CiteTEXT
...perused the judgments rendered by the HP High Court, Shimla and the CAT-Chandigarh Bench. No doubt, the HP High Court, Shimla relying upon the judgment of the Honble Apex Court in the case of State of U.P...judgment which was followed by the CAT-Chandigarh Bench and vide its order dated 18.11.2009 granted the same relief. 2. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the..., Shimla in CWP No.262/2002 and CAT-Chandigarh Bench judgment dated 18.11.2009 rendered in OA No.287/JK/2009 and it is expected from the respondents to consider the same in the light of the direction...
...authority but at that time the judgments of the CAT Chandigarh Bench, CAT Principal Bench, and Punjab & Harayana High Court and the order of the dismissal of the SLP of the Honble Apex Court were...grant pay band and grade pay Rs. 4200 in the hierarchy of promotional post. The applicant has further stated that the CAT-Chandigarh Bench in OA No.1038/CH/2010 vide order dated 31.5.2011 and CAT...the hierarchy posts. Further, the Honble Punjab and Haryana High Court also affirmed the order of the CAT-Chandigarh Bench dated 19.10.2011 and the SLP No. 7467/2013 was dismissed vide order dated...
...candidates, filed applications before CAT seeking the setting aside of the aforesaid order made by the Chandigarh Administration by which it had cancelled the select list prepared by the earlier...by the fresh Selection Board. The Chandigarh Administration, which felt aggrieved by this judgment of CAT has preferred this appeal by special leave.5. In its judgment under...appeal, the CAT has, no doubt, expressed its reactions to the views of the Chandigarh Administration as to the charge of corruption levelled against the members of the earlier Selection Board in the...
.../2013 delivered on 15.12.2015. The ratio regarding the validity of the letter dated 26.05.1977 laid down in the two judgments of CAT, Chandigarh Bench and of Principal Bench of CAT are contrary to each...Tribunal. Learned Counsel submits that the respondents' reliance on the judgment dated 15.12.2015 of the CAT Bench at Chandigarh is not tenable in view of the latter judgment of Principal Bench of CAT...at Chandigarh extensively discussed the issue of the High Courts having upheld the validity of the letter dated 26.05.1977. While arriving at a decision contrary to the judgments of the High Courts...
.../2013 delivered on 15.12.2015. The ratio regarding the validity of the letter dated 26.05.1977 laid down in the two judgments of CAT, Chandigarh Bench and of Principal Bench of CAT are contrary to each...Tribunal. Learned Counsel submits that the respondents' reliance on the judgment dated 15.12.2015 of the CAT Bench at Chandigarh is not tenable in view of the latter judgment of Principal Bench of CAT...at Chandigarh extensively discussed the issue of the High Courts having upheld the validity of the letter dated 26.05.1977. While arriving at a decision contrary to the judgments of the High Courts...
...availability of sanctioned posts for grant of temporary status is not required. iv) Reliance has been placed on the following judgments:- i) CAT-Chandigarh Rattan Chand Vs. UOI & Ors. in OA...21.10.2008 (Annexure A-20). ii) CAT-Chandigarh Man Bahadur & Anr. Vs. UOI & Ors. in OA No.1054/HP/1997, decided on 17.05.2000. iii) CAT-Chandigarh in OA No.172/HP/2010-Lekh Chand, 173/HP/2010-Dharampal and...174/HP/2010-Jagdish Lal, decided on 07.04.2010 by a common order. iv) CAT-Chandigarh in OA No.360/HP/1999 titled Moti Ram Vs. UOI & Ors, decided on 16.05.2000. upheld by the Honble High Court of HP...
...judgments:—i) CAT-Chandigarh Rattan Chand v. UOI in OA No. 822/HP/1998, decided 15.05.2000 (Annexure A-18...).ii) CAT-Chandigarh Man Bahadur v. UOI in OA No. 1054/HP/1997, decided on 17.05.2000.iii) CAT-Chandigarh in OA No. 172/HP/2010-Lekh Chand, 173/HP/2010-Dharampal and 174/HP.../2010-Jagdish Lal, decided on 07.04.2010 by a common order.iv) CAT-Chandigarh in OA No. 360/HP/1999 titled Moti Ram v. UOI, decided on 16.05.2000.upheld by...
...
dated 21.12.2023 in compliance to the above-mentioned judgments passed by the Hon'ble CAT, Chandigarh and upheld by the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana...reasoned and speaking order keeping in view the following judgments:
(i) The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh in O.A. No. 060/00254/2017 decided...
4. Principal Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise, Chandigarh Zone, Plot No. 19, Sector 17-C. Chandigarh. 160017
Email Id: prcommr-chda.gov.in...
...No. 13280-CAT of 2000. By the said order, the High Court confirmed the order recorded by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short “CAT”) in OA No. 171 HR of 2000...herein before CAT, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, inter alia on the ground that as per the circular, the minimum qualification was 8th standard and as he has secured more marks in 8th standard than the...Chandigarh, inter alia, on the grounds that while considering the matter the entire approach of CAT was wholly erroneous in law and not sustainable. According to the appellant, CAT has ignored the latest...
...the Hon'ble CAT Chandigarh Bench and Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court." The promotions have been made as per the recruitment rules and the DoPT's instructions in this regard (Annexures R-2 to R/7...dated 30.09.2014 (Annexure A-1) is in clear violation of the judgment dated 15.07.2011, passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, in case of...(2006) 8 SCC 212. The impugned order is also against the interim order passed by the Chandigarh Bench of
3
this...
...delay in TBP policy issued by BSNL CO. The issue raised in the OA is fully covered and answered in the judgments of the CAT, New Delhi and Chandigarh Bench vide Annexures-R10 & R11 of the...allowances of the applicant. The respondents have cited the cases of OA.No.2180/2014 of CAT, Principal Bench and OA.179/2016 of CAT, Chandigarh Bench with regard to the recovery from pay and allowance on...applied/appeared/qualified in the upgradation exam Annexure-R10: CAT PB New Delhi order dt.6.5.2016 Annexure-R11: CAT, Chandigarh Bench order dt.24.10.2016...
.... Chandigarh and others 2004(3) SLJ (CAT) 54 and Vandana Jain and others versus Union of India and others O.A. No. 33/CH... Kumar v. Chandigarh Administration and Others, 2004 (3) SLJ 229 (CAT) and Sonika Kohli and Others
v. U.T. Chandigarh and Others...termination risks, which have already been held to be unconstitutional in a series of judgments including Vandana Jain v. Union of India, Krishan Kumar v. Chandigarh Administration...
.... The employee then moved the Central Administrative Tribunal (“CAT”) (Chandigarh Bench) by his original applications. CAT directed that the benefit of OM dated 14-7-1995 be extended to the employee...Bombay High Court against a decision of the Full Bench of CAT (Mumbai Bench), and that the decision given by the Bombay High Court would decide the rights and contentions of the parties. The Union of...claims were refused by the Central Government. They filed original applications before CAT (Mumbai Bench). The issue as to the validity of the decision of the Central Government in fixing the cut-off date...
...were heard when learned counsel for the applicant reiterated facts and grounds taken in the O.A. Learned counsel also placed reliance on the judgments dated 25.3.2008 in CWP No.16007-CAT of 2007 titled...Police in Chandigarh Police against the vacancies of 2007 selection that was finalized on 13.6.2011 and vacancy of ESM quota being available due to non-issuance of offer of appointment and cancellation...of candidature of candidate in the main list and the applicant being next in order of merit, the only candidate in the waiting list, and offer the applicant appointment as an ASI in the Chandigarh...
...1936 long prior to the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.7. In Union of India v. Sarup Chand Singla, Chandigarh Bench of this Tribunal Full Bench Judgments (CAT) 1983...India, ATR 1988 (1) CAT 680, Premier Automibiles v. K.S Wadke, AIR (1976) SLWR 9 (SC) and...to come to CAT and it could entertain the matter.Para-9: Tribunal as appellate authority-Question whether Tribunal substitutes a District Judge under Sec. 17 of P.W Act as an...
...order dated 27-11-2002 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (in short “CAT”) in OA No. 124.HK of 2001.4. Background facts in a nutshell which are...legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the appellants' writ petition CWP No. 2965-CAT of 2003. The appellants had questioned correctness of the...5-5-1999 and 14/19-6-2000 before CAT on the ground that no material was available with Appellant 3 which could justify invoking of Rule 19(ii) and he could not have passed the order of dismissal from...
...-Pension Scheme as she had opted for CPF Scheme. She moved the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short “CAT”). CAT held that she was entitled to claim benefit of GPF Scheme...-cum-Pension Scheme. The original application was allowed by CAT on the ground that the appellants did not produce direct evidence to show that Respondent 1 had opted for the Scheme and brushed aside...the secondary evidence produced before it by the appellants to the effect that she had been continuing in the CPF Scheme and that she was allotted CPF account number. CAT further held that Respondent 1...
...judgments of Benches of CAT at a different place wherein relief had been granted to similarly placed officers of the MES cadre. The Tribunal by its judgment dated 6-2-1996 dismissed the original application...the service long before the judgment of the Principal Bench, CAT, dated 13-11-1992. In the judgments of different Benches of CAT copies of which have been placed on record in the case the applicants...(PBSO). They filed original application, OA No. 1935 of 1995 in the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short “CAT”), Principal Bench, Delhi, claiming fixation of their pay on promotion in terms of the...
...Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “CAT”) is one of the Tribunals constituted under Section 4 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) with its...selection of Vice-Chairman and members of CAT. In the case of selection of a judicial member, the Selection Committee is required to be chaired by the nominee of the Chief Justice of India, who shall be a...Personnel; and (iii) Chairman of CAT.3. Seven vacancies of judicial members and three vacancies of administrative members of CAT arose during the period 1-7-2001 to 31-12...
...it was found that the respondents were not suitable for appointment as Constables in Chandigarh Police.4. Aggrieved, the respondents filed OA before CAT. CAT vide order...and also their acquittal could be cancelled by the Screening Committee on the ground that they are not suitable for the post of Constable in Chandigarh Police and whether the court can substitute its...judgment. For convenience, we would deal with the facts in appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 20750 of 2016.2. On 14-3-2010, an advertisement was issued by UT Chandigarh Police...