Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Allahabad High Court64
+ Gujarat High Court49
+ Chhattisgarh High Court18
+ Bombay High Court11
+ Delhi High Court11
+ Gauhati High Court8
+ Madras High Court8
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court7
+ Karnataka High Court7
+ Supreme Court Of India7
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court6
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal5
+ Kerala High Court5
+ Jharkhand High Court4
+ Calcutta High Court3
+ Rajasthan High Court3
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court2
+ Patna High Court2
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction1
+ Company Law Board1
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court1
+ National Company Law Tribunal1
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Telangana High Court1
+ Uttarakhand High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards129
From 2011 To 202066
From 2001 To 201014
From 1991 To 20009
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

.... 5. Counsel for the opposite party no. 3 submits on the other hand that the judgment in the case of Kirtikant D Vadodaria (Supra) would not apply to the facts of the present case, in view...party no. 3 though being the step mother of the petitioner, is virtually helpless and has no body to maintain her. In the case of Kirtikant D Vadodaria (Supra) while explaining the scope and applicability...considering the several judgments of the Supreme Court in the context of claim for maintenance of the stepmother, including the judgment in the case of Kirtikant D Vadodaria (Supra), the Single Judge has...

...learned Counsel for the petitioner, would strenuously urge that the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria Vs. State of...reliance on paras 14 and 15 of the judgment in the case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (cited supra). He would then submit that the claim of the petitioner for disentitling the respondent for maintenance.... Mrs. Chincholkar, the learned Counsel for the respondent, while inviting my attention to the observations in para 15 of the judgment in the case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (cited supra) and the...

...Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat (1996) 4 SCC 479, while adverting to the dominant purpose behind Section 125 of the Code, ruled that...

...wife.”9. A two-Judge Bench in Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat...

...Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat & Anr., 1996 (3) GLR 746 (SC). The Court has held that the expression 'mother' in Clause (d) of...Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (supra) cannot be applied in favour of the petitioner No. 1. The petitioner No. 1 being a step-mother cannot claim benefit of maintenance...

...the reported judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat, (1996) 4 SCC 479 and submitted that in...Court in the case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (supra). I am of the considered view that the revision application deserves to be rejected.9. Firstly, the respondent No. 1 is old lady having...Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (supra). In the peculiar facts and circumstances of that case, the Apex Court came to the conclusion that surviving real and natural born sons...

..."Kirtikant D. Vadodaria Vs State of Gujarat and another, reported in (1996) 4 SCC 479", and also on the ground that the applicant is getting...Family Court has committed error of law in holding that the dicta laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of "Kirtikant D. Vadodaria..."Kirtikant D. Vadodaria Vs State of Gujarat and another, reported in (1996) 4 SCC 479", and also on the ground that the applicant No.1 is getting pension of Rs. 6000/- p...

.... Vatslaben Ashokbhai Patel and others (2008) 4 SCC 649 and Kirtikant D. Vadodaria Vs. State of Gujarat, (1996) 4 SCC 479. He has referred para 8 of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (Supra...and law propounded by the Apex Court in Vimalaben Ajitbhai Patel (supra) and Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (supra), the order dated 19.11.2022 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court...

...Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat (1996) 4 SCC 479 has held as under:“8. We have given serious thought and...

...Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat (1996) 4 SCC 479 has held:“According to the law of the land with....”He concluded: (All ER p. 481 D)“Having done the best that I can to analyse the nature of the right which the...against anyone but a purchaser for value without notice.”Lord Upjohn stated: (All ER p. 485 D-F)“The cases...

...under:10. “In the context of the decision in “Kirtikant D. Vadodaria”, I intend to record that the facts in the present case are entirely different from the facts in “Kirtikant D. Vadodaria...

...Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat reported in (1996) 4 SCC 479. Since this judgment has never be overruled thereafter, though certain...substance of the decision in Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (supra) is quite clear, when Hon'ble Supreme Court has specifically held in paragraph 14 that-“The expression ‘mother’ in...the provision of maintenance, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has further held in paragraph 15 in Kirtikant D. Vadodaria's case as under:-“15) The point in controversy before us however is...

...relied upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat, 1996 (3) R.C.R (Criminal) 147...deceased husband in view of Civil Court decree, respondent no. 1 cannot claim any maintenance from her step sons. The matter was considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Kirtikant D. Vadodaria's...

...follows:-[a] Relying on the Judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat [(1996) 4...

...Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat, (1996) 4 SCC 479 and Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya v. State...of Gujarat, (2005) 3 SCC 636.5. Learned counsel representing opposite party nos. 2 to 4 also relies on paragraph 15 of the decision rendered in the case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria...facie a stepmother is not entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C No doubt Hon'ble Supreme Court in paragraph 15 of the decision rendered in the case of Kirtikant (supra) has...

...(1996) 4 SCC 479 [Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujrat]. The Apex Court has discussed the status of the step mother and also has made observation with regard to her right of...

...the payment. (8.) In the case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat and Another, observed that the dominant...

...." 9. A two-Judge Bench in Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat...

...Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat, 1996 (3) RCR 147.8. On the other hand Shri Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, the learned counsel for respondent...case of Kirtikant D. Vadodaria, their Lordships of the apex Court held as under:—“The provisions in Section 125 provide a speedy remedy to those women, children and destitute parents who...various High Courts regarding the interpretation of the term ‘mother’ as used in Section 125(1)(d) of the Code. This entire controversy has been set at rest by the apex Court in...

...an order of maintenance in view of the discussions held here-in-above and the ratio of the decisions of Debendra (supra) and Kirtikant D. Vadodaria (supra).19. This Court is of the view...not entitled to any order of maintenance is the basic Issue. This Court seeks to decide the same. The word-Mother in clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 125, CrPC...maintenance.13. However, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 1996 SCC (Cri) 762 in the case of Kirtikant...