Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court1994
+ Central Information Commission1270
+ Delhi High Court720
+ Central Administrative Tribunal673
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court602
+ Patna High Court526
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal512
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court390
+ Jharkhand High Court379
+ Calcutta High Court279
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission211
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission175
+ SEBI174
+ Supreme Court Of India164
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court155
+ Allahabad High Court152
+ Rajasthan High Court122
+ Gujarat High Court107
+ Karnataka High Court96
+ Madras High Court89
+ CESTAT68
+ National Green Tribunal61
+ Uttarakhand High Court59
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission55
+ Kerala High Court53
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court49
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal47
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal46
+ Chhattisgarh High Court43
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court40
+ National Company Law Tribunal34
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal29
+ RERA28
+ Orissa High Court26
+ Telangana High Court26
+ Gauhati High Court25
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal21
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act19
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal13
+ Armed Forces Tribunal12
+ Company Law Board11
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India9
+ Privy Council7
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity6
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST6
+ Manipur High Court6
+ Tripura High Court6
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board5
+ Board of Revenue3
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission3
+ Competition Commission Of India3
+ Sikkim High Court3
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal2
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India1
+ Meghalaya High Court1
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission1
+ Trade Marks Registry1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards4425
From 2011 To 20203248
From 2001 To 2010498
From 1991 To 2000225
From 1981 To 1990193
From 1971 To 1980143
From 1961 To 1970142
From 1951 To 196044
Before 1950167

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...cross reel hank form and hence liable for duty, as held by the Revenue. On the basis of certain inquiries initiated by the Jurisdictional Central Excise officers in September, 2001, a show cause notice...Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The cotton yarn in plain reel hank form is fully exempt. Central Excise Duty under Notification No. 3/01-C.E., dated 1-03-01 and its predecessor...notifications. The point of dispute is as to whether the cotton yarn manufactured by the appellants was in plain reel hank form and hence fully exempt from duty, as claimed by the Appellants or was in...

...1,000 Metres of yarn in plain (straight) reel.”In the notifications issued under Rule 8(1) either on June 13, 1962, or on September 15, 1962 (Exh. P-2 and P..., 1963, issued in exercise of its powers under Rule 8(1), amended its earlier notification of September 15, 1962, by adding one more Explanation to that notification to the effect that for the purpose of...that notification the term “hank” means “hank” “which does not contain more than 768 Metres of yarn in plain (straight) reel”. It further stated that that notification shall be deemed to have taken...

...reel hank form and hence liable for duty, as held by the Revenue. On the basis of certain inquiries initiated by the Jurisdictional Central Excise officers in September 2001, a show cause notice dated 01...of an employee Shri B.P. Singh there is no other evidence that the yarn manufactured and clearance was cross reel hank yarn. It is well settled law that allegation of duty evasion cannot be based...Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The cotton yarn in plain reel hank form is fully exempt Central Excise Duty under Notification No. 3/01-CE dated 01/03/01 and its predecessor...

...younger brother of PW 3, Bhagat Singh, a Registered Medical Practitioner. Ved Prakash used to work in the clinic of his elder brother, PW 3. In the evening of August 26, 1981 both PW 3 and the...accused went away saying that the deceased would have to bear the consequence.3. The further case of the prosecution was that on August 27, 1981, PW 3 Bhagat Singh, went to...see a movie in Kundan cinema hall in the night show. His cousin brother, Sube Singh (PW 4), also met him at the said cinema hall. After witnessing the cinema show, both Bhagat Singh and Sube Singh...

...periods from 27-7-1970 to 31-1-1972, 1-2-1972 to 31-8-1972 and September 1972 to December 1972, respectively. These notices were issued under Rule 10A of the Central Excise Rules..., 1944 as it stood at the relevant time. The last notice mentioned above dated 29-1-1973 covering the period from September 1972 to December 1972 was issued on the alleged ground that overweight...to non-levy of appropriate rate of duty on wrappers used for ‘reel cores.”3. The notices contained the other particulars required to be contained in such show cause notices and it is...

...Anil Dev Singh, J.— Rule.2. The movie in question “Bandit Queen” which has been given ‘A’ Certificate pursuant to the order of the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (for..., 1952, (for short ‘the Act’) to exhibit the film ‘Bandit Queen’. The Central Board of Film Certification (for. short ‘the Board) through a letter of the Regional Office, Bombay, dated September 7, 1994...No. 1, Reel No. 1 Delete the title card of true story and replace it with the title “This film is based on the book “Bandit Queen” and prison papers and it is not claimed to be an authentic version of...

...Division. The charge against the respondents was that at about ten on the night of September 5, 1971 Venkataramaiah Chetty and Chakala Giddappa (PW1) were returning to their Village Sanganapalle from...motive, for the accused to commit the offence”. The immediate motive for the offence according to the prosecution was an incident said to have taken place on September 1, 1971 four days prior to the...September 1, was a trivial incident, PW 5 did not sustain any injury, he did not report the matter to anyone and even when the deceased came and intervened there was no quarrel, the accused did not try to...

...: PRONOUNCED ON: 25th September 2024 3rd October 2024 _______________________ JUDGMENT.../reel uploaded by "ingoa24x7", which showcased the emission of smoke in huge wall of smog along with sights of flame bursts before the crowd. The petitioner reposted the same post/reel on her private...Instagram account through her story, expressing her concerns regarding the pollution that could be seen in that post/reel. The petitioner commented thus : "I don't...

...help of his brother. He owns a chawl and receives rent from the same. There is an old dilapidated house of co-accused Shriram Bhagat in front of the house of informant. On 28 December, 2017, Shriram...Bhagat cut down two trees and wood thereof was thrown in front of the house of informant, which created hurdle for him and his family members. The younger brother of the informant Vikrant questioned...about the same. He was abused and threatened by accused Shriram Bhagat, Mangesh Bhagat, Omkar Bhagat, Punkaj Mhatre and Pradip Naidu. It is further alleged that on 30 May, 2017, the younger brother of...

...the yarn.3. On a visit by the Central Excise Officers to the Katai Mills revealed that whereas the bales of 32 count which were marked as Straight Reel (SR), were on...opening found to contain cotton yarn Straight Reel (SR) hanks only, but other bales (3 bales of 2 count; 8 bales of 24 count; 28 bales of 2/10 count and 33 bales of 2/24 count) though marked on the face...of the bales as SR, were found to actually contain cotton yarn in Cross Reel (CR) hanks of the same count. Shri S.N. Sharma, Authorised Signatory of the Assessee Company in his statement recorded on...

...Textbook Corporation had been tampered with and there was an unauthorized deduction against the paper issued in Voucher No. 4924 dated 19.5.1995 under 84 cms Reel paper in stock. The audit report had..., he is responsible for the material loss of 7.103 M. Tonnes of 84 cms Reel paper at the Godown. The writ petitioner did not hand over 7.103 M.Tonnes of 84 cms Reel paper to C. Sermakkani at the time...Reel paper belonging to the respondent-Corporation and caused loss to the Corporation to the tune of Rs.1,70.752. The respondents further averred that the disciplinary proceedings was conducted...

...duty demand is in three parts. One relates to the period September, 1984 to 4-3-1987, the second relates to the period 5-3-1987 to 23-4-1987 and the third relates to the quantity seized. The...manufactured by them are cleared in hank form and the hank yarn in plain reel is exempt from payment of duty while hank yarn in cross reel is liable to payment of duty. The Officers of the HQ Preventive..., Coimbatore visited the mills by surprise on 24-4-1987. In a stock challenge conducted by them they found staple fibre yarn weighing 16,633 kgs in double cross reel form (DHCR). However, the yarn was entered...

...H.L Dattu, J.— This appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the CP Act”) against the order in Original Petition No...order, which is called in question in this appeal. Since this is the first appeal under Section 23 of the CP Act, we are required to consider both the questions of facts as well as questions of law...the services provided by the appellant carrier were deficient and ordered payment of the compensation to the consignor.13. Shri Vinoo Bhagat, learned counsel, appears for the...

...if so, to what relief is he/they entitled. The Board consisted of three members, Shri R. P. Maheshwari, Chairman, and Shri B. B. Singh and Shri J. K. Bhagat, Members. Shri J. K. Bhagat was not present...Shri J. K. Bhagat and the award as it was made and signed by the two remaining members, viz., Shri R. P. Maheshwari and Shri B. B. Singh, was lawful and binding on the parties.... Government Notification No. 781 (L)/XVIII of March 10, 1948, cls. 4, 7, 23 Dismissal of workmen with permission of Regional Conciliation Officer-Jurisdiction of Board to hear the dispute whether dispute...

...Choubey (PW 6) brother of the deceased, recorded at the hospital. The learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment and order dated 22-7-1983 acquitted Mishri Bhagat but convicted the remaining 10...judgment since they arise out of the common judgment and order of the courts below. Prabhunath Prasad has filed Criminal Appeal No. 1827 of 1996 while Bhola Bhagat is the appellant in Criminal Appeal No...Mishri Bhagat standing in a lane near the medicine shop. He directed the remaining accused who were armed with weapons like dab, bhala and farsa to assault the complainant party. While the first...

...of Bihar. We are however informed by Mr K.G Bhagat, learned Advocate, appearing on behalf of the State of Bihar that the notice of the writ petition was served upon the State only on December 6, 1980...and that is the reason why it was not possible for the State to appear before us on December 2, 1980. We accept this explanation offered by Mr K.G Bhagat and exonerate the State of Bihar from...) Department of the State Government giving various particulars required by us by our order dated December 2, 1980. We have also before us the counter-affidavit filed by Jitendra Narain Singh, Assistant...

...1. The plaintiff has filed the Suit for a declaration that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trade name Bhagat Tarachand. By prayer clause (b) the plaintiff has sought an...order of injunction against defendant Nos. 1 to 6 restraining them from using the trade name Bhagat Tarachand or any name deceptively similar thereto in Inorbit Mall, near Vashi Railway Station, Vashi...licence for user of trade name Bhagat Tarachand or any name deceptively similar thereto.2. The present Notice of Motion is taken out by the plaintiff keeping in view the reliefs sought in the...

...the period September, 1998 to July, 2004. The demand was made under four show-cause notices dated 26-9-2003, 7-7-2003, 5-7-2004 and 30-3-2005. The ld. Advocate, Shri S. N. Sinha Mahapatra, appearing...for the appellants, states that the impugned goods are Cotton Yarn in Cross Reel Hanks which are exempted from basic excise duty. Since, the additional duty of excise (textile and textile articles) are...

...a distance of 20 miles from Shilaroo. Sub-Inspector Devi Singh of Theog Police station was on the night of September 16, 1969 away to Gajairi at a distance of five or six miles from Theog in...sent to judicial lock up on September 17, 1969. On September 29, 1969 Sub-Inspector Devi Singh made an application to PW 6 Shri Raj Kumar Sharma, Magistrate First Class Theog for recording the...Churi's mother Nagju. The accused and his wife lived alone in their house in Shilaroo. No one else resided with them in that house. On the evening of September 16, 1969, the accused and his wife were seen...

...Jaswant Singh, J.— This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated March 28, 1972 of the High Court of Delhi dismissing in limine the writ...from October 1, 1958. He was confirmed on the said post on September 30, 1959. On August 28, 1964, he was transferred to the Senior Basic Middle School of the corporation in Panna Mamurpur, Narela II.... In September, 1967, he was assigned the work of teaching certain subjects to both the sections of Class v. In section A of Class V, there was at that time a student named Surinder Kumar, son of Dhan...