Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court3677
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2028
+ Allahabad High Court2007
+ Supreme Court Of India1400
+ Madras High Court1215
+ Kerala High Court1069
+ Delhi High Court1048
+ Calcutta High Court1004
+ Karnataka High Court984
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission909
+ Central Administrative Tribunal768
+ CESTAT678
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court646
+ Gujarat High Court581
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court530
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court519
+ Rajasthan High Court514
+ Gauhati High Court493
+ Patna High Court487
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission466
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court448
+ Jharkhand High Court413
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal388
+ Telangana High Court362
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission329
+ National Green Tribunal263
+ National Company Law Tribunal195
+ Orissa High Court171
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal144
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity118
+ Chhattisgarh High Court97
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal93
+ SEBI83
+ Uttarakhand High Court78
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court74
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority58
+ Tripura High Court51
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal47
+ Company Law Board41
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal40
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission37
+ RERA35
+ Privy Council31
+ Armed Forces Tribunal26
+ Meghalaya High Court21
+ Board of Revenue20
+ Manipur High Court18
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India15
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal15
+ Sikkim High Court13
+ Competition Commission Of India12
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act9
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board7
+ Central Information Commission6
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange3
+ Authority For Advance Rulings3
+ Commissioner (Appeals)3
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST2
+ District Court2
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST1
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India1
+ Settlement Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards11893
From 2011 To 20206837
From 2001 To 20101720
From 1991 To 2000795
From 1981 To 1990570
From 1971 To 1980390
From 1961 To 1970330
From 1951 To 1960297
Before 1950349

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...made a reference to Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as Act for convenience), and submitted that the decree becomes enforceable from the date...Article 136 of the Limitation Act. Therefore, in respect of execution of decree on this aspect importance will have to be given to ...." In view of the Article 136 of the Act, which has repealed Section 48 of Civil Pr...

...21.06.1991 and therefore, limitation of 12 years as prescribed under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963, would run from the date of dismissal .... Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963, which is applicable to the matter, reads as under:Description of Application Period of Limitation ...to any period of limitation8. It is true, if the amount due to the petitioner has not been fully satisfied, the petitioner is entitled to initiate execution proceedings until the amount due to him is full...

... came to be dismissed only on 21.06.1991 and therefore, limitation of 12 years as prescribed under Article 136 of Limitation Act, .... 7. Both these contentions are untenable in law. Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963, reads as under: Description of Period ... subject to any period of limitation. 4 8. It is true, if the amount due to ...

...petitioner. 5. As per Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963, period for execution of decree is 12 years from the date when decree or order become enforceable. Key word is when de...petitioners submitted that application for execution is barred by under Limitation Act. Period of limitation will start running from date of judgment and decree and not from the date of order pass.... ORDER Petitioners have filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 06.05.2025 contained in Annexure-P/8 passed...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...decree. On receiving the notice of the said execution applicant submitted an objection that the execution proceeding is barred by limitation as per Articles 135 and 136 of the Limitation ...Article 135 of the Limitation Act is applicable, therefore, the execution filed after about 14 years from the date of judgment and decree i.e 01.07.1994 is not maintainable and s...such decree the execution has been filed within the period of limitation so prescribed, therefore, neither Article 135 nor Article 136 of the Limitation ...

..., Jaipur City, Jaipur, holding that in view of Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 the application of the decree-holder auction-purchaser for delivery of possession ...barred by limitation under Article 134 of the Limitation Act.4. It was held by the learned District Judge that in view of the provision of Explanation II ...would be questions relating to the execution of the decree and, as such, Article 136 and not Article 134 of the Limitation Act would apply. Further, the learned Judge held, inter alia, th...

...1 to 8 is barred by limitation as per Section 14 and Article 136 of Limitation Act. According to the petitioners, the preliminary decree was passed in the suit on...merits. The application for final decree is continuation of the suit and the suit is deemed to be pending till the final decree is passed. Article 136 and Section 14 of Limitation ...is no representation either in person or through counsel. 7.The only objection of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that final decree application is barred by limitation as the same is not...

...rendered on 11.07.2002 and therefore, Article 136 of Limitation Act is applicable to the present case on hand and the decree was enforceable as on 2002 and therefore, execution petition filed on...- the present petitioners and therefore, in terms of Article 136, the decree became enforceable the moment specific performance suit filed in O.S.No.30/1996 was decreed on 11.07.2002. Therefor...petitioners having challenged the agreement by filing a partition suit in O.S.No.711/2001, cannot take benefit by raising a plea of limitation under Article 136 of Limitation Act. ...

...executed as it is barred by limitation and the same is hit by Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963. The Executing Court having verified the records was of the view that the decree became e...limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act and therefore, the Executing Court negatived the defence in regard to limitation raised by the present petitioner herein. It is this ord...same is within the prescribed limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act. 8. For the reasons stated supra, I pass the following...

...whether the period of limitation, under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, will start from the date of the decree or from the date when the decree is actually drawn up and ...holding that the execution petition was barred by limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act and thus allowed the appeal on 30-9-1997. That judgment and order is challenged, by special lea..., in this appeal.4. Mr Tapas Ray, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant has argued that for the purposes of Article 136 of the Limitation Act, the starti...

...- holder from the date of the judgment till expiry of the period of limitation under Article 136 of Limitation Act.”6. In the d...Hon'ble Apex Court held that after passing the judgment and order of decree the Court became functus officio. It is axiomatic truth that under Article 136 of Limitation ....3. Now factual aspect is required to be revisited. The present decree holder had filed an application under Section 8(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 in...

...petitioner could file the second execution petition within time under Article 136 of Limitation Act, due to outbreak the corona and indefinite the lockdown being enforced. In this connection, the learned..., it appears that the second execution petition is maintainable, though the limitation could have expired otherwise under Article 136 of the Limitation Act is applied. Para 12 and 13 from the said...the order passed by this Court in C.R.P. No. 709 of 1980 by the Supreme Court of India, it must be held that Article 136 of the Limitation Act alone can be applied to...

...-holder himself on 08.12.2007, hence there is no question of revival of the execution application.Article 136 of the Limitation Act reads as under:-...per Article 136 of the Limitation Act, execution for decree for possession can be applied within 12 years from the date of decree.Undisputedly, first...execution application is allowed to remain dismissed for 12 years then its revival/restoration would be in violation of Article 136 of Limitation Act. Hence, revival ...

...contends that Article 137 applies to the facts of this case. In my opinion there is no question of application of Article 137 of the Limitation Act in ...follows:“Such application can be made at any time within the period of limitation provided by the residuary Article 181, Limitation Act. Viz, 3 years from the time...decision the majority Judges suggested that an application can be made by the heirs within the period of limitation as prescribed by Article 181 of the Indian Limitation Act....

...No. 55 of 2014 is not filed within the period of limitation as contemplated under Article 136 of Limitation Act; and (2) if the orders of the...contention of learned counsel for the respondents-Decree holders is that period of limitation starts with effect from 07.5.2003 i.e., the date of execution of the sale deed. In order to appreciate the riva...Article 136 of the Limitation Act, from the date of obtaining of the registered sale deed by the plaintiff-decree holder. During this interregnum period, the decree obtained by t...

...Limitation Act.7. On the contrary, learned advocate for the respondent/plaintiff would submit that the plaintiff has not only obtained a decree for mandatory injunction but also a decree for possession. The period for...Article 135 to Indian Limitation Act and the decree was passed on 18.12.1991 and the second appeal was dismissed on 29.9.95 But, the Execution Petition was filed on 1.7.99 which...plaintiff has not chosen to execute the decree for mandatory injunction within a period of three years and therefore, the execution petition filed beyond the period of three years is hit by Article 135 of...

...while passing the decree on 8th April, 1930 no time was prescribed for payment of Rs. 4,500/- to second defendant and, therefore either under Article 136 of the Limitation ...decree to proceed for drawing the final decree. This course can be exercised by the Court either suo motu or on an application by a party. Article 137 of the Limitation Act cannot be appl...Limitation Act has no application and the limitation prescribed under Article 136 of...

...dismissal of the second appeal would make the position different as the time would run from the date of such dismissal. He adopted a second contention that interpretation of the law of limitation should be.... It must be noted that the present Limitation Act has amended (sic repealed) Section 48 of the old CPC. The position under Article 182 of the old Limitation Act was quite different from ...becomes enforceable … ”.7. The forerunner of the said article in the Limitation Act, 1908 (for short “the old Limitation Act”) was Article 182. It was worded li...

...counsel for the appellant placing reliance on Article 136 of the Limitation Act argued that the said article prescribes a limitation period of twelve years in cases of e...-holder or judgment-debtor and therefore in a strict sense it cannot be said to be a case of execution of a decree. Article 136 of the Limitation Act has no application in the facts .... Article 136 specifically uses the words “decree or order of any civil court”. The application under Sections 31 and 32 of the State Financial Corporation Act is not by way of execution ...