Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court2192
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1810
+ Allahabad High Court1476
+ Patna High Court1473
+ Bombay High Court1181
+ Jharkhand High Court1153
+ Central Administrative Tribunal562
+ Delhi High Court329
+ Rajasthan High Court302
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal291
+ National Green Tribunal224
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court212
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission162
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court129
+ Gujarat High Court91
+ Kerala High Court91
+ Calcutta High Court86
+ Supreme Court Of India82
+ CESTAT67
+ Orissa High Court67
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission62
+ Gauhati High Court62
+ Karnataka High Court50
+ SEBI50
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal47
+ Madras High Court44
+ Uttarakhand High Court37
+ National Company Law Tribunal31
+ Armed Forces Tribunal28
+ Central Information Commission28
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act27
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission18
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court17
+ RERA15
+ Telangana High Court15
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal14
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority13
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court10
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal6
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal6
+ Tripura High Court4
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity3
+ District Court2
+ Manipur High Court2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Company Law Board1
+ Meghalaya High Court1
+ Sikkim High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards8622
From 2011 To 20203190
From 2001 To 2010217
From 1991 To 200038
From 1981 To 19905
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...G. Chitre, J. 1. Heard. The petitioner Mamta Jaiswal has acquired qualification as M.Sc., M.C., M.Ed. and was working in Gulamnabi Azad College of Education, Pusad, Dist. Yeotmal (MHS). ...is sub-engineer serving in Pithampur factory. The order which is under challenge by itself shows that Mamta Jaiswal, the wife was earning Rs. 4000/- as salary when she was in service in the year 1994. The husband Rajesh ...is getting salary of Rs. 5852/-. The matrimonial Court awarded alimony of Rs. 800/- to Mamta Jaiswal per month as pendente lite alimony Rs. 400/- per month has been awarded to their daughter Ku. Diksha Jaiswal. Expenses nec...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

..., Mat.App.(FC) No.106/2015, decided on 24.8.2016 by the High Court of Delhi 3.Smt Mamta Jaiswal versus Rajesh Jaiswal, Civil Revision N.1290...

...Jasbir Kaur Sehgal (Smt.) Vs. District Judge, Dehradun and Others, (1997) 7 SCC 7, Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Rajesh Jaiswal, Smt. Dipti Aggrawal Vs. Ashish Chandra and of this Court in...

...Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal, 2000 (4) MPHT 457.4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the submissions made on behalf of the appellant and closely perused...

...month.13. Though, placing reliance on the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal...interference.14. Though, decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court [Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal], is persuasive, on the...

...the document on record clearly point out that she has also been working. 11. Similar facts as in hand were considered in the case of Mamta Jaiswal vs. Rajesh Jaiswal...

...dated March 24, 2000 of Madhya Pradesh High Court reported as 2000 (3) MPLJ 100 Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal wherein the question...

...Juneja, (2013) 1 JCC 306; Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal II (2000) DMC 170.5. On behalf of...

...Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal observing as under:-“6. In view of this, the question arises as to in what way Section 24 of the Act has to be interpreted. Whether a spouse who has...battles, try to squeeze out the adversory by implementing the provisions of law suitable to their purpose. In the present case Mamta Jaiswal is a well qualified woman possessing qualification like...big question which is to be answered by Mamta Jaiswal with sufficient congent and believable evidence by proving that in spite of sufficient efforts made by her, she was not able to get service and...

...upon the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of SMT. MAMTA JAISWAL vs. RAJESH JAISWAL reported in 2000(3) MPLJ 100 and contended that wife is not entitled to maintenance...counsel for the petitioner sought to rely upon the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of SMT. MAMTA JAISWAL vs. RAJESH JAISWAL...petitioner, the wife, Mamta Jaiswal has made a prayer that she should be paid travelling expenses of one adult member of her family who would be coming to Matrimonial Court at Indore as her attendant...

...:- Addl.Commissioner Admn. Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- N.N.Jaiswal,Awadhesh Kumar Mishra,Mamta Singh,N N Jaiswal,Prashant Jaiswal,Rajesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Chief Standing Counsel...04.04.2024 has passed following order :- "1. Smt. Deepika Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Prashant Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for adjournment. 2. It is...

...Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal 2000 (3) MPLJ 100, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh while dealing with identical situation observed that well qual...the adversary by implementing the provisions of law suitable to their purpose. In the present case Mamta Jaiswal is a well qualified woman possessing qualification like M.Sc M.C M.Ed Till 1994 she...answered by Mamta Jaiswal with sufficient cogent and believable evidence by proving that in spite of sufficient efforts made by her, she was not able to get service and, therefore, she is unable to...

.... Purnima Jain . - DRJ 2007 96 115 and Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal - (II) 2000 DMC 170...

...Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal reported in II (2000) DMC 170, in Court's considered opinion, the impugned order does not require to be interfered with at the hands...

...applicants relied upon the following judgments: i) Mamta Jaiswal vs. Rajesh Jaiswal, (2000...

...Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Rajesh Jaiswal reported in - Laws (MPH)-2000-3-38. It is submitted that this petition be entertained. 3. On the other hand...

...Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal - 2001 (1) RCR (Civil) 588, wherein it has been held that well qualified spouses desirous of...

...Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal, II (2000) DMC 170 for the purpose that if the well qualified spouses desirous of remaining idle, not making efforts for the purpose of finding out a source of livelihood....8. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the judgment passed by this Court in the matter of Smt. Mamta...

...decision of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Smt. Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal (judgment dated 24.03.2000 delivered in Civil Revision No...