CiteTEXT
...the Dronacharya Award, 2018 on respondent no. 4 recognizing him as an outstanding coach in the discipline of Athletics. The petitioner further prays that directions be issued to respondent no. 2...
2. The petitioner is a national level coach with the Sports Authority of India. The petitioner trained the athlete, Sh. Devendra Jhajaria for the International Paralympics Comm...petitioner as his coach. Devendra Jhajaria was also conferred with the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award in 2017.
3. On 22.02.2018, respondent no.2 issued a notification...
...the requisite number of meals and also their bills. Accused Jamandas, bearer No. 13, used to supply meals in the sleeper coach and accussed Shaukat, bearer No. 6, in the first class compartments. The..." sleeper-coach passengers were issued from the Refreshment Room for the 58 Up Pathankot Express and they were carried by Shaukat and Jarnnadas respectively. Both of them had also been given some extra...(Article H.). But it is in controversy whether the trousers (Article B) that he was wearing when he returned to Bhopal were the same which he had on his person when he had commenced his outward journey...
...Coach Builders Ltd. v. Karnataka State Financial Corpn. 2003 10 SCC 482 paras 14-15, 24-25, 30, 32...Section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956. The principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in MK Ranganathan v. Govt. of Madras (supra) t...creditors and is no longer good law. This position has been recognized in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in International Coach Builders (supra) and several judgments that follow it. As would be...
.... Official Liquidator4; International Coach Builders Ltd. v. Karnataka State Financial Corpn...Court in MK Ranganathan v. Govt. of Madras (supra) that a secured creditor is entitled to stand outside the winding up and enforce his security by sale without reference...of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in International Coach Builders (supra) and several
24
judgments that follow it...
...; International Coach Builders Ltd. v. Karnataka State Financial Corpn. Corporation5; Rajasthan State Financial Corporation v. Official Liquidator6; Bank of...Section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956. The principle laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in MK Ranganathan v. Govt. of Madras (supra...places workers on par with secured creditors and is no longer good law. This position has been recognized in the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in International Coach Builders (supra) and several...
...controversy raised in these petitions are similar and, therefore, these petitions were taken up together.
3 3. Both...the Competition Act. This, essentially, is the principal controversy involved in these petitions.
Introduction
5. Ericsson...nature of a direction issued by CCI to the DG to conduct an investigation, is beyond the pail of controversy. The question whether a direction passed under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act is...
...Joint Commissioner of Police MK Tandon and then DCP Zone IV PB Gandia, were negligent in their duties : Having arrived at this conclusion, SIT had no option but to charge them with the criminal offence...questionable.
Mobile Phones of the accused persons were not seized by SIT.
4.
Suspicion on the cause and manner of fire in coach S-6 of Sabarmati Express on...to Shri Kapadia, he expressed his personal views that Shri Sreekumar was biased in his assessment of situation and that the same could further put him in same uncalled for controversy. Shri Kapadia...
...as the 'Intex Petition').
2. The controversy raised in these petitions are similar and, therefore, these petitions were taken up together.
3...(hereafter the 'Patents Act') and cannot be a subject matter of examination under the Competition Act. This, essentially, is the principal controversy involved in these petitions...controversy. The question whether a direction passed under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act is appealable is also no longer res integra. However, the decision in the case
50...
...controversy raised in these petitions are similar and, therefore, these petitions were taken up together.
3 3. Both...the Competition Act. This, essentially, is the principal controversy involved in these petitions.
Introduction
5. Ericsson...conduct an investigation, is beyond the pail of controversy. The question whether a direction passed under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act is appealable is also no longer res integra...
...negligence whatsoever, whether mild or gross. As a matter of fact, there was no negligence in terms of the definition of negligence provided by the Hon ble Supreme court in Laxman Balakrishan Joshi vs...., (2005)6 SCC I; 2005 SCCL.COM 456. ...".
III- Salemuddin & ors. vs. Dr. Sunil Kalhotr, III(2006) CPJ 396 NC.
IV- Narsimha Reddy (deceased) & ors. vs. Rohini Hospital...
...appeal before us, i.e. in Petition No. 197/MP/2015 dated 05.11.2015, the CERC held that, in the light of the judgement of the Supreme Court in UOI vs. UPSEB...3rdMay, 2013 and the Judgement of the Supreme Court dated 25th April, 2014 in Civil Appeal No. 5479 of 2013 (M/s Sesa Sterlite Vs. OERC & Ors), Northern...
S.KIREETENDRANATH REDDY vs. A.P. TRANSCO (1999 (5...