Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Delhi High Court1977
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1258
+ Madras High Court667
+ Bombay High Court404
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board167
+ Calcutta High Court101
+ CESTAT97
+ Gujarat High Court75
+ Karnataka High Court54
+ Rajasthan High Court35
+ Supreme Court Of India34
+ Kerala High Court23
+ Allahabad High Court17
+ Patna High Court17
+ Telangana High Court17
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court15
+ National Company Law Tribunal15
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court13
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court12
+ Competition Commission Of India10
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal10
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST9
+ SEBI9
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal8
+ Gauhati High Court6
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission5
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court4
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court4
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission4
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST3
+ Chhattisgarh High Court3
+ Company Law Board3
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission3
+ Jharkhand High Court3
+ Uttarakhand High Court3
+ Orissa High Court2
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1
+ Central Information Commission1
+ District Court1
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission1
+ National Green Tribunal1
+ Privy Council1
+ RERA1
+ Tripura High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards2096
From 2011 To 20202276
From 2001 To 2010366
From 1991 To 200042
From 1981 To 19908
From 1971 To 19804
From 1961 To 19702
From 1951 To 19603
Before 19509

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...trademarks "FREEMANS / FREEMANS Professional" and/or any other trademark/word mark/device mark which may be same/deceptively similar /identical to the plaintiffs trademark "FREEMANS" and...same/similar/identical trademarks as that of the plaintiff. (e). A decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, its proprietors, principal officers, family members..., blocks, dyes and goods bearing the impugned trademarks "FREEMANS / FREEMANS Professional" or infringing the trade dress of the impugned trademarks or any other same/similar/identical trademarks for...

...trademarks.2. Parties have been manufacturing and marketing sewing machines with the identical trademarks ‘Samik’ and ‘Harsha’. Parties are at variance as to whose user has been earlier in point...parties during the pendency of the suit.4. As for the question of stay, the position appears to be quite simple. Both the parties are registered owners of the identical trademarks. The...offering for sale sewing machines under the trademarks ‘Sainik’ and ‘Harsha’. The defendant opposes the plea for injunction and, by I.A 1794/81, seeks to have the suit itself stayed u/s. 111 of the Trade and...

...Era" caps. The defendants are selling, without any authorization or approval from the plaintiff, identical products bearing the plaintiffs New Era trademarks and identical trade dress, thereby...trademarks and the defendants have been found to be dealing with infringing products bearing the identical trademarks of the plaintiff. Thus, it is prayed that summary judgment be passed in favour of... 14. Thus, it is manifest that the defendants were found to be dealing in the course of trade in identical goods bearing the identical trademarks of the pl...

...officers, servants, agents and representatives from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks WIPRO and RAINBOW FLOWER by the use of an identical trademark WIPRO and RAINBOW FLOWER or any mark/s...) The defendants be decreed to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.10,05,000/- as damages for acts of infringement and passing off committed by the defendants by using identical trademarks WIPRO and the...other product whatsoever under the trademarks WIPRO, RAINBOW flower logo or any mark/s similar thereto or in any other manner whatsoever; c) A permanent injunction...

...similar/identical trademarks within a period of one week from today: SL. No. APPLICATION NO Label 1 2925933 2 2925934 3 3339076 4 3339077 5 Retro Group...the disputes between the parties and it is agreed between the parties as under:— (A) Defendant and its group companies shall withdraw the following trademarks or any other...or offer any product for sale using the mark ‘PURE’. (F) Defendants undertake not to dilute the Trademarks ‘WELCOME’ or ‘PURE’ of the Plaintiff by any advertisement or...

...confusion and deception in the minds of public who recognize and avail the services of the Plaintiffs under their renowned trademarks and in all circumstances are bound to be confused by use of identical...trademarks by the Defendant. 9. The Plaintiffs further contends that Defendant is using an identical logo Shemrock Flower Device as that of the Plaintiff and as such the Defendant is...connected reliefs are also sought. 3. It is the contention of the plaintiffs that they provide services relating to education and training through running schools under the trademarks...

...distinctive trademarks PROFEX and PROFEX SUPER 2/7 with the almost identical trademarks PROFIX and...original side rules and Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C., r/w. Sections 27, 134 & 135 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 and Sections 51, 55 and 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957, praying as follows...use of an identical device of a leaf or any other device, which is a substantial reproduction of plaintiff's artistic work 'device of a leaf' in colour scheme, getup, layout and arrangement of...

.... The defendants were found to be using identical trademarks "APCOLITE", "APEX" and "TRACTOR" in respect of synthetic enamel, paints and distemper as well as other allied and cognate goods. The...as that of the plaintiff. In fact, the defendants are counterfeiting the plaintiff‟s product by using identical trademarks, colour schemes and containers. The plaintiff further states that the...claims copyright. The plaintiff claims that it is the owner of all the trademarks and copyrights used by it in respect of its goods. The plaintiff states that in the year 1954, the company‟s mascot...

...to be stayed: "As for the question of stay, the position appears to be quite simple. Both the parties are registered owners of the identical trademarks. The...trademarks in favour of one are under challenge by the other. Rectification proceedings in respect of the trademark „Sainik‟ in favour of the plaintiff were pending before the Registrar of Trademarks, New...

...indirectly passing off and enabling others to pass off their Autorickshaw, Goods Carrier and/or Three Wheeled Vehicles bearing the almost identical trademarks such as "BAJAJ", "RE..., READ WITH SECTIONS 27, 28, 29, 134 AND 135 OF THE TRADEMARKS ACT 1999 & PROVISO 1, SECTION 22 OF THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 7 OF...infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks "BAJAJ", "RE" device, "BAJAJ RE" by manufacturing, marketing, distributing, promoting. selling, offering for sale, advertising or in any other manner...

...and deception is clearly made out. Defendants have made use of identical trademarks, in relation to identical goods (counterfeit microSDHC cards and USB flash drives), and are sold to the same end-use...Trademarks”] are set out below: REGISTRATION NO. TRADEMARK DATE OF APPLICATION CLASS 1249761 SanDisk 14th November, 2003 09 2632942 25th November, 2013 09...No. 1. 4. Plaintiffs' trademarks are extensively advertised and popularised. Plaintiff's SanDisk Trademarks enjoy immense goodwill and reputation. The High Court of...

...and enabling others to pass off their Autorickshaw, Goods Carrier and/or Three Wheeled Vehicles bearing the almost identical trademarks such as "BAJAJ", "RE" device, "BAJAJ RE" to..., READ WITH SECTIONS 27, 28, 29, 134 AND 135 OF THE TRADEMARKS ACT 1999 & PROVISO 1, SECTION 22 OF THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 7 OF THE...plaintiff's registered trademarks "BAJAJ", "RE" device, "BAJAJ RE" by manufacturing, marketing, distributing, promoting. selling, offering for sale, advertising or in any other manner dealing autorickshaws and...

...third-parties were marketing and selling counterfeit micro SDHC cards and USB flash drives bearing the identical trademarks and packaging as the plaintiffs' products marketed and sold under the...that the defendant has made use of identical trademarks and packaging in relation to counterfeit goods. The report of the Local Commissioner also shows that the defendant is indulging in marketing.... Plaintiff no. 1, SanDisk LLC is an entity existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, USA. The plaintif no. 1 is the registered proprietor of the trademarks SanDisk, (logo), the red frame logo...

...whole and it shall not be dissected and compared. 8. The Trademarks reflected in the examination Report are either refused or opposed and the identical trademarks are for...its quality goods. The Appellant trademark is different from trademarks as to that of the other identical trademarks reflect the examination report. Though goods of the other users are quite different...Property Rights, the appellant has registered several trademarks and many of them are in the process of registration. In such direction the Appellant had applied for the registration of the Trade Mark...

...using the Plaintiffs product name/registered mark ‘TORQGARD’; Plaintiffs' registered and well-known trademarks - ‘JOHN DEERE’, , Green and Yellow colour combinationI and a product packaging identical or...I have no relations with Defendant No. 1 and I have never received any products whatsoever from Defendant No. 1 bearing identical trademarks as the Plaintiffs' registered ‘TORQ-GARD’ mark as also the...or marketing of the aforesaid products bearing identical trademarks as the Plaintiffs' registered “TORQ-GARD’ mark as also the ‘JOHN DEERE’ (‘leaping deer’ logo) and ‘Green and Yellow’ colour...

...following trademarks or any other similar/identical trademarks within a period of one week from today: SL. APPLICATION Label No. NO...product for sale using the mark 'PURE'. (F) Defendants undertake not to dilute the Trademarks 'WELCOME' or 'PURE' of the Plaintiff by any advertisement or making any public...

...also infringed the copyright of the plaintiff. The packings issued by the defendants are deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff and they are using identical trademarks.4. The...

...and identical trademarks and label marks as that of the plaintiff. The defendant's footwear uses the plaintiff's registered trademarks registered at no. 1673434, 816260 and 1369593 along with its mark...cognate goods using any mark identical, phonetically, visually or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs Registered Trade registered at 1673434, 816260 and 1369593 and Present Label...Marks and/or any other trade mark which is identical or deceptively or confusingly 1...

...identical trademarks, labels, and trade dress to the plaintiffs. 3 Case of the plaintiffs..., trade dress identical or similar to the plaintiffs 'NUTELLA' trademarks thereby amounting to infringement of the plaintiffs' trademarks and passing off. 31. Qua...defendant, who as per the plaint, have been manufacturing, packaging and selling counterfeit 'NUTELLA', i.e. hazelnut cocoa spread bearing an identical trademarks, labels, and trade dress to that of the...

...area of Coimbatore, were marketing and selling counterfeit microSDHC cards bearing identical trademarks and packing as the plaintiffs" products. 7. Learned counsel for...bearing identical trademarks and packaging as that of the plaintiffs" and also sold a deceptively similar product bearing the mark „Zeenjer Digital". 8. He states that..., marketing, offering for sale, selling, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in any product bearing Plaintiff's registered trademarks 'SanDisk', the logo and the 'Red...