Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court3565
+ Allahabad High Court2050
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1188
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1119
+ Uttarakhand High Court703
+ Rajasthan High Court539
+ Patna High Court440
+ Delhi High Court348
+ Jharkhand High Court337
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission237
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission194
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court192
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal180
+ Central Information Commission163
+ CESTAT156
+ Chhattisgarh High Court141
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission120
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal118
+ Madras High Court108
+ RERA76
+ Bombay High Court71
+ Karnataka High Court52
+ Supreme Court Of India50
+ SEBI49
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal36
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal32
+ National Green Tribunal31
+ Kerala High Court28
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court27
+ Gujarat High Court22
+ National Company Law Tribunal21
+ Calcutta High Court16
+ Telangana High Court16
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court10
+ Gauhati High Court9
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal8
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority8
+ Orissa High Court7
+ Sikkim High Court6
+ Armed Forces Tribunal4
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act3
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India3
+ Company Law Board2
+ Railway Claims Tribunal2
+ Competition Commission Of India1
+ Meghalaya High Court1
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Privy Council0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards8662
From 2011 To 20203194
From 2001 To 2010142
From 1991 To 200015
From 1981 To 19902
From 1971 To 19801
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Nagar, to decide Complaint Case No.2756 of 2021 (Smt. Neetu Singh v. Gaurav Singh and others), under Section 12 of Protection of Women from... Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:170726 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1906 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt. Neetu Singh Opposite Party...

...proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondents. The petitioner has approached this Court to expedite the Civil Revision No.46 of 2017 (Smt. Neetu Singh v. Smt... Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6671 of 2017 Petitioner :- Smt. Neetu Singh Respondent :- Ld. Additional District Judge, Mirzapur And 25...

.... Rajeeva Sharma, Neetu Singh, V. Roy For the Respondents: M/s. J.C. to S.C. (Mines) ------ 13/Dated: 3rd August, 2016 Per D.N. Patel, J. 1) Having heard...IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No.82 of 2010 Ram Chandra Singh, Son of Late Gurucharan Singh, resident of...

...No. 1514 of 2014 (Neetu Singh v Ajit Kumar Singh & others), under sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibtion Act, P.S. Manduvadih, District Varanasi pending in the... Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19093 of 2015 Applicant :- Ajit Kumar Singh And 4 Ors. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for...thereafter. Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant Nos. 2 to 5 namely Smt. Tara Devi, Sita Ram Singh, Santosh Singh alias Ghoore and Smt. Sunita Singh in Complaint Case...

...Padli Gujjar, Post Milap Nagar, Roorkee, District Haridwar. ... . . Applicant By Adv: Shri Ms. Neetu Singh V E R S U S 1. General Manager... BY HON'BLE MR.RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMBER - J Heard Ms. Neetu Singh learned counsel for the applicants and Shri P. K. Rai, learned counsel for the respondents...

...case titled as Neetu Singh v. State, reported as 1999 (1) PLR (Delhi) 47 observed that even a minor girl cannot be kept in protective homes against her wishes...Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class Palwal on 7.3.2013 where she has clearly expressed her desire that she wants to reside with her husband Udham Singh and not with the petitioner who is her father....Likewise a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Smt. Raj Kumari v. Superintendent, Women Protection House, Meerut...

...perform marriage and that marriage cannot be said to be void. In Balwinder Singh's case (supra), a further reliance has been placed upon ‘Neetu Singh v. State (Delhi)’ 1999 (3) RCR (Criminal...Bench of this Court in ‘Balwinder Singh @ Binder v. State of Punjab’ 2008 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1 to state that a minor girl can also...KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL)Petitioners namely Poonam and Naveen Kumar are present in the Court. Petitioner No. 1-Poonam is aged 17 years as per her matriculation...

..., Rajasthan. ... . . Applicants By Adv: MS. Neetu Singh V E R S U S 1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of... O R D E R BY HON'BLE MR.RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMBER - J Heard Ms. Neetu Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri D.S...Maniyari (Female, Aged about 36 years, Staff Nurse Grade-II) D/o Mohan Lal R/o C/o Megh Singh Pokhriyal, Gali No.4, near Sanshkar Paly School, Rishikesh (Bharat Vihar), District- Dehradun, Uttarakhand...

...marriage cannot be considered as void. Likewise a Division Bench of Delhi High Court in the case titled as Neetu Singh v. State, reported as 1999 (1) PLR (Delhi) 47...security for her life they are also willing to part with half of the share of their property in her favour.The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Smt. Lila Gupta v. Laxmi Narain...18(5) of Hindu Marriage Act. Likewise a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Smt. Raj Kumari v. Superintendent, Women...

...such event, the police shall grant protection to them.”6. In Neetu Singh v. State, 1999 (3) R.C.R. (Crl.) 26, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held...confining an individual against his or her wishes even if he or she is minor. Apart from this the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Fiaz Ahmed Ahanger v. State of J & K 2009 (3) R.A.J...

...petitioner against the judgment and order dated 28.02.2013 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Kannauj in maintenance case no. 02/12/09 (Neetu Singh v. Suraj Singh), under...

...Singh v. State 1999 (3) R.C.R (Criminal) 26 and judgment of this Court in Balwinder Singh alias Binder v. State of Punjab, 2008 (3) R.C.R (Criminal) 1...Nari Niketan, she cannot be forced to stay in Nari Niketan, Karnal against her wishes. In support of his contentions, he has relied upon Division Bench judgment of the Delhi High Court in Neetu...

...intend to pass any order which may affect the circumstances of the case. Suffice it to say that in view of the observations of the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in Neetu Singh v. State...appears to be covered by the observations of Supreme Court in Fiaz Ahmed Ahanger v. State of J&K 2009 (3) R.A.J 692, which are as under:-“In such cases...

...further relies upon the Division Bench Judgment of Delhi High Court in Neetu Singh v. State 1999(3) R.C.R(Criminal) 26 in support of his contention and states that a minor...Balwinder Singh @ Binder v. State of Punjab and others 2008(3) R.C.R(Criminal) 1, the marriage of a minor girl cannot be said to be void and such wedlo...ORDERPetitioner Shamsher Singh has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the...

...could not be sent to the Nari Niketan against her wishes even if she was minor at that stage. A Division Bench of Delhi High Court in the case of Neetu Singh v. State, 1999...virtue of Section 18 thereof at best can lead to imprisonment of upto 15 days and/or fine which may extend to Rs. 1,000/- or both.”7. It was further held that the marriage of Neetu Singh was neither void nor voidable,...(3) R.C.R (Criminal) 26, in para 7 held as under:“7. It is thus clear that even if it is assumed that the petitioner-Neetu Singh was a minor on the date of marriage, even than...

...Singh v. Santosh Kumar Singh) under Sections 498-A, 504, 506 I.P.C and Section 3/4 D.P Act, Police Station Jalal Pur, District Ambedkar Nagar pending in the Court of...disputes and differences. The Settlement/Agreement entered into on 24.2.2009 between the petitioner, Santosh Kumar Singh (husband) and O.P No. 2, Smt. Neetu Singh @ Pinki (wife) is placed on record. The...petitioner, Santosh Kumar Singh and O.P No. 2, Smt. Neetu Singh @ Pinki who are identified by their learned counsels appeared in person before this Court on 09.09.2009 and confirmed that they have...

...Singh v. State, 1999 (1) PLR (Delhi) 47 has observed as under:-“7. It is thus clear that even if it is assumed that in the present case the petitioner Neetu...Court in Fiaz Ahmed Ahanger v. State of J & K2009 (3) R.A.J 692, has held under:-“In such cases of intercaste or inter-religion marriage the Court has only to be...important factor and therefore, the plea of the petitioner that she be lodged in Nari Niketan cannot be accepted in view of the peculiar facts of the case. That apart, the High Court of Delhi in Neetu...

...tantamount to illegal custody. In this regard reference is made to the judgments delivered in the cases of Neetu Singh v. State, 1999 (3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 26 (D.B....); Smt. Saroj v. State of U.P., 2012 (93) ALR 37; Balwinder Singh @ Binder v...; Surekha v. State of Haryana (CRM-M-11923-2013 (O&M), decided on 15.5.2013 by this Court); and Sabba Singh @ Sarbjeet Singh...

...of Delhi High Court in Neetu Singh v. State, 1999(3) RCR (Criminal) 26, to say that even a minor girl cannot be detained at Nari Niketan 1 of 3 Criminal...the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon decisions of this Court in Balwinder Singh @ Binder v. State of Punjab and others, 2008(3) RCR (Criminal) 1 as well as...Present: Mr. Ankush Chowdhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arjun Singh Yadav, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajender Singh Duggal, Advocate for respondent No. 4. LISA GILL , J. This petition...

...Singh v. State1999 (1) P.L.R Delhi 47, has held that even a minor girl cannot be kept in Nari Niketan against her wishes and she was released in custody of her husband...incidents are not entirely unheard of and prima facie the case also appears to be covered by the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Fiaz Ahmed Ahanger v. State of J & K2009 (3...police and, in such event, the police shall grant protection to them.”Even the wish of a minor girl is to be honoured. In Vivek Kumar alias Sanju v. The State Crl.M.C No...