CiteTEXT
..., 2003 (4) RCR (Civil) 415 : AIR 2004 P&H 41. The learned lower Appellate Court also took note of the fact...
...Single Judge of Punjab & Haryana High Court in Lal Dass vs Raghbir Dass and Another reported in AIR 2004 ...the plaintiff cannot maintain a suit for a bare injunction restraining alienation only without seeking any other prayer. It was also claimed that the suits are barred under Section 41 (h) of the...attention to Section 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act and contend that when an equally efficacious remedy is available, a suit for bare injunction will not lie. He would also point out that a reading of...
...: AIR 1988 SC 576, and Lal Dass v. Raghbir Dass, AIR 2004 P&H 41. ...163 : AIR 2001 SC 2607, P. Seshagiri Rao v. P.S Ramachandra Rao, 1999 (1) ALT 373...so determined.”23. In Ranjit Construction Co., Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India, AIR 2004 Delhi 64, while...
...National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Saju P. Paul (2013) 2 SCC ...mentioned above, we find marked similarity in the facts of this case and the one involved in Saju P. Paul case (2013) 2 SCC 41. Secondly...arrived near Jorabat, there was a head-on collision between the Tata Sumo and a truck bearing Registration No. AS 01 H 2598 coming from the opposite direction as a result of which Ismail Hussain and...
...(4) m. P. H. T. 363, darwarilal vs. State of m. P. 1995 mplj vol. 40 page 521 (db) , santosh kumar vs. State of m. P. (1995) 1 mpwn 41, shiv kumar vs. State of m. P. , (2005) 4 mplj 117 (sb) = 200...) m. P. H. T. 466, prakash babu vs. State of m. P. (2005) 1 mplj 430, arvind kumar vs. State of m. P. , ilr 2008 (mp) 1479 = 2008 (2) m. P. H. T. 38, m. P. Ration vikreta sangh vs. State,...) 203 and sahkari sanstha anaj vikreta sangh and others vs. State m. P. , air 1981 sc 2030.
(5) Learned counsel for respondent state has only submitted that at a...
...AIR 1991 P&H 159 (FB) has laid down a wrong principle. In order to raise a plea of collusion...AIR 1991 P&H 159 (FB) is correct and that the earlier judgment in the present case is bindin...AIR 1991 P&H 159 (FB) is not correct and in fact, it runs contrary to the provisions of Sect...
...AIR 1993 P&H 54 such unreasonable and arbitrary demand had been quashed by the High Court and the State Government was issued direction to redetermine the ...AIR 1993 P&H 54 the State Government, being aggrieved, had challenged the said judgment and order before this Court by filing the special leave petitio...for certain reasons. Therefore, it cannot be held that the judgment in D.S Laungia AIR 1993 P&H 54 stood approved by this Court...
...(2004) 1 SCC 305, AIR 2004 SC 448 wherein it is held so. The respondent has also..., AIR 2004 SC 448, Kishore Lal v. Chairman, Employees' State Insurance Corpn...506, this Court referred to the earlier judgments in Fair Air Engineers (P) Ltd. v. N.K Modi...
...never served upon the petitioner. Thus, the p . etPitioner stands condemned unheard and the order of susp e H nsion has been passed in breach of principles of natural justice. It was...; Sangram Singh vs. Election Tribunal, AIR 1955 h
SC 425...
Venkataraman and Co. (P) Ltd. vs. State of Madras, AIR i
1966 SC 1089, have held that though Article 226...
...584, AIR 2004 SC 1890 and Vidyadharan v. State Of Kerala . (2004) 1..., AIR 2000 SC 740 and Moly (2004) 4..., AIR 2004 SC 1890 and Vidyadharan (2004) 1 SCC 215 but the Division Bench placed reliance on Bhooraji (2001) 7 SCC 679...
...Court in the case of Ganpat v. Ram Devi AIR 1978 P&H 137 wherein the...Punjab Full Bench AIR 1978 P&H 137. The learned advocate for the respondents responded in the negative by placing...AIR 1978 P&H 137 and contended that by reason of the express saving, question of the Punjab Act being declared repugnant to Section 100 does not an...
...(2004) 7 SCC 27, AIR 2004 SC 4144..., AIR 2004 SC 4127, Krishnakali Tea Estate v. Akhil Bharatiya Chah Mazdoor Sangh (2004) 8 SCC 2...(2007) 10 SCC 385, SCC at p. 394, para 16).22. … ‘41. We may not be understood to have l...
...AIR 1979 P&H 215 it was held: (AIR p. 216, para 5)“5. The provisi...P. Swaroopa Rani v. M. Hari Narayana (2008) 5 SCC 765, ...Dalal (2001) 3 SCC 459 and Surinder Kumar v. Gian Chand AIR 1957 SC 875.31. Section 41 of the Evidence Act...
...(2004) 8 SCC 579, AIR 2004 SC 4778.... 1970 AC 1004, (1970) 2 WLR 1140, (1970) 2 All ER 294 (HL) (All ER p. 297g-h) Lord Reid said, ‘Lord Atkin's speech … is not to be treated as if it were a statutory definition. It will.... CIT, AIR p. 688, para 19)‘19. … Each case depends on its own facts and a close similarity between one case and another is not enough...
...Mineral Concession Rules. The Constitution Bench held that in exercising its power of revision under the aforesaid Rule the Central Government acts in a quasi-judicial capacity (see AIR p. 1610, para 8..., this Court, exercising its jurisdiction under Article 136, may find it difficult to ascertain which are the grounds on which the Central Government upheld the order of the State Government (see AIR p...: AIR p. 1304, para 7.)21. In Travancore Rayon Ltd. v. Union Of India . (1969) 3 SCC...
...parts of his case and fill up omissions in the court of appeal, it was observed as follows: (AIR p. 148)“… Under clause (1)(b) it is only where the...under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC, before the High Court on 3-4-2002.7. Vide order dated 3-4-2002, the High Court directed the Collector, Nainital to produce the notification under...applications were filed by the appellant on 24-3-2003 and 28-6-2004 seeking permission to urge additional grounds in support of the amendment application as well as the review application. As noted...
...what happened on 29-9-2004 was far below the standard of conduct/expected from a body like the Board and furthermore the manner in which the meeting was conducted clearly creates an air of suspicion...Madras High Court which was marked as Civil Suit No. 765 of 2004 inter alia for the following reliefs:“1. A declaration to declare that the eligible candidates who are...act as such for the term in the election to be conducted in the annual general meeting on 29-9-2004 and 30-9-2004 at Hotel Taj Bengal, Kolkata.2. For a...
...of the appellant companies are entitled to claim pension under the General Insurance (Employees') Pension Scheme, 1995. The High Court (2008) 149 PLR 755, (2008) 2 SLR 239 (P&H...matter before the High Court in separate writ petitions filed by them. The High Court has by a common order dated 25-1-2008 (2008) 149 PLR 755, (2008) 2 SLR 239 (P&H...he said: (WLR p. 1530 H)“It is true that ‘the industry’ is defined; but a definition is not to be read in isolation. It must be read in the context of the phrase...
.... H. C. Bhari . AIR 1956 SC 44, 1956 Cri LJ 140, (1955) 2 SCR 925, Pukhraj v. State of Rajasthan (1973) 2 SCC...a servant of the Crown” appearing in Section 270(1) of the Government of India Act, 1935. The following observations of the Federal Court are material: (AIR p. 55...) 2 SCR 925, AIR p. 49, para 20)“20. … the question must be determined with reference to the nature of the allegations made against the public...
..., AIR 2004 SC 261 this Court held:“12. In trials before a Court of Session, the prosecution ‘shall be conducted by a Public...purchased by Sonia from Itarsi on 10-9-2004. The same mobile phone was recovered from the shop of Sonu at Itarsi upon the disclosure statement made by the appellant, vide recovery memo, Ext. P-19...Family Court, Rohtak. The first motion was complete and the second motion had been fixed for 3-9-2004.3. On 2-9-2004 Sonia (the deceased) sent a telephonic message to her...