Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madras High Court8467
+ Bombay High Court4305
+ Karnataka High Court3931
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal3590
+ Kerala High Court3109
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2334
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court2214
+ Telangana High Court2120
+ Gujarat High Court1829
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1645
+ National Green Tribunal1315
+ Allahabad High Court985
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission863
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court843
+ Supreme Court Of India776
+ Patna High Court754
+ Delhi High Court684
+ Central Information Commission554
+ National Company Law Tribunal527
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission510
+ Gauhati High Court421
+ Orissa High Court379
+ Rajasthan High Court261
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal225
+ RERA220
+ CESTAT215
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court215
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court214
+ Calcutta High Court210
+ SEBI195
+ Chhattisgarh High Court166
+ Uttarakhand High Court153
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission142
+ Armed Forces Tribunal136
+ Jharkhand High Court133
+ Central Administrative Tribunal107
+ Tripura High Court98
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal71
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India63
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act62
+ Board of Revenue58
+ Meghalaya High Court48
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST38
+ Privy Council36
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal34
+ Sikkim High Court34
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity31
+ Manipur High Court31
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal30
+ Competition Commission Of India28
+ Company Law Board21
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal14
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal14
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board10
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange6
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board5
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India4
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property3
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction3
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission3
+ District Court2
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ Copyright Board1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards21152
From 2011 To 202015343
From 2001 To 20102940
From 1991 To 20001086
From 1981 To 1990539
From 1971 To 1980471
From 1961 To 1970374
From 1951 To 1960225
Before 1950438

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Patni Ali Shahu, name of his widow - Fatma Karim and other heirs came to be mutated by virtue of aforesaid Entry no. 5369. It appears that, subsequently, consolidation of Survey Numbers in questio... C/SCA/22277/2017 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL...APPLICATION NO. 22277 of 2017 ========================================================== DECEASE ALI SHAHU LEGAL HEIRS OF DAUGHTERS DECEASE BAI HAVU ALI PATNI'S LEGAL...

...of Kalidas Karsanbhai. Upon coming into force of Gujarat Patel Vatan Abolition Act, 1961, the land was forfeited till the period until the same could be re-granted. In the consolidation of survey ...noticed in brief. It related to agricultural land bearing Survey No.34/2 admeasuring 02 Acres 21 Gunthas at Village Kachhav, Taluka Olpad, Surat which land stood in the name of one Rukshmaniben widow...relinquishment of right by the other co-sharer. The Will was executed in favour of the present petitioner who was an agriculturist holding another land bearing Survey No.71/A at Hobla village in the...

...virtue of aforesaid Entry no. 5369. It appears that, subsequently, consolidation of Survey Numbers in question took place and Entry no. 5384 was entered in that regard on 25.08.1990 and was certified on... C/LPA/643/2018 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD... R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 643 of 2018 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22271 of 2017 With...

...of consolidating the fragments in various survey numbers to Block under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (for short ‘Consolidation Act’)....come into force. That there has been consolidation of various fragments under different survey numbers into Block numbers. That the plaintiff's predecessor in title being confirmed with title and...disbelieved the documents relied upon by the plaintiff on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to establish implementation of the Act. Consequently consolidation of lands in survey numbers having...

...of defendant Nos. 1, 5 and 6 were inserted by inheritance entry into the revenue record. It is further the case of the plaintiff that there was consolidation of survey numbers and as per entry No...., survey numbers were consolidated into the block numbers. It is stated that the defendant Nos. 5 and 6 waived their right of share and mutation Entry No. 1048 was effected. It is the say of the...having joint rights of the parties, situated at Village: Vayana, Taluka: Kalol, District: Gandhinagar, numbered as old Survey Nos. 482/2, 42/1, 83, 86, 616, 627, 138/A, 195...

...of conflicting decisions. In some cases, it has been held that consolidation means consolidation of two parcels of land, which can be held as one unit under the Berar Land Revenue Code. As under the rules ...portions of two different survey numbers cannot ordinarily be amalgamated, it has been held that consolidation can only be between two sub-divisions of the same..., consolidation may be between two survey numbers or portions of two different survey numbers.4. The words in sub-s. (2) of s. 184 also are “consolidation in the la...

..., the Appellate Court found that there was evidence coming forward to show that in the process of consolidation proceedings, it is not proved that Bhagwan Balwanta was offered opportunity to give any say in the matter. The defendant...pleaded the shield of limitation. They claimed that in the intervening period, consolidation proceedings were completed, and lands Survey Nos. 133/10, 133/11 and 133/12 are included in land Gat No...where the nature of transaction was subject-matter of adjudication. The objection as to jurisdiction was raised sheerly to defeat the decree that would be passed. When the various survey numbers are...

...to the revenue record, i.e. of old survey numbers of the property as well as the new gat numbers (after a consolidation scheme was brought into effect), though there was a partition between the...partition as well as the consolidation record indicates so. The conclusion in the impugned judgment about already effected partition of the suit property is simply on the footing that original..., accordingly, he was allotted the other land, namely, Gat Nos. 335 and 346 (upon consolidation), i.e. the suit property. Beside the pleading of Defendant No. 1 and his oral statement, there was nothing on record...

.... No. Area A.G. Name 11/1 11-22 Damodar Kalba Wagle 11/2 5-38.5 Lalasaheb Baban Wagle 11/3 6-8.5 Sarjerao Shripati Jagtap 3. During the course of consolidation scheme, the aforesaid three sub-divisions ...December, 1992. It has further been noticed that at the time of the consolidation scheme mutation as to sub-division of Survey No. 11 was recorded vide Mutation Entry No. 3483. The revisional authority has...change in the possession/occupation of the old survey numbers after their conversion into Gat numbers. These are all findings of facts recorded by both the authorities below...

...allotted possession of which property under consolidation scheme and that he is not aware of the original survey numbers of Gat No. 59. The Appellate Court on re-appreciation of evidence ...allotted in pursuance of a scheme Harish 8 of 22 8 of consolidation shall have the ...Gat No. 59/1 upon implementation of the consolidation scheme. The Appellate court rightly noted that if the proper case would have been pleaded by the Plaintiff as regards these two Survey numbers forming Gat No. 5...

...allotted possession of which property under consolidation scheme and that he is not aware of the original survey numbers of Gat No. 59. The Appellate Court on re-appreciation of evidence ...allotted in pursuance of a scheme Harish 8 of 22 8 of consolidation shall have the ...Gat No. 59/1 upon implementation of the consolidation scheme. The Appellate court rightly noted that if the proper case would have been pleaded by the Plaintiff as regards these two Survey numbers forming Gat No. 5...

...allotted possession of which property under consolidation scheme and that he is not aware of the original survey numbers of Gat No. 59. The Appellate Court on re-appreciation of evidence ...allotted in pursuance of a scheme Harish 8 of 22 8 of consolidation shall have the ...Gat No. 59/1 upon implementation of the consolidation scheme. The Appellate court rightly noted that if the proper case would have been pleaded by the Plaintiff as regards these two Survey numbers forming Gat No. 5...

...authorised Surveyor.16. Section 109 of the Act reads as follows:109. Division of survey number into sub-divisions:—Subject to the provisions of any law in force for t...fallen to the share of Rahimkhan under a registered sale deed.4. It is undisputed that the lands had not been mutually phoded and numbers of the sub-division had been allotted after survey...as may be required in view of the lawful acquisition of rights in land or for any other reason;(2) the division of survey numbers into sub-divisions and the fixing of the assessmen...

...07/10/2009, the information has been forwarded that as per mutation entry no.54 dated 01/12/1958 made in the land in question at moje Wadi wadi, Ta.Vadodara, the entry of consolidation of the survey ...acquired from the farmers. Thus, the survey number '54' has been formed after consolidation of the above survey numbers, the Government owned lands are also being included therein. As the City ...development of the land/ properties of the company lying and situated at village Wadi Wadi and Subhanpura for the land bearing survey numbers as per the details given in the said letter of authority...

...allotted under the Act. This Court held that restriction for the transfer contained under section 31 of the consolidation act would not apply when merely survey numbers were converted into the gat number after ...Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (for short, “the Consolidation Act”) was obtained. According to the respondents in pursuance of the said agreement of sale the appellant also handed...and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947, at the relevant time?(V) Whether the lower Appellate Court was right in considering the...

...Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holding Page 2 of 16 Act,1947, the said survey numbers were given...Consolidation of Holding Act,1947 coming into force, the survey numbers of the land were given block Nos.659, 639, 658, 656 Page 8 of 16...of agricultural land bearing original survey Nos.490, 486, 491, 446/1, 446/2 situated in the sim of Village Kudasan, Taluka & District Gandhinagar. In view of implementation of The Bombay...

... 5 gone through the revenue record, which was in existence prior to consolidation of lands. It can be said that the dispute is in respect of ...Criminal Application No.156 of 2012 filed by Respondent No.2, Rohidas Mahadik. It is his contention that he and his brothers owned land Survey No.43/3 from Fattevadgaon, Ashti admeasuring 1 Hectare.... 3 4 It is the contention of the Complainant that in the year 1993, consolidation of lands of village Fattevadgaon took...

.... Then the petitioner is aware that there was a consolidation of the land records for the city of Mumbai as a result of which the old Survey numbers were assigned City Survey ...Government Gazette. Thereafter, the joint measurement was carried out. The land was totally vacant. After ascertaining the position about ownership of these survey numbers, the requisite notices under...1. The Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed on 28 November, 2015, and...

...the directions issued in the said order. 5 The remand was on the basis that it would have to be determined whether on account of post consolidation, survey numbers have...is depicted in the village map prepared prior to the consolidation scheme being implemented. In view of some discrepancy in the said panchanama as regards the dates, the Tehsildar directed re...Revenue Code, 1966. Hence, though the Tehsildar, Ajra by his order dated 2.6.2007 had directed the foot way on the bandh of Survey No.426 to be made available for the use of the applicants, i.e...

...originally, survey no.861/1 of village Lambha, Taluka Vatva, District Ahmedabad i.e. the land in question was owned by the complainant and his ancestors. In the process of consolidation which took place in village ...the said exercise. Thus, in the said consolidation, in place of original survey No.861/1, block No.808 came to be allotted to the father of the complainant. However, by mistake, the name of the..., when the Page 1 of 8 land of the complainant bearing revenue survey no.861/1 (New Block No.808), admeasuring...