Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal851
+ Jharkhand High Court424
+ Patna High Court234
+ Rajasthan High Court223
+ Bombay High Court199
+ Delhi High Court129
+ Gauhati High Court118
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court91
+ Allahabad High Court84
+ Central Information Commission67
+ Central Administrative Tribunal63
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court45
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal23
+ Calcutta High Court21
+ SEBI17
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act15
+ CESTAT13
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission13
+ Chhattisgarh High Court12
+ Competition Commission Of India11
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court11
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission10
+ Karnataka High Court10
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission10
+ Supreme Court Of India10
+ Kerala High Court8
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court7
+ Madras High Court6
+ National Company Law Tribunal6
+ Orissa High Court6
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal5
+ Gujarat High Court5
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal5
+ Uttarakhand High Court5
+ Telangana High Court4
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity3
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board2
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court2
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority2
+ National Green Tribunal2
+ Tripura High Court2
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India1
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction1
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission1
+ District Court1
+ Meghalaya High Court1
+ RERA1
+ Railway Claims Tribunal1
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards1515
From 2011 To 20201005
From 2001 To 201069
From 1991 To 200025
From 1981 To 19909
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19501

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...of M/s. Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. (M/s. ABCL) revealed that they were dealers/traders of pre-recorded audio cassettes and CDs, which were got manufactured from different duplicators such as...appellant/M/s. Tarana Music Tapes Pvt. Ltd. and other namely M/s. Amsons, M/s. World Music etc. In the investigation it was found that prior to 28-2-1997 the audio cassettes and CDs were manufactured by...to consider the decision in Koch Rajesh C.D India Pvt. Ltd. vide its Order No. A/402.WZB/2004.C-II dated 11-6-2004 and Sagarika Acoustronics Pvt. Ltd. [2005(185) ELT 149] Vijaya Audio...

.... Subsequently they entered into an agreement with M/s. Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd., who are the producers of the said serial, for acquiring the telecast rights of the same on Sony TV for an amount of Rs...) Pte Ltd., for selling telecast rights of a television serial “Dekh Bhai Dekh” on 18-5-98 for a total consideration of Rs. 1.32 crores. The said agreement was valid for a period of two years...of Rs. 10 lakhs under section 114(1) on M/s. Globe Entertainments as also of Rs. l lakhs on other appellants M/s. Orson Video Pvt. Ltd., who recorded the cassettes.4. We...

...1995 SC 2256, Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. Mahilajagran Manch...superintendence. The Apex Court approved the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd.… v. Sukumar Mukherjee…Opposite...authority. In the case of Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate, 1997 (8) JT SC 705...

...Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. Mahila Jagran Manch, reported in (1997) 7 S.C.C 91. In that case, the writ petitioners had sought direction to restrain the original...

.... 15,000,000 3 Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. 11,050,589 4 Shri Amitabh Bachchan 814,459 ...the advances are in the nature of investment in shares or application for allotment of shares, therefore, no interest can be charged. In respect of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd., the assessee has.... Corporation Rs. 25,00,000/-, Galaxy Exports Rs. 25, dd, ddd, Amitabh Bachchan Corporation ltd. 1,25,33,982/- and Shri Amitabh Bachchan Rs. 6,29,586 from the total income without appreci...

....) 1 East West Travels & Tours 850,000 2 Lexicon Finance (P) Ltd. 15,000,000 3 Amitabh Bachchan ...shares, therefore, no interest can be charged. In respect of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd., the assessee has stated that this company had incurred heavy losses in A.Ys 1996-97 to 1998-99 and...Exports Rs.15,00,000/- C.A.Corporation Rs 25,00,000/-, Galaxy Exports Rs.25,00,000, Amitabh Bachchan Corporation ltd. 1,25,33,982/- and Shri Amitabh Bachchan Rs.6,29,586 from the total income with...

...is backed by a statutory right at the relevant time. Same view has been taken in Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. Mahila Jagran...v. Orissa Road Transport Co. Ltd., (35) and Commissioner Of Income Tax, Lucknow v. U.P Forest Corporation. (36). However, this...entitled for any opportunity of hearing when the permit is granted on a route which is overlapping on the nationalised route or does it affect the interests of the Corporation?(2) Whether the...

...in British Virgin Island (in short BVIL). The Assessing Officer further observed that out of the said amount of Rs. 23 crores, the assessee transferred Rs. 21.67 crores to M/s. Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. (in...Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd.) and hence should be handed over to AB Corpn. Limited.It is observed that the agreement between Mr. Amitabh Bachchan and Star India Limited was.... Amitabh Bachchan (copy of the said Agreement has been submitted to your office vide our letter dated 6th June, 2003)(ii) Vide agreement dated 10th January, 1995 and supplemented thereafter by agreement dated 11t...

...: AIR 1995 SC 2256, Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. Mahilajagran Manch...of Belwal Spinning Mills Ltd. v. U.P State Electricity Board, (1997) 6 SCC...Benwal Spinning Mills Ltd. v. U.P State Electricity Board, (1997) 6 SCC 740...

...the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 56 taxmann.com 77 (Mum-ITAT) wherein, it has been held that no disallowance...of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 68 SOT 217 (Mumbai - Trib). In the... ACIT, Central Circle -2, Madurai. vs. Transworld Garnet India Pvt. Ltd., 500, Panthe...

...the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 56 taxmann.com 77 (Mum-ITAT) wherein, it has been held that no disallowance...of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 68 SOT 217 (Mumbai - Trib). In the... ACIT, Central Circle -2, Madurai. vs. Transworld Garnet India Pvt. Ltd., 500, Panthe...

...the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 56 taxmann.com 77 (Mum-ITAT) wherein, it has been held that no disallowance...of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 68 SOT 217 (Mumbai - Trib). In the... ACIT, Central Circle -2, Madurai. vs. Transworld Garnet India Pvt. Ltd., 500, Panthe...

...the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 56 taxmann.com 77 (Mum-ITAT) wherein, it has been held that no disallowance...of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 68 SOT 217 (Mumbai - Trib). In the... ACIT, Central Circle -2, Madurai. vs. Transworld Garnet India Pvt. Ltd., 500, Panthe...

...the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 56 taxmann.com 77 (Mum-ITAT) wherein, it has been held that no disallowance...of Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT [2015] 68 SOT 217 (Mumbai - Trib). In the... ACIT, Central Circle -2, Madurai. vs. Transworld Garnet India Pvt. Ltd., 500, Panthe...

...the assessee, the assessing officer observed that assessee purchased 25,000 shares of M/s Amitabh Bachchan Corporation on 6th March, 1995 for a consideration of Rs. 20 lacs at Rs. 80 per share and 11000 shares of M/s Busine...corroborate evidences. A prima facie interference from the fact is that the sale transaction of shares of M/s. Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. and M/s Business Standard Ltd.to the Khodidas Vandas.... The Appellant, during the year, sold shares of M/s Amitabh Bachhan Corporation Ltd. for a sale consideration of Rs. 25,000/- and claimed long term capital loss of Rs. 44,69,208/. Further, the Appellant...

...(1997) 7 SCC 91 (Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd. Vs. Mahila...SCC 91 [Amitabh Bachan Corporation Ltd., v. Mahila Jagran Manch wherein the Supreme Court held as under:- "The High Court...[Union Of India v. T.R Varma ]; (2005) 12 SCC 725 [Orissa Agro Industries Corporation Ltd....

...running business in the name and style of "M/s. Sopan Leasing Pvt. Ltd.". Subsequently the name was changed to "M/s Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Limited" (‘ABCL’ for short). On 1-10-1994, pursuant to amalgamation, ...to Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Pvt. Ltd. on 29-12-1994. It became a public company on 28-2-1995 and the name again changed to Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Limited (ABCL). Pursuant to the...actors Shri Amitabh Bachchan and Smt. Jaya Bachchan. He relied on the decisions in the case of Alianz & Co. Ltd. v. Bell & B 666 KB...

...: AIR 1995 SC 2256. Amitabh Bachchan and Corporation Ltd. v. Mahilajagran Manch, JT 1997 (10) SC 868...the said Sri Sachidanand Singh was recalled. Shri B.K Varma, Assistant Manager, LPG, Indian Oil Corporation, Ghazipur, was appointed as receiver for ensuring distribution of Gas Cylinder in connection...with the business of the plaintiff. On 7.9.1990, an application was filed by the said Shri B.K Varma. Assistant Manager. LPG, Indian Oil Corporation, Ghazipur, praying that he should not be appointed...

... 395 ITR 1 (SC) 2 CIT Vs. Amitabh Bachchan 384 ITR 200 (SC) 3 ...Gati Limited, Hyd. case of ITAT A Bench, Kolkatta in J K Lakshmi Cement Ltd Vs ACIT dated 30/08/2011, the issue was whether, unadjusted brought forward losses were available for set...explanation reproduced above. Similarly the facts of the two other cases are also differing and hence cannot come to the rescue of the assessee. In the case of V & V Infotech Ltd, Vs ITO...

...other brands. 4. According to the plaintiff, the plaintiff has a well known brand name TANISHQ in relation to jewellery. This year TANISHQ is endorsing Mr. Amitabh Bachchan and Mrs.... Jaya Bachchan for its diamond jewellery collections. The agreement dated 17.03.2011 between the plaintiff and Mr. Amitabh Bachchan is called as "Agreement For Services" for engagement of Mr. Amitabh...: "9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (i) AMITABH BACHCHAN acknowledges, represents and undertakes to TITAN that all the intellectual Property Rights...