Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal31940
+ Karnataka High Court14636
+ Bombay High Court6746
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court5535
+ Madras High Court5200
+ Delhi High Court4759
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission3702
+ CESTAT3021
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court3004
+ Kerala High Court2537
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court2371
+ Gujarat High Court2289
+ Allahabad High Court2130
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1763
+ Calcutta High Court1715
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1503
+ Rajasthan High Court1488
+ Supreme Court Of India1457
+ RERA1402
+ Patna High Court787
+ Telangana High Court786
+ Central Administrative Tribunal762
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission705
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court676
+ National Company Law Tribunal585
+ National Green Tribunal520
+ Gauhati High Court495
+ Jharkhand High Court407
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal383
+ SEBI343
+ Orissa High Court328
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity304
+ Uttarakhand High Court243
+ Chhattisgarh High Court220
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission197
+ Tripura High Court190
+ Privy Council167
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal135
+ Competition Commission Of India128
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal111
+ Central Information Commission103
+ Sikkim High Court88
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal78
+ Company Law Board76
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal69
+ Armed Forces Tribunal67
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board56
+ Meghalaya High Court44
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal42
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange39
+ Railway Claims Tribunal35
+ Manipur High Court34
+ Board of Revenue22
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission21
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India18
+ Commissioner (Appeals)15
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act10
+ District Court10
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority8
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction7
+ Authority For Advance Rulings4
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board3
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST2
+ Collector Appeals2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Copyright Board1
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India1
+ Settlement Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Right to Information0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards33897
From 2011 To 202048866
From 2001 To 20106713
From 1991 To 20003082
From 1981 To 19902159
From 1971 To 19801149
From 1961 To 19701037
From 1951 To 1960889
Before 19502258

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...objections.3. Under these circumstances, we find that it would be a case to exercise the discretion for condonation of delay caused in preferring the concerned Cross Objections. Hence, delay.... Hence, on the same reason, the delay deserves to be condoned. Further, considering the facts and circumstances, as the delay has been condoned, we find that the Cross Objections are required to be...restored and hence, all the cross objections connected therein shall stand restored. Consequently, the Misc Civil Applications for restoration of the cross objections shall stand allowed and shall stand...

...Order 27/08/2018 S.B. Civ.cros.obj.miscapp No. 92/2011 The cross-objections is reported barred by 11 days. (2 of 2) [CCOMA-92/2011] An application under ...filing the cross-objections. For the reasons indicated in the application, supported by affidavit, the same is allowed. The delay of...legal representatives of respondent No.4 is dispensed with. Office to proceed. S.B. Civ.cros.obj.miscapp No. 74/2011 The cross-objections is reported barred by 11 days. An ...

...Order 27/08/2018 S.B. Civ.cros.obj.miscapp No. 92/2011 The cross-objections is reported barred by 11 days. (2 of 2) [CCOMA-92/2011] An application under ...filing the cross-objections. For the reasons indicated in the application, supported by affidavit, the same is allowed. The delay of...legal representatives of respondent No.4 is dispensed with. Office to proceed. S.B. Civ.cros.obj.miscapp No. 74/2011 The cross-objections is reported barred by 11 days. An ...

...Order 27/08/2018 S.B. Civ.cros.obj.miscapp No. 92/2011 The cross-objections is reported barred by 11 days. (2 of 2) [CCOMA-92/2011] An application under ...filing the cross-objections. For the reasons indicated in the application, supported by affidavit, the same is allowed. The delay of...legal representatives of respondent No.4 is dispensed with. Office to proceed. S.B. Civ.cros.obj.miscapp No. 74/2011 The cross-objections is reported barred by 11 days. An ...

...waives service of rule on behalf of respondents. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 151 days in filing cross objections. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. ...in filing cross objections has remained totally unexplained. Therefore, we are of the view that the delay caused...in filing cross objections deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule is made absolute...

...AGP waives service of rule on behalf of respondents. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 151 days in filing cross objections. Heard learned counsel for the parties. ...in filing cross objections has remained totally unexplained. Therefore, we are of the view that the delay caused...in filing cross objections deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule is made absolute...

.... Rule. Learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of respondents. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 151 days in filing cross objections. Heard learned counsel for the ...in filing cross objections has remained totally unexplained. Therefore, we are of the view that the delay caused...in filing cross objections deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule is...

.... DESAI) 1. Rule. Learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of respondents. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 151 days in filing cross objections. Heard learned counse...in filing cross objections has remained totally unexplained. Therefore, we are of the view that the delay caused...in filing cross objections deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned...

...their cross-objections are allowed, I deem it fit to condone the delay of 553 days caused in preferring aforesaid cross-objections. 3. Hence, delay of 553 days caused in...cross-objections as aforesaid. Mr. Nishit A. Bhalodi, learned advocate for the applicants submitted that the applicants are ready to forego the interest for 553 days, if at all their cross objections are...Company, aforesaid cross-objections filed by the original claimants are required to be examined along with the appeal preferred by the Insurance Company. Therefore, considering...

...in filing the Cross Objections has remained totally unexplained. Therefore, we are of the view that the delay caused in filing Cross Objections deserves to be condoned. Accordingly,.... Learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. By way of the present application, the applicant has prayed to condone delay of 243 days caused in filing Cross... Objections. 3. We have heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties. Considering the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the delay caused...

...to be dismissed accordingly the same stands dismissed. 2. MFA Cross objections is filed by the claimants in MFA 20305 of 2009. There is a delay of 1786 days in preferring the Cross...objections. IA.I of 2015 is filed seeking condonation of delay. I have gone through the reasons assigned in the application for delay in filing the cross objections. The reasons assigned are not to the sat...IA.I of 2015 is dismissed. Consequently, MFA Cross Objections is also dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE ...

...received. On 19-11-2002, the appellants filed cross-objections before the High Court under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC, along with an application for condonation of delay of 404 days in filing the cross...indefeasible divestment of right of the cross-objector in case of a delay and his rights to file cross-objections are protected even at a belated stage by the discretion vested in the courts. But at the same...Act, 1963, along with the cross-objections, praying for condonation of delay and leave of that Court to file their cross-objections beyond the statutory period of one month as provided in Order 41 Rule 22 ...

... 1. Application has been filed seeking extension of time to file cross objections to the appeal filed by the Insurance Company. Non-applicant -Insurance Company has no serious objection for entertaining...condoned. Cross objections be numbered accordingly. 2. The question of law arising out in the appeal for...authority. 6. The counsel for the respondents-claimants has also filed cross objections which has been admitted. It is the pleading that the finding of the Assistant...

...S.S. Garg, Member (Judicial):— The applicant has filed miscellaneous applications seeking condonation of delay of 314 days in filing the cross-objections. The applicant has further stated...appellant contacted their lawyer at Bangalore who advised the applicant to file the cross-objections and thereafter, the cross-objections have been filed and in the process, a delay of 314 days was caused...in filing the cross-objections, we are of the view that the delay was caused on account of the reasons given in the affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, we condone the delay in...

...ORDER This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 143 days caused in filing the Cross Objections. Considering the averments made in the application and in view of the dec... filing the Cross Objections. Hence, the application is allowed and the delay caused...in filing the Cross Objections is hereby condoned. Sd/- (GITA GOPI, J) CAROLINE Page 1 of 1 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 25 10:57:28 IST 2023 ...

...referred to as the Act). The assessee has filed cross objections (CO) against the aforesaid order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 2. The appeal of Revenue is time barred by 122 days. The Revenu...appeal by the Revenue is dismissed. Co No. 57/PUN/2018 7. The assessee has filed cross objections in the appeal filed by the Revenue. The cross objections has been filed with the delay...7 days. The assessee has filed an affidavit citing reasons for delay in filing of cross objections. After examining the same, we are satisfied that the assessee has been able to show reasonable cause for delay in...

...referred to as the Act). The assessee has filed cross objections (CO) against the aforesaid order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 2. The appeal of Revenue is time barred by 122 days. The Revenu...appeal by the Revenue is dismissed. Co No. 57/PUN/2018 7. The assessee has filed cross objections in the appeal filed by the Revenue. The cross objections has been filed with the delay...7 days. The assessee has filed an affidavit citing reasons for delay in filing of cross objections. After examining the same, we are satisfied that the assessee has been able to show reasonable cause for delay in...

...1stappellate court has set aside that decree. Therefore, if cross-objections filed by present appellant (original plaintiff) are gone unheard, a grave prejudice would be caused to him. It is, therefore, in the ...); hear the parties on cross-objections if delay is condoned and decide the appeal afresh in larger interest of justice. 3. In the result, impugned judgment and order is set aside. Matter... 2 cross-objection filed by present appeal which was supported by an application for condonation of delay (exhibit 10). However, the 1...

...petitioners had entered appearance in the appeal and sought to file cross objections under Order XLI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'CPC', for brevity), but...60 days in filing the same. The application to condone the delay was filed along with the cross objections. The court below had opined that no reasons are assigned to condone the delay and.... From a reading of the provision, though 30 days is the time prescribed to file any such cross objections, this provision itself indicates that the appellate court may allow the cross objections to be filed eve...

...travelling was not having valid permit and the said auto rickshaw was also overloaded and carrying persons which is against the permitted seating capacity. In these cross objections, notice were served on the respondents and in spit..., applications in I.A.No.1/2014 are filed in both cross objections, seeking condonation of the same and permit them to prosecute these cross objections before this Court. 4. Heard the learned cou...the compensation awarded by the tribunal is meager and then immediately they filed these cross objections. In that process, there was some delay in filing the above cross objections. 5. ...