Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Central Administrative Tribunal4383
+ Madras High Court1783
+ Allahabad High Court1634
+ Delhi High Court1562
+ Rajasthan High Court1542
+ Bombay High Court1430
+ Supreme Court Of India1389
+ Calcutta High Court1246
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1193
+ Gauhati High Court1134
+ Kerala High Court1006
+ Patna High Court1001
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court975
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court952
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal909
+ Jharkhand High Court569
+ Uttarakhand High Court561
+ Telangana High Court537
+ Gujarat High Court518
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court503
+ Karnataka High Court470
+ Orissa High Court463
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court262
+ Armed Forces Tribunal197
+ Central Information Commission184
+ Manipur High Court177
+ Tripura High Court163
+ Chhattisgarh High Court159
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity112
+ National Green Tribunal97
+ SEBI65
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission61
+ CESTAT55
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal48
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act46
+ Meghalaya High Court45
+ Sikkim High Court29
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission28
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission26
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal26
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal23
+ National Company Law Tribunal18
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission18
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST13
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal11
+ Competition Commission Of India10
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal8
+ Authority For Advance Rulings4
+ Company Law Board3
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India2
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST2
+ District Court2
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority2
+ Privy Council2
+ RERA2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards10631
From 2011 To 202010345
From 2001 To 20102598
From 1991 To 20001212
From 1981 To 1990564
From 1971 To 1980340
From 1961 To 1970168
From 1951 To 196029
Before 195014

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...inter se seniority of the direct recruits of the same batch to which the petitioners belong) is maintained. At the same time, it is clarified that the court has not pronounced up.... The OA No.608/2016 filed by the applicant was disposed of by this Tribunal vide order dated 12.02.2016, and the operative portion of the same reads as under:- "20. In view...of the above discussion, it is held that the respondent SSB acted arbitrarily to the extent that it revised the petitioners" seniority so as to adversely affect them, vis-à- vis other direct recruits...

...had passed B.Ed examination on 2.3.1996 In these circumstances, the petitioner could not have been appointed in the batch of 1994-95. In the affidavit, it has been stated that for batch-wise appointment, the date ...of the year 1996 batch as per the criteria. The inter-se seniority in the same batch on the basis of merit is the criteria of the batch-wise appointments as per...retrospective date from which his junior respondent No. 4 and others were selected/appointed in 1995 batch alongwith all benefits such as seniority etc.3. The further case of the petitioner...

...already been a selectee of the 2002 batch, he should have been assigned inter se seniority with his batchmates of that year, as the inter se seniority of appoin...determined in the order of merit indicated at the time of selection. Further, the inter se seniority is not dependent upon the date of joining, particularly when the joining of a candidat...delayed by the department itself and as per Rule 22 of the Delhi Police (Appointment and Confirmation) Rules, 1980, the inter se seniority of direct recruits in all ranks except...

...departmental test would be based on the marks obtained by them in that test. Likewise, the inter-se seniority of the apprentice who passed the second test and the third test would be so determined. But, the success...without much substance and justification. (8) In the result, we allow the petition, quash the impugned order of 27-3-1985 and restore the inter-se seniority of the petitioners and responde...years. Their inter-se seniority will be fixed on Ihe basis of marks obtained by them in respective examination! test." (Italics supplied) (2) Soon afier, on 27-3-1985 the aforesaid order was superseded...

...Indian Foreign Service (Recruitment, Cadre, Seniority and Promotion) Rules, 1961 the seniority of the IFS officer shall be decided by the year of allotment and the inter-se-seniority ...deem fit in the circumstances of this case. 3. Undisputed facts of the case are that applicant joined Indian Foreign Service in 1972 batch. After serving for about 36 years he...Foreign Secretary. Two officers of 1976 batch, namely, Sh. Pawar Kumar Varma and Sh. Ashok Kumar were posted on promotion to the Grade-II (Addl. Secretary) on 01.06.2008 i.e. after the date of empanelment...

...probation. The latter, who are not working satisfactorily during the period of probation thus, loses its place in merit initially determined before appointment in the matter of assigning inter se seniority...the order of merit as per select list. Those who do not complete the initial period of service satisfactorily and period of probation in their case is required to be extended, lose their inter se ...of officer or an employee whose probation has been extended, his seniority shall be reckoned just below all the officers or employees, if any, recruited or promoted in the same batch along with him...

.... The learned counsel for the applicant argues that as per Rule-15 of the Indian Foreign Service (Recruitment, Cadre, Seniority and Promotion) Rules, 1961 the seniority of the IFS ... 2. This is a third round of litigation. The applicant had earlier filed O.A. No.3517/2011. The same was allowed to be withdrawn by an order dated 27.09.2011 with liberty to...communicated to him vide D.O. letter No. T-392/FS/2008 dated 07.06.2008 by the Foreign Secretary. Two officers of 1976 batch were posted on promotion to the Grade-II (Addl. Secretary) on 01.06.2008 i.e...

...inter-se seniority of direct recruits of the same panel/batch, it is to be seen that the post in question is governed by Military Engineer Services (Non-industrial Class III and Cl...candidate higher in merit. Therefore, it is well settled that seniority of direct recruits of the same batch is to be determined on the basis of their inter-se merit in th...) Recruitment Rules, 1970. Admittedly, there is no provision in the said rules for determination of inter-se seniority of direct recruits. It was pleaded that in the absence of any provisio...

...302 (a) of IREM Vol. I qua the inter-se seniority of the incumbents his Tribunal held directed recast of seniority showing the final inter se seniority ...Assistant Loco Pilots; seniority list dated 19.6.2008 (A-3), prepared on the basis of combined marks in the transportation and diesel test whereas in all other zones, the same has been prepared on he basis...candidates recruited in the same batch of RRB would be on the basis of marks obtained in the examination after completion of the training after clubbing all the candidates who were sent for training...

...Grade Scale-I vis-a-vis Officers recruited in the same batch will be reckoned with reference to the rank allotted to you as per merit.”2. Relying on this clause, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that since t...fixation of inter se seniority between the same batch. It does not proceed further. In view of the specific rules contained in 18.3 of the Officers Services Rules, there is no es...Rules prescribes that the inter se seniority of officers directly recruited in a batch to any grade or scale shall be reckoned with reference to the rank allotted to them at the time of s...

...that the pre-existing position (so far as the inter se seniority of the direct recruits of the same batch to which the petitioners belong) is maintained. At the same time,...subordinate police service in the State shall take rank immediately below the entire batch of direct recruits, any officer of which appointed on the same date, the inter-seniority ...1969 Rules, stating the candidates of 1979-81 batch should be placed above the candidates of 1980-81 batch. Rule 14 of the Rules determines the inter se seniority...

...inter se seniority of the direct recruits of the same batch to which the petitioners belong) is maintained. At the same time, it is clarified that the court has not pronounced up..., stating the candidates of 1979-81 batch should be placed above the candidates of 1980-81 batch. Rule 14 of the Rules determines the inter se seniority of the candidate...inter se seniority of the graduates and ongraduates which was settled as early as in the year 1982. The State Government in its letter dated 12.10.1982 had taken the view that two years' training was...

...training in the appropriate batch for the purpose of regulating the inter-se seniority provided such persons pass the examination at the end of the training in the first attempt. ...not undergo the initial training earlier because of administrative reasons, their inter-se seniority will be placed along with the same batch provided they clear the examination at the end ...same RRB panel are sent for initial training in batches due to administrative reasons and not because of reasons attributable to the candidates, the inter-se seniority will be regulated batchwise...

...that class of posts:Provided firstly, that if in any class of posts two or more persons are appointed substantively on the same date their seniority inter-se shall be determined in...that inter-se seniority of persons appointed by promotion in the same batch shall be determined in accordance with their relative seniority in the post from which they have been promoted...recruitment in the same batch; andProvided fourthly, that inter-se seniority of persons appointed by promotion in the same batch from different classes ...

...the training later. Therefore, the promotee"s seniority over the direct recruit entrants was affirmed by following Rule 3. It was not a case of inter se seniority in the same batch...Srl.No.29 to 35 and AC (LDCE) batch Srl-05 and re-arrange the inter se seniority in accordance with BSF (GD Officers) Recruitment (Amendment) Rules 2003 and Rule 7(3)(2) of the BSF Group „A" (GD...(„1978 Rules") which reads as under: "(3) Subject to the provisions of Sub-Rule (2) inter-se seniority amongst officers holding the same rank shall be as...

...determining the inter-se seniority in the same batch on the basis of merit.” 7. In 1981, certain posts to be filled up on batchwise basis, were taken out of the purview ...General, that practice adopted by the State, for reckoning the batch seniority of a candidate, is the year commencing from 1st January to 31st December of passing professional examination as recorded in ...the concerned University, shall be deemed date for reckoning the batch seniority of the candidate. If more than one candidate is issued the final professional examination certificate on the same date, then ...

..., which provided for confirmation with retrospective effect i.e with effect from 16.8.87 The grievance of the petitioner is that while determining inter-se seniority of the officers appointed in the ...) ……………………(c) ……………………(2) The inter-se seniority of officers or employees directly recruited in a batch to any grade or scale shall be reckoned with reference to the rank allo...the date of confirmation and runs as an exception to sub-clause (2) which provides for determining inter-se seniority according to the merit rank in the select list. According to clause (3), if...

... entrants was affirmed by following Rule 3. It was not a case of inter se seniority in the same batch of direct...actually a case of inter se seniority between a promotee and a direct recruit. The promotee there had taken training earlier with the 16th batch whereas the Appellants..., the inter-se seniority of the officers from both the batches was clubbed and the petitioners were given notional seniority 3...

...IREM Vol. 1 (Annexure A/2), inter se seniority amongst candidates of the same training batch is determined on the basis of their inter se merit in this exam, i.e., the p...'C' employees. Hence, for the purpose of formation of panel for selection for the 11 Group 'B' posts (UR-08, SC-01 and ST-02) against the said 70 % vacancies, revised provisional integrated seniority... Aggrieved by the placement of certain other candidates above him in the aforesaid integrated seniority lists, Applicant made representations dated 14.09.2013 & 15.11.2013. Thereafter the date ...

...circular dated 5.2.54 would clearly indicate that if appointments are made from the same recommendations in two batches, the inter-se seniority between the members would be batch wise and between the membe...later batch dated 6.6.80 which includes the writ petitioner. For the writ petitioner, the relevant date for purposes of seniority would be 6.6.80 and not 22.6.79. Inter-se between the batch who we...any indication of preference in the merit list about their suitability for the post in question, the seniority should be fixed according to the preference indicated otherwise the inter-se seniority ...