...Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal in the Revision Application No.TEN/BK/22/11 and conform the order passed by the subordinate authorities in the interest of justice; (C) Your...order passed by Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, by which, the matter is remanded to the Mamlatdar. During the pendency of this petition, Mamlatdar has already decided the matter and passed the order and the... IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19622 of 2017...

...Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad and one is filed by the State of Gujarat and has challenged the said order i.e judgement and order dated 20.08.2008 The impugned common order has been passed by the...Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Revision Application Nos. TEN.B.A.340/96, B.A.419/96, B.A.434/96, B.A.435/96, B.A.475/96, B.A.527/96 and B.A.428/96.2. Brief...State of Gujarat before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal by way of filing different revision applications. The said revision applications came to be allowed in favour of the State of Gujarat and the order...

...said order can be challenged before the Deputy Collector or Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal. The petitioner is basically challenging the action of the respondent authorities taken under Section 32-G of...76 before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal. The Court, therefore, does not interfere in the matter and disposes of the petition reserving the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order...India praying for quashing and setting aside the order dated 06.02.2008 of the Joint Secretary (Appeals), Revenue department, State of Gujarat, Ahmedabad in Appeal No. 8 of 2007.2...

...India praying for quashing and setting aside the order dated 25.08.2008 passed by the learned Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad, in Review Application Nos. 31 of 2008 and 36 of 2008 whereby the learned Tribunal has reviewed the Order passed by the earlier Bench on 21.08.2008 in Appeal Nos. 23 of 2008 and 24 of 2008 dated 21.08.20082 It is the case of the petitioner that the land bearing...Raijibhai Harjibhai Bharwad i.e Jagabhai Raijibhai Bharwad has preferred Revision Application No. 267 of 1998 before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad and obtained interim order of status...Rajesh Hasmukhbhai Thakkar, preferred an Appeal under Section 36(3) of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad, which came to be...

...authority under the Ordinance for declaration that the transaction is invalid the revision was competent before the Saurashtra Land Revenue Tribunal as per the provisions of section 67 of the Ordinance and after formation of the Gujarat State...before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal. However, Section 67 of the Ordinance is repealed by the Saurashtra Land Reforms Act (hereinafter...repealing of Section 67 of the Ordinance and therefore it appears that the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal which is substituted in place of Saurashtra Land Revenue Tribunal after formation of Gujarat State...

...Constitution challenging the order dated 11.05.2018 passed by the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal (the Tribunal) whereby the Tribunal has stayed the order dated 11.07.2016 passed by the Deputy Collector...impugned before it in Revision Application No.TEN/309/2016 and also ordered to maintain status-quo as regard the site position and the revenue record of the land in question... C/SCA/13487/2018 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL...

...Collector and thereafter, before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal, the petitioner did not prefer any such appeals. In fact, for over 9 years, the petitioner took no steps to challenge the said order...aspects of bid land is kept aside, the order of the Mamlatdar on the said aspects of provisions of Section 6(3)(B) was required to be considered. But, the Learned Single Judge...Mamlatdar would bind the petitioner.10. Though sought to be suggested by the counsel for the petitioner, notice dated 31.5.1993, was not for taking over possession of the excess land. In-fact...

....9. Though statutory appeal was available first before the Deputy Collector and thereafter, before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal, the petitioner did not prefer any such appeals. In...provisions contained in Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 (herein after referred to as ‘the said Act’), the petitioner was required to make a declaration of his land holding...revenue records. It was decided to measure the land and hold a programme to ascertain the actual position at the site, the petitioner should, therefore, remain present on 4.6.19934. It...

...authority held that the surrender of the land made by the tenant-respondent in favour of the land owner was legal. The tenant-respondent filed Revision Application before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal against the order of Deputy Collector. The Gujarat Revenue Tribunal under its order dated 8-9-1983 accepted the said Revision Application and held that the legal tenancy of the tenant-respondent subsists on 1-4-1957. The surrender of the possession of the land in...petitioner before this Court. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that both the Mamlatdar and the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal have not drawn distinction in between..., the order of the learned Gujarat Revenue Tribunal cannot be allowed to stand. In the result, this Special Court Application succeeds and the same is allowed. The order of the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in...

...Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal have remained unchallenged. 9. It was clearly established before the Trial Court in the Regular Civil Suit No.23 of 2005 that as per...Collector, the said land was declared as a government land belonging to the government and not to the appellant. 5. The said dispute was carried before the Revenue Tribunal...to be dismissed on 28.11.1969 and the said order was challenged up to the Revenue Tribunal and once again the matter was remanded on 31.04.1970 to decide afresh as to whether the land of naveri is a...

...the petitioner preferred revision application before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal being Revision Application No. TEN/BAS/38/09(3). The Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal rejected said Revision...respondent no. 5 was mutated in the land which the said respondent has never purchased. To put it differently, in the revenue record against the land of the petitioner the name of respondent no. 5 was...respondent authorities ought to have appreciated that Mutation Entry No. 26 dated 13.09.2004 and all subsequent entries in the revenue record with respect to the land in question in favour of the private...

...17th March, 1987 by the Deputy Collector. However, the said order came to be challenged by the present petitioner before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Revision Application No.TEN/BS/155/87, the Tribunal, vide its judgment and order dated 22nd August, 1991, partly allowed the appeal, despite holding that the petitioner was not entitled to one extra unit and the land was...of on 25th May, 1993, the Deputy Collector held that the petitioner was in possession of 50 acres and 20 Gunthas excess land. The petitioner then challenged the said order before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal, which...confirmed and the Special secretary, Revenue Department ( Appeals), vide order dt. 3/9/2014 has instructed to examine as to whether the lands are Khar land or not ?, by submitting the proposal to the...

...order passed by gujarat land revenue tribunal on 26. 11. 1996 in revision under sec. 38 of the gujarat agricultural land ceiling act against the order of the deputy collector, valsad dated 10. 7..., the state preferred revision before the gujarat revenue tribunal which was decided on 14. 2. 1992. The tribunal observed that the mamlatdar had deducted the land admeasuring 8 acres 4 gunthas in total...somebody else. In its order, the tribunal affirmed the finding of the authorities below as to the deductibility of 4 acres 24 gunthas on account of the land being not fit for cultivation. However, it...

...JUDGMENT K.A. Puj, J. 1. The petitioners, in this petition, have challenged the order passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal on 31-3-1992 in Revision Application No. TEN. B.A. 421 of 1991 confirming the order passed by the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms...order and judgment dated 20th March, 1991, and thereafter, the said order and judgment was confirmed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal while exercising the revisional jurisdiction conferred under Section 76 of the Act. 12. It was ftirther contended that the predecessors who are the owners and occupants of the land in...by limitation, the Deputy Collector has entertained the said appeal and decided.it on merits against the petitioners. The Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal has also decided the revision against the...

...present petitioner before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Revision Application No.TEN/BS/155/87, the Tribunal, vide its judgment and order dated 22nd August, 1991, partly allowed the appeal, despite holding that the petitioner was not entitled to one extra unit and the land was...petitioner then challenged the said order before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal, which, by its order dated 20th August, 1993 in Revision Application No.TEN/BS/83/93, dismissed...confirmed and the Special secretary, Revenue Department ( Appeals), vide order dt. 3/9/2014 has instructed to examine as to whether the lands are Khar land or not ?, by...

.... The original petitioner carried the matter in revision before the Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal and the Tribunal, vide order dated 10th April, 1992 further found that there is no reference of...contention, therefore, has no substance and is hereby rejected. So far as adoption of Sureshkumar by the petitioner is concerned, the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal has given cogent and convincing reasons in...& A.L.T or before the Deputy Collector or before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Revision Application No. TEN. B.S.145/88, I am of the view that the Tribunal did not commit any error in not entertaining...

...of Dy. Collector Shri in Appeal No.1/2002 was set aside by Gujarat Land Revenue Tribunal ? 7. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for relief as prayed for in the plaint...finding of Gujarat Revenue Tribunal that section 43 does not apply to said transaction ? 5. Whether the Ld. First Appellate Court has committed an...property is a new tenure restricted land under the provision of Section 43 of the Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 ('Act,1948', for short) but thereafter the acquisition proceedings were...

...facie clear as is asserted before the three authorities under the Act. We therefore unhesitatingly allow the appeal, upset the impugned order of the High Court, restoring that of the Gujarat Revenue Land Tribunal and of the other officers below. There shall be no order as to costs....did their revision before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal. This led them to the High Court in proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution. The High Court interfered and granted them the status...have specifically put to the learned counsel for the respondents if there is any revenue entry to show that the respondents were in cultivating possession of the land reflective of the user thereof...

...under reference is formulated as under :- "Whether the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal constituted under the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957, has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal / revision against the order passed under Section 75 of the Saurashtra Gharkhed, Tenancy Settlement and Agricultural Lands Ordinance, 1949, after enforcement of the Saurashtra Land Reforms...Gujarat, and with the amendment of Section 76, the jurisdiction is conferred upon the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal against orders of the Collector. The Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1939, provided for constitution and functioning of the then Bombay Revenue Tribunal, which is now Page 9 of 54 termed as Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, which exercises the appellate and revisional powers under Sections 204 and 211 of the Bombay Land Revenue...with the repeal of the whole of Chapter-VII, the respondents have been rendered remediless in case the argument of the State is accepted that the revision before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal is not maintainable even after the repeal. Section 75 of the Ordinance, 1949 provided for summary eviction of any person, allegedly in unauthorized occupation or wrongful possession of any land, under...

...for the petitioner, upon instructions of the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with a view to approach the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal by way of preferring Revision Application under Section 76 of the Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 ('Tenancy Act' for short) challenging the order dated 03.03/04.2021 passed by the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms.... 2.2 As and when the present petitioner files Revision Application before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal challenging the order order dated 03.03/04.2021 passed by the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms...application is preferred by the petitioner, the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal may be directed to hear the present petitioner and decide such application within some time bound schedule...