CiteTEXT
... F.No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00460 Dated, the 26th December, 2006. Appellant : Shri B. Premanand, 11/7 Chettipalayam Road, Podanur-
F.No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00460 Dated, the 26th...December, 2006. Appellant : Shri B. Premanand, 11/7 Chettipalayam Road, Podanur- 641 023, Tamil Nadu. Respondents : Shri H.K.Kawllienthang, Under Secretary & PIO, Ministry of Home Affairs, Jaisalmer...:
1. Shri B. Premanand, 11/7 Chettipalayam Road, Podanur-641 023, Tamil Nadu. Shri H.K.Kawllienthang, Under Secretary & PIO, Ministry of Home Affairs, Jaisalmer House, 26...
...override it.”This view was followed in B. Premanand v. Mohan Koikal (2011) 4 SCC 266...
...***** No.CIC/OK/A/2006/00434 Dated: 27 February 2007 Name of the Appellant Shri B. Premanand, 11/7, Chettipalayam Road, Podanur 641 023, Tamil Nadu. Name of the Public Authority..., Information Commissioner, heard the matter.
5. Shri B.L. Meena, CPIO, Railway Board, represented the Respondents.
6. The Appellant, Shri B. Premanand, was neither...Authenticated true copy: Sd/- (Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar) Assistant Registrar
1. Shri B. Premanand, Indian Skeptic, 11/7, Chettipalayam Road, Podanur-
641 023 Tamil Nadu...
.../- (Prof. M.M. Ansari) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy: (L.C. Singhi) Additional Registrar Name & address of Parties:
1. Shri B. Premanand, Indian Skeptic, 11/7...
...)30. In B. Premanand v. Mohan Koikal (2011) 4 SCC 266 this Court has observed as follows...decision in all these appeals is: at what stage of the proceedings under Chapter XIV-B does the assessing authority require to record his satisfaction for issuing a notice under Section 158-BD of the...conditions precedent have not been complied with by the assessing officer, and(b) beyond the period of limitation as provided for under Section 158-BE read...
...to the police officer except to register an FIR. In support of the above proposition, he relied on the following decisions viz. B. Premanand v...(1973) 1 SCC 216, B. Premanand (2011) 4 SCC 266....”46. The above decision was followed by this Court in B. Premanand (2011) 4 SCC 266 and after referring to...
...Authority, Office of Postmaster General, Western Region, Tamilnadu, Coimbatore 641002.
3. Mr. B. Premanand, Indian Skeptic, 11/7, Chettipalayam Road, Podanur, Tamil Nadu 641023
...
.... Premanand v. Mohan Koikal (2011) 4 SCC 266 is misconceived in the facts of the case. In that case this Court was dealing with Rule 27(c) of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958. In...seniority of SMOs was not determined by UPSC, at the time of selection;(b) The Department should have requested UPSC to recommend candidates for such...wholly fortuitous, cannot be accepted.26. The reliance by the respondent(s) on the judgment of this Court in B...
..., CHAIRMAN,
KARNATAKA RURAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,
AINAPPUR, TALUK. KAGWAD,
DISTRICT. BELAGAVI-591303.
2. B. PREMANAND, PRINCIPAL...
...: (2003) AIR SCW 4140: 2003 AIR SCW 2133),, M/s Hiralal Rattanlal (supra), B. Premanand (supra.... Impugned notices dated 21.06.2018 and 22.06.2018, Annexures A and B issued by respondent No.1 are herby quashed, subject to the above observation. SD/- JUDGE ...
...B. Premanand v. Mohan Koikal (2011) 4 SCC 266, this Court held :“9. It may be mentioned in this connection that the first and...:Provided that for the financial creditors, referred to in clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (6-A) of Section 21, an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against th...other record or evidence of default as may be specified;(b) the name of the resolution professional proposed to act as an interim resolution professional...
... F.No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00549 Dated, the 20th February, 2007. Appellant : Shri B. Premanand, 11/7, Chettipalayam Road, Podanur- 641023, Tamil Nadu. Respondents : Shri S.K. Bhatnagar, Deputy...Address of parties:
1. Shri B. Premanand, 11/7, Chettipalayam Road, Podanur-641023, Tamil Nadu. Shri S.K. Bhatnagar, Deputy Secretary & CPIO, Ministry of Home Affairs, North...
... F.No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00643 Dated, the 26th February, 2007. Appellant : Shri B. Premanand, 11/7 Chettipalayam Road, Podanur-
641 023, Tamil Nadu...:
1. Shri B. Premanand, 11/7 Chettipalayam Road, Podanur-641 023, Tamil Nadu. Shri A.K. Agrawal, Commissioner of Income Tax & CPIO, Karnataka (Central...about the response to this information requested by the appellant, there is sufficient deliberation regarding (a) the various categories of information requested by him, (b) the public authorities...
...))30. In B. Premanand v. Mohan Koikal (2011) 4...-section, ‘foreign company’ shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (4) of Section 80-B of the Income Tax Act.(2) The foreign companies referred to in...(b) foreign companies providing any services or facilities or supplying any ship, aircraft, machinery or plant (whether by way of sale or hire) in connection with any business consisting...
...: 1990 AIR (SC) 10, Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India, (P&H) (DB), 2003 (4) SCT 69, B. Premanand v. Mohan Kaikal...
...,
AINAPUR, TALUK KAGWAD,
DISTRICT. BELAGAVI 591303.
5. B. PREMANAND,
PRINCIPAL,
KARNATAKA RURAL EDUCATION SOCIETY'S...
...) This judgment is referred to and followed in a recent decision of this Court in B. Premanand v. Mohan Koikal...dated 6-6-2008 under Sections 363/366/506/120-B IPC against the private respondents.4. Even after registration of the FIR against the private respondents, the police did not....(b) Section 154(1) does not have ambiguity and is in clear terms.(c) The use of expression “shall” clearly...
...observations in Hiralal Rattanlal [(2011) 4 SCC 266], this Court observed as under: (B. Premanand case13, SCC p. 270...called into aid only when the legislative intention is not clear.? 46. The above decision was followed by this Court in B. Premanand13 and after referring to the abovesaid...written and documented. For example, in case of arrest under Section 41(1)(b) of the Code, the arrest memo along with the grounds has to be in writing mandatorily; under Section 55 of the Code, if an...
...meaning as far as possible. The legislative duty to correct the law could not be usurped by Court. He would rely upon B. Premanand v. Mohan Koikal 2011 Volume-IV Supreme Court...hence, the observation of Vodafone could not help ITP either. He distinguished Hameed, B. Premanand and Saraswati by contending that Hindusthan Lever clearly held that the provisions, even without...distinct. Hence, transfer from A to B would definitely a “transfer” to come within the scope of paragraph 45 of Hindusthan Lever quoted (Supra), attracting appropriate duty.As per the...
...counter-affidavit is filed by the 2nd respondent, inter alia, bringing to the notice of the Court that on earlier occasion, a Writ Petition was filed by one B. Premanand in W.P.No. 14454 of 1993 with...