green Tribunal673
+ Uttarakhand High Court549
+ Gauhati High Court515
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission453
+ Orissa High Court445
+ Central Information Commission268
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court264
+ National Company Law Tribunal202
+ Armed Forces Tribunal142
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal129
+ Tripura High Court126
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity112
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST109
+ SEBI101
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission96
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal89
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal80
+ Meghalaya High Court65
+ Privy Council51
+ RERA48
+ Sikkim High Court32
+ Company Law Board31
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST30
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal29
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India28
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act27
+ Competition Commission Of India21
+ Commissioner (Appeals)20
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal18
+ Authority For Advance Rulings15
+ Manipur High Court15
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal15
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board14
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority14
+ Settlement Commission8
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction6
+ Board of Revenue5
+ District Court5
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange4
+ Collector Appeals3
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission3
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs2
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India2
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board2
+ Railway Claims Tribunal2
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal1
+ Deputy Collector1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards27021
From 2011 To 202031560
From 2001 To 20107014
From 1991 To 20002338
From 1981 To 1990883
From 1971 To 1980289
From 1961 To 1970203
From 1951 To 1960183
Before 1950234

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...into the evidence adduced on behalf of the State Khadi Board to prove the misconduct in Court. The answer to the said issue has impacted the answers to the other issues, once the Labour Court came to a conclusion that the m...reinstatement in service. 8 The said judgments and orders dated 28/03/2011 passed by the learned Judge of the Labour Court No.2, Pune in Complaint ULP Nos.175 of 2011 and 174 of...] Residing at C-1/4, Todkar Township ] Sanas Nagar, Hadapsar, Pune 411028 ] ] 2] Judge, Labour Court, Pune...

...to the said issue has impacted the answers to the other issues, once the Labour Court came to a conclusion that the misconduct has not been proved by the State Khadi Board. The learned Judge of the Labour Court No....] ] 2] Judge, Labour Court, Pune ] ] 3] Member, Industrial Court, Pune ]..... Respondents.... Haveli, Dist. Pune ] 1 ] 2] Judge, Labour Court, Pune...

...into the evidence adduced on behalf of the State Khadi Board to prove the misconduct in Court. The answer to the said issue has impacted the answers to the other issues, once the Labour Court came to a conclusion that the m...reinstatement in service. 8 The said judgments and orders dated 28/03/2011 passed by the learned Judge of the Labour Court No.2, Pune in Complaint ULP Nos.175 of 2011 and 174 of...] Residing at C-1/4, Todkar Township ] Sanas Nagar, Hadapsar, Pune 411028 ] ] 2] Judge, Labour Court, Pune...

...into the evidence adduced on behalf of the State Khadi Board to prove the misconduct in Court. The answer to the said issue has impacted the answers to the other issues, once the Labour Court came to a conclusion that the m...reinstatement in service. 8 The said judgments and orders dated 28/03/2011 passed by the learned Judge of the Labour Court No.2, Pune in Complaint ULP Nos.175 of 2011 and 174 of...] Residing at C-1/4, Todkar Township ] Sanas Nagar, Hadapsar, Pune 411028 ] ] 2] Judge, Labour Court, Pune...

...Somnath Tulshiram Galande vs. Presiding Officer, IInd Labour Court, Pune and Others1 and H.R. Adyanthaya and...indulged in unfair labour practices. 7. It would be contextually relevant to note that the learned Member, Industrial Court had granted interim relief staying the...of fact recorded by the learned Member, Industrial Court is found to be justifiable, the inference of unfair labour practices is a matter of necessary corollary as the complainants were deprived of...

...Somnath Tulshiram Galande vs. Presiding Officer, IInd Labour Court, Pune and Others1 and H.R. Adyanthaya and...indulged in unfair labour practices. 7. It would be contextually relevant to note that the learned Member, Industrial Court had granted interim relief staying the...of fact recorded by the learned Member, Industrial Court is found to be justifiable, the inference of unfair labour practices is a matter of necessary corollary as the complainants were deprived of...

...Revision Application without assigning any reason. By this Revision, the petitioner has challenged order dated 27 June, 2012 passed by the Labour Court, Pune, whereby it is held that “Enquiry conducted against complainant i...1. Heard finally, by consent of the parties.2. The Petitioner has challenged impugned order dated 7 July, 2012 passed by the Industrial Court, Pune, thereby rejected the...interlocutory order of the Labour Court, the Industrial Court, has not given any reasons on merits of the matter.3. The order passed by the Labour Court, treated as...

...the conciliation proceedings, had submitted his reports. The Appropriate Government passed identical orders of referring the industrial dispute to the Labour Court at Pune. Vide the identical 15...the 30 incidental Orders passed between 21st March 2015 to 28th November 2016 by the Learned Labour Court at Pune in 30 identical IDA...disputes and the disputes were referred to the Labour Court at Pune. Similar to the cases in hands, the Labour Court had answered the Reference cases in negative. The petitioners approached this ...

...totally unjustified in interfering with the order of the Labour Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. We set aside the judgments of the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of the Delhi High...meanwhile. We have now before us a case where a dispute originating in 1969 and referred for adjudication by the Government to the Labour Court in 1970 is still at the stage of decision on a preliminary.... Governor of Delhi referred the dispute for adjudication to the Additional Labour Court, Delhi under Sections 10(1)(c) and 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The dispute referred for adjudication to...

...Court and the Industrial Court at Pune.9. I have, with the assistance of the learned advocates, gone through the petition paper book and the impugned judgments of the Labour Court a.... The respondent is the employer. In the 2nd petition, the petitioner is the employer bank and the respondent is the employee. Since both these petitions challenge the same judgments of the Labour Court...passed by Labour Court dated 6-3-2009 and remanded the matter back to Labour Court for decision on the complaint afresh after framing proper issues.(m) The employee, being aggrieved by...

...to the Labour Court to go into the findings recorded by the enquiry officer regarding the misconduct committed by the respondent. This Court in a number of judgments has held that the punishment of...at Nainital in Writ Petition No. 603 (M/S) of 2002. By the impugned order, the High Court upheld the findings recorded by the Labour Court to the effect that the punishment of removal imposed upon...the respondent was excessive in comparison to the charges levelled against him. The High Court while maintaining the findings recorded by the Labour Court that the punishment of removal was excessive in...

...under section 44 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act and Industrial Court has after considering various judgments cited...the judgment dated 2nd February, 2008 passed by Labour Court, Aurangabad in Complaint (ULP) No. 399 of 1994. The Labour Court found termination of petitioner from 31st October, 1994 an unfair labour...has not correctly applied the law on the point. The subsequent judgments of Honourable Apex Court holding that violation of section 25F itself entitles workman to appropriate relief could not be...

...officer the employees approached the Labour Court challenging the action of employer by filing complaint under Act of 1971. The Labour Court, Pune dismissed the said complaint. Feeling aggrieved by the ord...item No. 1(a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the Act of 1971 before the Labour Court, Pune. The workmen contended before the Labour Court that their services were terminated hurriedly and in...A.B Naik, J.:— FACTS IN BRIEF:2. This petition is filed challenging the orders passed by the Labour Court, Aurangabad and Industrial Court Aurangabad. The petitioner was in...

...labour for any work of an establishment would, in law, create relationship of master and servant between the establishment and the labour; he sought to derive support from judgments of this Court in the...two three-Judge Benches of this Court on the interpretation of the expression “appropriate Government” in Section 2(1)(a) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (for short “the...Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent contract labour in these appeals submitted that in view of the concession made by the learned Solicitor-General, he would not address the Court on that aspect...

...judgment.3. The short question involved in this appeal centres around the jurisdiction of the Labour Court functioning under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and.... 90 to 98 of 1989 before the Presiding Officer, First Labour Court, Bombay, alleging therein, inter alia, that the appellant's predecessor company had engaged in commission of unfair labour practices...employer-Company from continuing the unfair labour practices complained of and from terminating the services of the respondents. The Labour Court passed an ex parte injunction restraining the employer...

...employer to adduce evidence before the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal to justify the termination of the services of a workman has been recognised in various judgments of this Court delivered in the last...Officer, Labour Court 1984 Supp SCC 520, (1985) 1 SCR 544 we are referring this matter to a larger Bench which has to be a Bench of more than three Judges. Mr Rao...additional evidence in a proceeding before the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal either under Section 10 or Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act questioning the legality of the order terminating...

..., the Court has affirmed the award passed by the Labour Court, Junagadh in Reference Case No. 192 of 1995 dated 14-5-2007, wherein and whereunder the Labour Court has directed the employer to reinstate...the practice of engaging the services of daily-wage workmen and in lieu of it to hire labourers on contractual basis.3. The claim of the workman before the Labour Court was...terminated without giving notice and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. The stand of the appellant before the Labour Court was that, the workman was employed on a daily-wage...

...judgments lay down the basic principle, namely, that the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution will not interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Labour Court unless...the writ petition filed by the Assistant Executive Engineer (SD-1), Athani and set aside the order of the Labour Court dated 27-10-1999 directing reinstatement with 50% back wages from the date of the...was liable to be set aside. The above industrial dispute was referred by the State Government to the Labour Court vide reference under Section 10(1)(c) of the 1947 Act. The reference was in the...

...company situated in Bombay.3. While the appellant was in Calcutta and before his transfer on promotion to Pune the appellant applied to the Labour Department, Government of...dispute be referred to the Labour Court under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the Act. Accordingly, the Government of West Bengal made a reference on 23-8-1977 to the First Labour Court, West Bengal for...the adjudication of the dispute between the parties. An objection was raised by the employer company before the First Labour Court that the reference was incompetent as the Government of West Bengal...

...not have been any regularisation of these workmen in view of the judgments of this Court in Delhi Development Horticulture...) 7 SCC 177)“29. The learned counsel for the appellant referred to two judgments wherein this Court granted compensation instead of reinstatement...by the industrial adjudicator. It was also argued that the Labour Court can create terms existing in the contract to maintain industrial peace and therefore it had the power to vary the terms of the...