Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court102
+ Madras High Court96
+ Delhi High Court87
+ Central Administrative Tribunal86
+ Allahabad High Court83
+ Bombay High Court69
+ Rajasthan High Court55
+ Gujarat High Court52
+ Supreme Court Of India50
+ Patna High Court46
+ Karnataka High Court41
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court39
+ Orissa High Court37
+ Calcutta High Court30
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal25
+ Kerala High Court24
+ Gauhati High Court23
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court23
+ Central Information Commission19
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court19
+ Jharkhand High Court18
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court17
+ Chhattisgarh High Court11
+ Telangana High Court9
+ National Company Law Tribunal6
+ Uttarakhand High Court5
+ Armed Forces Tribunal4
+ Manipur High Court4
+ National Green Tribunal4
+ SEBI4
+ Sikkim High Court4
+ CESTAT3
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity2
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2
+ Tripura High Court2
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act1
+ Company Law Board1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ Meghalaya High Court1
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal1
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards338
From 2011 To 2020416
From 2001 To 2010136
From 1991 To 200060
From 1981 To 199029
From 1971 To 198016
From 1961 To 197014
From 1951 To 19607
Before 19504

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...and valid even today are: (i) rule against bias i.e nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being heard to the party concerned i.e audi alter...without bias and they must give (sic an opportunity) to each of the parties to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing...justice. Since these attributes are treated as natural or fundamental, it is known as “natural justice”. The principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue...

...interfering. In such circumstances, there is clear bias. Nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa is a maxim that was accepted in India also. But .... Nemo Judex in re sua (No man a Judge in his own cause). It is an important part of principle of fair hearing and rule of audi alteram partem (hear the other side) means no man shall be condemned...due to retire on 30-11-2002. In ground A of the original petition it was contended as follows:“It is one of the basic tenets of the principles of Natural Justice viz. Nemo Judex in Cause...

...standard except that it should be a substantial one, giving rise to a real bias, or a reasonable apprehension on the part of the accused of such bias., The maxim “Nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa...

...principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today are: (i) rule against bias, i.e nemo debet esse judex in propria .... It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice. Since these attributes are treated as natural or fundamental, it is known as ‘natural justice’. The...duty is to decide, must act judicially. They must deal with the question referred both without bias and they must give (sic an opportunity) to each of the parties to adequately present the case made...

.... 2008 13 SCC 406.. It is extracted hereinbelow:“D. Administrative Law — Natural justice — Bias/...complaint being entrusted with the task of holding the enquiry. This is impermissible, so contends Sri Parasaran. He read out head note D of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in the case of...(BSNL) are different from the facts of W.P No. 35223-34/2010 (Bharati Airtel). In BSNL case, bias is alleged. Despite admitting that the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the BSNL's earlier case is...

...'. The principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today were: (i) rule against bias, i.e. nemo debet esse judex in ...made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice. Since these attributes are treated as natural or fundamental, it is known as 'natural justice... 4 question referred both without bias and they must given to each of the parties to adequately present the case...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...contentious issues with an unbiased mind. The maxim nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa and the principle “justice should not only be done but should manifestly be seen to...competent to sit over his own earlier order passed as Settlement Officer under the Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. The maxim nemo debet esse judex in propria sua ...evolution in the field of administrative law but the courts performing judicial functions only cannot be excepted from the rule of bias as the Presiding Officers of the court have to hear and decide...

...i.e. nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being heard to the party concerned i.e. audi alteram partem. These are known as principles of natural jus...natural or fundamental, it is known as "natural justice". The principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today are: (i) rule against bias...opportunity) to each of the parties to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice. Since these attributes are treated as...

...developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today were: (i) rule against bias, i.e. nemo debet esse judex in propria ...give (sic an opportunity) to each of the parties to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind..."Audi Alteram Partem" is that there should be no bias and the rule against the bias is expressed in the maxim that "no one must be judged in his own cause", whereas the second broad principle...

...still in vogue and valid even today are: (i) rule against bias i.e. nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being hear...must give (sic an opportunity) to each of the parties to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice...connotation. It is developed with this fundamental in mind that those whose duty is to decide, must act judicially. They must deal with the question referred both without bias and they...

...has been derived from the Latin maxim—nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa. A reasonable permutation of this principle is that no Judge should adjudicate a dispute which he...] partially but whether the circumstances are such as to create a reasonable apprehension in the mind of others that there is a likelihood of bias affecting the decision. If there is a reasonable likelihood...of bias it is ‘in accordance with natural justice and common sense that the [Judge] likely to be so biased should be incapacitated from sitting’. The basic principle underlying this rule is that...

...contentious issues with an unbiased mind. The maxim nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa and the principle “justice should not only be done but should manifestly be seen to...in the field of administrative law but the courts performing judicial functions only cannot be excepted from the rule of bias as the Presiding Officers of the court have to hear and decide...view of the fact that the Chairman, who, undoubtedly, was a Senior Advocate and an ex-Advocate General, had, at one time, represented Prem Chand in some case. These principles have had their evolution...

.... nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being heard to the party concerned i.e. audi alteram partem. These are known as..., it is known as "natural justice". The principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today are : (i) rule against bias i.e...parties to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice. Since these attributes are treated as natural or fundamental...

...esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being heard to the party concerned i.e. audi alteram partem. These are known as principles of natural justice. To these principles a third...fundamental, it is known as “natural justice”. The principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today are : (i) rule against bias i.e. nemo debet...parties to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice. Since these attributes are treated as natural or...

...against bias i.e. nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being heard to the party concerned i.e. audi alteram partem. These .... It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice. Since these attributes are treated as natural or fundamental, it is known as... "natural justice". The principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today are: (i) rule...

...even today are: (i) rule against bias i.e. nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being heard to the party concerned i.e. audi alteram parte...they must give (sic an opportunity) to each of the parties to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice.... Since these attributes are treated as natural or fundamental, it is known as “natural justice”. The principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid...

.... nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being heard to the party concerned i.e. audi alteram partem. These are known as ..., it is known as "natural justice". The principles of natural justice developed over a period of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today are: (i) rule against bias i.e...to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice. Since these attributes are treated as natural or fundamental...

...of time and which is still in vogue and valid even today are: (i) rule against bias i.e. nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (...Central Excise, Gauhati & Ors., reported in (2015) 8 Supreme Court Cases 519, the Supreme Court has held as under: 21.)..The principles of natural justice developed over a period...

...against bias i.e. nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and (ii) opportunity of being heard to the party concerned i.e. audi alteram partem. These are known as pri.... The principles of natural justice have developed over a period of 9time and are still in vogue and valid i.e., (i) rule against bias i.e. nemo debet esse judex in propia sua causa; and ...to adequately present the case made. It is perceived that the practice of aforesaid attributes in mind only would lead to doing justice. Since these attributes are treated as natural or fundamental...