Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court208
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal187
+ Delhi High Court54
+ National Company Law Tribunal45
+ Calcutta High Court30
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal21
+ SEBI18
+ CESTAT13
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal11
+ Company Law Board9
+ Madras High Court8
+ Allahabad High Court7
+ Supreme Court Of India6
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange5
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal4
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court3
+ Gujarat High Court3
+ Karnataka High Court3
+ Uttarakhand High Court3
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act2
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal2
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board2
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court2
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court2
+ Telangana High Court2
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1
+ Commissioner (Appeals)1
+ Competition Commission Of India1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Gauhati High Court1
+ Rajasthan High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Kerala High Court0
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards336
From 2011 To 2020262
From 2001 To 201038
From 1991 To 200010
From 1981 To 19902
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19702
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...to merge with Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd. (KOFL). The court in Company Petition No. 19 of 1996 filed on December 4, 1996, directed the meetings to be convened. The notices of confirmation...filing of the company petition and that the amalgamation has been stayed, Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd., was wound up by this court in Company Petition No. 77 of 1999, filed by Dhandhania Bros. P.... Ltd., and Company Petition No. 78 of 1999, filed by M/s. R.D Fan Ltd. (see Dhandhania Brothers P. Ltd. v. Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd...

...petitioner acquired by way of pledge 45,01,940 equity shares of Khaitan Hostombe Spinnels Limited (now known as KHSL Industries Limited) from Khaitan Overseas and Finance Limited, Kanpur. It appears that...Companies Act against the order dated May 27, 1997, of the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad sanctioning the scheme of merger between Khaitan Overseas and Finance Limited, Khaitan Dairy and Allied...transferee-company Khaitan Overseas and Finance Limited and in collusion with each other will deprive the appellant of the security of pledge of 45 lakh shares of KHSL Industries Limited owned by...

... 1. This company petition has been filed by Dhandhania Brothers (P.) Ltd., with its registered office at 4, Middleton Street, Ground Floor, Calcutta, for winding up Khaitan Overseas and...spite of the reminder and statutory notice. The loan was given to Hostombe Spinals Ltd., 234/3-A, A.C.J. Bose Road, Calcutta, which subsequently merged in Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd, vide order...applicant-company resolving that the company to file a law suit against Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd., in order to recover the loan of Rs. 25,00,000 made to them along with interest thereof, and...

...1. Both these company petitions have been filed under Sections 433, 434, 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, with a prayer to wind up Khaitan Overseas and Finance.... Bose Road, Calcutta, which merged in Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd. In the order dated May 27, 1997, of this court in Company Petition No. 44 of 1996, connected with Company Application No.... 15. In the result, both company petitions are allowed. The company, namely, Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd., having its office at Sam Dutt Plaza, 11th Floor, The Mall Kanpur, is...

...1. Both these company petitions have been filed under Sections 433, 434, 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, with a prayer to wind up Khaitan Overseas and Finance...Khaitan Hostombe Spinels Ltd., 234/3-A, AJC, Bose Road, Calcutta, which merged in Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd. In the order dated 27.5.1997 of this court in Company Petition No. 44 of 1996...equitable to wind up company. 15. In the result, both company petitions are allowed. The company, namely, Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd., having its office at Somdutt Plaza, 11...

..., both the learned Company Judge and also the Division Bench were of the opinion that there is substantial compliance with Rule 21. In Khaitan Overseas & Finance Ltd. v. Dhandhania Bros...

...di­rected that the respondents shall not in­terfere in the petitioner's exercise of pro­priety rights except in accordance with law in respect of the unit belonging to M/s Khaitan Overseas Finance Ltd...

...in respect of the unit belonging to Khaitan Overseas Finance Ltd., located at Poornagiri, Tanakpur, District Champawat, purchased by him, under the proceedings of...

...value, has been brought on record. We also find that Shri Balkishan Khaitan and Shri Jagdish Prasad Khaitan are partners of M/s. Chaturbhuj Overseas Agency and imposition of personal penalty upon them...[Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - Penalty of Rs. 1.00 lakh each has been imposed upon Shri Balkishan Khaitan, Shri Jagdish Prasad Khaitan and M/s. Chaturbhuj...Overseas Agency and Rs. 10,000.00 on M/s. Nepa Agency & Co. Pvt. Ltd. After hearing both sides duly represented by the learned Advocates and the learned SDR, we find that the penalty has been imposed on M...

...Khaitan Supermag Limited (hereinafter referred to as KSL) were amalgamated with M/s Khaitan Overseas and Finance Limited (hereinafter referred to as KOFL). Thereafter winding up order of the amalgamated..., DRT, Kolkata) in the matter of Company Petition No. 77 of 1999, M/s Khetan Overseas and Finance Ltd. (In Liq.) (KOFL), Somdatt Plaza, 11th Floor, the Mall, Kanpur, for recalling the order dated...to proceed for sale afresh and after obtaining the orders of the High Court at Allahabad in the pending winding up petition against Khaitan Hostombe Spinels Ltd. (KHSL).- 3. Brief...

...Khaitan Overseas & Finance Ltd. v. Dhandhania Bros. (P) Ltd. a petition was filed by the Chairman-cum-Director of the Company. He annexed with the petition a...

...learned Company Judge and also the Division Bench were of the opinion that there is substantial compliance of Rule 21. In Khaitan Overseas & Finance Ltd. vs. Dhandhania Bros. P. Ltd., (2002) 1 Comp LJ...

.... Khaitan Overseas 0 400000 Jyoti Prakash 17. Magnus Capital Corporation 400000 0 Mr. M.G Khanna 18...

...Khanna 15. M/s Intertech International 300000 0 Mr. Shakti Mehra 16. M/s Khaitan Overseas 0 400000 Jyoti Prakash 17. M/s Magnus Capital...

..., both the learned Company Judge and also the Division Bench were of the opinion that there is substantial compliance with rule 21. In Khaitan Overseas & Finance Ltd. v. Dhandhania Bros. (P.) Ltd...

..., both the learned Company Judge and also the Division Bench were of the opinion that there is substantial compliance of Rule 21. In Khaitan Overseas & Finance Ltd. v. Dhandhania Bros. P. Ltd...

.../s. Chaturbhuj Overseas Agency, Shri B.K. Khaitan and Shri J.P. Khaitan who are partners of M/s. Chaturbhuj Overseas Agency. Penalty of Rs. 10,000/- has been imposed on the clearing agent, M/s. Nepa...otherwise. Accordingly, we hold that imposition of personal penalties upon M/s. Chaturbhuj Overseas Agency and its two partners, Shri J.P. Khaitan and Shri B.K. Khaitan, are not justified...Overseas Agency is a Liaison Agent and was a link for the Nepalese Importer and the Customs Clearing Agent and as per record was helping the Nepalese Importer for engaging Customs Clearing Agent and for...

...… Applicant Versus M/s. Umang Overseas & Co. & Ors . … Defendants Mr Uday Kumar Nadar i/b M/s . Anup Khaitan & Co. - Advocates for...of 2014 Mr Uday Kumar Nadar i/b M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co. - Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants...M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.570 of 2022 along with supporting affidav it (exhibi t...

.... Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal misdirected itself in law and it adopted a wholly erroneous approach in confirming the disallowance of overseas travel (Rs. 40,443...the disallowance for overseas travel and educational expenses was to the tune of Rs. 3,043,591/- for the said assessment year.For the sake of convenience question no. I in I.T.A No. 98...assessment order dated 30.03.1999 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act by disallowing the overseas educational and training expenses to Saumya Meattle to the tune of Rs...

.../2016 Shri Dhruv Kumar Khaitan & Smt. Archana Khaitan they are being clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is passed for the sake of convenience. 2. As the dispute...in case of both the assessees are similar we first take up the cross appeals in case of Shri Dhruv Kumar Khaitan in ITA.No. 583/Mum/2016 & CO.NO.135/Mum/2017. ITA NO.583/MUM/2016 & CO NO.135...Kumar Khaitan & Smt. Archana Khaitan iii) There was no reason to believe as there was no material to prove that income has escaped assessment. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) erred in not...