.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner has two grievances: (i) counting of adhoc JBT service for the purpose of increments and pension; (ii...) the adhoc service followed by regular service in the post of Language Teacher for the purpose of increments and pension. As far as counting of... purpose of pension and not for the purpose of increments. As far as adhoc service followed by regular service as Language Teacher is concerned, the said adhoc...

...claims proficiency step up on completion of 24 years of service and counting of adhoc service for the purposes of calculation of pension. Both these claims were not subject matter of the decree, the...of the decree dated 13.8.1997 stands fully satisfied.The plaintiff-decree holder filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the defendants are liable to release the payment of...:-“It is hereby ordered that the suit of the plaintiff is decreed to this extent that the plaintiff is entitled to that such salary dues, increments, seniority and other service benefits...

...other retiral benefits and even adhoc service in terms of Paras Ram's case (supra) followed by regular service in the same post has to be counted for the purpose of increments and in turn for pension...adhoc service, exclusion of service “on contract basis” will be discriminatory. Appointment on contract basis is a type of adhoc service. Mere fact that nominal breaks are given or lesser pay is given or increments are not given, is no ground to treat the said service differently. Beneficial provision for pension having...regularization in a pensionable establishment, will be entitled to be treated at par with adhoc employees in such establishment, for counting their qualifying service for pension.”15. Adverting...

...SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)The petitioner seeks a direction for counting of her adhoc service towards the ‘qualifying service’ for the purpose of pension and other retiral dues...is allowed in terms of decision of this Court in Harjit Singh's (supra), with a direction to the respondents to count the adhoc service rendered by the petitioner towards ‘qualifying service’ for the.... It is averred that the petitioner joined as S.S Mistress initially on adhoc post on 12.01.1982 and her services were thereafter on regularized on 01.04.1985 The petitioner retired from service w.e.f...

..., C.J. (Oral) The State has come up in appeal aggrieved by the judgment dated 7.7.2009, passed in CWP(T) No. 2599 of 2008. The issue pertains to the counting of adhoc/tenure/contract service rendered by an employee prior to his regular appointment for the purpose of increment and pension. Learned...rendered by the employee followed by regular appointment shall count for the purpose of increment and pension but not contract service. The writ petitioner is a tenure appointee. Therefore, on facts, the...case does not call for any interference. However, the observation that the contract service followed by regular service also will count for the purpose of increment and pension cannot be sustained, in...

...permitted to make a representation to the University (Management) for counting her previous service for the purpose of pension etc.In view of this factual and legal position, both the petitions are dismissed with liberty to the workman to make a representation to the Management for counting her adhoc previous service for the purpose of pension etc....coming to the conclusion that the termination of the services of the workman was illegal, he was ordered to be reinstated with full back wages and continuity of service.CWP No. 11304 of...2009 has been filed by the workman seeking direction to the respondent to regularize her services as she has already completed more than 12 ½ years of service.During the course of hearing...

...application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail by this Court. Relevant portion of the...is filed by the petitioner for a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents for payment of post retiral dues and pension counting the adhoc services. The... are entitled for counting of services rendered by them as ad-hoc employees for pensionary purposes. In view of above, all the impugned orders are set aside...

...2022, wherein issue relating to interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt...counting his adhoc services. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Medical Officer on adhoc basis on 18.6.1988 and his services were regularized on 16.3.2005. The petitioner has...entitled for counting of services rendered by them as ad-hoc employees for pensionary purposes. In view of above, all the impugned orders are set aside...

...interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail by this Court. Relevant...petition is filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 16.01.2023, whereby the respondents have denied the service benefits for the purpose of pension, Gratuity, ACP and promotional pay scale.... The impugned order was passed on the ground that Ordinance issued under U.P. Qualifying Services for Pension and Validation Act, 2021 which later resulted in Act No.1 of 2021 and it excludes...

...Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail by this Court. Relevant portion of the said judgment reads.... Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 31.01.2023, whereby the respondents have denied the service benefits for the purpose of pension, Gratuity, ACP and...promotional pay scale. The impugned order was passed on the ground that Ordinance issued under U.P. Qualifying Services for Pension and Validation Act, 2021 which later resulted in Act No.1 of 2021...

...Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail by this Court. Relevant portion of the said judgment reads...the petitioner challenging the orders dated 12.03.2021 whereby the respondents have denied the service benefits for the purpose of pension, Gratuity, ACP and promotional pay scale. The impugned order...was passed on the ground that Ordinance issued under U.P. Qualifying Services for Pension and Validation Act, 2021 which later resulted in Act No.1 of 2021 and it excludes services rendered on non...

...17.2.2023 passed in a bunch of writ petitions, leading one is Writ-A No.8968 of 2022, wherein issue relating to interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees...filed by the petitioner whereby the petitioner has prayed for mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of pensionary benefits by counting his adhoc services prior to his regularization...Court in case of Prem Singh (supra), thus, there can be no dispute that all the petitioners are are entitled for counting of services rendered by them as ad-hoc employees for pensionary purposes...

...of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail by this Court. Relevant portion of the said judgment reads...purposes of qualifying service for retirement benefit. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Investigator Cum Compute on adhoc basis on 29.04.1991 and his services were regularized...by the petitioner for a mandamus commanding the respondents to pay all the post retiral benefits of petitioner after counting his entire services including his ad hoc/temporary services for the...

....8968 of 2022, wherein issue relating to interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has...for counting of services rendered by them as ad-hoc employees for pensionary purposes. In view of above, all the impugned orders are set aside...Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Ayush Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anupama Bhadauria,Rakesh Singh,Vinod Kumar Shukla...

..., wherein issue relating to interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in...can be no dispute that all the petitioners are are entitled for counting of services rendered by them as ad-hoc employees for pensionary purposes. In view of...Of U.P. Thru. Appar Chief Secy. Ayush U.P. Civil Secrett. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent...

...2022, wherein issue relating to interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt...), thus, there can be no dispute that all the petitioners are are entitled for counting of services rendered by them as ad-hoc employees for pensionary purposes. In...:- State Of U.P. Thru. Appar Chief Secy. Ayush Anubhag-1 Civil Sectt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui Counsel for...

...issue relating to interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail...the petitioner for a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay pension and post retiral benefits to the petitioner by counting his entire service. The...of Prem Singh (supra), thus, there can be no dispute that they are entitled for pension by counting in services rendered by them as non- regular employees...

...interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail by this Court. Relevant...writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 28.8.2021, whereby claim of the petitioner for service benefits for the purpose of pension is rejected by the respondents...hit by the judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Prem Singh (supra), thus, there can be no dispute that all the petitioners are are entitled for counting of services rendered by...

...2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail by this Court. Relevant portion of the said judgment reads...by the petitioner challenging the order dated 17.03.2020 whereby the respondents have denied the service benefits for the purpose of pension, Gratuity, ACP and promotional pay scale on the ground...entitled for counting of services rendered by them as ad-hoc employees for pensionary purposes. In view of above, all the impugned orders are set aside...

...on record to justify this delay. It is undisputed that petitioner has been receiving his pension since the date of his retirement. Present is not a case of denial of pension due to non counting of adhoc service prior to regularisation for purposes...Lisa Gill, J.:— Petitioner is aggrieved of the action of the respondents in not counting his adhoc service for the period 21.08.1968 to 25.02.1970 as qualifying service for the purpose of...relying on various judgments submits that approved adhoc period of service from 21.08.1968 to 25.02.1970 should be included in the period of qualifying service for the purpose of pension/pensionary...