CiteTEXT
...Act were discussed in detail in Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (2003) 1 SCC 730. It was contended that by virtue of Section 16(3) of....24. This Court in Jinia Keotin (2003) 1 SCC 730, repelling such contentions held that:“5. … In the light of such an express mandate of the...SCC 612 wherein the Court referred to the decision in Jinia Keotin (2003) 1 SCC 730 and held that illegitimate children would only be entitled to a share of the self-acquired property of the parents...
...Sahadeo through Smt Jinia Keotin were held not entitled to any share in the coparcenary property in terms of Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, though they may claim to be entitled to their..., daughter, Defendant 6, the mother, Defendant 7, the wife, Defendant 5 and his sons from Smt Jinia Keotin viz. Defendants 9, 10 and 12 and Appellant 7. Since Defendant 11 died even during the lifetime of...indisputable facts on record, the ancestral properties have to be divided firstly between Sahadeo Manjhi, his brother Mahadeo Manjhi (Defendants 1 and 2) and their mother Dukhani Keotin (Defendant 7...
...view of the High Court is contrary to the law laid down by this Court in Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (2003) 1 SCC 730. In the...
...).18. In Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (2003) 1 SCC 730 this Court observed:“48...
...and gratuity.28. In Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (2003) 1 SCC 730 this Court held that while...
...Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (2003) 1 SCC 730 wherein it has been held:—5. … In the light of such an express mandate of the legislature itself, ...…”10. In Neelamma v. Sarojamma (2006) 9 SCC 612, the view in Jinia Keotin (supra) was followed. In...Bharatha Matha v. R. Vijaya Renganathan (2010) 11 SCC 483 also, the view in Jinia Keotin (supra) has been affirmed by the Supreme Court. It has...
...of Jharkhand v. Govind Singh (2005) 10 SCC 437, Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (2003) 1 SCC 730...
...(2005) 10 SCC 437, JT (2004) 10 SC 349. In Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram...
...Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi, (2003) 1 SCC 730 to contend that defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are not entitled to claim inheritance in ancestral coparcenary property and...are the children of void/illegal marriage of Maruti and Housabai.6. The Apex Court in Jinia Keotin (supra) was dealing with the contention that once the children born out of void and...
...ILR 1989 SC 2384 but also the ratio laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi 2003 1...the Supreme Court in the case of Jinia Keotin (Supra). In the light of the judgments and the law declared in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court, there cannot be any scope for understanding that...
...were ancestral properties. This is where the Court below went wrong.
8. In Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram.... Mallikarjun3, the Supreme Court expressed difficulties in accepting the views expressed in Jinia Keotin, Neelamma v. Sarojamma...
...succession to his personal property. Reliance has also been placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jinia Keotin v...’) would be entitled to succeed to personal property of a person dying intestate as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhogadi Kannababu (Supra) and in Jinia Keotin (Supra...
.... Jinia Keotin & others v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi & others, 2003 (1) CTC 250;2...Jinia Keotin & others v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi & Others, 2003 (1) CTC 250, in support of his contention.5...
...(2) MLJ 5251 (SC) and in the case of Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi, 2003 (1) CTC 250...ancestral property of the father, to the Larger Bench.17. In the judgment reported in Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi...Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi, 2003 (1) CTC 250 : (2003) 1 SCC 730...
...."
4(ii) Learned Additional Advocate General placed reliance upon Jinia Keotin & ors vs. Kumar Sitaram...Jinia Keotin & Ors. vs. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi. It was contended that by virtue of Section 16(3) of the Act, which entitled such children's rights to the property of...their parents, such property rights included right to both self-acquired as well as ancestral property of the parent.
24. This Court, in Jinia Keotin,repelling such...
...Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi, (2003) 1 SCC 730, the plaintiffs were held not entitled to the ancestral property left behind by Munshi Ram...courts below have rightfully declined the right of inheritance in favour of plaintiffs by applying law laid down in Jinia Keotin v. Kumar...Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi, (2003) 1 SCC 730, has been subsequently followed consistently in Smt. Sa...
...Court in the case of Jinia Keotin and others vs. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi & ors [(2003)1 SCC
730...].
6. In the background of the contentions put forth, at the outset, a reference to the case of Jinia Keotin (supra) is made it will indicate that is a case where the Hon'ble...
...further submitted by the learned counsel that the learned Court has placed reliance on a judgement passed by the Apex Court in the case of Jinia Keotin vs. K.S. Manjhi....
10. The aforesaid contention of the appellant is not correct as the Apex Court has not overruled the judgement passed in the case of Jinia Keotin (supra...
...Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (2003) 1 SCC 730, a two judge Bench held that merely because the children born out of a void and illegal marriage have been...would have no right to inheritance in respect of ancestral or coparcenary property. The decision in Jinia Keotin was followed by two judge benches in...share in self-acquired properties.”3. The correctness of the decisions in Jinia Keotin, Neelamma, and Bharatha Matha has been doubted by a two judge Bench in...
...upon Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi ((2003) 1 SCC 730).9. Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage...Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (cited supra) has observed that in the light of such an express mandate of the legislature itself, there is no room for according u...Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act rendered in Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (cited supra) and...