Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1088
+ Bombay High Court288
+ Karnataka High Court262
+ Orissa High Court106
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission76
+ Madras High Court31
+ Calcutta High Court26
+ Central Administrative Tribunal22
+ Supreme Court Of India19
+ Jharkhand High Court15
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court12
+ Delhi High Court11
+ Kerala High Court9
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court9
+ Allahabad High Court6
+ Chhattisgarh High Court5
+ Gujarat High Court4
+ National Company Law Tribunal4
+ National Green Tribunal4
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court4
+ Rajasthan High Court3
+ Telangana High Court3
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal2
+ Gauhati High Court2
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court2
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity1
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction1
+ CESTAT1
+ Central Information Commission1
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority1
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Patna High Court1
+ SEBI1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards808
From 2011 To 2020979
From 2001 To 201051
From 1991 To 200029
From 1981 To 199024
From 1971 To 198013
From 1961 To 19707
From 1951 To 196010
Before 19506

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...) members the flats being contiguous, this should be considered to be a residential unit and would thus be entitled to exemption u/s 54F in the light of the following decisions: CIT vs Jeo B.Fernandez 322 ITR (St.) P. 8 ...Taxman Part 1 Prabhanandam Parikant vs ITO 22 SOT (Hyd) 58 CIT vs Kolandas Chancholmal 155 ITR 273 (Guj...PER HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal of the assessee, for assessment year 2006-07, is directed against the order of the ld. CIT, dated 24.3.2011, passed u/s...

...(family) members the flats being contiguous, this should be considered to be a residential unit and would thus be entitled to exemption u/s 54F in the light of the following decisions: CIT vs Jeo B.Fernandez...Taxman Part 1 Prabhanandam Parikant vs ITO 22 SOT (Hyd) 58 CIT vs Kolandas Chancholmal 155 ITR 273 (Guj...PER HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal of the assessee, for assessment year 2006-07, is directed against the order of the ld. CIT, dated 24.3.2011, passed u/s...

...appeal. The case laws relied upon are as under :- 1. Decision of Bombay High Court in CIT vs. Devdas Naik; Income Tax Appeal No. 2483 of 2... Ujjain ::: Appellant Vs Asstt.Commr. of Income tax 1(1) Ujjain ::: Respondent... 24.11.2015 Date of pronouncement 21 .12.2015 O R D E R...

...) CIT Vs. D. Ananda Basappa [(2009) 309 ITR 329 (Karn)] ii) CIT Vs. Smt. V.R. Karp...)] iii) CIT Vs. Smt. K.G. Rukminiamma [(2011) 331 ITR 211 (Karn)] iv...) CIT Vs. Smt. Jyothi K. Mehta [(2011) 201 Taxman 79 (Karn) (MAG)] v) CIT Vs. Syed Ali Adil...

...' and, therefore, the singular 'a residential house' also permits use of plural by virtue of s. 13(2) of the General Clauses Act.—CIT vs. D. Ananda Basappa (2009) 223 CTR (Kar...High Court in the case of CIT vs. Ananda Basappa reported in [2009] 223 CTR (KR 186) and later on the decision of..., Mumbai -400 012 Vs Ms Manju D Jethwani, 501, Moru Milap Building, 15th Road, Khar (West), Mumbai -400 052 थयी लेखा स.ं:PAN: ABRPM 4292 N...

..., disposed of on 20th Sept., 2008 [reported as CIT vs. D. Ananda Basappa (2009) 223 CTR (Kar) 186 : (2009) 20 DTR (Kar) 266Ed...the judgement of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court rendered in the case of CIT & Another Vs. Smt. K.G. Rukminiamma as reported in [2011] 331...of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court rendered in the case of CIT & Another Vs. Smt. K.G. Rukminiamma (supra), we find that as per the...

...[2011] 331 ITR 211/196 Taxman 87 (2010) 8 taxmann.com 121 (Kar); (iii) CIT v. D. Ananda Basappa [2010] 320 ITR (St.) 19 (FRSC); ...B. Fernandes (2010) 322 ITR (St.) 8. (v) CIT VS. Smt. Rashmi Khanna (2010) 322 ITR (St.) 9 (vi) ...vs. D.Ananda Basappa - (2009) 223 CTR (Ker) 186 iv) CIT vs. Sri...

.... In support of such proposition he relied upon the following decisions: - i) CIT vs. Gita Duggal (2013) 357 ITR 153 (Del.) ii) CIT vs. DevedasNaik (2014) 366 ITR 12(Bom.) iii) CIT ...) 309 ITR 329 (Kar.) iv) CIT vs. K.G. Rukminiamma (2011) 331 ITR 211 (Kar.) As regards the issue relating to claim of deduction under Section 54 of the Act in respect of.... 5178/Mum/2016 Shri Aftab A L Furniturewala 4. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid decision of the AO assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the course of proceedings...

.... 1477/Del/2016 CIT Vs Gita Duggal [2013] 30 taxmann.com 230 (Delhi) CIT Vs Gita Duggal [2014] 52 taxmann.com 246 (SC) - SLP Dismissed ...demolish an old structure and construct a new building thereupon. The above view also finds supports from the following judgments: CIT Vs Ashok Kumar Ralhan 2014 146...taxmann.com 416 (Delhi) CITVs P V Narsimhan 181ITR 101 (Mad.) CIT Vs A.R.Mathavan Pillai 219 ITR 696 (Kerela) Jvothi Pat Ram Vs ITO 92 ITD 423 (Lucknow) Elvis Stephenson Vs ITO (ITA...

...case of CIT vs Syed Ali Adil in ITA No. 410 of 2012 dated 20.12.2012 reported in 352 ITR 418 (AP) c) Honble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs Smt K.G.Rukminiamma...been dismissed in the following cases:- a) CIT vs D Ananda Basappa SLP(C ) No. 20867 of 2009 dt 10.8.2009 reported in 320 ITR (Statutes) 1 against the...vs Raman Kumar Suri in ITA No. 6962 of 2010 dated 27.11.2012. The Honble Bombay High Court again considered the identical issue in the case of CIT vs Devdas Naik in ITA No. 2483 of 2011 dated...

...case of CIT vs Syed Ali Adil in ITA No. 410 of 2012 dated 20.12.2012 reported in 352 ITR 418 (AP) c) Honble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs Smt K.G.Rukminiamma...been dismissed in the following cases:- a) CIT vs D Ananda Basappa SLP(C ) No. 20867 of 2009 dt 10.8.2009 reported in 320 ITR (Statutes) 1 against the...vs Raman Kumar Suri in ITA No. 6962 of 2010 dated 27.11.2012. The Honble Bombay High Court again considered the identical issue in the case of CIT vs Devdas Naik in ITA No. 2483 of 2011 dated...

.... 113 of 2004, disposed of on 20th Sept., 2008 [reported as CIT vs. D. Ananda Basappa (2009) 223 CTR (Kar) 186...judgment of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court rendered in the case of CIT & Another Vs. Smt. K.G. Rukminiamma as reported in [2011] 331 ITR...be distinguished. in the case of Sri. D. Anand Basappa V. ITO, the assessee being an HUF has sold a residential house and purchased two residential flats adjacent to each other. In...

... CIT vs D. Ananda Basappa (2009) 180 Taxman 4 (Karnataka); relevant paragraphs 6 to 8 on pages 14 are as...Jurisdictional Delhi High Court in the cases of CIT vs. Kamal Wahal..., the assessee relies on judicial pronouncements in the case of CIT Vs. V Natarajan (203CTR0037), DIT (International Taxation) Vs. Jennifer Bhide (Karnataka High Court). I have gone...

...constructed within the stipulated period. The ratio laid down in CIT vs D. Ananda Basappa (2009) 309 ITR 329 (Karn.) SLP dismissed....), CIT vs Beena K. Jain (1994) 75 taxman 145 (Bom.), Vinod Kumar Jain vs CIT (2010) 195...(P & H) and CIT vs R. L. Sood (2000) 245 ITR...

...CIT vs. D. Ananda Basappa reported in 180 taxman 4, the relevant observation of the Hon'ble bench reads as under:...Samrat Old Sharda Mandir, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad-380006. PAN: AAVPT8602J Vs. I.T.O., Ward-1(2)(2), Ahmedabad. (Applicant... घोषणा क तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 02/03/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER...

...consider the case law: 1. CIT Vs. Vittal Krishna Conjeevaram, ITTA No. 588 of 2013, dated 06/12/2013 2. Vittal Kirshna.... " 2. CIT vs Syed Ali Adil ( Decision of AP High Court dated 20.12.2012): In this case though the decision was rendered in the...the judgement of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Geeta Dugal (ITA No. 1237/2011 dated 21/02/2013) and 11...

...consider the case law: 1. CIT Vs. Vittal Krishna Conjeevaram, ITTA No. 588 of 2013, dated 06/12/2013 2. Vittal Kirshna.... " 2. CIT vs Syed Ali Adil ( Decision of AP High Court dated 20.12.2012): In this case though the decision was rendered in the...the judgement of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Geeta Dugal (ITA No. 1237/2011 dated 21/02/2013) and 11...

...law: 1. CIT Vs. Vittal Krishna Conjeevaram, ITTA No. 588 of 2013, dated 06/12/2013 10 2. Vitta.... " 10.7 The ld. CIT(A) has relied on the judgement of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Geeta Dugal (ITA No. 1237/2011 dated 21/02/2013) .... CIT Vs. Gita Duggal, 357 ITR 153 6...

...Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Gita Duggal (2013) 257 CTR 208 (Delhi) in this regard. Reliance has also been placed on the judgement of the Hon'ble Karnataka Hi...Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs. D. Ananda Basappa (supra) wherein the similar proposition was dealt with. The judgement...High court in the case of CIT vs. Gita Duggal (supra) in the context of Sections 54/54F of the Act, and the following discussion in the...

...Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Gita Duggal (2013) 257 CTR 208 (Delhi) in this regard. Reliance has also been placed on the judgement of the Hon'ble Karnataka Hi...Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs. D. Ananda Basappa (supra) wherein the similar proposition was dealt with. The judgement...High court in the case of CIT vs. Gita Duggal (supra) in the context of Sections 54/54F of the Act, and the following discussion in the...