...State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara, reported in AIR 1951 SC page 318 ( at page-32) held..., areas under: 14. In Anant Mills Company v. State of Gujarat and others, reported in 1975(2) SCC Page-175, the Court held...-Divisional Officer in exercise of the power under sub-section (gg) of Section 95 shall be revisable by the Commissioner of the Division and also by the State Government...

...summary by his Lordship Fazl Ali, J., in The State of Bombay and another v. F.N Balsara(1) of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court...reasonable and just relation to the things in respect of which it is proposed. Vide also State of West Bengal v. A.A Sarkar(3).We did not understand Mr. Kumaramangalam...Industrials v. State Of Madras. It was therein pointed out that on principle classification made by the Legislature can be as valid as classification made by executive or administrative bodies. Actually...

...discussed by the Supreme Court in recent decisions and the principles relating thereto were summarised by Fazl Ali, J. in The State of Bombay and Another v. F.N Balsara(6...,. The contention was overruled and the prior ruling of the Court in The State Of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar, was distinguished, and it was held that S. 4 was not unconstitutional (Bose J. dissenting).The learned Advocate General made a reference to the decision of the Supreme Court in The State of Bombay and Another v. F.N Balsara in...exemptions in a taxing statute. As Stone, J. observed in Carmichael v. Southern Coal and Coke Co.(2):“It is inherent in the exercise of the power to tax that a State be...

...A.K Gopalan v. State Of Madras ., AIR 1950 SC 27; D.S. Nakara and others v. Union of India, AIR 1983 SC 130; State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara, AIR... Smt. Vimla Srivastava v. State of U.P. and another, 2016(1) ADJ 21 (DB...." 12. I had occasion to consider in Manjul Srivastava v. State of U.P. and others...

...State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara, AIR (38) 1951 SC 318, The State of Assam v...its judicial review. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Murlidhar Agrawal and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others...Court in E.P. Royappa v. State of T.N., (1974) 4 SCC 3...

... 366. 7 21. Citing State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara, reported..."ble Supreme Court observed that there is an understandable basis for 4 State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara, reported...IFB Agro Industries Ltd. and Another v. State of W.B. and others, reported at...

...submission.13. The Apex Court in (The State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara)11, A.I.R. 1951 S.C. 318, had laid down that Notification containing order made in exercise of power given by.... State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara, A.I.R. 1951 S.C. 318.12. Orient Paper Mills Ltd. v. Union of India...retrospective operation, it cannot be so construed as to have the effect of altering law applicable to a claim in litigation at the time the Act was passed. In Arjun Singh and another v. State of Punjab and...

...State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara, AIR (38) 1951 SC 318, The State...Hon'ble --- 22 --- Supreme Court in the case of Murlidhar Agrawal and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, AIR 1974...arbitrary or unreasonable. This Court in E.P. Royappa v. State of T.N., (1974) 4 SCC 3...

.... He was of the opinion that the only way to give full effect to the judgment in State of Bombay v. F.N Balsara case Balsara case (1951) 54 Bom LR 325 was to engraft an appropriate exception or proviso...upon Section 13(b) in the light of that decision. He considered that State of Bombay v. F.N Balsara case Balsara case (1951) 54 Bom LR 325 did not import a new definition or rewrite Section 13(b). It...of the question referred to us, it is necessary to set out what this Court decided in Balsara case (1951) 54 Bom LR 325. In that case the constitutional validity of the Bombay Prohibition Act (25 of...

...form. The answer to this is to be found in the Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court, in State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara, (AIR...1951 Supreme Court 318). In that case, pursuant to the Bombay Prohibition Act and in furtherance of the State policy under...impugned letter, dated 17.03.2016, cannot be sustained. 76. We may usefully refer to the decision of the Supreme Court, in K.T. Plantation Private Limited and another v. State of...

...Chowdhury v. Union of India and others and The State of Bombay and another v. F.N. Balsara and reiterated the principle that presumption was always in favour of constitutionality of an enactment.... Some of these decisions are : M/s. Steelworth Limited v. State of Assam; Gopal Narain v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another; Ganga Sugar Corporation Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others..., R.K. Garg v. Union of India and others and State of W.B. and another v. E.I.T.A. India Limited and others.28. In R.K. Garg, the Constitution Bench of this Court...

...‘fundamental right is in no case’ saved, cannot therefore be accepted.”29. In State of Maharashtra v. Mumbai Upnagar Gramodyog Sangh...such control and restriction was necessary for the preservation of public health and morals and to raise revenue. In The State of Bombay and Another v. F.N Balsara, AIR...preparations. In State of Bombay v. R.M.D Chamarbaugwala and Another, AIR 1957 SC 699. The Supreme Court said that...

... Harikisandas (1866) 3 Bom. H.C.R. (A.C.J.) 6, it was noticed that the exercise of testamentary power was evident at least from...Arjun Dass v. State of A.P. (2026 SCC OnLine SC 992). 25. The Apex Court has ruled that the varying needs of different classes of persons often require separate/differential treatment [Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union Of India And Others (AIR 1951 SC 41), State of Bombay and another vs. F.N Balsara (AIR...State of Bombay and Another v. F. N. Balsara (AIR 1951 SC 318), the Apex Court after referring to its earlier judgment in...

... Harikisandas (1866) 3 Bom. H.C.R. (A.C.J.) 6, it was noticed that the exercise of testamentary power was evident at least from...Arjun Dass v. State of A.P. (2026 SCC OnLine SC 992). 25. The Apex Court has ruled that the varying needs of different classes of persons often require separate/differential treatment [Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union Of India And Others (AIR 1951 SC 41), State of Bombay and another vs. F.N Balsara (AIR...State of Bombay and Another v. F. N. Balsara (AIR 1951 SC 318), the Apex Court after referring to its earlier judgment in...

... Harikisandas (1866) 3 Bom. H.C.R. (A.C.J.) 6, it was noticed that the exercise of testamentary power was evident at least from...Arjun Dass v. State of A.P. (2026 SCC OnLine SC 992). 25. The Apex Court has ruled that the varying needs of different classes of persons often require separate/differential treatment [Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union Of India And Others (AIR 1951 SC 41), State of Bombay and another vs. F.N Balsara (AIR...State of Bombay and Another v. F. N. Balsara (AIR 1951 SC 318), the Apex Court after referring to its earlier judgment in...

...State of Bombay and another vs. F.N. Balsara, reported in AIR 1951 SC 318, the... Court, in State of Bombay and another vs. F.N. Balsara..., (AIR 1951 Supreme Court 318). In that case, pursuant to the Bombay Prohibition Act and in furtherance of the State policy under Article 47 of the Constitution of...

..., State of Bombay and another vs. F.N. Balsara, AIR 1951 SC 318 and, in later years, in Minerva Mills Ltd. and others vs. Union of...SC 1019 and The State of Gujarat & Another v. Shri Ambica Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad & Another, (1974) 4 SCC 656. It has...decisions of the Supreme Court in Saghir Ahmad v. State of U.P. & Others, AIR 1954 SC...

...decision of the Honble Apex Court in case of The State of Bombay and another Vs. F.N. Balsara, reported in AIR 1951, SC pg 818. In the year 1949, in the erstwhile State of Bombay, prohibition was imposed...but while imposing prohibition for the State of Bombay, certain establishments and certain areas were left out of the purview of prohibition laws. Army canteens and Army establishments were such areas...State of Uttarakhand & others ..Respondents Present:- Mr. Arvind Vashishta, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Chief Standing Counsel for...

...the subject lying within the competence of another legislature vide State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara. 60. In Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam, it has been observed by this Court that the test of pith and substance...another entry nugatory vide Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of W.B. This is especially so when some of the...topic or category of legislation vide United Provinces v. Atiqa Begum. 64. Another important aspect while construing the entries...