Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal11071
+ Bombay High Court8153
+ Madras High Court6267
+ Delhi High Court5549
+ Allahabad High Court4403
+ Gujarat High Court3390
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court3280
+ Kerala High Court3132
+ Karnataka High Court3073
+ Calcutta High Court2890
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court2579
+ Supreme Court Of India2360
+ Patna High Court2333
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court2308
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court2302
+ Central Administrative Tribunal2091
+ CESTAT1848
+ Rajasthan High Court1679
+ Gauhati High Court1381
+ Jharkhand High Court1286
+ Telangana High Court1107
+ Orissa High Court1060
+ SEBI835
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission766
+ National Green Tribunal718
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission673
+ National Company Law Tribunal627
+ Chhattisgarh High Court574
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court530
+ Company Law Board458
+ Central Information Commission421
+ Uttarakhand High Court418
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity374
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission351
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal334
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal327
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act200
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission157
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal153
+ Meghalaya High Court142
+ Manipur High Court133
+ Tripura High Court125
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange121
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board121
+ Privy Council120
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal104
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal96
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal88
+ Armed Forces Tribunal71
+ Sikkim High Court69
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST55
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India51
+ RERA51
+ Competition Commission Of India30
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority28
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST24
+ Authority For Advance Rulings19
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property12
+ Commissioner (Appeals)12
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India12
+ Settlement Commission10
+ Board of Revenue8
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission5
+ District Court4
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal3
+ Collector Appeals3
+ Copyright Board3
+ Right to Information2
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction1
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs1
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal1
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board1
+ Trade Marks Registry1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards30314
From 2011 To 202027756
From 2001 To 20106919
From 1991 To 20003764
From 1981 To 19902726
From 1971 To 19802116
From 1961 To 19701770
From 1951 To 1960956
Before 1950857

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...in such an event, the principles of quasi-partnership in a given case may be invoked.231. The ratio of the said decision, with respect, cannot be held....2. The Company being a private limited company, which is in the nature of a quasi-partnership concern, the Court should take a holistic view of the matter and so view...this nature where a company for all intent and purport is a quasi-partnership concern. Parliament, while enacting a statute, cannot think of all situations which may emerge in giving effect to the...

...(1981) 3 SCC 333.)227. It is now well known that principles of quasi-partnership are...(1996) 10 SCC 696 whereupon Mr Desai placed strong reliance, thus, cannot be said to be an authority for the proposition that for no purpose whatsoever can the principles ...impugned may assume significance and in such an event, the principles of quasi-partnership in a given case may be invoked.231. The ratio of the said decision, with respect...

...question viz. whether the principles of quasi- partnership would apply as there are no third party shareholders in the Company?. As submitted by Respondent Nos. 2 and 5, the shareholders of the Respondent...No.1 Company have consciously decided to adopt a corporate model of business and as such principles of quasi partnership cannot apply to the present case. The Respondent Nos. 2 and 5 have relied upon...(1996) 10 SCC 696, in support of their contention that principles of quasi partnership do not apply to the facts and circumstances ...

...for determination by this Court in the above Appeal are also identical to the questions raised by them in Company Appeal No. 7 of 2010, except one question viz. whether the principles of quasi-partnership ...5, the shareholders of the Respondent No.1 Company have consciously decided to adopt a corporate model of business and as such principles of quasi partnership cannot apply to the present case. The...(1996) 10 SCC 696, in support of their contention that principles of quasi partnership do not apply to the facts and circumstances of...

...[(1981) 3 SCC 333] .) 227. It is now well known that principles of quasi-partnership ...that for no purpose whatsoever can the principles of quasi-partnership be applied to an incorporated company. The real character of the company, as noticed...principles of quasi-partnership in a given case may be invoked. 231. The ratio of the said decision, with respect, cannot be held...

..., the respondents have, in breach of the principles of quasi-partnership, acted in an oppressive manner against the petitioners holding ⅓rd shares in the company and have also indulged in gross...: (1996) 10 SCC 696, the Supreme Court has held that quasi-partnership principles cannot be applied in a company. Further, the petitioners have not established...Ltd., [1972] 2 All ER 492 (HL), it has been held that using the majority power as provided in the articles, if a director in a company in the nature of a quasi-partnership, is removed, it would amo...

...Appeal No. 7 of 2010 except one question viz. whether the principles of quasi-partnership would apply, as there are no third party shareholders in the Company?. As submitted by Respondent Nos. 2 and...5, the shareholders of the Respondent No.1 Company have consciously decided to adopt a corporate model of business and as such principles of quasi partnership cannot apply to the present case. The...Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs. Shekhar Mehra (1996) 10 SCC 696, in support of their contention that principles of quasi partnership ...

...appointment of Respondent No. 5 as Additional Director is against the interests of KEIL/Company as well as the Petitioner as a shareholder of KEIL/Company and also violative of the principles of ...B.S.V. Prakash Kumar, Judicial Member:— The Petitioner filed this CP u/s. 397, 398 r/w 402, 403 & 408 of the Companies Act. 1956 seeking the reliefs as follows...:(a) Declare that the alleged meeting of Board of Directors held on 16.7.2013 behind the hack of the Petitioner was illegal and null and void.(b) Declare that the...

...on the basis of principles of quasi partnership which should be in the interest of members and the public. The interest of the Company is paramount rather than personal relations. I do no...settled law that though the provisions of CPC do not apply in these summary proceedings, but the principles do apply. The principle of res judicata does apply in the present matter. The petitioners...Petition on the ground of res judicata. In this regard, learned Advocate for the appellants invited attention of the Court to the observations made by the Company Law Board in paragraph 17 which...

...principles of partnership, for judging true character of the company and business realities of the situation enquiry should not be confined to a narrow legalistic view. Principles of ...and there was no right as such agreed upon for active participation of members who were sought to be excluded from management, the principles of dissolution of partnership should not be liberally invoked. ...real character of the company for the purpose of judging the dealings between the parties and the transactions impugned, assume significance and in such an event, the principles of quasi-...

...of a quasi-partnership, and therefore, the principles relating to a quasi-partnership apply to the facts of the case in hand. Referring the decision rendered by the CLB, Principal Bench, ..., next submitted that in a company running on the principles of quasi-partnership, the legitimate expectation of its shareholders, having almost equal shareholding, is that they should be on the Board....14. On the other side, the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondents refuted the contention of the Petitioners that the principles of quasi-partnership can be applied to the Company. He...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...the basis of principles of quasi partnership. The Learned Counsel submitted that the figures which were given by the Company are not correct. The sole intention of the respondents is to dilute the...1. The applicants are the respondents in the above C.P The present application is filed by them seeking directions from this Bench to allow the applicant company to infuse funds by way of...increase in paid up capital by issue and allotment of shares to the members in proportion to their shareholding. Shri Jagtiani, Learned Counsel for the applicants submitted that this Bench vide its...

...venture of which business has been taken over by respondent No. 1 company. Learned counsel submits that in order to contend the principles of quasi partnership, the essential ingredients or parameters as...the given case much more to qualify to assert to rely upon the principles of quasi-partnership, the participation should be in equal proportion, before and after incorporation;(b) Since...is in minority. However, it will not be open for him to contend and resort to the principles of quasi-partnership nevertheless, their right to independently establish grievances as minority...

...(2005 (11) SCC 314) that even principles of quasi partnership could be invoked, when the company in question is a family company. The Court also...noted that the true character of the company and the business realities of the situation should not be confined to a narrow legalistic view and that the principles of quasi partnership are not for...Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of...

...carried out on me basis of principles of quasi partnership which should be in the interest of members and the public. The interest of the Company is paramount rather than personal relatio...1. The present petition is filed by invoking the provisions of Sec. 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) alleging certain acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of...the Company by the Respondents and sought reliefs as prayed in para 7.1 to 7.3 of the petition. Shri Dhiren Dave, PCS appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the directors and...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...2005 (11) SCC 314, it has been held that the principles of quasi partnership could be invoked when the Company in question is a family company. However...(Judgment of the Court was delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.) This Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated 23.12.2011 made in W.P(MD)No.8955 of 2011. 2.Brief...facts of the case are as follows: (i) The appellant is the Managing Director and one of the Directors of a Company namely Jaivairavan Private Limited in Ramnad. The said...

...veil of the Respondent No. 1, 4 and 9 and declare that all are same and apply the principles of Quasi Partnership to remedy the oppression and mismanagement caused by the Respondents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10...illegal and improper and they are against the principles of Quasi partnership. In addition to this, the Respondent No. 2 & 3 with the connivance of other Respondents have been siphoning off the funds ...unequivocal terms the true nature of relation between Petitioner 1 and Respondent No. 4 which is of Quasi-Partnership. After meeting all its obligations as per the said MOU, Petitioner's nominee was...

...circumstances under which a director's office must be vacated), which once again points to the quasi- partnership functioning of the Plaintiff Company. 42. As such.... Therefore, even according to the Defendants, Defendant No.4 is a quasi-partnership, being in the nature of a family business, to which principles recognized under Indian law akin to partnership...principles are applicable and as a part of which quasi-partnership understanding directors are permanent directors subject only to the office of the directorship being vacated under Article 144 of...