CiteTEXT
..., Investigating Officer, and Dr S.P Jain in the Sujalpur hospital. The dying declaration recorded by the Investigating Officer is Ex. P-10 and the one recorded by Dr S.P Jain is Ex. P-5. Ex. P-10 was...and Dr S.P Jain. The High Court says : “In this case there have been dying declarations and in fact the prosecution case depends only on dying declarations.” As it has disbelieved the oral evidence of...other to Dr S.P Jain9. As regards the latter dying declaration, the High Court has remarked that it is not noted in the case diary of the Investigating Officer. It saw the...
...S.P. Bharucha, J.
(1) This is a transfer petition by the wife. She seeks the transfer of matrimonial proceedings filed by the husband in Delhi to Kanpur, where she is now...
...the State of Himachal Pradesh, Dr S.P Kapoor, Dr R.M Bali and Dr K. Pandeya. Writ Petition No. 2 of 1980 was filed by Dr R.M Bali against the State of Himachal Pradesh and eight others including Dr...Jiwan Lal, Dr (Mrs) Damyanti Kapur, Dr S.P Kapoor and Dr K. Pandeya, who were Respondents 8, 9, 6 and 7 respectively in the writ petition. Dr S.P Kapoor, the appellant in CA No. 2104 of 1980 was the 2nd...prayed for certain other reliefs also including declaration of the appointment of Dr S.P Kapoor as Director of Health Services as null and void and for his case being considered for appointment to...
...the Central Government on 25-1-1988. We have been informed at the Bar that Mr Murgad was at No. 1, Mr S.P Singh Chaudhary at No. 2, and the appellant at No. 4 of the select panel recommended by the....8. Apart from the appellant, Mr S.P Singh Chaudhary, who was at No. 2 in the select panel also sought similar relief from the Central Administrative Tribunal. His application having been...dismissed, he filed Civil Appeal No. 5156 of 1993 in this Court. Shri S.P Singh Chaudhary was a member of the Delhi Judicial Service and was posted as Additional District and Sessions Judge at the...
....2. For disposal of these appeals it is not necessary to narrate the facts in great detail. FIR was registered on 31-5-1996 against S.P Gupta, the then Divisional Manager...source information report. It was, inter alia, alleged in the FIR that S.P Gupta while posted and functioning as Divisional Manager in National Insurance Co. Ltd., Hoshiarpur, entered into a criminal..., District Kangra and some other unknown persons with the object of cheating National Insurance Co. Ltd. by abusing his official position as a public servant and, in pursuance of the said conspiracy S.P...
...Balance 1. S.P. No. 42/Coch/2014 2006-07 5,33,310/- 2. S.P. No. 43/Coch/2014 2007-08 11,17,218/- 3. S.P. No. 44/Coch/2014 2008...-09 3,05,54,782/- 4. S.P. No. 45/Coch/2014 2002-03 26,88,905/- 5. S.P. No. 46/Coch/2014 2003-04 62,40,220/- 6. S.P. No. 47/Coch/2014 2004...-05 66,75,778/- 7. S.P. No. 48/Coch/2014 2005-06 1,54,91,537/- 8. S.P. No. 49/Coch/2014 2006-07 37,82,807/- 9. S.P. No. 50/Coch/2014 2007...
...Balance 1. S.P. No. 42/Coch/2014 2006-07 5,33,310/- 2. S.P. No. 43/Coch/2014 2007-08 11,17,218/- 3. S.P. No. 44/Coch/2014 2008...-09 3,05,54,782/- 4. S.P. No. 45/Coch/2014 2002-03 26,88,905/- 5. S.P. No. 46/Coch/2014 2003-04 62,40,220/- 6. S.P. No. 47/Coch/2014 2004...-05 66,75,778/- 7. S.P. No. 48/Coch/2014 2005-06 1,54,91,537/- 8. S.P. No. 49/Coch/2014 2006-07 37,82,807/- 9. S.P. No. 50/Coch/2014 2007...
...Balance 1. S.P. No. 42/Coch/2014 2006-07 5,33,310/- 2. S.P. No. 43/Coch/2014 2007-08 11,17,218/- 3. S.P. No. 44/Coch/2014 2008...-09 3,05,54,782/- 4. S.P. No. 45/Coch/2014 2002-03 26,88,905/- 5. S.P. No. 46/Coch/2014 2003-04 62,40,220/- 6. S.P. No. 47/Coch/2014 2004...-05 66,75,778/- 7. S.P. No. 48/Coch/2014 2005-06 1,54,91,537/- 8. S.P. No. 49/Coch/2014 2006-07 37,82,807/- 9. S.P. No. 50/Coch/2014 2007...
...Balance 1. S.P. No. 42/Coch/2014 2006-07 5,33,310/- 2. S.P. No. 43/Coch/2014 2007-08 11,17,218/- 3. S.P. No. 44/Coch/2014 2008...-09 3,05,54,782/- 4. S.P. No. 45/Coch/2014 2002-03 26,88,905/- 5. S.P. No. 46/Coch/2014 2003-04 62,40,220/- 6. S.P. No. 47/Coch/2014 2004...-05 66,75,778/- 7. S.P. No. 48/Coch/2014 2005-06 1,54,91,537/- 8. S.P. No. 49/Coch/2014 2006-07 37,82,807/- 9. S.P. No. 50/Coch/2014 2007...
...Balance 1. S.P. No. 42/Coch/2014 2006-07 5,33,310/- 2. S.P. No. 43/Coch/2014 2007-08 11,17,218/- 3. S.P. No. 44/Coch/2014 2008...-09 3,05,54,782/- 4. S.P. No. 45/Coch/2014 2002-03 26,88,905/- 5. S.P. No. 46/Coch/2014 2003-04 62,40,220/- 6. S.P. No. 47/Coch/2014 2004...-05 66,75,778/- 7. S.P. No. 48/Coch/2014 2005-06 1,54,91,537/- 8. S.P. No. 49/Coch/2014 2006-07 37,82,807/- 9. S.P. No. 50/Coch/2014 2007...
...Balance 1. S.P. No. 42/Coch/2014 2006-07 5,33,310/- 2. S.P. No. 43/Coch/2014 2007-08 11,17,218/- 3. S.P. No. 44/Coch/2014 2008...-09 3,05,54,782/- 4. S.P. No. 45/Coch/2014 2002-03 26,88,905/- 5. S.P. No. 46/Coch/2014 2003-04 62,40,220/- 6. S.P. No. 47/Coch/2014 2004...-05 66,75,778/- 7. S.P. No. 48/Coch/2014 2005-06 1,54,91,537/- 8. S.P. No. 49/Coch/2014 2006-07 37,82,807/- 9. S.P. No. 50/Coch/2014 2007...
...Balance 1. S.P. No. 42/Coch/2014 2006-07 5,33,310/- 2. S.P. No. 43/Coch/2014 2007-08 11,17,218/- 3. S.P. No. 44/Coch/2014 2008...-09 3,05,54,782/- 4. S.P. No. 45/Coch/2014 2002-03 26,88,905/- 5. S.P. No. 46/Coch/2014 2003-04 62,40,220/- 6. S.P. No. 47/Coch/2014 2004...-05 66,75,778/- 7. S.P. No. 48/Coch/2014 2005-06 1,54,91,537/- 8. S.P. No. 49/Coch/2014 2006-07 37,82,807/- 9. S.P. No. 50/Coch/2014 2007...
...Balance 1. S.P. No. 42/Coch/2014 2006-07 5,33,310/- 2. S.P. No. 43/Coch/2014 2007-08 11,17,218/- 3. S.P. No. 44/Coch/2014 2008...-09 3,05,54,782/- 4. S.P. No. 45/Coch/2014 2002-03 26,88,905/- 5. S.P. No. 46/Coch/2014 2003-04 62,40,220/- 6. S.P. No. 47/Coch/2014 2004...-05 66,75,778/- 7. S.P. No. 48/Coch/2014 2005-06 1,54,91,537/- 8. S.P. No. 49/Coch/2014 2006-07 37,82,807/- 9. S.P. No. 50/Coch/2014 2007...
...India. He took on lease premises on a monthly rent of Rs 75 per month, more particularly described in the application made to the House Allotment Officer, Nagpur by first respondent Shri S.P Pathak...Sharma. Respondent 1 Shri S.P Pathak made an application to House Allotment Officer, Nagpur registered as Miscellaneous Case No. 51.A-71(2)/76-77 against the present appellant Mansaram alleging that the...application made by Shri S.P Pathak, first respondent on December 7, 1976, it was in terms stated that the appellant Shri Mansaram Sharma was a Government servant employed in the telephone department at...
...whereupon the Deputy Superintendent of Police Pandya came to Anand along with Sub-Inspector Kantilal Patel and the next morning the Dy. S.P Pandya called the complainant and took down his complaint. Two...panch witnesses Mohanbhai Shankarbhai and Rambhai Dahyabhai were also called and in their presence the complainant was searched and the Dy. S.P Pandya then gave him Rs 250 consisting of two currency...and the witness went to the house of the appellant and they were followed by two Sub-Inspectors Kantilal and Rathod and Dy. S.P Pandya. There money was paid by the complainant to the appellant who...
...facts of the case are as follows:- The assessee is an Indian Company engaged in the business of rendering software development services and call centre Page 2 of 5 S.P. No.141/Bang/2011 services. During...selecting 26 companies as comparables, the TPO determined the TP adjustment at Rs.1,79,47,930/-. In accordance with the provisions of section 144C, Page 3 of 5 S.P. No.141/Bang/2011 the AO passed a...outstanding tax Page 4 of 5 S.P. No.141/Bang/2011 arrears would be reduced to only Rs.35 lakhs. Further it was submitted that the TRO had included comparable cases of two companies, i.e. Avani...
...its Director, S.P. Mines, Chitra Colliery,
Deoghar.
2. The Chief General Manager, E.C.L., S.P. Mines, Chitra Colliery, Deoghar.
3. The Deputy Chief Personnel Manager, ECL..., S.P. Mines, Chitra Colliery, Deoghar.
4. The Assistant Manager (Personnel), ECL, S.P. Mines, Chitra Colliery, Deoghar.
5. The Deputy Manager (Finance), ECL, S.P. Mines, Chitra...Colliery, Deoghar.
6. The Attendence Clerk, ECL, Girija Section, S.P. Mines, Chitra Colliery, Deoghar.
7. Paklu Sore, W/o of Late Bihari Marandi, R/o Jamua, Chitra, Deoghar at present...
...(S.P. SINGH (SATPAL SINGH) Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS ) Dated : 12-11-2024
Shri D.P.Singh - advocate for the petitioner.
Shr...was wrongly mentioned as "S.P. Singh (Satpal Singh)"
instead of "S.P. Singh (Suraj Pal Singh)", therefore, in the order dated 22.01.2024 name of the petitioner was mentioned as "S.P.... Singh (Satpal Singh)" instead of "S.P. Singh (Suraj Pal Singh)".
The said mistake appears to be a typographical error which is required to be corrected...
...order dated 9.7.2013 passed by the respondent No. 1 and the notification dated 2.8.2013 whereby the respondent No. 7 was transferred and posted as Dy. SP CPW from Dy. S.P Security.He...promoted to the rank of Inspector (Mechanic) by order dated 26.11.2002 and has been continuing in that capacity till today without any further promotion to the next promotional post of Dy. S.P...Central Police Workshop. He submits that the post of Dy. SP (CPW) was created after receiving sanction from the Governor of Mizoram by a letter dated 21.3.1984 Along with the said post of Dy. S.P, another...
...petitioners Mr. S.P Shankar that the Assistant Commissioner functions as a Revenue Court as envisaged under Section 25 of the...Board, Trivandrum v. T.P Kunhaliumma,1. Elaborating his contention Sri S.P Shankar maintained that the PTCL Act having come into force on and with effect from 1.1.1979 the respondents-applicants...Supreme Court the contention of Sri S.P Shankar, learned Counsel for petitioners, does not carry any legal weight.9. Apart from above, the non-applicability of the provisions of the...