Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal9783
+ National Company Law Tribunal4668
+ Bombay High Court3616
+ Delhi High Court3471
+ Madras High Court3005
+ SEBI2824
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal2331
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2024
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission2015
+ Kerala High Court1893
+ Calcutta High Court1627
+ CESTAT1602
+ Gujarat High Court1491
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1481
+ Karnataka High Court1431
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1083
+ Supreme Court Of India1054
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1001
+ Allahabad High Court838
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission769
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court743
+ Patna High Court674
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court566
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal518
+ Rajasthan High Court478
+ Telangana High Court465
+ Company Law Board400
+ Gauhati High Court345
+ Jharkhand High Court315
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court283
+ Orissa High Court270
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal265
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act225
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity219
+ Central Administrative Tribunal202
+ National Green Tribunal136
+ RERA130
+ Privy Council127
+ Chhattisgarh High Court123
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court111
+ Uttarakhand High Court100
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction95
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange92
+ Competition Commission Of India74
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST72
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal64
+ Central Information Commission59
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal49
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India40
+ Tripura High Court34
+ Authority For Advance Rulings32
+ Settlement Commission27
+ Meghalaya High Court23
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India20
+ Sikkim High Court12
+ Manipur High Court9
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST8
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board6
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority5
+ Commissioner (Appeals)4
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property3
+ Board of Revenue3
+ District Court3
+ Armed Forces Tribunal2
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board2
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property1
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission1
+ Trade Marks Registry1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards20185
From 2011 To 202021971
From 2001 To 20104535
From 1991 To 20001680
From 1981 To 19901000
From 1971 To 1980696
From 1961 To 1970602
From 1951 To 1960342
Before 1950496

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...reported in (2018) 14 SCC 202 wherein, the earlier Judgement of the Supreme Court regarding the criminal liability of Directors of the company under Section 141 ...Court order dated 07.08.2019 in ] Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records and quash the complaint in 1/6... This petition has been filed by the Non-Executive Directors of the company. The petitioners alleged that the subject cheque was not given with their knowledge or consent. The...

...of the public analyst was not final and that the same could be challenged under Section 13(2) of the said Act. Ground 6 deals with the criminal liability of the Directors of the Company o...(4) What is the liability of the Directors of a company which is said to have committed defaults within the meaning of Section 17 of the 1954 Act, in...(2) of the 1954 Act.18. On the question of the liability of the Directors of the appellant Company on account of the alleged violation of the provi...

...under the IBC may result in extinguishment of the actual debt by restructuring or through the process of liquidation. But such extinguishment will not absolve its directors from the criminal liability. Sec...: (i) Section 138 NI Act proceedings are not recovery proceedings. (ii) The Directors of the Company remains liable under Section 138 of the NI Act, even...company gets dissolved, the directors and the other accused cannot escape from their liability by citing its dissolution. What is dissolved is only the company, not the personal penal liability of the...

...(2012) 5 SCC 661, the Honble Supreme Court has held that liability of the company and the Directors requires to be considered with reference to the company and the nature of its entity and applica...on the Directors of the company. It was held that a company being a juristic person, criminal liability can be fastened on it. If a company is not.... 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a settled position of law that when a criminal action is sought to be taken against the Directors of a company, the same...

...would be personally liable. The second judgment in Parthasarathi Sinha's case (supra) concerned continuation of malfeasance proceedings initiated against Directors of a company against the legal heirs on the death ...Directors who were charged for acting pursuant to a criminal conspiracy.23. In the plaint there are no averments of malfeasance or misfeasance. None have been proved. It is not the case pleaded that the ...and Paisa Sixty Three only).19. This takes us to the issue of liability of the Directors and perhaps issue No. 3: whether the suit is bad for misjoinder of parties.20. A...

...which appellant, Venkataraman in Criminal Appeal No. 2344 of 2011 and appellant, Mani Prasad in Criminal Appeal No. 2343 of 2011 were Directors and appellant, Chandrasekhran in Criminal Appeal No....Directors and Promoter in the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate Changanasserry and the same was forwarded to the police for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and t...deceive the complainant and committed the offences as alleged.5. The Company and its Directors filed petitions under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Criminal MC No. 220 to 222 ...

...the IBC may result in extinguishment of the actual debt by restructuring or through the process of liquidation. But such extinguishment will not absolve its directors from the criminal liability. Section 1...statutory notice. The only question before the criminal court is whether the cheque issued by the accused towards the discharge of his liability was dishonoured and despite the service of demand notice...Magistrate taking cognizance upon the complaint and during the pendency, the company gets dissolved, the signatories/directors cannot escape from their penal liability under Section 138 of the NI Act by...

...held liable. Thus, a reading of the relevant provisions including the definition of the “Officer who is in default” as given in Section 5 would make it amply clear that the criminal liability of ordinary ...acts of the Company above mentioned would not arise. Admittedly, the petitioners herein are the mere Directors of the Company and as such criminal liability cannot be fastened to the petitioners in...sought to be quashed as contended by learned Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. V.S Raju is that the petitioners are merely the Directors of the Company which has been shown as A-1 and that in view of the...

...Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act). This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (‘CrPC’) also raises questions concerning the ....).” (emphasis supplied)16.1 Although the Supreme Court has termed the liability of a Director, where the company is the accused, as being “vicarious”, the classical understanding of the concept of v...an accused, such a deemed criminal liability can attach, to the directors was first addressed in the judgment of a Bench of the three Judges of Supreme Court in...

...of the aforesaid decisions are as follows: "12. …..The section 78 specifically deal with offence by companies and the criminal liability is fastened on t...liability of the Directors to pay the sales-tax dues of the Company nor does it empower the authorities to proceed against the personal properties of the Directors. The very f...of the Directors without providing for any personal liability of the Directors of their personal...

...Section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, there is no provision in the Sales-tax Act fastening the liability of t...the Directors who were in charge of and were responsible for the conduct of the business of the Company, but does not at all provide for any personal liability of the Directors to pay the...on the ground that the Company and its Directors being separate legal entities, the liability of the Company to pay sales-tax cannot be fastened on the Directors personally or on the personal...

...liability, there is no presumption that every Director knows about the transaction.(ii) Section 141 does not make all the Directors liable for the offence. The criminal ...as there is no deemed liability of a Director in such cases.”16. Every company is required to keep at its registered office a register of its Directors...indicate that criminal liability of a Director must be determined on the date the offence is alleged to have been committed.18. On 2-3-2004, the appellant sent a letter of...

...in the complaint so as to make the accused vicariously liable. For fastening the criminal liability, there is no presumption that every Director knows about the transaction.(ii) Section 141 does...necessary averments ought to be contained in a complaint before a person can be subjected to criminal process. A liability under Section 141 of the Act is sought to be fastened vicariously on a person...P. Sathasivam, J.— Leave granted in all the above special leave petitions. The appeals arising out of SLPs (Criminal) Nos. 445-61 of 2008 have been filed by the appellant...

...accused in a 138 complaint only by virtue of the fact that the criminal liability of the Directors and the Officials of the Company is vicarious in nature. Therefore, no action can be brought agai...Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed by the learned Fast Track Court-III, Metropolitan...Company, the penal liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, cannot be avoided and it is an independent action irrespective of the fact where the company...

...F.I.R. against respondent-company, its directors and guarantor in respect of their criminal liability for offence under Sections 403, 406, 417, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 120B, 109 read with Section...not to proceed against the respondent-company and its directors in the aforesaid 3 criminal complaints of 2007. There was no admission, muchless judicial admission of petitioner, within the meaning of...directors. The petitioner chose to deliberately suppress this fact of filing criminal complaints and subsequently settlement before learned court in the said proceedings. Entering into MOU dated...

...specifically deal with offence by companies and the criminal liability is fastened on the Directors who were in charge of and were responsible for the conduct of the business of the Company, but d...all provide for any personal liability of the Directors to pay the sales-tax dues of the Company nor does it empower the authorities to proceed against the personal properties of the Directors. Th...advocate for the petitioner that this Hon'ble Court in various judgments have held that the liability of a company cannot be fastened on its directors in the matter of payment of sales tax dues and...

...to make specific averments as are required under the law in the complaint so as to make the accused vicariously liable. For fastening the criminal liability, there is no presumption that every Director knows about the transaction....High Court framed Criminal Revision No. 4099 of 2011 two questions as under:“(i) Whether the Directors can be prosecuted on the bald assertion made in the complaint...company and the respondents therein and some others were the Directors/persons responsible for carrying on the business of the company and their liability shall be joint and several. The respondents...

...Act, 1961, there is no provision in the Sales-tax Act fastening the liability of the Company to pay its sales-tax dues on its Directors. 12. Reliance placed by the le...the Directors who were in charge of and were responsible for the conduct of the business of the Company, but does not at all provide for any personal liability of the ...6 of 8 liability of Company on its Directors in the matter of payment of sales-tax dues. There appears to be substance in the...

...in part. Unlike Section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, there is no provision in the Sales-tax Act fastening the liability of the Company to pay its sales-tax dues on its Directors. ...fastened on the Directors who were in charge of and were responsible for the conduct of the business of the Company, but does not at all provide for any personal liability of the ...the Directors without providing for any personal liability of the Directors or their personal properties for payment of sales-tax dues of the Company in question, the provisions of...

... Visakhapatnam for invoking criminal liability against the petitioner/accused and other Directors. 4. The apprehension of the petitioner/accu...E R:- This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'the BNSS') has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/accused to...Labour issued notice to the petitioner/accused, one of the Directors of the said firm vide Notice No.B/1398/2024, dated 20.07.2024 directing the petitioner/accused and other Directors to submit...