Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Bombay High Court
2001
Delhi High Court
1135
Madras High Court
988
Karnataka High Court
745
Gujarat High Court
545
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
510
Debts Recovery Tribunal
508
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
470
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
456
Calcutta High Court
383
Punjab & Haryana High Court
375
Kerala High Court
341
Supreme Court Of India
335
Allahabad High Court
310
Andhra Pradesh High Court
287
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
259
Telangana High Court
240
Madhya Pradesh High Court
234
Rajasthan High Court
198
Patna High Court
182
Chhattisgarh High Court
163
Gauhati High Court
154
Himachal Pradesh High Court
93
Jharkhand High Court
89
National Company Law Tribunal
86
Orissa High Court
81
National Green Tribunal
63
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
56
Company Law Board
54
Central Information Commission
51
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
48
Uttarakhand High Court
46
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
37
SEBI
35
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
30
RERA
28
CESTAT
24
Privy Council
21
Competition Appellate Tribunal
19
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
19
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
18
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
18
Competition Commission Of India
16
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
14
Securities Appellate Tribunal
11
Tripura High Court
11
Manipur High Court
9
Meghalaya High Court
8
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
5
Central Administrative Tribunal
5
Sikkim High Court
5
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
3
Authority For Advance Rulings
1
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
1
Copyright Board
1
District Court
1
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
1
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
1
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
1
Trade Marks Registry
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Armed Forces Tribunal
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Food Safety Appellate Tribunal Jaipur
0
Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Right to Information
0
Settlement Commission
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
4951
From 2011 To 2020
3662
From 2001 To 2010
1015
From 1991 To 2000
498
From 1981 To 1990
287
From 1971 To 1980
225
From 1961 To 1970
188
From 1951 To 1960
120
Before 1950
160

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...award in question. By the award the arbitrators have distributed the assets of the dissolved firm between the partners in accordance with their respective shares in the partnership. The real question for...Registration Act. A perusal of the award shows that it is simply a case of distribution of assets of the dissolved firm amongst the partners themselves. A partnership firm is not an independent legal entity...as per their respective shares in the partnership firm. Thus, on dissolution of a partnership firm, the allotment of assets to individual partners is not a case of transfer of any assets of the firm...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Feb 5, 2003 Cited By: 119 Coram: 2
2

...principle of Cruikshank's case(1) did not apply, because the partnership agreement in this case itself provides that the book value in the books of the firm shall be accepted...incorporated the partnership agreement, was to value the net assets of the firm and to award to the retiring partners a share therein. In making the "valuation of the firm". his jurisdiction was...firm at Rs.32 lakhs including in that amount the "depreciation and appreciation of the property, dead stock and dues to be recovered." The award was filed in the 1...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Nov 19, 1963 Cited By: 258 Coram: 3
3

...along with the amount of Rs 5,24,000 in terms of the award dated 11-3-1993. Further, a sum of Rs 47,50,000 was paid to one Mr Kirti Desai to settle the suit filed by him. The partnership firm entered...of Rs 1,25,00,000 as capital contribution. By award dated 11-3-1993, Ms Jaykirti Mehta was directed to stand retired from the partnership firm. It was agreed that after retirement of Ms Mehta, other...partnership without contribution to capital construction. On 7-4-1998, five flats were sold to the creditors of the partnership firm in order to repay the loans and excess amount was paid to the firm. In...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Apr 14, 2003 Cited By: 720 Coram: 1
4

...of a partner in a firm dying or retiring shall not survive to his legal representatives. Bachubai and L.A Watkins case arose out of a case in which in the partnership agreement it was provided that the...that the plaintiffs were not entitled to an account in the profits and losses of the firm after the death of Boatwalla, nor to exercise an option under Section 37 of the Partnership Act, but...share in the assets of the firm other than goodwill: they contend that in the goodwill of the firm the plaintiffs had no share.3. By Section 14 of the Partnership Act...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Feb 12, 1970 Cited By: 75 Coram: 3
5

...held to be not maintainable in view of Section 69(3) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932; the name of Ajay Arora having not been shown in the Register of Firms as a partner of the firm...maintainable in view of the bar enacted by Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act as the name of the applicant does not figure in the Register of Firms as partner of the firm. The plea has...be partners in the firm M/s Ashok Traders, Appellant 1. These twelve private parties to the litigation can be grouped into three, for the sake of convenience. Gurumukh Das Saluja, Sanjay Chawla and...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Jan 9, 2004 Cited By: 383 Coram: 1
6

...independent rights of their own under the award in the properties allotted under the schedule and hence it is not a case purely of assignment of the shares in the partnership but it confers exclusive...allocation of properties owned by partnership firm on dissolution to the erstwhile partners is not partition of immovable properties. In this connection, learned counsel for the respondents placed reliance on...benefits of partnership. Such a minor is given a right to his share of the property of the firm and also a right to share in the profits of the firm as may be agreed upon but his share is made liable for...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Jan 11, 1993 Cited By: 95 Coram: 2
7

...recoveries of monies from the debtors of the firm and, therefore, this was a case of specific entrustment. All that he could point out was Item 15 in the minutes of that meeting which runs thus..., Indian Penal Code on the ground that his failure to account for monies belonging to the firm in which he was a partner amounts to criminal breach of trust.2. The...partners and the appellant was its working partner. This firm was constituted in the year 1954. But on February 6, 1957 three of the partners retired and the business was continued by the remaining five...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Dec 11, 1964 Cited By: 202 Coram: 2
8

...is not even the second appellant's case that he was ever in the employment of the first appellant firm but was at all material times a partner thereof. Even if the first appellant held a valid driving...viz. whether the driver was in the employ of the insured. It completely overlooked the second clause that the driver, Appellant 2 was driving with the permission of the insured, the firm in this case...appeals are by the firm, owner of the vehicle which was involved in the accident and one of its partner who it was alleged was shown to be driving the vehicle at the time of the accident and while...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Apr 25, 1985 Cited By: 348 Coram: 2
9

...from a contract or conferred by the Partnership Act unless the firm is registered and the person suing is or has been shown in the Register of Firms as a partner in the firm. Sub-s. (2) similarly...) for the realisation of the property of a dissolved firm. The emphasis in each case is on dissolution of the firm. Then follows a general exclusion of the section. The fourth sub-section says that the...not registered- Application in the High Court for appointment of arbitrator- If maintainable-Interpretation of statute-Ejusdem Generis- Noscitur a sociis-Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (9 of 1932), s. 69...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Apr 29, 1964 Cited By: 143 Coram: 4
10

...receiver during the pendency of the suit to manage the firm.5. The case of the plaintiffs, as set out in the plaint, in brief, is as under. A partnership firm in the name and...also subsequently became a partner of the firm by making investments and a deed of partnership was executed on 20-12-1972. The partnership was reconstituted on 21-5-1976, in which the share of Shri...Rajendra Prasad Singh had predeceased him.6. The case of the plaintiffs further is that the defendants fraudulently executed another partnership deed on 17-2-1992, in which...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Jan 4, 2008 Cited By: 148 Coram: 2
11

...) the award seeks to assign the respondent's share in the partnership to the appellant and so does not require registration; and (3) under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, the Court was...respondent, interpreted in the aforesaid sense, to the appellant in express words. Nor such is the necessary intendment of the award. It expressly makes an exclusive allotment of the partnership assets...gave their award on September 20, 1963. They filed the award in the High Court on November 9, 1963. On September 10, 1964 the respondent filed an application for determining the validity of the...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Jan 11, 1974 Cited By: 89 Coram: 3
12

...:“That all the disputes touching the affairs of the partnership firm shall be referred to arbitrator in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act and the award of such arbitrator....28. In the instant case, the appellant being the only son of his deceased mother, is undisputedly a partner in the partnership firm with the respondents especially where the dispute concerning the.... According to him, the rights of the appellant as legatee/legal representative of Dulari Devi are conditioned by Section 29 of the Partnership Act and in case if Section 40 of the Arbitration and...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Mar 21, 2007 Cited By: 53 Coram: 1
13

...on 10-12-1949. During the years from 1973 to 1980, the firm obtained three mining leases from the State Government. The partnership firm was reconstituted in the year 1980, taking in some additional...term of 10 years. Thereby, the appellant was engaged as a raising contractor in respect of the mines for which the firm had obtained leases from the State Government. On 25-3-1991, the firm executed...nominating Mr Sanjeev Jain as its arbitrator in terms of the arbitration agreement.6. It is seen that the respondent firm, for reasons best known to itself, sought for and...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: May 17, 2007 Cited By: 173 Coram: 1
14

...69 of the Partnership Act. In the instant case, Seth Sugan Chand had to admit in unmistakable terms that the firm “Sethiya & Co.” was not registered under the Indian Partnership Act. It cannot...agreement with Sethiya & Co., a partnership firm of the plaintiff and Seth Sugan Chand. Under this agreement which was originally meant to last for five months but which was allowed to remain in force...dissolution of the firm, neither Seth Sugan Chand was a necessary party to the suit, nor was the suit barred under Section 69 of the Partnership Act ; that the alterations in the deed of agreement dated July 6...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Oct 20, 1976 Cited By: 180 Coram: 3
15

....(ii) The dissolution of the partnership of the dealer's firm or the death or adjudication as insolvent of any partner of the firm if the dealer be a firm...representation made by the appellant herein that the firm had certain outstandings in the market which were in danger of becoming unrecoverable, “if the supplies were suddenly stopped”. The respondent agreed to...of the partnership firm and while handing over the said notice, the staff members thereof were forcibly ousted from the business premises.7. The writ petition filed by the...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Sep 15, 2005 Cited By: 305 Coram: 2
16

...scope of Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 (briefly the Act) and in particular whether the principles applicable in the case of dissolution of partnership could be invoked in the case of...disclosed in the petition, dissolution would have been ordered by the court under Section 44 (g) of the Partnership Act. A case for winding-up has been, therefore, prima facie, made out by the...could be fairly called a partnership in the guise of a private Company then the things which might be a ground for dissolution of a partnership will apply also in the case of a private Company and that in...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Oct 10, 1975 Cited By: 276 Coram: 3
17

...subsequently on the firm itself?(3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the profits were assessable in the assessment year 1952-53 and, if not, whether they were...instance of the assessee. The assessee is an unregistered firm. It was constituted under an oral agreement of partnership sometime in March, 1946, between three persons, namely, Amin, Valia and Kharas...1953-54 on 4th November, 1953, he did not include his share of the profit from the partnership of Associated Commercial Corporation which he had received under the award in the accounting year 1952-53...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: Jun 18, 1962 Cited By: 66 Coram: 2
18

...244, AIR 1970 SC 833 this Court found that in case the award, if it creates for the first time a right in the immovable property of the value of Rs 100 or above, in the absence of its registration, the.... 790) the deed of relinquishment was accepted by one partner in favour of the other partners in the partnership firm including immovable property. This Court held that the deed of relinquishment was in...respect of individual interest of a partner in the assets of the partnership firm including immovable property was valid without registration. All the assets of the partnership firm vested in the new...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Apr 26, 1994 Cited By: 176 Coram: 2
19

..., on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the sum of Rs. 1,48,24,876 became taxable in the hands of the firm which according to the assessee stood...Tribunal is right in law and on facts, in holding that the award amount of Rs. 1,48,24,876 is not taxable in the hands of the assessee firm under the provisions of s. 176(3A) r/w s. 189(1) of the Act...facts as appear from the statement of case and found by the Tribunal may be noticed at the outset. M/s Banyan and Berry was a partnership firm under a deed of partnership executed on...


Court: Gujarat High Court
Date: Dec 21, 1995 Cited By: 155 Coram: 2
20

...written statement could arise only after the order of reference. Another ground is raised in support of this contention that the terms of partnership do not contemplate dissolution of the firm “at...this contention in this case when the partners sought for dissolution of the partnership on various grounds enumerated in Section 44(c) to (f) (sic) may also be sufficient and may not be necessary to...S. Rajendra Babu, J.— A partnership firm, M/s V.H Patel and Company, was constituted consisting of four brothers, namely, Jamnadas Himabhai Patel, Vallabhbhai Himabhai Patel...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Apr 18, 2000 Cited By: 62 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).