... restoration application no. 7 of 2002-03 (Om Prakash Vs. Sukkhey and Others) filed in Reference No. 64 of 1989-90 (Om Prakash Vs. Sukkhey and... restoration application no. 7 of 2002-03 (Om Prakash Vs. Sukkhey and Others) filed in Reference No. 64 of 1989-90 (Om Prakash Vs. Sukkhey and Others... Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32808 of 2015 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- D.V. Jaiswal...

...Execution Case No. 53 of 2000 (Satya Prakash vs. State of U.P.) within stipulated period of time. It is submitted by learned counsel...for the petitioner that petitioner had filed an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. in Execution Case No. 53 of 2000 (Satya Prakash vs. State...(Satya Prakash vs. State of U.P.) expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, unless there is any legal impediment...

...the hearing the Respondents stated that the Commissions Order dated 13.09.2011 was received by them in the last week of No. CIC/SS/C/2012/000747 : Kanodia Om Prakash Vs. APEDA 1 of 3...& CPIO, No. CIC/SS/C/2012/000747 : Kanodia Om Prakash Vs. APEDA 2 of 3 Agricultural & Processed Food Products Export Development Authority, 3rd Floor, NCUI Building, 3, Siri...) Dairy, DELHI 110 042. No. CIC/SS/C/2012/000747 : Kanodia Om Prakash Vs. APEDA 3 of 3 ...

...Prakash Vs. Jitendra and Ors" pending before the Rent Tribunal, Alwar. The present writ petition has already been finally disposed off on 03.11.2017...vide order dated 07.09.2022, called for the report about the pendency of application No.87/2014 titled as"'Prem Prakash Vs. Jitendra and...dated 17.09.2022, has reported that the case No.34/87/2014 "Prem Prakash Vs. Jitendra and Ors" has been finally decided on 12.02.2021...

...:- Dharmendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has instituted Rent Suit No.10 of 2014 (Ram Prakash Vs. Kishan...adjournments. In the aforesaid backdrop, petitioner has prayed for a direction to Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kanpur Nagar to decide the Rent Suit No.10 of 2014 (Ram Prakash Vs. Kishan...of with a direction to Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur Nagar to decide the Rent Suit No.10 of 2014 (Ram Prakash Vs. Kishan Sharma and Others) pending before him expeditiously...

...Revisional Order dated 22.11.2023 passed by the learned Additional District and Session Judge, Court No. 12, Agra in Criminal Revision No. 529 of 2022 (Om Prakash vs. State of U.P. and...others) and summoning order dated 08.09.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Agra in Complaint Case No. 1798 of 2022 (Om Prakash vs. Awdesh Kumar and...Criminal Revision No. 529 of 2022 (Om Prakash vs. State of U.P. and others) which was also rejected by by Additional District and Session Judge, Agra vide order dated 22.11.2023. The...

.... Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus to direct the opposite party No.2 to decide the interim application filed with Revision No. 2585 of 2025, Prakash Vs. Deputy Collector (Revenue...: Prakash Vs. Deputy Collector (Revenue), Lucknow and another. 5. Accordingly the petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party No.2-Commissioner Lucknow...Division to expeditiously decide the Revision No. 2585 of 2025: Prakash Vs. Deputy Collector (Revenue), Lucknow and another with expedition in accordance with law, in case there is no legal...

.... T202105440202463 (Ram Prakash Vs. Vikas) filed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006, expeditiously within time bound period as fix by this Hon'ble Court." .... T202105440202463 (Ram Prakash Vs. Vikas) filed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 within a stipulated period. 4. Per contra, learned standing cou.... T202105440202463 (Ram Prakash Vs. Vikas) preferred by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date a certified...

... HIGH COURT OF M.P. BENCH AT INDORE M.Cr.C.No.6005/2022 (Rahul S/o. Shree Prakash vs. State of M.P.) Indore dt.2.2.2022 Heard through...Shri Shvinararayan vs. State of M.P." whereas it should have been "Rahul S/o. Shree Prakash vs. State of M.P." and prays for modification of the order dated 27.1.2022...extent that the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid M.Cr.C its heading be read as "Rahul S/o. Shree Prakash vs. State of M.P." and not as "Mahesh S/o Shri Shvinararayan...

...present writ petition has been filed for a suitable direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.1, Muzaffarnagar to decide the Execution Case No.6 of 2001 (Ravi Prakash Vs. State...Division), Court No.1, Muzaffarnagar to consider and decide the objections under Section 47 of C.P.C. filed by the defendant-respondent in Execution Case No.6 of 2001 (Ravi Prakash Vs. State of...the Execution Case No.6 of 2001 (Ravi Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others), most expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of...

...Background: Shri Prakash VS of Trivandrum filed an RTI application with the CPIO of Indian Space Research Organisation, Department of Space, Bangalore on 11 February 2010...Organisation, Department of Space, Bangalore, who is directed to dispose of the appeal of Shri Prakash VS within twenty working days from the date of receipt of this decision, under intimation to Shri Vijay...Authenticated true copy: (Vijay Bhalla) Assistant Registrar 1. Shri Prakash VS, TC. 18/214, Annoor, Thirumala PO, Trivandrum 695 006. 2. The Central Public Information Officer...

...this Court in CWP No.7602 of 2010, titled as Om Prakash vs. State of H.P. & Ors., along with connected matters, on 2nd May, 2012. He further submits...this Court in CWP No.7602 of 2010, titled as Om Prakash vs. State of H.P. & Ors., along with connected matters, on 2nd May, 2012, within eight weeks...from today and will decide the same by passing a speaking order. In case petitioners are found similarly situated as petitioners in CWP No.7602 of 2010, titled as Om Prakash vs. State...

...information sought by him was not clear and advised that he may seek specific No. CIC/SS/C/2012/000746 : Kanodia Om Prakash Vs. APEDA 1 of 4 information and he was also advised that if he was..., the matter is closed at the Commissions end. No. CIC/SS/C/2012/000746 : Kanodia Om Prakash Vs. APEDA 2 of 4 (Sushma Singh) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy: (D C...Singh) Deputy Secretary & Deputy Registrar No. CIC/SS/C/2012/000746 : Kanodia Om Prakash Vs. APEDA 3 of 4 Copy to: 1. The General Manager & CPIO...

...Om Prakash vs. State of Rajasthan [S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8928/2015]. The order dated 18.8.2015 passed by the co-ordinate Bench in the case of Om Prakash (supra) reads as...as in as in the case of Om Prakash vs. State of Rajasthan [S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8928/2015] decided on 18.8.2015. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA)J... S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9617/2015 Phoolchand vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:- 28th August, 2015 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Mr...

...1 Mcrc.4055.2016 Ramesh alias Prakash Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh 18.04.2016 Shri Arun Barua, counsel for the applicant. Shri B.K. Sharma, Public...Ramesh @ Prakash be read as Lalluram Jatav instead of Janved Jatav. 2 Mcrc.4055.2016 Ramesh alias Prakash Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh This order shall be the part and parcel of the order dated 30.03.2016 p...Jatav. Copy of the voter identity card has also been filed in support of the present application. It appears that only one Ramesh @ Prakash is required by the police in the case and therefore, the...

...Petitioner :- Saurabh Chaurasia,Amit Singh Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. The petitioner is defendant in Original Suit No. 3379 of 2021 (Satya Prakash Vs. Yamuna Prasad...to decide the Temporary Injunction Application No. 60-C and the Original Suit No. 3379 of 2021 (Satya Prakash Vs. Yamuna Prasad Chaurisa), expeditiously. In the facts and... Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3279 of 2023 Petitioner :- Yamuna Prasad Chaurasia Respondent :- Satya Prakash And 9 Others Counsel for...

...seeking a direction to the respondent no. 1-Principal Judge Family Court, Jalaun at Orai to decide the case being Marriage Petition No. 204 of 2017 (Rahul Prakash Vs. Smt. Priyanka Gupta and...Marriage Petition No. 204 of 2017 (Rahul Prakash Vs. Smt. Priyanka Gupta and another) pending before him since 31.5.2017 expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the... Court No. - 39 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1016 of 2019 Petitioner :- Rahul Prakash Respondent :- Principal Judge Family Judge And 2 Others Counsel...

...Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (M.P./M.L.A.), Prayagraj in Criminal Revision No.115 of 2024 (Om Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others) as well as order dated 03.02.2024 passed by Judicial...Magistrate, Court No.2, Prayagraj in Misc. Application No.656 of 2024 (Om Prakash Vs. Hari Singh and others), under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C... Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13662 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37717 of 2024 Applicant :- Om Prakash Opposite Party :- State Of...

...application dated 16.12.2024 for grant of temporary injunction filed in Original Suit No.1023 of 2024 (Ved Prakash vs. Mukesh), which is pending consideration. As no useful purpose...direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffarnagar to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) dated 16.12.2024 filed in Original Suit No.1023 of 2024 (Ved Prakash vs. Mukesh... Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84402 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5217 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Respondent :- Mukesh...

...present petition with a sole prayer that a direction be issued to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Etawah to decide the Suit No.64 of 2006 (Ravi Prakash Vs. Guru Narayan and others...to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Etawah to decide the Suit No.64 of 2006 (Ravi Prakash Vs. Guru Narayan and others) pending before him expeditiously, preferably within a period...:- Ravi Prakash And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Mishra Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has come up in the...