...suit to its file and on such transfer the suit was renumbered as CS No. 14 of 1958. A preliminary decree was passed in the suit on 28-6-1963 on the basis of the compromise entered into between the...in CS No. 14 of 1958 in which they were not parties.8. The relevant provisions of CPC material for the case are Rules 97 to 103 of Order 21 of the Code. Rule 97...appellants by a Single Judge at the first instance.20. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. The order dated 28-12-1995 of the learned Single Judge in CS No. 14 of 1958...

...CS 14 of 1958. The preliminary decree, on the basis of the compromise, was passed on 28-6-1963 and as there was no appeal therefrom, it has become final. In the preliminary decree the subject matter ...become absolute owners. It is also contended that they have been residing in the pucca houses constructed by them, since their purchase and therefore the decree passed by this Court in CS 14 of 1958 has...partition in CS 14 of 1958. M/s. Cyrus Investments Ltd., purchased 50 shares (Ac.98.10 gts) from some of the defendants/decree-holdcrs, in the above suit and assigned the same in favour of the...

...into compromise but there is no record or evidence to show that the receiver has entered into any compromise. There is no order of the Court in CS. 14 of 1958 about any such compromise with the...Dilawarunnisa Begum filed C.S. No. 14 of 1958 on the file of this Court for partition of huge extent of properties including the suit Survey Number, which was shown as item 38 of Schedule...of tenants, that Paigah is not in possession on any part thereof, that after the preliminary decree was passed in C.S. No. 14 of 1958 on 28-6-1963, the High Court appointed an advocate-commissioner-cum...

...and transfer took place in the year 1958 and the suit was re-numbered as CS No. 14 of 1958.34. Since the genesis of the present dispute should be traced to the plaint...properties damaged and the extent of damage caused by the respective parties.46. It must be mentioned here that the suit CS No. 14 of 1958 on the file of the present...favour of F.E. Dinshaw Ltd., which later became Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. This transfer was recognized, and consequently, Cyrus was impleaded as defendant No. 206 in the suit CS No. 14 of 1958...

.... was allotted to the respondents by virtue of the orders passed by this Court in CS No. 14 of 1958, that in pursuance of the said orders, the Receiver-cum-Commissioner delivered vacant possession...suit property was allotted to the plaintiff by allotment order dated 29-1-1971 passed in Application No. 73 of 1970 in Application No. 113 of 1972 in CS No. 14 of 1958 and the same was delivered t...to the plaintiff pursuant to the orders passed by the High Court in CS No. 14 of 1958 and negatived the contention of the defendants in the following words:“We are not impressed by the...

...M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.:—Introduction:1. All these Original Side Appeals (for short ‘the OSAs’) arise out of CS No. 14 of 1958 on the file of this Court...under Or.XXI Rule 97-101 CPC in E.P.3 of 1996 in CS. No. 14 of 1958.11. O.S.A. No. 59 of 2004 arises out of the same common order dt.26.10.2004...and numbered as CS. No. 14 of 195828. Khursheed Jah's daughter Dildarunnissa Begum filed O.S. No. 41 of 1955 in the City Civil Court, Hyderabad which was transferred to the High Court...

...village which is subject matter of C.S. No. 14 of 1958 (an original proceeding still pending on the file of this Court) and there are certain findings recorded by a Division Bench in ...not confer title. If the petitioner's predecessors-in-title have succeeded against the State in CS No. 14 of 1958, petitioner would certainly get good title under registered sale deeds executed by such.... Cyrus Investments Private Limited and 2 others to cancel the registered sale deed dt.21.05.1966 executed by her in favour of Defendants 156 and 157 in CS No. 14 of 1958...

...Khursheed Jah, a Paigah, who had died in 1902.28.The said suit was withdrawn and taken on the file of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and renumbered as C.S.No.14 of 1958. Hafeezpet patta lands com...to the preliminary decree dated 28.06.1963 in CS No.14 of 1958 miserably failed.39. So we are not adjudicating in this Writ Petition the title to land in Sy.No.80 of Hafeezpet village which the...decree dt.28-6-1963 in CS no.14 of 1958, that the lands were inam lands, that they were not partible and to set aside the preliminary decree on the said basis and the said OSA was dismissed on 7.2.2001...

...committed in respect of valuable lands belonging to the Government by filing CS Nos. 7, 9 and 14 of 1958 before this Court, and on more occasions than one, this Court has exposed the fraud involved therein..., 1460 and 1461 of 2000, were filed with a prayer to implead it in CS No. 7 of 1958, as one of the defendants to recognize the assignment and to direct to the District Judge, Ranga Reddy District to delive...of rights, recognition of the assignment, and delivery of possession. Almost as a set pattern, this went on for years, not only in CS No. 7 of 1958, but also in CS Nos. 9 and 14 ...

...of Andhra Pradesh was impleaded as defendant No. 53 in CS No. 14 of 1958 and the Jagir Administrator of the Government of Hyderabad was impleaded as defendant No. 43 in the said suit...in CS No. 14 of 1958 miserably failed. 43. So we are not adjudicating in this Writ Petition the title to land in Sy. No. 80 of Hafeezpet village which the petitioners...to the fact that the State had raised a plea in OSA (SR) no. 3526 of 2000, filed by it against the preliminary decree dt.28-6-1963 in CS no. 14 of 1958, that the lands were inam lands, that they were...

...the army. On succession of Government of India over Nizam of Hyderabad, the legal heirs of Khurshid Jahi Paigah started claiming ownership on these lands and filed a civil suit in CS No.14 ... government lands and were impleaded as defendants 53 and 43 in CS No.14 of 1958. Further the Hon'ble High court of undivided A.P passed a preliminary decree in the suit on...there is no valid transfer of the impugned property because the title of the impugned lands in Sy.No.172 of Hydernagar village is the subject matter of Civil Suit in C.S.No.14/1958 in Telangana Hi...

...of Hafeezpet Village, Shenlingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District from Smt. Zaheerunnisa Begum, W/o. Mohammad Khan, Defendant No. 94 in C.S No. 14 of 1958 on the file of this Court. They filed Appl. No. 75.... 14 of 1958, and interlocutory proceedings therein, Appl...of the District Judge, Rangareddy, District.4. It is not in dispute that C.S No. 14 of 1958 is filed for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule propert...

...contends that the applications for production of additional documents cannot be considered for a variety of reasons. Some of the documents including the final decree in CS No. 14 of 1958 ...14. In our respectful view the above judgment does not postulate a principle of law of general application that where a review of judgment is sought on the ground for instance that relevant...Goda Raghuram, J.:— These are applications seeking review of the common judgment dated 16.7.2010 passed in AS Nos. 719, 723 and 725 of 2005 whereby the appeals were dismissed confirming...

..., preliminary decree was passed in CS No. 14 of 1958 on 28.6.1963, and petition schedule property is specifically excluded and all the parties to compromise decree including the vendors of Saraswathi Prasa...not owner of the premises in occupation of tenant as he lost his case in C.S No. 14 of 1958 in all the Courts. The learned Rent Controller as well as appellate authority decided these issues against the...tenant and ordered eviction.2. The admitted factual background, brief, is as follows. Civil Suit No. 14 of 1958 was filed before High Court of A.P, by Dilidar-un-nissa Begum for...

...21.09.2021, passed by the High Court of Telangana in Interlocutory Application No. 5/2020 in Application No. 837/2013 in CS No. 7/1958.3. The brief facts of this case...list of Mukthas in the preliminary decree dated 06.04.1959 by the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh in CS No. 7/1958.4. The underlying original suit was filed in 1953...herein, the respondents herein filed 6 IAs (in Application 837/2013 in CS No. 7/1958) before the High Court of Telangana in 2020. The details of the applications are as follows...

...assessees the learned CIT(A) confirmed the additions made by the learned Assessing Officer in respect of the lands which were the subject matter of the litigation in CS No. 14 of 1958 on the file ...all these appeals, the addition involved is in respect of the property, which happens to be the subject matter in CS No.14/1958 in respect of which the plea of the assessees is that the Hon'ble Hi...of CS No.14/1958 by order dated 15/06/2023. According to the assessees under the Judgement, they lost ownership on the capital asset in question. Based on this, the assessees contend that, in these...

...assessees the learned CIT(A) confirmed the additions made by the learned Assessing Officer in respect of the lands which were the subject matter of the litigation in CS No. 14 of 1958 on the file ...all these appeals, the addition involved is in respect of the property, which happens to be the subject matter in CS No.14/1958 in respect of which the plea of the assessees is that the Hon'ble Hi...of CS No.14/1958 by order dated 15/06/2023. According to the assessees under the Judgement, they lost ownership on the capital asset in question. Based on this, the assessees contend that, in these...

...assessees the learned CIT(A) confirmed the additions made by the learned Assessing Officer in respect of the lands which were the subject matter of the litigation in CS No. 14 of 1958 on the file ...all these appeals, the addition involved is in respect of the property, which happens to be the subject matter in CS No.14/1958 in respect of which the plea of the assessees is that the Hon'ble Hi...of CS No.14/1958 by order dated 15/06/2023. According to the assessees under the Judgement, they lost ownership on the capital asset in question. Based on this, the assessees contend that, in these...

...therefore are accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the applications for impleading the applicants as defendants in CS No. 14 of 1958 are also dismissed. It is however, made clear that this order...individuals in some cases and groups in others. Each of them filed two applications, one with a prayer to implead them as defendants in C.S.No. 14 of 1958 and the other, to recognize the assignments of...applications came to be made may briefly be stated as under: 3. Initially C.S. No. 14 of 1958 was filed in the City Civil Court, Hyderabad for partition of the suit schedule properties. It...

...including the final decree in CS No. 14 of 1958 are inadmissible as evidence on account of under valuation of stamp duty; and other documents do not fall within the...disposal of the appeal is not a justifiable ground for seeking review, held this court. 14. In our respectful view the above judgment does not postulate a principle of law of gen...ORDER Justice Goda Raghuram 1. These are applications seeking review of the common judgment dated 16-07-2010 passed in A.S.Nos. 719; 723 and 725 of 2005...