Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal157
+ Delhi High Court70
+ Karnataka High Court5
+ SEBI5
+ Bombay High Court3
+ CESTAT3
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal3
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board3
+ Kerala High Court3
+ Madras High Court3
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal3
+ National Company Law Tribunal3
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court1
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ Gujarat High Court1
+ Supreme Court Of India1
+ Uttarakhand High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Calcutta High Court0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Rajasthan High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards89
From 2011 To 2020160
From 2001 To 20100
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

.... The suit patent was, therefore, granted by the Patent Office in favour of IRM LLC on 30 September 2016. It remains valid till 20 November 2027. 6. The compound exemplified.... 15. Consequent thereon, this Court, vide order dated 21 August 2020 passed in I.A. 6729/2020 restored the ad interim injunction granted by this Court on 2 May 2019. The order continu...(since May 2016) under the brand name SPEXIB and internationally (since 2014) under the brand name ZYKADIA. It functions as preferred first line therapy for treatment of adult patients suffering from...

...their respective patents in the year 2014 and 2018 as also Zydus Cadila that Dapagliflozin was first disclosed in US‘117, equivalent to IN ‘625, the suit patent. Disclosure is a question of fact and...on 27 April, 2010. On 27 April, 2011 the plaintiff filed a petition under Rule 137 of the Patents Rule 2003 to keep the patent alive which was allowed by the Patent Office on 4 July, 2011. On 15 May...drug until the expiry of the plaintiff's US patents till 2025. Further the defendant's own patent applications in India, in the years 2014 and 2015, one application in European Union (EU) in October...

...), IA No.14827/2013 (u/O VIII R-10 CPC), IA No.1402/2014 (u/O VIII R-1 CPC) & CCP No.64/2013 SUNGRO SEEDS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr...this Court first on 31st May, 2013 when though no ex parte ad interim relief sought granted and no Court Commissioner as sought appointed but the defendants were directed to within three days of their...with respect to PPVFR Act and one of which may be mentioned. This Court in CS(COMM) No.132/2016 titled Mosanto Technology LLC Vs. Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. was concerned with a claim for...

...Controller General of India („DGCI") on 3rdAugust 2012, 16thMay 2014, 29thMay 2015 and the permission was recently amended in the name of Plaintiff No.3 on... 2011. 7. It is further averred in para 10 of the plaint that the Defendant on 9thMay 2016 filed a petition before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board...„Nitrogen Containing Heterobicycles As factor Xa Inhibitors" on 11thNovember 2010. It is stated that Plaintiff No.2 was granted import and marketing approval for Apixaban tablets by the Drug...

...of Rs. 1.25 crores in the year 2010-11, Rs. 1.30 crores in the year 2011-12 and Rs. 1.34 crores in the year 2012-13. The said affidavit of use filed before the Registrar of Trade Marks reads as un...considerable and I give below the details there of:- YEAR SALES (in Rs) 2010-2011 1.25...CRORE 2011-2012 1.30 CRORE 2012-2013 1.34 CRORE...

...appeal under section 117A(2) of the Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter, "Act") has been filed by the Appellant-Nippon Steel Corporation challenging the impugned order dated 5th March, 2012 passed under.... Therefore, l refuse to proceed with the application No. 435/DEL/2006 under section 15 of the Patents Act 1970. Dated 05/03/2012." 9. This Court in...Agriboard International LLC v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs [C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 4/2022, dated 31st March, 2022...

...structure of an earlier patent, is determined by looking for clear, unambiguous and individual disclosures. In this behalf, reliance was placed on Patent Office Guidelines, 2013; Patents Office Manual, 2011...been granted patents qua DAPA in approximately 70 countries. In 7 India, DAPA has not been subjected to any pre...-grant or post-grant opposition or even revocation proceedings prior to 2020. vii. It is only in 2020, some entities have embarked on infringing the aforementioned patents...

..., USA etc. These approaches have also been applied, even with modifications, in order to suit the facts and circumstances of each case by Courts. [2019] RPC 9, [2012] RPC 6 and Johns-Manville...application for grant of a patent titled ‘Notched Fastener’ bearing Application No. 5160/DELNP/2013, filed on 10 June, 2013 (hereinafter ‘subject patent’), under Section 15 of the Patents Act, 1970..., 2013. The Appellant filed a request for examination for the said application. A First Examination Report (hereinafter ‘FER’) with statement of objections was issued on 25 April, 2018. The primary...

...Awards 2013’ and also received the “Best Managed Services Vendor” award at the “7th NTA ICT World Communication Awards 2013”. Last year, i.e on 19 March, 2014, the plaintiff won an award for its LTE...suit patents. In fact, it was pointed that the two suits for patent infringement being CS (OS) No. 442 of 2013 & CS (OS) No. 2010/2013 have been instituted by the plaintiff against Micromax...., (620 F.3d 1321 at Page 8) which ratio has since been applied in WIAV Networks LLC v. 3Com Corp (2010) and Medsquire LLC v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., (2011). Following we...

...applications for their respective patents in the year 2014 and 2018 as also Zydus Cadila that Dapagliflozin was first disclosed in US117, equivalent to IN 625, the suit patent. Disclosure is a question of fact...under Rule 137 of the Patents Rule 2003 to keep the patent alive which was allowed by the Patent Office on 4 July, 2011. On 15 May, 2020 the defendant filed a representation before the Patent office.../2020 Page 25 of 89 have been applying and have been granted patents for the Markush claim. IN147 covers the basic core, structure, scaffold (pharmacophore) showing three rings, one sugar and two...

...- in respect of IN 176 and IN 161, for each calendar year, were identical. The product was also identified, in the Form 27s, filed in respect of both the patents, as REVOLADE which was, therefore...patent was originally granted to M/s. Smith Kline Beecham Corporation (later renamed “Glaxo Smith Kline LLC”) on 27 March, 2009. Novartis claims that the suit patent was first assigned by Glaxo Smith...Kline LLC to the Glaxo Group Ltd. on 5 October, 2015, on which date, by a back-to-back assignment deed, the suit patent was assigned by the Glaxo Group Ltd. to Novartis Pharma AG, who, by another...

...the 'Act'), laying a challenge to an order dated 18.03.2021 in Indian Patent Application No. 8198/DELNP/2013 passed by the Controller of Patents/Respondent herein. By the impugned order, the said...Patents, Designs & Trade Marks & Ors., IPAB Case No. OA/38/2011/PT/KOL, it was held that when notice for hearing is sent, Appellant should clearly know the objections...subject invention captured in the application under consideration. (Ref.: Agriboard International LLC v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs, C.A. (COMM.-IPD-PAT...

...Rules, 2003 read with Section 146(2)8 of the Patents Act in respect of IN 176 and IN 161, for each calendar year, were identical. The product was also identified, in the Form 27s, filed in respect of...originally granted to M/s SmithKline Beecham Corporation (later renamed GlaxoSmithKline LLC) on 27th March, 2009. Novartis claims that the suit patent was first assigned by GlaxoSmithKline LLC to the Glaxo...term of every patent granted, after the commencement of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, and the term of every patent which has not expired and has not ceased to have effect, on the date of such...

...assessment year 2011- 12 and thereafter no income was earned nor any payment was received during assessment year(s) 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. No evidence of any receipt durin...)2012-1319.79 Crs.2013-144.65 Crs.2014-1526.57 Crs.2015-1645.12 Crs.2016-17...) in AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 is liable to be deleted. 21. Insofar as the assessments which had abated i.e. AY 2016-17 and in the year of search i.e. AY 2017-18, Mr. Jain submitted...

...assessment year 2011- 12 and thereafter no income was earned nor any payment was received during assessment year(s) 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. No evidence of any receipt durin...)2012-1319.79 Crs.2013-144.65 Crs.2014-1526.57 Crs.2015-1645.12 Crs.2016-17...) in AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 is liable to be deleted. 21. Insofar as the assessments which had abated i.e. AY 2016-17 and in the year of search i.e. AY 2017-18, Mr. Jain submitted...

...assessment year 2011- 12 and thereafter no income was earned nor any payment was received during assessment year(s) 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. No evidence of any receipt durin...)2012-1319.79 Crs.2013-144.65 Crs.2014-1526.57 Crs.2015-1645.12 Crs.2016-17...) in AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 is liable to be deleted. 21. Insofar as the assessments which had abated i.e. AY 2016-17 and in the year of search i.e. AY 2017-18, Mr. Jain submitted...

...assessment year 2011- 12 and thereafter no income was earned nor any payment was received during assessment year(s) 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. No evidence of any receipt durin...)2012-1319.79 Crs.2013-144.65 Crs.2014-1526.57 Crs.2015-1645.12 Crs.2016-17...) in AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 is liable to be deleted. 21. Insofar as the assessments which had abated i.e. AY 2016-17 and in the year of search i.e. AY 2017-18, Mr. Jain submitted...

...assessment year 2011- 12 and thereafter no income was earned nor any payment was received during assessment year(s) 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. No evidence of any receipt durin...)2012-1319.79 Crs.2013-144.65 Crs.2014-1526.57 Crs.2015-1645.12 Crs.2016-17...) in AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 is liable to be deleted. 21. Insofar as the assessments which had abated i.e. AY 2016-17 and in the year of search i.e. AY 2017-18, Mr. Jain submitted...

...assessment year 2011- 12 and thereafter no income was earned nor any payment was received during assessment year(s) 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. No evidence of any receipt durin...)2012-1319.79 Crs.2013-144.65 Crs.2014-1526.57 Crs.2015-1645.12 Crs.2016-17...) in AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 is liable to be deleted. 21. Insofar as the assessments which had abated i.e. AY 2016-17 and in the year of search i.e. AY 2017-18, Mr. Jain submitted...

...parties under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code are as follows: a. In CS(COMM) 423/2016, the Plaintiff filed I.A. 14921/2013 and Pearl Engineering filed I.A. 21411/2012. b. In CS(COMM) 519/2018...I.A. 19993/2014 in CS (COMM) 423/2016 and I.A. 21917/2015 in CS (COMM) 499/2018. CS(COMM) 423/2016 & connected matters Page 33 of 223..., 2011 and 28thMay, 2012 [Ex. PW-1/1 in CS (COMM) 423/2016 and CS (COMM) 519/2018, respectively] executed by Mr. E.P. Coutinho.25To...