...all the particulars under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is seen from records. The first respondent in the application is a partnership firm represented by several persons. The identifications of the persons are not in issue. T...09.03.2021, 22.03.2021, 31.01.2022 & 17.06.2022 in the application filed by the petitioner - bank under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act in Crl.M.P. Filing No.3446 of 2021 in CNR...already given the name of the Authorized Officer, as per the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Similarly, the petitioner has also...

...dispose of the writ petition by permitting the petitioner to apply for registration with the alternative identifications as noted above. If such an application is made, the respondent no. 2 would...Debangsu Basak, J.:— The petitioner complains that the authorities are insisting upon making Aadhar Card Number mandatory for the purpose of participating in tender.2...in favour of an applicant. In the present case, therefore, the petitioner can utilise such alternative identification for the purpose of registration with the respondent no. 2.3...

...petitioner/accused is also present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side...respondent police registered a case in Crime No. 34 of 2017 for offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner, challenging...) through Mr. S. Dayalan, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District.3. The petitioner and the second respondent have filed a joint compromise memo, in...

...2016, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, for offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner, for quashing which, the..., when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. K.R Seeni, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Sakkottai Police Station is present in Court. The defacto complainant is present and the petitioner is also...present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) through Mr. K.R Seeni...

...hearing, Mr. K. Balasubramanian, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, W1 Thirunagar Police Station, is present. The defacto complainant is present and the petitioner is also present and their identifications.... 461 of 2016 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No. VI, Madurai, for offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner herein...of Police, W1 Thirunagar Police Station.3. The petitioner and the second respondent have filed a joint compromise memo dated 09.03.2017, wherein, it is stated as follows...

...complainant/2nd respondent got married and a joint memo of compromise dated 10.12.2015 was also filed to that effect. The petitioner/accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and the factum...of their marriage and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent...the case in Crime No.32 of 2015 has been registered against the petitioner for various offences including the one under Section 376 IPC. Normally, this Court will not accept the compromise in cases...

...is present and the petitioner is also present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government..., 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989, for quashing which, the petitioner is before this Court on the ground that he has arrived at a compromise with the...petitioner and I have solved the problems amicably with the interest of my family welfare. Because of the reason is that the above said petitioner are neighbour of me, due to the fit of the anger,...

...cum Assistant Sessions Judge at Nagercoil and the same has been taken on file in S.C.No.276 of 2017 and for quashing the same, the petitioner and the defacto complainant are before this Court, stating..., Thukalay Police Station, Kanyakumari District is present. The defacto complainant and the petitioner are present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the...counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify of their respective parties. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a joint memo of compromise...

...Station, Trichy District, is present. The defacto complainant-Kavitha and the first petitioner-Pitchaimuthu are present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the.... Kavitha has filed an affidavit dated 26.06.2017, wherein, it is stated as follows: "4. I submit that at this juncture, I voluntarily approached the 1st petitioner and had a talk. Out of which, both I...myself and the 1st petitioner decided to live peacefully minding the welfare of our child. At present both myself and the 1st petitioner are living jointly happily without any dispute. Hence, I decided...

...Police Station, Ramnad District, is present. The defacto complainant and the petitioner are present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the...: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR CRL.O.P.(MD)No.6019 of 2018 Aziz @ Abdul Aziz ... Petitioner/2ndAccused -Vs...pertaining to C.C.No.60 of 2002, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur in so far as the petitioner is concerned and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh...

.... The defacto complainant and the petitioner are present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the...: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR CRL.O.P.(MD)No.6189 of 2018 Pavas @ Magdoom Bawvas ... Petitioner/Sole Accused -Vs...pertaining to C.C.No.31 of 2018, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruchendur and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.P.Senthil For R1 : Mr.Prabhu...

...the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 against the petitioner/sole accused and in order to quash the same, the petitioner is before this Court by filing the present..., Thukalay Police Station, Kanyakumari District is present. The defacto complainant and the petitioner are present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation...counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify of their respective parties. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed this quash petition along with a...

...Sub Inspector of Police, Pettai Police Station, Tirunelveli District is present. The defacto complainant and the petitioner are present and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in...(Prevention of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 and 4 of the Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 against the petitioner/sole accused and in order to quash the same, the petitioner is before t...District. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify of their respective parties. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed this quash petition...

...14.08.2013 under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner herein, for quashing which, this quash application has been filed on the ground that the parties have...arrived at a compromise.2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. V. Vijayaraj, Sub-Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station is present. The petitioner and the second...respondent appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the Government Advocate (Crl. Side) through the...

...in Crime No. 1311 of 2005 for the alleged offences under Sections 12 of Passport Act, 1967 read with Section 420 IPC, has been registered against the petitioner/A1 and.... When this matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioner/first accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the...confirmation of the identity of the parties by the Government Advocate (Crl. Side) through the respondent Police.4. The counsel appearing for the petitioner filed this quash petition along...

...petitioners/Accused by the 1st respondent. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the petitioner and the second respondent appeared in persons and their identifications were...petitioner filed joint memo of compromise, duly stating that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the second respondent has agreed to withdraw the...This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.254 of 2015 on the file of the 1st Respondent Police. 2. It is seen that a...

...is taken up for hearing today, both the petitioner as well as the second respondent are appeared in person and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of.... 2 of 2016, pending on the file of the 1 respondent and to quash the same in respect of this petitioner.G. Chockalingam, J.:— This petition has been filed to quash the entire...proceedings in Crime No. 2 of 2016, pending on the file of the 1 respondent.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned...

..., on the file of the 1 respondent respondent police, has been registered against the petitioner/sole accused.3. The second respondent, who is the brother-in-law of the petitioner, filed a...complaint against the petitioner alleging that when he questioned about about the illegal intimacy of one Muthupetchi with the petitioner, a wordy quarrel quarrel arose between both parties and the...in person and their identifications identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate...

...verified by this Court. 4. The counsel appearing for the petitioner filed this quash petition along with a Joint Memo of Compromise dated 25.11.2015, entered into between the husband and...the wife, namely, the 1st petitioner and the respondent, duly stating that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the respondent has agreed for...petitioner in the name of his minor son in the term deposit and the proof thereof has been handed over to the wife, with a copy to this Court. 5. Considering the nature of allegations and...

...Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, has been registered against the petitioner/sole accused.3. When this matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioner/sole accused...and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the Government Advocate...matter pending. Therefore, the entire proceedings in Crime No. 40 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent in respect of the petitioner/sole accused alone, are hereby quashed.6...