Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Gauhati High Court8
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission5
+ Allahabad High Court3
+ Patna High Court3
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2
+ Calcutta High Court1
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1
+ Central Information Commission1
+ Delhi High Court1
+ Gujarat High Court1
+ Karnataka High Court1
+ Kerala High Court1
+ Madras High Court1
+ National Green Tribunal1
+ Uttarakhand High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Bombay High Court0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Rajasthan High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Supreme Court Of India0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards17
From 2011 To 20206
From 2001 To 20104
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19901
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19701
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19502

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...the House of Lords in the case in Minter v. Priest (1930) A.C. 558 where every law Lord expressed the opinion that the case in More v. Weaver (1928) 2 K.B. 520...unreported case Minter v. Brockman. If the reason of the rule is examined, this view seems to be sound. The doctrine of absolute privilege is, as pointed out by Channel, J., in Bottomley v..., Suitors and parties, in respect of anything stated by them in the course of any such proceeding. 9. As Brett, J., observed in Munster v. Lamb (1883) 11 Q.B.D. 588, it does not...

...privileged. (See Minter v. Priest (1930) A.C 558, 571-72) (7). A complete list of those occasions of qualified privilege is furnished by nine exceptions enacted in...classic definition was given by Mr. Justice Cave in Scott v. Sampson (1882)8 Q.B.D 491(1) as “a false statement about a man to his discredit”. In Sim v. Stretch...Bira Gareri v. Dulhin Somaria, AIR 1962 Patna 229) (3). In civil actions for damages there is what has been called “judicial privilege.” Neithe...

...Lords in Minter v. Priest, 1930 AC 558. But I would rely upon a recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Szalatnay Stacho v. Fink, (1947) KB 1.15. In 1941 the Plaintiff...absolutely privileged. There are numerous English cases on the subject but I would first make reference to the decision of the House of Lords in H. Watson v. Mrs. J.P Jones...afraid to give their testimony.”14. The view taken in Watson's case, 1905 AC 480 (supra), was followed by the Court of Appeal in Beresford v. White...

...doubtful authority since Minter v. Priest(11). There the House of Lords make it clear that the privilege of the occasion when a solicitor is consulted protects only statements relevant to the matter about...respectfully agree with the Madras High Court in Balammal v. Palandi Naidu(1) that where there are two possible opinions as to what English law...law recognised that a Judge as such could speak as he liked without any fear or favour whatsoever. One reason for this is clearly stated as early as 1674 by North, C.J, in Barmardiston v. Soame(2) as...

...the better view is that it is an occasion and not the statement which is privileged. (See Minter v. Priest (1930) AC 558, 571-72). A complete list of those occasions of qualified...; v. Nusserwanji Nowroji Engineer…Defendant., reported in AIR 1941 BOMBAY 278.(ii) Khair-ud-Din v. Tara...Singh, reported in AIR 1927 LAHORE 20.(iii) Bhagwan Singh v. Ujagir Singh, reported in...

...------------ Advocate for the Petitioner : V Mandal, Eho Menjo,Minter Karbak,Pritam Taffo Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Education),Taba Tagum Date of...order imposing any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of Rule 11 shall be made except after an inquiry held, as far as may be, in the manner provided in this rule and rule 15, or in the...derived authority from a decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in BSNL v. Bhurumal, reported in (2014) 7 SCC 177...

...-DaporijoUpper Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Pritam Taffo V Mandal, Eho Menjo,Minter Karbak Advocate for the Respondent...penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of Rule 11 shall be made except after an inquiry held, as far as may be, in the manner provided in this rule and rule 15, or in the...Supreme Court in BSNL v. Bhurumal, reported in (2014) 7 SCC 177, wherein it has been held as...

...the police for the offences related to the theft, only with the intention to show good work. It is next submitted that the case of the applicant is similar to co-accused Damru @ Rammurti, Ram Minter...@ Minter, Anoop and Chippa @ Sunder, who have been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 9878 of 2022, 5896 of 2022, 4865 of 2022 and 3889 of 2022, respectively. The...the bail orders of co-accused Damru @ Rammurti, Ram Minter @ Minter, Anoop and Chippa @ Sunder provided by the learned counsel for the applicant are taken on record...

...that similarly placed co-accused persons, Chippa @ Sundar Lal and Ram Minter @ Minter have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 9.11.2021 25.11.2021 passed in Bail Nos. 10885 of...filed on 9.3.2022. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, Chippa @ Sundar Lal and Ram Minter @ Minter who have already been enlarged on bail, he...

...confessed that he had committed the robbery about one month ago along with his accomplices Chippa @ Sunder Lal, Ram Minter @ Minter, 1...- accused persons Chppa @ Sundar Lal, Ram Minter @ Minter and Anoop have already been granted bail by this court by means of orders dated 09.11.2021, 25.11.2021 and 16.03.2022, passed in Criminal Misc...

...furnishes one personal bond with two reliable sureties. Keeping in view the fact that the applicant is seriously ill, let the applicant-Smt. Sumitra @ Minter be released on short term bail for a period of...

..., North Western Railway, RTI Cell, DRM's Office, Jodhpur Division, Jodhpur, Rajasthan seeking following information:— i) certified copy of seniority list of track-minter I, II, III and IV under Sub-Zonal...not published, v) publishing date of joint seniority year wise list from 2011-2017 and, vi) last publishing date of joint seniority, vii) reasons for not publishing the last joint seniority list etc...

...) 1. Smt. Minter Kumari, W/o- Sri Ashok Kumar, R/o- Village & PO- Bailhanddi, PS- Bailagang, District- Gaya ...........Appellant(s) Versus 1. The... BIHAR, PATNA Appeal No. 369 of 2012 Smt. Minter Kumari, W/o- Sri Ashok Kumar, R/o- Village...

..., DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686002 BY ADVS. SMT. SREEJA V. - SENIOR PUBLIC..., Smt. Sreeja V., on instructions, submits that the investigation is over and the draft final report is ready. The learned Public Prosecutor further submits that final report could not be filed, since... 5 Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY POULOSE.V.J. TO THE HON'BLE MINTER FOR LAW AND INDUSTRIES DATED 12-3-20...

...(J) Harinder Singh, Office Supdt., age 51 years, Group C S/o Lt. Shri Beg Minter R/o H.No.17, Gali No.20, Jain Road, R.K. Block...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

... : Pritam TaffoV Mandal, Eho Menjo,Minter Karbak, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Education),Taba Tagum Date of Hearing & Judgment...Rules provides that no order imposing any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of Rule 11 shall be made except after an inquiry held, as far as may be, in...back wages, this court derived authority from a decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in BSNL v. Bhurumal, reported in (2014) 7 SCC...

...Petitioner : Pritam TaffoV Mandal, Eho Menjo,Minter Karbak, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Education),Taba Tagum Date of Hearing...dismissal from service, which are indisputably major penalty, under the said Rule. Rule 14 of the said Rules provides that no order imposing any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to...Hon'ble Supreme Court in BSNL v. Bhurumal, reported in (2014) 7 SCC 177, wherein it...