...PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ORS. 2 CWP-6407-2013 RAJINDER KUMAR KAUNDAL V/S PRESIDING OFFICER..., INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ORS. 3 CWP-23265-2012 SWARN SINGH V/S PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ORS.... 4 CWP-23266-2012 JATINDER SINGH V/S PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ORS...

...Tribunal and Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr... RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh by award dated March 10, 2015 has granted reinstatement with 25% back... -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.18751...

...Department, the appellant sent a notice to the respondent. Since the Department declined to accede to his request, the appellant made Reference No. 81 of 1999 before the Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh. He...P. Sathasivam, J.— Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the judgment and final order dated 23-12-2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in...pleaded before the Labour Court that he had completed more than 240 days of service and all along he was performing his duties at the residence of the Chief Minister, Haryana. The...

...M.M Kumar, J.:— This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 5.8.1988 passed by the Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh. The...is pertinent to mention that on 15.12.1988 after admission of the writ petition, an order was passed by this Court for depositing the awarded amount with the Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh and...claim of workman-respondent No. 2 has been allowed by the Labour Court because his termination order dated 30.4.1988 was set aside in the earlier litigation and he was ordered to be...

...& Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh and others .... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH...award dated 01.09.2014 (Annexure P- 4) rendered by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh, awarding compensation of ` 60,000... IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 215 of 2016 ( O&M ) DATE OF...

...& Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh and others .... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH...the award dated 01.09.2014 (Annexure P- 4) rendered by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh, allowing the application moved by... IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 216 of 2016 ( O&M...

...Officer, Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh (for short, ‘the Tribunal’), whereby she has been directed to be paid compensation of Rs. 50,000/-.Learned...Rajesh Bindal J.The petitioner, who was working as part-time Sweeper with the management, has approached this court impugning the award dated 5.6.2012, passed by Presiding...

...The Punjab State Cooperative Bank is before this Court assailing the award dated 05.06.2012 (P-1) passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh. Prayer...Office, Sector-37, Chandigarh. It is beyond cavil that the workperson was engaged to labour for an hour daily as a Sweeper. The Labour Court has correctly returned a finding that a part time employee...was for a short duration everyday. The Labour Court has exercised its jurisdiction and discretion by balancing out the equities in the light of violation of mandatory provisions of law and has taken...

...1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the award passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour-Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh, in I.D.R No. 202 of 1988, decided on 8 June, 1991.... Thereafter, the services of the petitioner were not taken in by the respondent. Therefore, the petitioner raised an industrial dispute and the matter was referred to the Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh. The...Labour Court came to the conclusion that the petitioner worked for less than 240 days in a year and, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief whatsoever. Aggrieved by...

...is directed against the order dated 15.04.2009 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh vide which the application moved by the petitioner to lead additional...evidence stands dismissed.The petitioner sought reference against termination of his services which was referred to the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh for..., 20.5.2003, 8.9.2003 and 30.8.2005 Issue of Satwinder Singh and Sukhwinder Singh was raised in the evidence led by the petitioner.Learned Labour Court, therefore, found that the plea that...

..., Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh, whereby the Labour Court has held the termination of the service of the respondent-workman as illegal. The Labour Court has further held that respondent...natural justice.3. Learned counsel for the management has not been able to show how the order of the Labour Court suffers from any legal defect. He has not been able to distinguish the...written statement as well as according to the arguments raised before the Labour Court it is clear that services of the respondent-workman were terminated on the ground of absence from duty...

...1. These two writ petitions are directed against the award of the Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh dated April 26, 1993 whereby the workman has been directed to be reinstated but...were terminated on the appointment of a regularly selected candidate. The workman challenged her termination by raising an industrial dispute which was referred for adjudication to the Labour Court...- respondent. After appreciating the evidence led by the parties, the Labour Court came to the conclusion that the workman had put in more than 240 days of service and that her services were terminated...

... Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH...20.03.2018 (Annexure P-1) passed by Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'), whereby the reference was answered in favour of the...petitioner be dismissed. 3 of 9 5. The Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh, vide its award...

...about five years thereof, the workman served another demand notice dated March 31, 1982. This demand notice was referred to the Labour Court for adjudication vide notification dated September 13, 1983. It may at this stage be noticed that the office of the petitioner Corporation is located at Chandigarh and it was perhaps for this reason that the Chandigarh Administration referred the dispute to the Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh...Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh by its award dated March 26, 1985 came to the conclusion that the order of termination of services was illegal and unjustified and that the workman was entitled to...given some of the benefits of back wages in terms of the award dated March 26, 1985 filed a petition under Section 33-C(2) of the Act. The Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh by...

...dated 17.7.2009 (Annexure P-9) passed by the learned Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh, the petitioner-workman has approached this Court, by way of instant writ petition under...learned Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigrh for fresh decision, in accordance with law, and after granting due opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. It is further directed that since the...reference is of the year 2005, the learned Labour Court shall make an endeavour to decide the matter at an early date by passing an appropriate order, in accordance with law.With the observations made and directions issued, aforementioned, the present petition stands disposed of....

...and Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) has filed the present petition.Learned counsel for the management submitted that it is a case in which...

...and Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) has filed the present petition.Learned counsel for the management submitted that it is a case in which...

...Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is challenge to the award dated 16.11.2015 (Annexure-P/1) passed by learned Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh (hereinafter...to Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh immediately for compliance. 10. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (SHEKHER DHAWAN...view of the above, it has become essential to remand the matter to learned Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chandigarh to consider the matter afresh. Ordered accordingly. Learned Tribunal shall...

...Corporation v. Labour Court, Patiala [1981—II L.L.N 619]. Counsel also referred to Tarsem Singh v. Labour Court, Jullundur [1981 (1) S.L.R 646], Workmen of American Express International Banking Corp oration [1985—II L.L.N 817] (vide supra) and Rajbir Singh v. State of Haryana [1983 (1) S.L.R 38 (sic)], besides an unreported judgment in Civil Writ Petition No. 4079 of 1986 (Nachhaiar Singh v. Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh), decided...1. This petition on behalf of the workman is directed against the award of the Labour Court, dated 18 December, 1984, whereby his termination order, dated 2 June, 1979, was held to be...Industries Corporation, had also filed a writ petition being Civil Writ Petition No. 220 of 1985 challenging the said award of the Labour Court reinstating the workman. The said petition was admitted to...

...& Labour Court, Union Territory Chandigarh while ordering his reinstatement has awarded 60 % back wages instead of full back-wages. Learned counsel submits that the.... Presiding Officer, Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, U.T.Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR...service illegally in violation of the provision of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereupon the petitioner raised industrial dispute and through award dated 20.04.2011 (Annexure P-9), the Labour Court...