Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court7
+ Supreme Court Of India5
+ Calcutta High Court3
+ Delhi High Court2
+ Madras High Court2
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Gujarat High Court1
+ Kerala High Court1
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Karnataka High Court0
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Rajasthan High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards2
From 2011 To 20207
From 2001 To 20104
From 1991 To 20005
From 1981 To 19901
From 1971 To 19802
From 1961 To 19701
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...1. Esso Standard Eastern Corporation, a incorporated in U.S.A., has its main office at Bombay and has a at Ahmedabad. 1 is hereinafter referred to for the Esso. It has been dealing in...warehouse for the purpose of sale or for being marketed. About 5% of the quantity stored by Esso at Okha was released by it for consumption, use or sale within the territorial limits of the Panchayat...then Esso has been pay of duly to the Panchayat on the goods consumed, used or sold within the territorial limits of the Panchayat the Panchayat had granted to Esso current account facility by virtue of...

...do so.2. ESSO, a company incorporated in USA had been dealing in petroleum products in India. It had oil terminals in different ports in India where it had storage...B.P Jeevan Reddy, J.— This appeal is preferred by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, successor to the ESSO Standard Eastern Corporation against a common judgment of...facilities. One such storage facility was located within the limits of Okha Gram Panchayat in the State of Gujarat. Petrol, diesel oil and furnace oil were stored there. The ESSO was importing products at Okha...

...general considerations. But I do not think this would be found acceptable. Nor do I think the case can be brought within the second category. If the Shell Company had been asked at the beginning...precision. On this point I agree with Kerr, J. It should be noticed that in Esso case (1966) 2 QB 514, (1965) 3 WLR 469 Mocatta, J. also refused to make such an implication: see Esso...WLR 1988 (PC), dealt with the implied terms of the contract in the context of the articles of association of a company. It has been observed as under: (WLR pp. 1993-95, paras 16-27...

.... Desai that the provision such as the right of first refusal is merely regulatory and not in restraint of trade.4. The appellant is a company incorporated under the Companies...had entered into an agreement with the appellant. Respondent 2 is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956.6. The appellant entered into the said agreement with...House of Lords in Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. v. Harper's Garage (Stourport) Ltd. (1967) 1 All ER 699, 1968 AC 269, (1967) 2 WLR 871 (HL) as follows...

...were put to half ahead. The Tug and the Tanker proceeded on the parallel course. The Tanker was not less than 250 ft. abeam another Tanker named “Esso Port Dickson” which at that time and was being...passing the same at a close distance on her starboard but before actually going past allowed down to communicate a message to the harbour pilot on board the said “Esso Port Dickson”.(c...hrs. after the Tug got clear the engines of the Tanker were put to half ahead. At that time the Tanker was 300 ft. ahead the “Esso Port Dickson” berthing at the Jetty No. 1. Thereafter it was noticed...

...company focused on the management and valuation of brands) Global 500 Report March 2010. Further, for the year 2009, the Plaintiff was ranked as the world's 11 most reputed company...according to a study complied by United States based Reputation Institute. Documents pertaining to the ‘well-known’ status, reputation and goodwill enjoyed by the plaintiff company have been filed in the...owns trademark registrations for the word TATA in over 50 countries besides India. Copies of trademark registration certificates etc. of the trademarks owned by the plaintiff company are filed in the...

...A.P Shah, J.:— This appeal is directed against an order of temporary injunction passed by the learned single Judge. Briefly the facts are that the second plaintiffs are a company.... Mr. Chagla relied upon the cases of Illustrated Newspapers Ltd. The Illustrated London News and Sketch, Ltd. and The Sporting and Dramatic Publishing Company Ltd. v. Publicity Services...individual and actually damaging him.”10. The next case is Jasperson v. Dominion Tobacco Company, In that case two companies appointed an agent to buy tobacco on their behalf...

...Esso Standard Inc. v. Udharam Bhagwandas Japanwalla he submitted that, that was a case in which for the individual acts of the directors of the Company the ...has revealed that the Union Carbide Corporation is a company with headquarters in U.S.A. having affiliate and subsidiary companies throughout the world. These subsidiaries were supervised by four...UCIL, India besides others. UCC, U.S.A. got incorporated in India on 20/6/1934, a company known as the Eveready Company (India) Ltd. under the indian companies act (act vii) of 1913 with the Registrar...

...agent whom he did not wish to employ, especially when the agent could bring an action for damages" vide. , brett v. East india and london shipping company, 2 h and m 404. The same reasoning...confirming this principle to a contract for employment and excluding its application to other contracts". The supreme court referred to the observation of lord pierce in esso petroleum company limited v.... 3. 2004, mr. M. K. Cheong, regional sales manager of the first respondent informed the applicant that he "already got the approval fiom the president of my company". On 3. 7. 2004, the applicant...

...Esso Standard Inc. v. Udharam Bhagwandas Japanwalla (1975) 45 Comp Cas 16 (Bom) he submitted that, that was a case in which for the individual acts of the directors of the .... Investigation has revealed that the Union Carbide Corporation is a company with headquarters in U.S.A having affiliate and subsidiary companies throughout the world. These subsidiaries were...controlled UCIL, India besides others. UCC, U.S.A got incorporated in India on 20-6-1934, a company known as the Eveready Company (India) Ltd. under the Indian Companies Act (Act VII) of 1913 with the...

...) was also incorporated in USA which was resident of USA for tax purposes. Exxon was the holding company of Esso which paid dividends in U.K to its holding company-Exxon. The Special Commissioner held...) the term “person” includes an individual, a company and any other entity which is treated as ‘taxable unit’ under the taxation laws in force in the respective Contracting States;(f...” are defined in Clause (c) of article 3 as meaning UAE or India as the context may require. In clause (e) of article 3 the term ‘person’ is defined to include an individual, a company and any other...

...Company Limited. The said company leased 478.40 acres including the suit property to the plaintiff by a registered lease deed dated 21-7-1967 under Ex. A1. The lease was for a period of 15 years. The...liabilities of Anglo American Direct Tea Trading Company. On 21-8-1980, the def endant informed under Ex. A5 that on the expiry of the lease by efflux of time, the plaintiff had to surrender the demised pre...dated 31-12-1976 the defendant took over the entire assets and undertaking of M/s. Anglo American Direct Tea Trading Company Limited and its sister concerns. Thereafter, the plaintiff attorned to this...

...building. By an agreement dated 1st May, 1968 the said D.D Solanki gave his aforesaid flat No. 1A to Esso Standard Eastern Incorporated, the predecessors of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...knowledge of the Company. By an order dated 12th November, 1987 the amendment was granted in part and the first respondent carried out the necessary amendments on 1st December, 1987.9. On the...Exs. 3 and 4 and then filed a suit in Order to forestall the company from proceeding against him under section 630 of the...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...acquired any assets or liabilities since its coming into existence. The petitioner was working with a Food Aggregator Business Company, Zomato, in various capacities, as...Reid in the Esso Petroleum case (1968) AC 269, where he said at p.301: 'I think it better to ascertain what were the legitimate...in restraint of trade. In Esso Petroleum Co.Ltd. (supra) the question whether the agreement under consideration was a mere agreement for the promotion of trade and not an...

...Tsq J ruudsgt eA cist in uarely against the principles laid by the Division Bench of this CourtLuga Bay Shipping Corporation and another v. Board of... Shipping Corporation and another v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Cochin 10 W.A.No.790 OF 2010...- (a) transhipping of passengers or goods between vessels in the port or port approaches; (b) landing and shipping of passengers or goods...

...Nadkarni, 1982(1) Bom.C.R. 867. 6. Krishan Avtar Bahadur v. Col Irwin Express, 1986(50) C.C. 417. 7. Baldev K. Sahi v. Shipping.... Advocates appeared : M.A. Rane and A.K. Abhyankar and V.M. Rane i/by Gagrat and Company, for the petitioner. V.P. Vashi with Miss Neelam V...gave his aforesaid flat No. 1-A to Esso Standard Eastern Incorporated, the predecessors of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, respondent No. 1 in the present petition. By this agreement a licence was...

...VICE-ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.43 OF 2012 Murmansk Shipping Company ...Plaintiff vs Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd...constitution of a limitation fund in connection with the operation of the vessel for claims falling under Section 352-A of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 ("MS Act"). 2. The...Plaintiff is a company incorporated under the laws of Russia, and was at all material times and still is the owner of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY ("the vessel"),which flies Russian flag and is...

...22, 1965 entered into between the Petitioners. M/s. Pearey Lal & Sons (East Punjab) (P) Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Petitioners’ and ‘the Company’) and M/s. V/O “Mashpriborintorg...4, 1965 the Russian Party and the Company entered into an agreement whereby the former sold and the latter bought certain goods mentioned in Annexures A to C to the contract “amounting to the total...contracted for to the Company and also issued invoices in terms of the contract. These invoices are as below:Sl. No. Invoice No. Date 180 days from date of invoice 1...

...of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (“MS Act”).2. The Plaintiff is a company incorporated under the laws of Russia, and was at all material times and still is the owner of the vessel M.V...company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, was a consignee of cargo on board the vessel, whose cargo was lost...packaging. This led to the clausing of the shipping orders in respect of the cargo to the effect that the vessel was not to be responsible for any loss caused by carriage of the deck cargo (identifying...