CiteTEXT
..., in the advertisement in question, for Dabur Chayawanprash is also a Chayawanprash as against which disparagement is made. To the same effect is the judgment of Calcutta High Court in Reckitt...this Court in Reckitt Coleman (supra) and Dabur India (supra).10. Prima facie, I am of the view that the offending advertisement is clearly covered by the fourth principle set out in...by such decisions.11. According to the counsel for the plaintiff, a learned Single Judge in Dabur India (supra) has followed the Calcutta High Court judgment in Reckitt Coleman (supra...
...
$~26. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 1829/2014 and I.A. 11443/2014 RECKITT BENCKISER...(INDIA) LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Nancy Roy, Advocate
versus
DABUR INDIA LTD ..... Defendant
Through: Ms. Meenakshi Singh...
...Ltd v. Reckitt Benckiser (I) Ltd, 128 (2006) DLT 81 and Dabur India Ltd v.... 2005 (31) PTC 1(Del.); Dabur India Limited…Plaintiff v. Colgate Palmolive India Ltd.… 2004 (29) PTC 401(Del....); Dabur India Limited…Petitioner v. Emami Limited… 2004 (29) PTC 1 (Del...
...
Dabur India Limited For the plaintiff : Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Senior. Advocate Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Senior. Advocate
Mr. Subhasis Sengupta, Advocate...product "Dabur Cool King Icey Perfume Talc" (the impugned advertisement).
2. Briefly, the petitioner is inter alia engaged in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector...
VO:"KAHAN HAI TUMHARA DABUR COOL KING'SUDDENLY
GET SURPRISED, HEAR SOME NOISE AND LOOKUP
DABUR COOL KING TALC...
...in order to attain a business advantage. Several decisions were referred to by the learned counsel for the plaintiff which include:-(1) Reckitt & Colman of India Ltd v. M.P...Ramchandran & Another: 1999 PTC (19) 741;(2) Dabur India Limited…Petitioner v. Emami Limited...…: 2004 (29) PTC 1 (Del); and(3) Dabur India Limited v. Colgate Palmolive India Limited: 2004 (29) PTC 401 (Del).7. On the other hand, the learned counsel...
...has filed the present suit seeking injunction/damages for disparagement, denigration, etc. The case of the Plaintiff is that they manufacture DABUR Chyawanprash which is an ayurvedic proprietary...in chyawanprash are as per the prescribed ayurvedic text Charaka Samhita which has about 48 ingredients. The details of the DABUR Chyawanprash product have been set out in the plaint. The grievance in...Plaintiffs DABUR Chyawanprash by the consumer. The complaint of the Plaintiff is that the chyawanprash product category is described as saadharan and ordinary and is juxtaposed with the Defendants asaadharan...
.... b) Dabur India Ltd. c) Reckitt Benckiser of India Ltd. d) ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd. e) Procter & Gamble Home...
...product of the plaintiff as was the position in Dabur v. Colgate Palmolive (Supra) and Reckitt & Colman of India Ltd. v. M.P Ramchandran & Anr. (Supra). Compared to these cases.... Learned counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon Dabur India Limited…Petitioner v. Emami Limited…, 2004 (29) PTC 1 (Del.). In that case...Reckitt & Colman of India Ltd. v. Kiwi T.T.K Ltd., 1996 (16) PTC 393, it was held that a manufacture is entitled to make a statement that his...
....
(8) Eureka Forbes Ltd. v. Pentair Water India Pvt. Ltd. 2007 (4) Kar.L.J 122
(9) Reckitt...Benckiser v. Naga Ltd. 2003 (36) PTC 535
(10) Dabur India v. Wipro Ltd...following decisions:
[1] Reckitt & Coleman of India v. M.P. Ramachandran and Anr. 1999 PTC [19] 741...
..., plaintiff no. 2/Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Ltd. would be referred to as RB (India) while the defendant/Dabur India Limited would be referred to as Dabur. Collectively, though, wherever the context...Advocate with Mr. Jawahar Lai and Ms. Nancy Roy, Advocates. versus DABUR INDIA LTD. .....Defendant Through Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Mamta Jha, Mr. Manish Kumar Mishra and Ms. Akansha Singh, Advocates................................................ 6 Passing off .............................................................................................................................. 7 Submissions on behalf of Dabur...
....16. The Division Bench in Dabur - Colortek after laying the following propositions relating to comparative advertising:—“Finally, we may mention that Reckitt & Colman of...the Court and CS(OS) No. 463/2016 has been filed only as a counter-blast to CS(OS) No. 459/2016. Per contra the senior counsel for HUL referred to Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Reckitt Benckiser...2005 SCC OnLine Del 1427, ii) Reckitt & Colman of India Ltd. v. M.P Ramchandran 1999 PTC (19) 741, iii...
...Ltd11 ("Dabur v Colgate" hereinafter) and
Reckitt v. Wipro6(rendered by me...before me in Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd v. Wipro Enterprises (P) Ltd6 ("Reckitt v Wipro...Bench of this Court in Dabur India Ltd v. Colortek Meghalaya Pvt Ltd7 ("Dabur v. Colortek" hereinafter), he derives...
...(2002) 3 SCC 65.(iv) Bloomberg Finance LP v. Prafull Saklecha MANU/DE/3673/2013.(v) ...) Ltd. v. Dabur India Ltd. 2014 (60) PTC 634 (Del).(vi) Century Traders… v. Roshan Lal Duggar & Co… AIR 1978 Delhi 250...
...Dabur, Perfetti, Reckitt Benckiser, Colgate-Palmolive etc. The plaintiffs own a website www.varahi.in where all its products are extensively advertised. It is alleged that the plaintiffs have...set out by Perfetti as per their specification sheet. Defendant is a listed company having a turnover in excess of INR 75 Crores and supplies products to reputed companies such as Perfetti, Dabur...
...Court. In support of this submission, the learned counsel relied upon the judgment in the case of Dabur India Ltd. v. Emami India Ltd.... 2004 (29) PTC 1 (Del) and Reckitt Benckiser (India) Limited…Plaintiff v. Hindustan Lever Limited…Defendant..., the learned counsel relied on the judgment of the Division Bench in the case of Dabur India Limited v. Colortek Meghalaya Private Limited and Godrej Sara-Lee 167 (2010) DLT 278...
..., (1995) 5 SCC 139; Dabur India v. Colortek Meghalaya Pvt. Ltd. and Godrej Sara-Lee, 167 (2010) DLT 27...Ltd. v. Reckitt Benckiser (I) Ltd, 128 (2006) DLT 81; Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v. Naga Limited & Ors., 104(2003) DLT 490...; and Dabur India Ltd. vs. Colortek Meghalaya Pvt. Ltd., 2010 (42) PTC 88 (Del.).
(v) Mr. Bhatia thus contended that since...
...the principles enunciated in Reckitt & Colman (1999) 19 PTC 741 (Cal), by the judgment in Dabur...observations in Dabur ILR (2010) 4 Del 489, vis-a-vis Reckitt & Colman (1999) 19...story board of the impugned advertisement is provided thus, for ready reference:6. The plaintiff Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Limited (“Reckitt”, hereinafter), who...
...102 (Dabur India Limited v. Colgate Palamolive India Ltd.)
(2) 1975(2) ALL ER...(32) PTC 307 (Del.) (Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. v. Reckitt Benckiser (I) Ltd.
(2) 2006 (32) PTC 677...(Del.) (Dabur India Ltd. v. Wipro Limited. Bangalore)
22. I have considered the rival submissions carefully with...
...to its competitors. Reference is made to the decisions in Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd., 200 (2013) DLT 563...: 2013 (55) PTC 156 (hereafter Dettol v. Lifebuoy case) and Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd...., 2013 VAD (Del) 94 : 2013 (55) PTC 156 (hereafter Dettol Liquid, case) and Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v...
...:-• Dabur India Limited…Plaintiff v. Colgate Palmolive India Ltd.… Ltd.2004 (29) PTC 401 (Del) - to contend that generic disparagement of a rival product without...;• Dabur India Ltd.… v. M/S. Colortek Meghalaya Pvt. Ltd.…(2010) 44 PTC 254 Delhi (DB) holding that in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court...Dabur India Ltd.…Plaintiff; v. Wipro Limited, Bangalore…Defendant. Limited2006 (32) PTC 677 (Del) laying down that it is permissible for an...