Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court9924
+ Allahabad High Court9214
+ Delhi High Court6844
+ Supreme Court Of India6098
+ Madras High Court5962
+ Gujarat High Court5308
+ Calcutta High Court4801
+ Kerala High Court4698
+ Karnataka High Court4444
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court3807
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal3806
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court3290
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court3067
+ Rajasthan High Court2684
+ Patna High Court2486
+ Gauhati High Court1991
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1987
+ Orissa High Court1798
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court1612
+ Telangana High Court1165
+ CESTAT1095
+ National Green Tribunal915
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court797
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission791
+ Chhattisgarh High Court745
+ Jharkhand High Court695
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission502
+ Uttarakhand High Court460
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission429
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal366
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal273
+ Tripura High Court268
+ National Company Law Tribunal198
+ Manipur High Court192
+ Sikkim High Court182
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity181
+ Company Law Board163
+ Armed Forces Tribunal129
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal126
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board122
+ Meghalaya High Court116
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal102
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST100
+ Central Information Commission90
+ SEBI86
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal80
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal75
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission73
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange26
+ RERA26
+ Privy Council22
+ Board of Revenue20
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act17
+ Competition Commission Of India14
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission12
+ Authority For Advance Rulings8
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority8
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST7
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property7
+ Trade Marks Registry7
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India6
+ Settlement Commission5
+ Commissioner (Appeals)4
+ District Court3
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs2
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board2
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction1
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan1
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal1
+ Deputy Collector1
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards24531
From 2011 To 202028769
From 2001 To 201010544
From 1991 To 20006763
From 1981 To 19905731
From 1971 To 19805581
From 1961 To 19705184
From 1951 To 1960173
Before 195031

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...in Tulsi Ram v. State of U.P AIR 1963 SC 666, (1963) 1...State of A.P v. Cheemalapati Ganeswara Rao AIR 1963 SC 1850, (1963) 2...Cheemalapati AIR 1963 SC 1850, (1963) 2 Cri LJ 671 the charges were of conspiracy. The same is also a charge in the...

...making the inducement. (See AIR 1963 SC 666 : (1963 (1) Cri LJ 623...cognisance as well as the proceeding itself. (See (1983) 1 SCC 1 : AIR...1983 SC 67 : (1983 Cri LJ 159) (Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Ram Kishan Rohatgi)). In this view of the matter...

...criminal proceedings. The reliance placed on the decision reported in AIR 1963 SC 666 was rightly not accepted by the learned Single Judge on...

...conspiracy.7. In Tulsi Ram v. State Of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 666, it...

..., AIR 1963 SC 666).5. It is a common ground that the firm M/s. J.N Sharma & Sons was a partnership firm of which the appellants were ...Vacuum Glass, Faridabad from 1963 to 1975. PW Gobind Narain Lakhe (PW 18), who was posted as Assistant Engineer, Incharge Telegraph Circle Store Depot at Secunderabad deposed that no store was received...

...Kabra v. State of Madras);10. AIR 1963 SC 666 (Tulsi Ram v. State of U.P).9. I...(Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi);9. AIR 1967 SC 986 (Shivnarayan...: Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal; JT 2000 (1) SC 360: G. Sagar Suri v. State of U.P...

...to a decision cited by Mr. Padia in the case of Tulsi Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 666, where the effect of...State of Gujarat v. Patel Raghav Natha, AIR 1969 SC 1297. The Supreme Court while considering the effect of the exercise of revisional jurisdiction of the State Governme...Government. It is also true that in the case of AIR 1969 SC 1267 (supra) when the Supreme Court thought that the reasonable time in which...

...”, [AIR 1963 SC 666]. Hence, it is apparent that the bill was raised to cheat the insurance company and a wrongful loss was caused to the...judgments passed by Hon'ble the Apex Court in case of “Naib Singh v. State Of Punjab.”, [AIR 1986 SC 2192...], “Manjur Faiju Inamdar v. State Of Maharashtra”, [AIR 1993 SC 2322] and “Nandlal v. State of Uttarakhand...

...Tulsi Ram v. State Of Uttar Pradesh., AIR 1963 SC 666. In this case a letter from the Un...learned Additional Sessions Judge has relied upon Miss Hardevi Malkhani v. State, AIR 1969 Allahabad 423. In this case a letter purporting to be signed by the Principal...

...Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 666, though in the context of..., (1986) 4 SCC 326 : AIR 1986 SC 2160:“The terms of section 20(1) of the Act do not postula..., (1981) 3 SCC 90 : AIR 1981 SC 1776 and Bombay High Court decision in the case of...

...(AIR 1963 SC 666).17. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we do not find any reason to interfere with the findings arrived at by the GCM. In the result, the appeal is dismissed....

...Tulsi Ram v. State of U.P, AIR 1963 SC 666 at p. 674..., (1969) 3 SCC 107 : AIR 1970 SC 843 : (1970...: (1963-1 Cri LJ 623), that when an allegation is made that a person has dishonestly induced another to part with property, what has to be considered is...

...Tulsi Ram v. State of U.P. AIR 1963 SC 666 wherein it is held that it was not necessary ..., AIR 2009 SC 3250, where the Apex Court held that when at an initial stage a prosecution is asked to be quashed, the test to be applied by the court is as to whether th..., AIR 1982 SC 58, wherein the accused violated the statutory order covering Soda ash, which is in force by then, and the dealer violated...

...jurisdiction upon the court to try the case." (6) Another authority referred to by Mr. Bhasin in this behalf is AIR 1963 SC 666. In...AIR 1954 SC 637 which lays down that :- ''The burden of proving that the requisite sanction has been obtained rests on the prosecution and such burden i...referred me to AIR 1967 Punjab 13. As against this authority the learned counsel for the State has referred me to AIR 1963 Raj 233 which...

...the Supreme Court in Tulsi Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 666. In that case there was a letter on the record...Lordships of the Supreme Court in Major E.G Barsay v. State Of Bombay ., AIR 1961 SC 1762. There it was observed:“The.... P.J Ratnam v. D. Kanikaram, AIR 1964 SC 244 and 4. P. Joseph John v. State Of Travancore-Cochin...

..., AIR 1963 SC 666: parkash Chandra v. Union of India, AIR 1965 Punj 270 (D. B.) ; and M/s Bijoya Lak.... Sibal next referred to Tulsi Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh , AIR 1963 SC 666. In that case, the charge against the..., AIR 1963 SC 666. However, is that if the objection had been taken at the proper time, evidece could be led to show whether or not the Governor had ...

...Tulsi Ram v. State Of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 666 : (...polythene bags had stuck to each, other. He has further clarified that the bags which he used were in such a condition that there was no scope for any gap or air and humidity to be there between the two...were in the same condition in which they were supplied by the manufacturer. The Food Inspector has also stated that the surfaces had stuck to each other and hence there was no scope for any air or...

...., AIR 1963 SC 666, the Supreme Court clarified the law on this subject. In that case, consignor of the goods had drawn a hundi for the price...); M/s. Pepsi Foods Ltd. and Anr. v. Special Judicial Magistrate and Ors. AIR 1998 SC 128; Ru...., JT 1996 (7) SC 6. In the alternative, learned counsel argued for production of documents under section 91 of the code, as these documents are necessary and desirable for the just decision in the...

.... State of U.P., AIR 1963 SC 666, the question as to whether proper sanction was granted came up for consideration of the Apex Court..., AIR 1973 SC 2131, the sanction by the Chief Minister was not produced and a witness was examined, who stated that the C.M. had signed the sanction. It was urged in tha...., AIR 1979 SC 1504, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that it would not be just and proper to send the appellant to custody...

...will not make the trial illegal when no prejudice is caused to the accused. In Tulsi Ram v. State of H.P, AIR 1963 SC 666, where...Mandhari v. State of Chhatisgarh, (2002) 4 SCC 308 : AIR 2002 SC...) State of Gujarat v. Anirudhsing, (1997) 6 SCC 514 : AIR...