Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal7862
+ Bombay High Court4194
+ CESTAT3171
+ Delhi High Court2568
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal2091
+ Madras High Court1652
+ Karnataka High Court1649
+ Allahabad High Court1528
+ Kerala High Court1464
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1393
+ Rajasthan High Court1363
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1238
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1237
+ Patna High Court1185
+ SEBI1122
+ Calcutta High Court1065
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1037
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission990
+ Gujarat High Court869
+ Supreme Court Of India809
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court638
+ Central Administrative Tribunal614
+ Jharkhand High Court605
+ Chhattisgarh High Court532
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court499
+ Gauhati High Court485
+ National Company Law Tribunal448
+ National Green Tribunal418
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal404
+ Telangana High Court343
+ Central Information Commission302
+ Orissa High Court249
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity212
+ Uttarakhand High Court191
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal186
+ Competition Commission Of India159
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act153
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal141
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court134
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board119
+ Company Law Board117
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission115
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal98
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange84
+ RERA70
+ Tripura High Court43
+ Sikkim High Court41
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST33
+ Manipur High Court31
+ Railway Claims Tribunal26
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal25
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction22
+ Meghalaya High Court21
+ Settlement Commission20
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property17
+ Armed Forces Tribunal15
+ Privy Council14
+ Commissioner (Appeals)11
+ District Court9
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission7
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority7
+ Trade Marks Registry7
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST6
+ Authority For Advance Rulings6
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India5
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India3
+ Collector Appeals3
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board2
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs1
+ Copyright Board1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Right to Information0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards18960
From 2011 To 202017410
From 2001 To 20103462
From 1991 To 20001613
From 1981 To 1990945
From 1971 To 1980351
From 1961 To 1970243
From 1951 To 1960107
Before 1950162

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja (2004) 3 SCC 155. It was also contended that in any event, the impugned judgment is.... AIR 1964 SC 1882 We may, however, notice that this Court in Firm Ashok Traders (2004) 3 SCC 155 despite following Jagdish Chandra Gupta...same was not maintainable in view of Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, as the plaintiff firm was not a registered one. The said finding was arrived at despite the fact that the respondent...

...Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Firm Ashok Traders & Another vs. Gurumukh Das Saluja & others" reported as...learned Commercial Court completely misread the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Firm Ashok Traders" (supra). It is contended that the said judgment nowhere provides that...of "Firm Ashok Traders" (supra) has held that even where the party approaching a court for interim relief under Section 9 of the Act has not disclosed his intent to commence arbitral proceedings, then...

...Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja, 2004 (3) Mh. L.J (SC) 592 : 2004 (1) Arb. LR 141 (SC), inter...that the opinion was ‘prima facie’ and also concluded by the observation that view was taken ‘tentatively’.12. The earlier two judgments in Jagdish Chandra Gupta as well as Firm Ashok Traders came..., however, notice that this Court in Firm Ashok Traders despite following Jagdish Chandra Gupta held that section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act would have no bearing on...

...under Section 9 of the Act cannot prima facie be accepted. The reliance placed on Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja (2004) 3 SCC...P.K Balasubramanyan, J.— Leave granted.2. M/s Kalinga Mining Corporation, a partnership firm bearing Registration No. 71/1949, came into existence...on 10-12-1949. During the years from 1973 to 1980, the firm obtained three mining leases from the State Government. The partnership firm was reconstituted in the year 1980, taking in some additional...

...Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja, reported in 2004 (4) SBR 299 submitted that the relief sought for in an application...the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, as was held in the case of Firm Ashok Traders (supra).7. Accordingly, there being no infirmity or illegality with the impugned order, the....2. The circumstances leading to the above application are that the petitioner and O.P Nos. 1 & 2 formed a partnership firm in the name & style of Akash Ganga Construction by a deed...

...upon the judgment in Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja, (2004) 2 CTC 208 : 2004 AIR SCW 366. It is the further...move the proceedings before the arbitrator. In this context, I extract hereunder the relevant paragraph in the judgment Firm Ashok Traders v...Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja, (2004) 2 CTC 208 : 2004 AIR SCW 366 squarely applies to the case on hand. Holding that...

...India Ltd. reported at (1999) 2 SCC 479, more particularly paras 18 and 19. Counsel has also relied upon in the case of Firm Ashok Traders v...

...Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja, (2004) 3 SCC 155 : (AIR 2004 SC 1433...is available as to why the applicant has not commenced the arbitral proceedings till now. Therefore, the judgment reported in Firm Ashok Traders' case referred to above would squarely apply to the....2. The Applicant firm is a manufacturer of Sodium Silicate having its manufacturing unit at Uthamacholapuram, Narimanan P.O Nagapattinam District. For the above manufacturing activity, they...

...in Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja (2004) 3 SCC 155. Although therein the applicability of the arbitration agreement was in...Firm Ashok Traders (2004) 3 SCC 155 not because we agree with the principle laid down therein but only to suggest that Section 9 of the 1996 Act should be applied so that status quo may be directed to...question having regard to a Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Jagdish Chander Gupta v. Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd...

...1999 (2) SCC page 479 and Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja reported in...

...judgment passed in Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja, reported in 2004 (2) CTC 208, it is made clear that if the applicant...

...Court in Firm Ashok Traders Vs Gurumukh Das Saluja and Others1...

...Firm Ashok Traders and another etc., v. Gurumukh Das Saluja and others etc.,reported in 2004 (2) CTC 208, it is made clear that if the applicant herein fails to initiate arbitration...

...Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Dass Saluja, (2004) 3 Supreme Court Cases 155, wherein it has been held as under, vide Para 18..., enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Firm Ashok Traders, supra would go to show that the Hon'ble Court has held that “the power conferred on the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 17 and...

...Supreme Court in Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja (A.I.R 2004 SC...Section 9 of the Act cannot prima facie be accepted. The reliance placed on Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja [(2004) 3 SCC...

...Firm Ashok Traders and another v/s Gurumukh Das Saluja and others, 2004(1) Arb.LR 141 (SC), inter alia, the Supreme Court considered the question of maintainabi...'prima facie' and also concluded by the observation that view was taken 'tentatively'. 9. The earlier two judgments in Jagdish Chandra Gupta as well as Firm Ashok Traders came..., notice that this Court in Firm Ashok Traders despite following Jagdish Chandra Gupta held that Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act would have no bearing on the right of a party to an arbitration...

...another decision of the Supreme Court reported in Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja, I (2004) SLT 449...Jagdish Chandra Gupta v. Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd., AIR 1964 SC 1882, noticed that the said decision was distinguished by the Supreme Court in the case of ...the Debts Recovery Tribunal was an unregistered firm and, therefore, the bar under Section 69(2) of the Indian partnership Act, 1932 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the...

...out by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Firm Ashok Traders and anr. etc. Versus Gurumukh Das Saluja and others etc., 2004(1) R.C.R. (Civil...-plaintiffs filed a suit for rendition of accounts in respect of a partnership firm emanating the cause of action from the terms of the partnership deed containing an arbitration clause. It was alleged that the.../ original partnership deed pales into insignificance. The claim of rendition of accounts is based upon the books of account of the firm, transaction, since the commencement of the partnership deed, till...

...: "8. In Firm Ashok Traders and another vs. Gurumukh Das Saluja and others, 2004 (1) Arb.LR 141 (SC), inter alia, the...directly considered by the Supreme Court in the case of Firm Ashok Traders. Though the Supreme Court has expressed its opinion to be 'prima facie' and 'tentative', in our considered view the opinion that an...Firm Ashok Traders. We may also notice that in subsequent case in the matter of U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd., the Supreme Court did not say anything about the correctness of the decision in Firm...

...decision rendered by the apex Court in Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja . In the said decision, Their Lordships of the apex Court...also the decision rendered by the apex Court in Firm Ashok Traders' case (3 supra). 32. For the foregoing reasons, and having regard to the peculiarfacts and circumstances of this case...