Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court57
+ Delhi High Court40
+ Supreme Court Of India33
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court24
+ Allahabad High Court21
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court13
+ Karnataka High Court13
+ Central Information Commission12
+ Gujarat High Court12
+ Chhattisgarh High Court8
+ Rajasthan High Court7
+ Madras High Court6
+ Patna High Court6
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court6
+ Calcutta High Court5
+ Gauhati High Court5
+ Telangana High Court5
+ CESTAT4
+ Kerala High Court4
+ Sikkim High Court4
+ Uttarakhand High Court3
+ Manipur High Court2
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court1
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange1
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal1
+ SEBI1
+ Tripura High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards146
From 2011 To 2020123
From 2001 To 20105
From 1991 To 20002
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19801
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...against each of them, namely,:Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3)For allowing Flat No. 25 on the 6 floor ...-Hussaini building, he (Tiger) was having dinner with Yakub Abdul Razak Memon (A-1), Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) and other members of.... He deposed that Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) departed from India on 11.03.1993 and he also recognized the embarkation card (‘X-405’) issued to A-3....

...the case of TADA reported in JT 2013 (6) SC 1 (Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) Vs. The State of .... 16. Learned counsel has cited a decision reported in the case of Sri Ram @ Bhalu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [ALLCRIC-2012-77-322/JIC-2012-1-741...Kumar Misra @ Buddhu Vs. State of U.P. [LAW (ALL)-2012-2-149/ACC-2012-77-64], no principle of law has been laid down. 19. In the case of Ram Pal @ Data Ram ...

...." 21. While dealing with the case of TADA reported in JT 2013 (6) SC 1 (Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) Vs. ...interpreting ends of justice. 17. In the case of Machhi Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(1983) 3 SCC 470], it h...Om Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan and another [(2012) 5 SCC 201], Hon'ble Apex Court has cautioned the courts to be more sensitive in dealing with juve...

...Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 ("COFEPOSA") against Ibrahim Abdul Razak Memon alias Tiger Memon. He is the son of Abdul Razak Memon and Hanifa Memon....required them to show cause why the properties should not be forfeited to the Central Government under Section 7 of the SAFEMA. The notice records Abdul Razak Memon and his daugh...as the holders of the said flats, but the same in occupation of one Ibrahim Mohd Khan - the Petitioner's deceased husband and also the brother in law of Abdul ...

...Razak Memon (A-3) and others v. The State of Maharashtra, through STF, CBI Mumbai and others, JT 2013 (6) SC1...ends of justice." 18. It would not be out of context to cite the paragraphs 376 and 377 of the extract of the judgment of the Apex Court in .... 7. Parsum @ Rajesh Gupta v. State of U.P. & Another 2015 LawSuit (All) 870, date of decision 15 April, 2015." 3. The present criminal revision ...

...of the Apex Court in the case of Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) and others v. The State of ...impugned order dated 10.5.2016 passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Gorakhpur in case crime No. 185 of 2015 (State v. Suraj Gupta), under Section 376...Suraj Gupta (juvenile) son of Arjun Gupta. 3. Aggrieved by the order dated 10.5.2016 of the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Gorakhpur a Criminal Appeal No. 73 ...

...." 16. It would not be out of context to cite the paragraphs 376 and 377 of the extract of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of...(A3) and others v. The State of Maharashtra, through STF, CBI Mumbai and others, JT 2013 (6) SC 1, which are quoted below: "376. While dealing with such an issue, the...Virendra v. State of U.P., 2015 (1) ACR 629 para 23 is quoted below: "23. A citizen''''s claim to equality before ...

...‘Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra’, 2013 (4) SCALE 1, the Apex Court, after considering the relevant provisions ...State contended that at the time of arrest of the accused a detailed dossier was prepared wherein on the basis of the interrogation of the petitioner, ...behalf of State, the petitioner filed a petition bearing W.P (Crl.) No. 1504/2011 praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to t...

...judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) v. The State of .... Court as well as of the Apex Court.1. Monu @ Moni @ Rahul @ Rohit v. State of U.P. . 2011 (74) ACC 353 (HC),2. Mohit v. State of U.P....8. The Apex Court in the case of Om Prakash v. State of Rajasthan . 2012 (77) ACC 654 (SC), has cautioned the Courts to be more sensitive in deal...

...98 accused persons in the following cases: i. Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon vs. State of Maharashtra ...; and v. Sanjay Dutt (A-117) vs. The State of Maharashtra through CBI (STF), Bombay cited as 2013 (4) SCALE 462..., a single charge-sheet was filed in the Designated Court against 189 accused persons, of which 44 were shown as absconding. Investigation from the State Police was transferred to CBI on 19.11.1993 and...

...cases of serious nature like sexual molestation, rape, gang-rape muder etc.13. While dealing with the case TADA in Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-...rendered in the case of Ravi Vs. State of U.P. & Another reported in 2015 (2) JIC 509 (ALL) as well as Judgment rendered in the case of Ranjeet Y...) Vs. State of U.P. & Another reported in 2015 (2) JIC 738 (All).7. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate rebutting the above contentions submitted that rejection...

...Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs. The State of Maharashtra, through CBI, Bombay, reported in ...diary. 6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Yakub Abdul Razak Memon (supra) has described the importance of Naksha Panchayat Nama that it is ...Kailash Gour & Others vs. State of Assam, reported in 2012 (2) SCC 34 and in the case of...

...public peace and tranquility, shall not be granted furlough. In that order, it is reflected that the petitioner is the wife of brother of Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. She will spend her perio...in view of the fact that during the funeral of Yakub Abdul Razak Memon, the crowd was in thousands. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor also pointed out that .... State of Maharashtra and others and it is reported in 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 2413. The said decision is on Rule 4(13) of The Prisons (Bombay Parole & Furlo...

...of Chembur Refinery. The following persons also participated in the said meeting, namely, Yakub Abdul Razak Memon (A-1), Essa alias Anjum Abdul Razak ...specified in the said charge framed against each of them, namely,:Essa alias Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3...Abdul Razak Memon (A-1), Essa alias Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) and other members of the Memon family....

...of which the State, the public or the community at large has an interest; Explanation.—In this clause “State” includes a corporation established by or under a Central, Provincial....37. Section 2 (b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 provides that“public duty” means a duty in the discharge of which the State, ...KCCR 3668.46.1 The question in that case was “with respect to the petitioner who is a Project Manager of Nirmithi Kendra which is neither enunciated by the State...

...and detonators to your co-accused Altaf Ali Mustaq Sayed at the instance of Yakoob Abdul Razak Memon and thereby you committed an offence punishable under Section 3(3) of TADA (P...of the conspiracy.”44. A perusal of the aforesaid charge shows that the allegation against Amjad is that he had permitted co-accused Yakoob ..., landing and transportation of arms, ammunition and explosives (RDX) which were smuggled into the country by Mushtaq @ Ibrahim @ Tiger Abdul Razak Memon and his associates which landed at Shekhadi on ...

.... Rubina Suleman Memon vs. The State of Maharashtra and others). Thirdly, it is mentioned in the impugned order that the report submitted by the Additional Supe..., State of Maharashtra, furlough cannot be granted. Secondly, furlough cannot be granted to the Petitioner in view of the order passed by the High Court in Writ Petition No.4017 ...was convict under the Terrorist and Destructive Activities Act, 1987 and wife of brother of Yakub Abdul Razak Menon. Learned counsel invited our attention to the adverse...

...Suleman Memon vs. The State of Maharashtra and others). Thirdly, furlough is not the right of the convict. Accordingly, by invoking the ...2017 [Abdul Rajjak Sheikh Abdul Nabi Shah vs. Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur and others]. It is further submitted that the ratio in the case of Smt. Rubina Suleman Memon...") and wife of brother of Yakub Abdul Razak Menon. The Petitioner herein is not convict of the offence punishable under the provisions of TADA Act. Therefore, l...

...(Smt. Rubina Suleman Memon vs. The State cwp1104.17 of Maharashtra and others) Thirdly, as the appeal filed by the Petitioner challenging the convictio...High Court, in view of the Notification dated 26th August, 2016 issued by the Home Department, State of Maharashtra, furlough cannot be granted. Fourthly, furlough is not the right ...therein was convict under the Terrorist and Destructive Activities Act, 1987 and wife of brother of Yakub Abdul Razak Menon. Learned counsel further submitted that merely because...

...15-7-2013 WP (Cri) No. 63 of 2013, while enlarging the petitioner on bail, a report was called for from the Juvenile Justice Board, Datia, Madhya Pradesh.3. A perusal ...doubt that the petitioner was a juvenile as on the date of occurrence. Since, it has now turned out that the petitioner was a juvenile on the date of occurrence his incarceration...continued.5. A question arose as to when conviction came to be imposed on an accused, prior to the coming into force of the Act of 2000, and a claim as to his status as ...