Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Delhi High Court36
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court5
+ Supreme Court Of India5
+ Bombay High Court4
+ Madras High Court4
+ Orissa High Court2
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India1
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Kerala High Court1
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1
+ Tripura High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Calcutta High Court0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Gujarat High Court0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Karnataka High Court0
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Rajasthan High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards46
From 2011 To 202012
From 2001 To 20100
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...party is limited as it has to choose one out of the five names 18 that are forwarded by the other side...considered by the Supreme Court in Voestalpine Schienen GMBH (supra), wherein it was explained why the names of the arbitrators in the panel should not be limited to Government departments or Public...observed that this panel should be broad based and not limited to the Officers/ officials of one party only. 30. This principle was followed by the Co-ordinate Bench in...

...party is limited as it has to choose one out of the five names 18 that are forwarded by the other side...considered by the Supreme Court in Voestalpine Schienen GMBH (supra), wherein it was explained why the names of the arbitrators in the panel should not be limited to Government departments or Public...observed that this panel should be broad based and not limited to the Officers/ officials of one party only. 30. This principle was followed by the Co-ordinate Bench in...

...party is limited as it has to choose one out of the five names 18 that are forwarded by the other side...considered by the Supreme Court in Voestalpine Schienen GMBH (supra), wherein it was explained why the names of the arbitrators in the panel should not be limited to Government departments or Public...observed that this panel should be broad based and not limited to the Officers/ officials of one party only. 30. This principle was followed by the Co-ordinate Bench in...

...issued by OP alongwith copy of courier receipt issued by Overnite Express Ltd. OP has also filed written arguments. 7. This forum has considered the case of the complainant in the...investigator of OPs company, it is found that the insured vehicle was parked in area where DMRC has put a board stating that the area is no parking area as per order of DMRC and condition no. 4 ...therebyalleging that thecomplainant is owner of the vehicle i.e. TVS-APACHE RTR 160 bearing Registration no. DL-08-SN-D-6018 and got the same insured with OP vide insurance cover note bearing policy...

...place, the choice given to the opposite party is limited as it has to choose one out of the five names that are forwarded by the other side. There is no free choice to nominate a...arbitrators have also limited choice of picking upon the third arbitrator from the very same list i.e. from remaining three persons. This procedure has two adverse consequences. In the first...panel has to be limited to the aforesaid category of persons. Keeping in view the spirit of the amended provision and in order to instil confidence in the mind of the other party, it is...

... Annexure 12 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22ND AUGUST 2022 IN OVERNITE EXPRESS LIMITED VS. DELHI METRO... THE PETITIONER Annexure 11 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18TH APRIL 2022 IN JAGUAR OVERSEAS LIMITED... Annexure 5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLETION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY GE (P) EZHIMALA VIDE LETTER NO. 8064/1030/E8 DATED...

...same condition as it was on the date of pre-bid site visit and carry out all acts and deeds including and not limited to re-installation of power cables and isolators/MCCBs...specific relief. It is an order of a court requiring a party either to do a specific act or acts or to refrain from doing a specific act or acts either for a limited period or...with the remedies connected with compensatory reliefs except as incidental and to a limited extent. The right to relief of injunctions is contained in Part III of the Specific...

...same condition as it was on the date of pre-bid site visit and carry out all acts and deeds including and not limited to re-installation of power cables and isolators/MCCBs...specific relief. It is an order of a court requiring a party either to do a specific act or acts or to refrain from doing a specific act or acts either for a limited period or...with the remedies connected with compensatory reliefs except as incidental and to a limited extent. The right to relief of injunctions is contained in Part III of the Specific...

...same condition as it was on the date of pre-bid site visit and carry out all acts and deeds including and not limited to re-installation of power cables and isolators/MCCBs...specific relief. It is an order of a court requiring a party either to do a specific act or acts or to refrain from doing a specific act or acts either for a limited period or...with the remedies connected with compensatory reliefs except as incidental and to a limited extent. The right to relief of injunctions is contained in Part III of the Specific...

...prominence from the private sector etc. The said judgements were relied upon in the case of Overnite Express 16 Limited Vs. Delhi...14SMS Ltd. Vs Rail Vikas Nigam Limited , out a panel of 37 names, only eight names had no connection with the Railways. It ...Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited . Also, the coordinate bench of this court in BVSR-KVR (Joint...

...case of Overnite Express Limited Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation16, this court went to the extent of...arbitrator the Court would not find any imbalance impinging upon the concept of party autonomy. This was the sentiment expressed by the Supreme Court in TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering...Government of Haryana PWD Haryana (B and R) Branch Vs. G.F. Toll Road Private Limited and...

...private sector etc. The said judgments were relied upon in the case of Overnite Express Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, this...Court in Union Of India Petitioner(S) v. Tantia Constructions Limited (S)., SLP (C) No. 12670 of 2020 and..., In SMS Ltd. v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited, out a panel of 37 names, only eight names had no connection with the Railways...

..., engineers of prominence from the private sector etc. The said judgments were relied upon in the case of Overnite Express ... involving appointment from a panel. Thus, In SMS Ltd. v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited, out a panel of 37 names, only eight names had .... Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 4849; Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. v...

...summons sent to the petitioner the address is changed to Village and Post office Rajauri. The summons have been sent by courier from Overnite Express Private Limited. The report of the courier service...instead of village Rajokari. Summons had been returned back showing that the address is incomplete. This is clear from the report of the Overnite Express Private Limited the courier through which the...Army. It is stated that the petitioner and respondents No.2 and 3 decided to incorporate a Private Limited Company. The Director General Resettlement, Ministry of Defence, R.K.Puram, New Delhi...

...of the BC-2 Project to SEL cannot be said to be contrary to the express terms of the contract or any provision of law.18. In any event, given the scope of the proceedings under Sect...failing to concur on such appointment the Respondent filed Arb. P. No. 339 of 2009 in this Court under Section 11(6) of the Act. By an order dated 9 April 2010, the Court appointed Justice S.S Chadha, a...1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act’) by Senbo Engineering Ltd. (‘SEL’) is to an Award dated 1st August 2011 passed by the...

...case of Bharat Broadband Network Limited v. United Telecoms Limited...the said list. Above all, the two arbitrators have also limited choice of picking upon the third arbitrator from the very same list i.e. from remaining three persons. This...procedure has two adverse consequences. In the first place, the choice given to the opposite party is limited as it has to choose one out of the five names that are forwarded by the...

...limited as it has to choose one out of the five names that are forwarded by the other side. There is no free choice to nominate a person out of the entire panel prepared by DMRC...Section 12(5) of the Act. Elucidating the law in this regard, Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Broadband Network Limited v. United...done away with). Not only this, DMRC is also to nominate its arbitrator from the said list. Above all, the two arbitrators have also limited choice of picking upon the third...

.... 2. OMP (COMM) (I) 200/2017 is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Act by Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Concessionaire) seeking a...Airport Metro Express Private Limited (the Concessionaire) seeking a direction to the Delhi Metro to deposit with the Court an amount of Rs. 3502.62 Crores being 75% of the amount...under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as Delhi Metro for...

.... 2. OMP (COMM) (I) 200/2017 is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Act by Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Concessionaire) seeking a...Airport Metro Express Private Limited (the Concessionaire) seeking a direction to the Delhi Metro to deposit with the Court an amount of Rs. 3502.62 Crores being 75% of the amount...under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as Delhi Metro for...

... Generation Private Limited v. Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Private Limited and another [2025 (2) SCC 417]. Paragraph No.73 ....) No.525 of 2025 Chennai Network Infrastructure Limited [CNIL] Presently called: M/s.GTL Infrastructure Limited, City Centre, No.232, Old .... 3. The respondents entered into a lease agreement dated 10.10.2006 with M/s.Aircel Cellular Limited with respect to open terrace for the purpose of erecting cellular mobile transmitting...