Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Administrative Tribunal
5487
Himachal Pradesh High Court
2596
Madras High Court
2376
Punjab & Haryana High Court
1888
Bombay High Court
1198
Gujarat High Court
1145
Madhya Pradesh High Court
1100
Allahabad High Court
901
Kerala High Court
763
Rajasthan High Court
594
Patna High Court
549
Delhi High Court
454
Gauhati High Court
360
Jharkhand High Court
360
Andhra Pradesh High Court
320
Karnataka High Court
295
Uttarakhand High Court
284
Telangana High Court
243
Orissa High Court
234
Tripura High Court
228
Central Information Commission
179
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
176
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
167
Supreme Court Of India
164
Chhattisgarh High Court
162
Calcutta High Court
148
Armed Forces Tribunal
116
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
104
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
84
Meghalaya High Court
56
Manipur High Court
50
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
23
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
15
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
9
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
8
National Green Tribunal
5
CESTAT
4
National Company Law Tribunal
4
Sikkim High Court
4
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
3
Competition Appellate Tribunal
2
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
1
District Court
1
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
1
Privy Council
1
SEBI
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
0
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Authority For Advance Rulings
0
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
0
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Company Law Board
0
Competition Commission Of India
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
0
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
0
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
RERA
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Right to Information
0
Securities Appellate Tribunal
0
Settlement Commission
0
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
0
Trade Marks Registry
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
12453
From 2011 To 2020
8025
From 2001 To 2010
1062
From 1991 To 2000
218
From 1981 To 1990
73
From 1971 To 1980
32
From 1961 To 1970
17
From 1951 To 1960
1
Before 1950
0

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...adhoc service, exclusion of service “on contract basis” will be discriminatory. Appointment on contract basis is a type of adhoc service. Mere fact that nominal breaks are given or lesser pay is given or increments are not given, is no ground to treat the said service differently. Beneficial provision for pension having...regularization in a pensionable establishment, will be entitled to be treated at par with adhoc employees in such establishment, for counting their qualifying service for pension.”15. Adverting...carefully.5. Rule 17 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 reads as under:17. Counting of service on contract—“(1) A person who is...


Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date: Dec 26, 2019 Cited By: 750 Coram: 2
2
BHAGAT RAM v. STATE
Un Reportable

.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner has two grievances: (i) counting of adhoc JBT service for the purpose of increments and pension; (ii...) the adhoc service followed by regular service in the post of Language Teacher for the purpose of increments and pension. As far as counting of... purpose of pension and not for the purpose of increments. As far as adhoc service followed by regular service as Language Teacher is concerned, the said adhoc...


Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date: Aug 19, 2011 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
3

...claims proficiency step up on completion of 24 years of service and counting of adhoc service for the purposes of calculation of pension. Both these claims were not subject matter of the decree, the...account of leave encashment and Rs. 80,352/- on account of gratuity, were paid to the decree holder. Besides, the provisional pension @ Rs. 3486/- has also been paid.The decree holder...proficiency step up; adhoc service or any other relief in appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law.(HEMANT GUPTA)JUDGE30-07-2009ds...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Jul 30, 2009 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
4

...SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)The petitioner seeks a direction for counting of her adhoc service towards the ‘qualifying service’ for the purpose of pension and other retiral dues.... It is averred that the petitioner joined as S.S Mistress initially on adhoc post on 12.01.1982 and her services were thereafter on regularized on 01.04.1985 The petitioner retired from service w.e.f...3101.2006The petitioner urges that the adhoc service rendered by her followed by regularization i.e from 12.09.1982 to 31.03.1985 deserve to be counted towards the ‘qualifying service’ as...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Sep 13, 2011 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
5

...of counting of only 50% of the adhoc service for pension, cannot be sustained and the balance 50% of the adhoc service would also be liable to be counted for the purpose of pension in accordance with..., restricting the benefit to counting of only 50% of the adhoc service is wrongful.4. As far as the first aspect is concerned, as explained in the counter affidavit and one may say as it is...past should be counted towards fixation of pay even though it was in the capacity of Stenographers while they were appointed as L.D.Cii) For the purpose of computation of pension...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Mar 12, 2014 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
6

...on record to justify this delay. It is undisputed that petitioner has been receiving his pension since the date of his retirement. Present is not a case of denial of pension due to non counting of adhoc service prior to regularisation for purposes...Lisa Gill, J.:— Petitioner is aggrieved of the action of the respondents in not counting his adhoc service for the period 21.08.1968 to 25.02.1970 as qualifying service for the purpose of...relying on various judgments submits that approved adhoc period of service from 21.08.1968 to 25.02.1970 should be included in the period of qualifying service for the purpose of pension/pensionary...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Jan 8, 2016 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
7

...additional increment in the running scale on completion of 10/20 years or 8/18 years of service?3. Whether ad hoc/work charged service, followed by regular service, is to be counted for the purpose of pension and seniority?The issue of counting adhoc/work...charged service, followed by regular service, for the purpose of pension and seniority was also incidentally under...the adhoc/work charge service followed by regular service has to be counted for the purpose of seniority and pension also, but has held that the same cannot be counted for grant of higher pay scale...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Jan 22, 2010 Cited By: 2 Coram: 1
8

...benefit, the adhoc service followed by regular appointment without any break can be counted towards pay-fixation on regular appointment. 5. Similarly, the question re: counting of adhoc service towards "qualifying service" for the purpose of pension is...adhoc service towards pay fixation, no impediment either caused under the Rules or an Executive Policy has been pointed-out. Unless there is an embargo created by way of policy or rule for denying such...have to be restricted qua the pay fixation only? In some of the cases, the benefit of adhoc service is claimed towards pension and other retiral benefits also. 2. So far as the claim...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Oct 27, 2016 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
9
STATE v. UMA DUTT
Un Reportable

..., C.J. (Oral) The State has come up in appeal aggrieved by the judgment dated 7.7.2009, passed in CWP(T) No. 2599 of 2008. The issue pertains to the counting of adhoc/tenure/contract service rendered by an employee prior to his regular appointment for the purpose of increment and pension. Learned..., titled Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. and another, wherein it has been held that adhoc/tenure service...rendered by the employee followed by regular appointment shall count for the purpose of increment and pension but not contract service. The writ petitioner is a tenure appointee. Therefore, on facts, the...


Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date: Apr 28, 2011 Cited By: 1 Coram: 2
10

...continuous and uninterrupted adhoc service rendered by him from 08.02.1985 till substantive appointment-regularization on 30.11.1996 and thereafter till superannuation on 30.04.2018 deserves to be counted as qualifying service for the purposes of retiral benefits, like Pension, Gratuity etc; and the second claim of the petitioner for counting the...service counts for increments. Further, any service which counts for increments, in a time scale, is liable to be reckoned as qualifying service for H ig C ou rt of H 15 pension and gratuity in terms of Rules 13 and 14 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. MANDATE OF LAW ENTITLING COUNTING OF CONTINUOUS ADHOC SERVICE...Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. & others, mandated for counting of adhoc service followed by regular service for purpose of increments and pension but by disentitling a government servant...


Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date: Nov 22, 2025 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
11

...Surya Kant, J. (Oral)The petitioners seek a direction for counting of their adhoc service rendered before regular appointment, towards the ‘qualifying service’ for the purpose of retiral benefits including pension. They...writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for counting of their adhoc service towards ‘qualifying service’ for the purpose of pensionary benefits in the...seek a further direction to re-fix their pension as all of them have already retired from service and grant the consequential arrears of the retiral...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Feb 29, 2012 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
12

...Jaswant Singh, J.(Oral)Petitioners pray for counting of their adhoc service towards qualifying service for the purpose of retiral benefits including pension.Some...benefit of adhoc service to their employees appointed on adhoc basis against regular posts followed by their regular appointment, similar relief has been claimed by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the...of the petitioners are still in the service of respondent-Punjab School Education Board whereas the rest of them have retired on various dates in the last 3-4 years. They claim to have been...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Jan 13, 2014 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
13

...fixation of pension and contend that the present claim has been raised after an inordinate delay of nearly 19 years from the date of retirement. f) The respondents further dispute the applicant's claim regarding counting of adhoc service towards qualifying service for 7...T.A. No. 98/2025 7. The applicant, an ex-serviceman, seeks directions for fixation and release of pension, including counting/adjustment of the temporary/adhoc service period rendered prior to regularization, and for release...applicant is entitled to counting/adjustment of the temporary/adhoc service rendered prior to regularization and/or condonation of deficiency, if any...


Court: Central Administrative Tribunal
Date: Feb 2, 2026 Cited By: 0
14

...Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J (Oral):The issue raised in this case pertains to the counting of adhoc service followed by regular appointment for the purpose of increments and pension. This...is entitled only for counting the ad hoc service, followed by regular service for the purpose of increments and pension, there is no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed subject to the above...through the same recruitment process, he is entitled to have seniority also in respect of the period of adhoc service. We are afraid that contention cannot be appreciated. It is not in dispute that...


Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date: Aug 20, 2010 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
15

...issued by this Court. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the record, it transpire that admittedly, the petitioner has rendered adhoc service from 07.04.1983 to 24.03.1988 and as such, his case is squarely covered by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kesar Chand's case (supra). The petitioner seeks counting of his adhoc service for the aforementioned period, towards his pension, gratuity...behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 on 05.04.2025, does not indicate that post service rendered by the petitioner as adhoc service for the aforementioned period has been counted towards revised pension...rendered by the petitioner on adhoc basis towards qualifying service for calculating pension, gratuity and other pensionary benefits. The necessary calculations and disbursements shall be made within a...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Aug 25, 2025 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
16

...20.01.2021 passed by Respondent No. 2 wherein her prayer for counting of continuous adhoc service for grant of pension and pensionary benefit has been rejectedhas filed this OA praying for following...the prayer of the applicant since in terms of Rule 13 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 the service rendered on adhoc basis before regularization shall not be considered as holding substantive post. It is...submitted that grievance of the applicant for counting the period of service from 21.11.1986 to 10.02.1991 is hit by limitation since she did not claim the same when she took 1st ACP which...


Court: Central Administrative Tribunal
Date: Oct 9, 2024 Cited By: 0
17

...application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to adhoc employees has been dealt with in detail by this Court. Relevant portion of the...is filed by the petitioner for a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents for payment of post retiral dues and pension counting the adhoc services. The...petitioner was appointed on the post of Pharmacist on adhoc basis on 20.03.1991 and his services were regularized on 25.08.2008. The petitioner has retired on 30.11.2020. Similar controversy has already been...


Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: Feb 23, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
18

...Bench of the Tribunal in Kolkata in O.A. No.351/00148/2011 decided on 15.02.2018, wherein similar prayer to treat adhoc service as regular service was made and also for counting adhoc service for the purpose of ACP + Pension. Also...redundant as per para 5 of the MACP Scheme. 2 . Prayer of the applicant is for treating adhoc service as regular service and count it for...service on September 2016, but seeks regularization of adhoc service w.e.f. 15.3.980 after 38 years. The O.A. is also hit by delay. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused written submission...


Court: Central Administrative Tribunal
Date: May 2, 2019 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
19

...Bench of the Tribunal in Kolkata in O.A. No.351/00148/2011 decided on 15.02.2018, wherein similar prayer to treat adhoc service as regular service was made and also for counting adhoc service for the purpose of ACP + Pension. Also...redundant as per para 5 of the MACP Scheme. 2 . Prayer of the applicant is for treating adhoc service as regular service and count it for...service on September 2016, but seeks regularization of adhoc service w.e.f. 15.3.980 after 38 years. The O.A. is also hit by delay. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused written submission...


Court: Central Administrative Tribunal
Date: May 2, 2019 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
20

...Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J (Oral):The issue raised in this case pertains to the counting of adhoc/tenure service followed by regular appointment for the purpose of increments and pension. This...under law is entitled only for counting the ad hoc service, followed by regular service for the purpose of increments and pension, there is no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed subject to the...recruited through the same recruitment process, he is entitled to have seniority also in respect of the period of adhoc service. We are afraid that contention cannot be appreciated. It is not in dispute...


Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date: Aug 26, 2010 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).