Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Rajasthan High Court242
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court12
+ CESTAT6
+ Gujarat High Court5
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal3
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2
+ Delhi High Court1
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Karnataka High Court1
+ Kerala High Court1
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority1
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Bombay High Court0
+ Calcutta High Court0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Madras High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Supreme Court Of India0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards249
From 2011 To 202023
From 2001 To 20103
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19902
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

..., TALUKA BYAVAR, DIST. AJMER. (RAJASTHAN). 2 MOHAMMADRASID KHAJIMOHAMMAD FAKIR... NOTICE UNSERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 2,4 ========================================================== This First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the...

..., the requirement of service on respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 is dispensed with and as Mr. Sankhla, learned counsel appears on respondent No.1, no need to issue notice. Heard on stay..., after taking into consideration amount, if any, deposited under Section 140 and/or proviso to Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, the rest of the impugned award...

...consideration, admit. Mr. S.K. Sankhla, learned counsel appears for the claimant Nos.1 and 2. Service on respondent Nos. 3 and 4 is dispensed with. Heard on stay application. In the meanwhile, if the...under Section 140 and/or proviso to Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the rest of the award shall remain stayed. The amount when deposited be disbursed to the...

.... Mr. Sankhla, learned counsel appears for the respondents No. 1 to 4, therefore, issue notice to respondents No.5 & 6 only. Rule is made returnable within a period of...the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, the rest of the impugned award qua the appellant-Insurance Company shall remain stayed. The amount when deposited be disbursed to the claimants in...

...received the invoices without the goods; that no inquiry has been made by the Department at the suppliers end; that they were purchasing HR/CR coils for the manufacture of motor vehicle parts from...the registered dealers; that it is not the case of the Revenue that they have not manufactured motor vehicles parts; that the said parts have been cleared by them on payment of duty. He referred to the...recovery.3. Opposing the prayer, Shri R.C. Sankhla, learned Senior Departmental Representative, reiterated the finding as contained in the impugned order and submitted...

...Appellant-claimant has laid this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, ‘Act of 1988’) seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the learned Motor...Accident Claims Tribunal (First), Jodhpur in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 366/2011.The undisputed facts are that appellant-claimant met with an accident on 02.03.2011 near Bageshwari...the appellant, Mr. Sankhla has argued that the amount of compensation determined by the learned Tribunal is inadequate and not commensurating with the injuries suffered by the appellant, therefore, the...

...Vineet Kothari, J.:— The present appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award dated 13.04.2015 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (First), Jodhpur in MAC...learned Tribunal are quoted below:-3. Learned counsel for the appellant-claimant, Mr. S.K Sankhla submits that in case the deceased was to be treated as owner of the vehicle in question, then...

...: MR SUNIL B PARIKH(582) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR CZ SANKHLA(3243) for the Defendant(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 2...the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 28.02.2020 passed in M.A.C.P. No.1665 of 2010 seeking enhancement of compensation. This appeal...

..., District Jodhpur Owner. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jagdish Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. SK Sankhla Mr. Mragendra Singh for Mr. TRS.... The learned Tribunal shall decide the claim petition in accordance with Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act,1988. Accordingly, the present appeal is allowed. The present order...

... For Appellant(s) : Mr. S.K. Sankhla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Singhi HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI...Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act being aggrieved of the judgment-cum-award dated 25.01.2019 passed by the learned Judge, Industrial Dispute Tribunal, Labour Court-cum-Motor Accident Claims...the learned Judge, Industrial Dispute Tribunal, Labour Court- cum-Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jodhpur, in MAC No.83/2017 is modified accordingly. 6. Any amount, if...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

... 1. Dinesh Sankhla S/o Tejaram, Resident of Raas, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali (Rajasthan) 2. Sohanlal S/o Mishrilal, Resident of Raas, Tehsil Jaitaran, District... 1. Dinesh Sankhla S/o Tejaram, Resident of Raas, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali (Rajasthan) 1 2...about 21 years, Resident of Babra, Tehsil Raipur, District Pali (Rajasthan) ----Appellant Versus 1. Dinesh Sankhla S/o Tejaram, Resident...

... JODHPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 99/1995 1. Dr. Sohan Singh S/o. Shri Kishore Singh Sankhla.... 2. Smt. Suraj Devi widow of Shri Kishore Singh Sankhla. (Dead) (Name deleted) 3. Smt. Mamta W/o. Arun Gehlot D/o. Shri Kishore Singh Sankhla.... 4. Smt. Urmila D/o. Shri Kishore Singh Sankhla (Dead) through her legal heir :- 4/1. Kumari Nisha D/o. Smt. Urmila. All residents of...

..., Rajasthan. 15. Shree Raghupati Stonex Private Limited, Through Its Director Mahendra Singh Sankhla S/o Shri Debi Lal Sankhla, Aged About 57 Years, E-292, Ivth Phase, Riico.... Rajasthan Electricity Regulation Commission, Through Its Chairman Vidhyut Viniyamak Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Near State Motor Garage, Jaipur Rajasthan 302001. 3. Ajmer Vidhyut...

...burnt. The fire was eventually extinguished by a fire brigade from Byavar. An Assistant Engineer (O&M) and a lineman from Ajmer Vidyut Vikas Nigam conducted inspection and submitted their report... (4) of Central Motor Vehicle Rules, the height of the vehicle from the surface on which it rests should not exceed 3.8 meter and in terms of Rule 93(8), the height of the...the accident. The 4 respondent violated both the policy terms and the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. The order...

... For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jagdish Vyas for Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Sankhla for claimant Mr. Aditya Singhi, for.... 1 2. The present appeals arise out of the impugned award dated 17.12.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (First...

... ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vishal Singhal. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Sankhla. HON'BLE...Motor Accident Claims Tribunal First, Jodhpur. 3. A memorandum of settlement as signed by both the counsels for appellant-Insurance Company as well as respondents...

... For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mudit Vaishnav(in CMANo.786/11) Mr. S.K. Sankhla(in CMANo.2067/13) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vasudeo Vyas for Insurance Company.... Both these appeals arise out of the award dated 25.01.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Churu in MAC case No.28/2008. Vide the impugned award, while partly allowing the claim petition...

.... L.K. Purohit for appellants in CMA Nos. 776/2018 & 1050/2018 Mr. S.K. Sankhla for appellants in CMA Nos. 623/2018 & 633/2018... For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Sankhla for claimants in CMA Nos. 776/2018 & 1050/2018 Mr. L.K. Purohit for respondent...dated 20.11.2017 passed by the Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, First, Jodhpur, in Claim Case No. 720/2012 (NCV No. 1930/2014) titled as "Smt. Jethi & Ors. Vs. Ghanshyam Singh...

... For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jagdish Vyas for Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Sankhla for claimant Mr. Aditya Singhi, for.... 1 2. The present appeals arise out of the impugned award dated 17.12.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (First...