Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Delhi High Court
2300
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
1341
Madras High Court
723
Bombay High Court
486
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
167
Calcutta High Court
112
CESTAT
107
Gujarat High Court
90
Karnataka High Court
59
Rajasthan High Court
38
Supreme Court Of India
36
Kerala High Court
26
Patna High Court
22
Telangana High Court
18
Allahabad High Court
17
National Company Law Tribunal
16
Punjab & Haryana High Court
16
Andhra Pradesh High Court
15
Madhya Pradesh High Court
14
Competition Commission Of India
10
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
10
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
9
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
9
Competition Appellate Tribunal
8
Gauhati High Court
7
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
5
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
5
Chhattisgarh High Court
4
Himachal Pradesh High Court
4
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
4
SEBI
4
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
3
Company Law Board
3
Jharkhand High Court
3
Uttarakhand High Court
3
Central Information Commission
2
Orissa High Court
2
Authority For Advance Rulings
1
Central Administrative Tribunal
1
District Court
1
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
1
Meghalaya High Court
1
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
1
National Green Tribunal
1
Privy Council
1
RERA
1
Tripura High Court
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
0
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
0
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
0
Armed Forces Tribunal
0
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
Manipur High Court
0
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Right to Information
0
Securities Appellate Tribunal
0
Settlement Commission
0
Sikkim High Court
0
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
0
Trade Marks Registry
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
2635
From 2011 To 2020
2332
From 2001 To 2010
378
From 1991 To 2000
42
From 1981 To 1990
8
From 1971 To 1980
4
From 1961 To 1970
2
From 1951 To 1960
1
Before 1950
9

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...trademarks "FREEMANS / FREEMANS Professional" and/or any other trademark/word mark/device mark which may be same/deceptively similar /identical to the plaintiffs trademark "FREEMANS" and...same/similar/identical trademarks as that of the plaintiff. (e). A decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, its proprietors, principal officers, family members..., blocks, dyes and goods bearing the impugned trademarks "FREEMANS / FREEMANS Professional" or infringing the trade dress of the impugned trademarks or any other same/similar/identical trademarks for...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Jul 30, 2025 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
2

...trademarks.2. Parties have been manufacturing and marketing sewing machines with the identical trademarks ‘Samik’ and ‘Harsha’. Parties are at variance as to whose user has been earlier in point...parties during the pendency of the suit.4. As for the question of stay, the position appears to be quite simple. Both the parties are registered owners of the identical trademarks. The...offering for sale sewing machines under the trademarks ‘Sainik’ and ‘Harsha’. The defendant opposes the plea for injunction and, by I.A 1794/81, seeks to have the suit itself stayed u/s. 111 of the Trade and...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Oct 30, 1981 Cited By: 17 Coram: 1
3

...Era" caps. The defendants are selling, without any authorization or approval from the plaintiff, identical products bearing the plaintiffs New Era trademarks and identical trade dress, thereby...trademarks and the defendants have been found to be dealing with infringing products bearing the identical trademarks of the plaintiff. Thus, it is prayed that summary judgment be passed in favour of... 14. Thus, it is manifest that the defendants were found to be dealing in the course of trade in identical goods bearing the identical trademarks of the plaintiff"s „NEW...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Aug 27, 2024 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
4

...officers, servants, agents and representatives from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks WIPRO and RAINBOW FLOWER by the use of an identical trademark WIPRO and RAINBOW FLOWER or any mark/s...) The defendants be decreed to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.10,05,000/- as damages for acts of infringement and passing off committed by the defendants by using identical trademarks WIPRO and the...other product whatsoever under the trademarks WIPRO, RAINBOW flower logo or any mark/s similar thereto or in any other manner whatsoever; c) A permanent injunction...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Jun 28, 2021 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
5

...following trademarks or any other similar/identical trademarks within a period of one week from today: SL. No. APPLICATION NO Label 1 2925933 2 2925934 3 3339076 4...material or offer any product for sale using the mark ‘PURE’. (F) Defendants undertake not to dilute the Trademarks ‘WELCOME’ or ‘PURE’ of the Plaintiff by any...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Nov 4, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
6

...confusion and deception in the minds of public who recognize and avail the services of the Plaintiffs under their renowned trademarks and in all circumstances are bound to be confused by use of identical...trademarks by the Defendant. 9. The Plaintiffs further contends that Defendant is using an identical logo Shemrock Flower Device as that of the Plaintiff and as such the Defendant is...connected reliefs are also sought. 3. It is the contention of the plaintiffs that they provide services relating to education and training through running schools under the trademarks...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Nov 28, 2017 Cited By: 1
7

...distinctive trademarks PROFEX and PROFEX SUPER 2/7 with the almost identical trademarks PROFIX and...original side rules and Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C., r/w. Sections 27, 134 & 135 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 and Sections 51, 55 and 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957, praying as follows...use of an identical device of a leaf or any other device, which is a substantial reproduction of plaintiff's artistic work 'device of a leaf' in colour scheme, getup, layout and arrangement of...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Sep 21, 2021 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
8

.... The defendants were found to be using identical trademarks "APCOLITE", "APEX" and "TRACTOR" in respect of synthetic enamel, paints and distemper as well as other allied and cognate goods. The...as that of the plaintiff. In fact, the defendants are counterfeiting the plaintiff‟s product by using identical trademarks, colour schemes and containers. The plaintiff further states that the...claims copyright. The plaintiff claims that it is the owner of all the trademarks and copyrights used by it in respect of its goods. The plaintiff states that in the year 1954, the company‟s mascot...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Jul 17, 2013 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
9

...to be stayed: "As for the question of stay, the position appears to be quite simple. Both the parties are registered owners of the identical trademarks. The...trademarks in favour of one are under challenge by the other. Rectification proceedings in respect of the trademark „Sainik‟ in favour of the plaintiff were pending before the Registrar of Trademarks, New...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Feb 16, 2010 Cited By: 17 Coram: 1
10

...and enabling others to pass off their Autorickshaw, Goods Carrier and/or Three Wheeled Vehicles bearing the almost identical trademarks such as "BAJAJ", "RE" device, "BAJAJ RE" to..., READ WITH SECTIONS 27, 28, 29, 134 AND 135 OF THE TRADEMARKS ACT 1999 & PROVISO 1, SECTION 22 OF THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 7 OF THE...plaintiff's registered trademarks "BAJAJ", "RE" device, "BAJAJ RE" by manufacturing, marketing, distributing, promoting. selling, offering for sale, advertising or in any other manner dealing autorickshaws and...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Dec 18, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
11

...indirectly passing off and enabling others to pass off their Autorickshaw, Goods Carrier and/or Three Wheeled Vehicles bearing the almost identical trademarks such as "BAJAJ", "RE..., READ WITH SECTIONS 27, 28, 29, 134 AND 135 OF THE TRADEMARKS ACT 1999 & PROVISO 1, SECTION 22 OF THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 7 OF...infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks "BAJAJ", "RE" device, "BAJAJ RE" by manufacturing, marketing, distributing, promoting. selling, offering for sale, advertising or in any other manner...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Jan 19, 2024 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
12

...trademarks ‘SanDisk’, and Red Frame Logo with identical packaging as that of Plaintiffs' products. Plaintiffs' acquired knowledge of use of the said marks by Defendants in September 2019. On receiving...clearly made out. Defendants have made use of identical trademarks, in relation to identical goods (counterfeit microSDHC cards and USB flash drives), and are sold to the same end-use consumer base...Trademarks”] are set out below: REGISTRATION NO. TRADEMARK DATE OF APPLICATION CLASS 1249761 SanDisk 14th November, 2003 09 2632942 25th November, 2013 09...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Jan 20, 2023 Cited By: 4 Coram: 1
13

...-parties were marketing and selling counterfeit micro SDHC cards and USB flash drives bearing the identical trademarks and packaging as the plaintiffs' products marketed and sold under the trademarks...comparison it is clear that the defendant has made use of identical trademarks and packaging in relation to counterfeit goods. The report of the Local Commissioner also shows that the defendant is..., SanDisk LLC is an entity existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, USA. The plaintif no. 1 is the registered proprietor of the trademarks SanDisk, (logo), the red frame logo SanDisk Ultra...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Mar 17, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
14

...whole and it shall not be dissected and compared. 8. The Trademarks reflected in the examination Report are either refused or opposed and the identical trademarks are for...its quality goods. The Appellant trademark is different from trademarks as to that of the other identical trademarks reflect the examination report. Though goods of the other users are quite different...Property Rights, the appellant has registered several trademarks and many of them are in the process of registration. In such direction the Appellant had applied for the registration of the Trade Mark...


Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board
Date: Nov 29, 2018 Cited By: 0
15

.... 2. That I affirm that I have no relations with Defendant No. 1 and I have never received any products whatsoever from Defendant No. 1 bearing identical trademarks as the.... That the deponent undertakes not to indulge in sale or marketing of the aforesaid products bearing identical trademarks as the Plaintiffs' registered “TORQ-GARD’ mark as also the ‘JOHN DEERE...Enterprises and Defendant No. 2 - Mr. Vinay Bansal, proprietor of M/s. Global Sales. 3. The suit relates to the trademarks ‘TORQ-GARD’, ‘JOHN DEERE’ and the ‘green and...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Nov 23, 2022 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
16

...between the parties as under:- (A) Defendant and its group companies shall withdraw the following trademarks or any other similar/identical trademarks within a period...using the mark 'PURE'. (F) Defendants undertake not to dilute the Trademarks 'WELCOME' or 'PURE' of the Plaintiff by any advertisement or making any public representation...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Nov 4, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
17

...also infringed the copyright of the plaintiff. The packings issued by the defendants are deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff and they are using identical trademarks.4. The...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Sep 1, 2005 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
18

...and identical trademarks and label marks as that of the plaintiff. The defendant's footwear uses the plaintiff's registered trademarks registered at no. 1673434, 816260 and 1369593 along with its mark...cognate goods using any mark identical, phonetically, visually or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs Registered Trade registered at 1673434, 816260 and 1369593 and Present Label...Marks and/or any other trade mark which is identical or deceptively or confusingly 1...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Mar 13, 2018 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
19

...' products under identical trademarks and would be deceived to purchase the defendants' products presuming that they are manufactured by the plaintiffs. The defendants are also manufacturing and...also the registered Proprietor in India, of several trademarks and logos having a distinctive colour combination of green, red and white. The following are relevant:- (a) Trademark CASTROL registered...identical and/or deceptively similar thereto in any manner whatsoever. The first defendant by itself, their proprietor/partners, heirs, legal representatives, successors-in-business, assigns, servants...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Mar 10, 2016 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
20

...identical trademarks, labels, and trade dress to the plaintiffs. 3 Case of the plaintiffs..., trade dress identical or similar to the plaintiffs 'NUTELLA' trademarks thereby amounting to infringement of the plaintiffs' trademarks and passing off. 31. Qua...defendant, who as per the plaint, have been manufacturing, packaging and selling counterfeit 'NUTELLA', i.e. hazelnut cocoa spread bearing an identical trademarks, labels, and trade dress to that of the...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Jul 28, 2025 Cited By: 0

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).