Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal41072
+ Bombay High Court4316
+ Gujarat High Court3162
+ Karnataka High Court2663
+ Madras High Court2629
+ Kerala High Court2495
+ Delhi High Court2326
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court1564
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1379
+ Allahabad High Court1309
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1165
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1106
+ Rajasthan High Court1082
+ Supreme Court Of India1081
+ Calcutta High Court917
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission840
+ Patna High Court804
+ Telangana High Court758
+ CESTAT687
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission454
+ Gauhati High Court454
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court445
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission401
+ Jharkhand High Court352
+ National Company Law Tribunal331
+ Central Information Commission320
+ Orissa High Court314
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission258
+ Chhattisgarh High Court228
+ Uttarakhand High Court224
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court200
+ SEBI183
+ Company Law Board153
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal149
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal128
+ National Green Tribunal124
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal98
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity62
+ RERA62
+ Armed Forces Tribunal55
+ Tripura High Court55
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal52
+ Manipur High Court52
+ Meghalaya High Court35
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board34
+ Sikkim High Court34
+ Competition Commission Of India32
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal31
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange26
+ Board of Revenue25
+ Privy Council25
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST24
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act23
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India18
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal16
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction10
+ Authority For Advance Rulings8
+ Railway Claims Tribunal7
+ District Court6
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board5
+ Settlement Commission5
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST4
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India4
+ Commissioner (Appeals)3
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Collector Appeals1
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards21478
From 2011 To 202041521
From 2001 To 20104401
From 1991 To 20001911
From 1981 To 19901188
From 1971 To 1980568
From 1961 To 1970356
From 1951 To 1960165
Before 1950104

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...(Partition) Suit No. 21 of 2002, nor there is any order of deletion of party-defendant has been passed by the trial court and therefore, apprehension of the petitioners is baseless. Nonetheless, i...mind of the original defendants, that they may be deleted from the party defendants and therefore, the present petition has been preferred.2. I have heard learned counsel for the..., the suit is already pending and it will be decided in final hearing and there is no intention on the part of the respondents to delete the present petitioners as party defendants in the Title...

....2. The petitioner Insurance Company had preferred the application at Exh.15 for deletion of the Insurance of Company as party respondent to the main proceedings pending before the Tribunal..., that is pending. In an application for deletion of party, the Tribunal was not called upon to make any observations on the merits of the case.6. Hence, it is clarified that the...by the learned advocate for the petitioner, upon instructions, that insofar as the order of rejection of the application for deletion of the name of the petitioner-Insurance Company is concerned, the...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...application of the petitioner herein for deletion of party. Against such order the appeal preferred to the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal was dismissed on the ground of limitation. Being aggrieved by th...the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institution Act, 1993 in which the petitioner herein was a party defendant no. 8. Such proceeding was registered as OA No. 406 of 2011. In..., 2014. According to the petitioner, it is neither a guarantor nor a borrower of the bank. The petitioner is entitled to certain amounts from the bank which the bank has wrongfully withheld. The...

...:- Yogendra Pal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J. Shri Yogendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant has prayed for deletion of opposite party no....2 from array of parties. As prayed permission is granted for deletion of opposite party no. 2 from array of parties in the due course of day. Heard learned counsel for the... Court No. - 68 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35174 of 2019 Applicant :- Sachin @ Bittu Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant...

...appropriate order for addition or for deletion of party and for that purpose no specific petition is required, particularly when there is a statutory requirement to make the Deputy Commissioner as a.../appellants to add the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi a party in the suit. 5. Counsel for the appellants submits that the matter arose out of Title Partition Suit No...as to whether the suit is barred on account of non-joinder of a necessary party? This issue was decided by the learned trial court vide Para 17 of the judgment against the plaintiff. He submits that...

.... 13. The addition or deletion of party during pendency of suit is at the discretion of the Court. The discretion has to be exercised judiciously. For impleading a ...presence of M/s Ebike as a party in the suit is not going to help the Court in any manner in complete and effective adjudication of the issues involved. 18. In result... 2025:HHC:21853 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.211 of...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...the amendment at para 1 and 2 are with regard to cause title and deletion of party which is simply not permissible. Consequent amendments at para 3 and 4 are with regard to the share of the parties... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.316 of 2017... ====================================================== 1. Smt. Aarti Devi Wife of Sri Premchand Banwali, resident of village - Senma, P.O. Senua, P.S. Lotan, Distt. - Sidharth Nagar, Uttar Prad...

...contained under Order I, rule 10(2) CPC, Court is under obligation to order for impleadment or deletion of any of the party(s) at any stage, rather careful perusal of...aforesaid provision reveals that whenever it appears to the Court that impleadment/deletion of any of the party(s) is necessary for the adjudication of the case, it may order for impleadment/...) at any stage of trial. Recording of satisfaction by the court to the effect that such impleadment/deletion of a party(s) is necessary, is a sine qua non for the same.7. In...

... C.R.P.Nos.6096 & 6115 of 2018 amendment is sought. Amendment in the pleadings consequent to adding or deletion of party is very much required as mere impleadment/...pendente lite of the said suit. The plaintiff is being not a party to the purported loan, it will not bind on the plaint schedule property and also to the plaintiff. The purported General Power of...I.A.No.238 of 2017 submitting that this defendant is not at all a necessary party to the proceedings and mere non-issual of reply to the notice does not amount to admitting the contents of notice and that...

...Google Inc. as another defendant in the suit. By virtue of the order impugned the trial Court disposed of two applications, one filed by the petitioner for deletion of its name from the array of defendant ...counsel for the respondent that at the stage of considering the application for rejection of plaint or deletion of party from the array of defendants when even the written statement is yet to be f...as the trial Court) whereby the application moved by the petitioner in terms of Order-I Rule 10 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure for its deletion from the...

...complaint for non-deletion of name of respondent/opposite party No.3, in spite of order being passed to that effect and for non-appearance of the complainant on 10.10.2016. 2....gone through the averments made in the memo of appeal, we are satisfied that there was sufficient cause for committing the default in executing the order for deletion of name of opposite : 2 : party No....3 and we also find that there was sufficient cause for non-appearance of the appellant/ complainant on 10.10.2016. 3. In the circumstances, we set aside the impugned order and...

...application No.6/2015, the petitioner impleaded respondent No.1-M/s. MAGNA Infotech Pvt. Ltd. and respondent No.2-M/s. SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. (Annexure-A). Respondent No.2 filed an application for deletion of his name being a ...application No.6/2015. The Labour Court proceeded to accept such application for deletion of second party- M/s. SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd. Even though the relationship was...In the instant petition, the petitioner has assailed the order of the Labour Court dated 25.08.2015, passed in application No.6/2015 (Annexure-D). 2. In...

...dismissed the complaint for non-deletion of name of respondent/opposite party No.3, in spite of order being passed to that effect and for non-appearance of the complainant on 10.10.2016.... 2. Having gone through the averments made in the memo of appeal, we are satisfied that there was sufficient cause for committing the default in executing the order for deletion of name of opp...of the appellant/ complainant on 10.10.2016. 3. In the circumstances, we set aside the impugned order and the complaint is restored to its original number. The matter is remanded...

..., learned counsel appearing for some of the private respondents. 2. By this application, the applicant, who is respondent No. 7 in WP (C) No. 596 is praying for deletion of his name as party respond...deletion of the name of the applicant as party respondent in WP (C) No. 596 of 2014. 5. Mr. Dijen, learned counsel for the applicant however, submits that the applicant still wants his...name to be deleted inasmuch as he is not a necessary party and deletion may be done at the risk of the applicant. 6. After considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the...

..., learned counsel appearing for some of the private respondents. 2. By this application, the applicant, who is respondent No. 10 in WP (C) No. 596 is praying for deletion of his name as party respon...deletion of the name of the applicant as party respondent in WP (C) No. 596 of 2014. 5. Mr. Dijen, learned counsel for the applicant however, submits that the applicant still wants his...name to be deleted inasmuch as he is not a necessary party and deletion may be done at the risk of the applicant. 6. After considering the submission made by the learned counsel for...

...revision application was allowed and the order dated 19.9.2014 passed by Board of Nominee below Exh.38 for deletion of the respondent No.1 as party from the proceedings of the Lavad Suit and to dispose...learned advocate Mr. S.P. Majmudar for respondent No.1. 3. Learned advocate Mr. Mehta submitted that deletion of respondent No.1 as party from the Lavad Suit...entity in the eye of law is no ground to permit deletion of such a party especially when such party opposed the assertion made in the pursis submitted by the petitioners- plaintiffs. In any case, it...

.... Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J. Shri Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant has prayed for deletion of opposite party no.2 from array of partie.... As prayed permission is granted for deletion of opposite party no. 2 from array of parties in the due course of day. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional... Court No. - 68 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35186 of 2019 Applicant :- Dangal Singh Opposite Party...

...6.12.2018 whereby the amendment to seek deletion of opposite party no.4, wife of the deceased, from the array of parties in Claim Petition No.134 of 2014 (Smt. Saira Bano & Ors. v. Shr....7 of 2015 (Naseema Khatoon v. Sarvare Alam & Ors.) has been filed by the opposite party no.4 namely wife of the deceased claiming her right to receive compensation... Civil Misc. Amendment Application dated 25.2.2019. By means of the proposed amendment, the prayer is sought to be added in the prayer clause of the present petition...