Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Madras High Court
39
Calcutta High Court
23
Bombay High Court
17
Allahabad High Court
14
Andhra Pradesh High Court
3
Madhya Pradesh High Court
3
Privy Council
3
Supreme Court Of India
3
Orissa High Court
2
Patna High Court
2
Delhi High Court
1
Gauhati High Court
1
Gujarat High Court
1
Kerala High Court
1
Punjab & Haryana High Court
1
Rajasthan High Court
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
0
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
0
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
0
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
0
Armed Forces Tribunal
0
Authority For Advance Rulings
0
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
0
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
CESTAT
0
Central Administrative Tribunal
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
0
Central Information Commission
0
Chhattisgarh High Court
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Company Law Board
0
Competition Appellate Tribunal
0
Competition Commission Of India
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
District Court
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Himachal Pradesh High Court
0
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
0
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
0
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
0
Jharkhand High Court
0
Karnataka High Court
0
Manipur High Court
0
Meghalaya High Court
0
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
0
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
0
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
0
National Company Law Tribunal
0
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
National Green Tribunal
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
RERA
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Right to Information
0
SEBI
0
Securities Appellate Tribunal
0
Settlement Commission
0
Sikkim High Court
0
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
Telangana High Court
0
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
0
Trade Marks Registry
0
Tripura High Court
0
Uttarakhand High Court
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
1
From 2011 To 2020
5
From 2001 To 2010
1
From 1991 To 2000
0
From 1981 To 1990
0
From 1971 To 1980
3
From 1961 To 1970
5
From 1951 To 1960
8
Before 1950
87

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...Limitation Act of 1871. Their Lordships then quoted the well-known passage from the case of Katama Natchiar v. Rajah of Shivagunga [1863] 9 M.I.A. 539 (P.C.), which...has been described as laying down the rule, in Shivagunga's case [1863] 9 M.I.A. 539 (P.C.). No doubt, for the purpose of that case, it was not absolutely necessary to lay down that rule but there is...which was laid down in Shivagunga's case [1863] 9 M.I.A. 539 (P.C.) in the passage quoted at p. 894. I must here point out that all that was remarked in that passage was that the whole estate for the...


Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: Jul 10, 1928 Cited By: 10 Coram: 4
2

...] 9 M.I.A 539 , 2 W.R 31 (P.C)] and the case of Hari Nath Chatterjee v. Mathuramohun Goswami [1894] 21 Cal. 8 , 20 I.A 183 (P.C), threw the suit out on the...think the principle of the Shivagunga case [1861-63] 9 M.I.A 539 , 2 W.R 31 (P.C) cannot be extended so as to cover a case of the kind we are dealing with. It is true Page: 13that...than her own, the general rule laid down in the Shivagunga case [1861-63] 9 M.I.A 539 , 2 W.R 31 (P.C) might apply. But it has often been pointed out that it cannot apply to cases in...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: Sep 5, 1917 Cited By: 3 Coram: 2
3

...considering the prior decisions relating to prescription against a widow, more particularly Katama Natchiar v. Raja of Shivagunga 9 M.I.A. 539 : 2 W.R.P.C. 31 : 1 Suth. P.C.J...referred shows in their opinion that the Board has invariably applied the rule of the Shivagunga case 9 M.I.A. 539 : 2 W.R.P.C. 31 : 1 Suth. P.C.J. 520 : 2 Sar. P.C.J...Shivagunga's case 9 M.I.A. 539 : 2 W.R.P.C. 31 : 1 Suth. P.C.J. 520 : 2 Sar. P.C.J. 25 : 19 E.R. 843 to the effect that on adverse decree against a Hindu...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Dec 20, 1928 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
4

...down by their Lordships in the case of Katama Natchicr v. Rajah of Shivagunga 9 M.I.A. 539 : 2 W.R.P.C. 31 : 1 Suth. P.C.J. 520 : 2 Sar. P.C.J. 305...


Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: Mar 8, 1923 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
5

...nature of property in an impartible Raj the Privy Council in the case of Katama Natchiar v. The Rajah of Shivagunga 9 M.I.A. 539 at p. 589 : 2 W.R. 31...survivorship. [See Naragunty Luchmidavamah v. Vengama Naidoo 9 M.I.A. 66 : 1 W.R. (P.C.) 30 Heeranath Kooer v. Baboo Rurm Narain Singh 17 W.R. 316 : 15...appeared for the Crown to support the opinion of the lower Courts. 2. Section 4 of the Succession Certificate Act, VII of 18-9, provides that "no Court shall...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Sep 5, 1910 Cited By: 1
6

...question is whether having regard to the decision of the Privy Council in Katama Natchiar v. The Rajah of Shivagunga (1863) 9 M.I.A. 539, the question in the previous suit was...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: Sep 20, 1912 Cited By: 2 Coram: 2
7

..., it is impossible to say who are the persons who will be entitled to succeed as heirs to her husband; 9 M.I.A 539 at p. 604. The succession does not open to the heirs of the husband until the...Act.9. Mr Naunit Lal appearing for the appellant argued that the result of the decision of this Court in Eramma v. Verrupanna is that on the death of Wadhawa Singh's widow...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Mar 5, 1974 Cited By: 39 Coram: 2
8

...Sivaganga (1863) 9 M.I.A. 539 for the succession of self-acquisition. The siuia holds good in the case of the self-acquisition of a Nambudri. The Nambudri is governed by the Smritis. He is even more...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: May 4, 1910 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
9

...v. The Rajah of Shivaganga . [1862] 9 M.I.A 539, it was held that a Hindu widow who represents the whole estate in a litigation represents also the reversioners and at p...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Nov 26, 1930 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
10

...decision in Katama Natchier v. Raja of Shivagunga [1861-63] 9 M.I.A. 539, that where no special custom is proved, the customary law of succession is to be found in the Mitakshara...happened in Katama Nachier v. Raja of Shivagunga [1861-63] 9 M.I.A. 539. On the other hand, it is also well settled that as regards an impartible estate which was or had to be...


Court: Privy Council
Date: Dec 15, 1927 Cited By: 15 Coram: 5
11

...the mother in her lifetime had, upon the principle of Katama Natchire v. The Rajah of Shivagunga (1863) 9 M.I.A. 539 operated to bar the interest of the plaintiff...Lordships' Board in the Shivagunga case (1863) 9 M.I.A. 539 established the principle of the representation of the inheritance by a Hindu widow. That case was decided during the currency of the Act of...formed part of Uttam Ram's estate. In fact, the mother and the aunt received payment of the malikana of Rs. 1,600 in equal moieties. 9. In 1886 the mother began a suit (No. 237 of 1888...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: Apr 19, 1929 Cited By: 3 Coram: 2
12

...9 M.I.A. 539 : 2 W.R. 31 (P.C.). He refers to the remarks at page 609 of the report to the effect thai: self-acquired property, if the acquirer loaves male issue, will descend to that...inherited from his father or other predecessor." 5. Clauses 9 and 10 of Section V of the same Chapter are in conflict with the above in that they lay down...may be pointed out, however, that for the special case of re-union after partition, the Mitakshara makes provision in chapter II Section 9 and it is clear, therefore, that the re-united sons would take...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Nov 17, 1908 Cited By: 13
13

...survivorship falls…..”11. In 12 M.I.A 5235 at p. 541 their Lordships say:“In 9 M.I.A 539 …. it is stated in a judgment which underwent the most careful consideration by...1941 Nag. 29765. A different view was taken by Stuart and Bisheshar Nath, JJ. in 5 Luck. 649 where, relying on 9 M.I.A 539, their Lordships held that in the case of property...they have no right of interdiction which they have in the case of ancestral property. In 12 M.I.A 523 at p. 541 their Lordships said:“In 9 M.I.A 539 at p. 610 it is stated in a...


Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: Apr 22, 1942 Cited By: 12 Coram: 3
14

...Katama Natchier v. Rajah of Shivagunga 9 M.I.A. 539 : 2 W.R. 31. (P.C.) : 1 Suth. P.C.J. 620 : 2 Sar. P.C.J. 25 : 19 E.R. 843...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Dec 21, 1915 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
15

.... 10 The case of Katama Natchier v. The Rajah of Shivagunga (1863) 9 M.I.A. 539, which has been brought to their Lordships' notice, has no direct bearing upon the point now to be...complusion, but the kind of pressure which the law recognises an serious and sufficient. 9. Btaring this in mind their Lordships will proceed to consider whether an alienation, which is the...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: May 31, 1922 Cited By: 3 Coram: 2
16

...Katama Natchiar's case 9 M.I.A. 539 P.C. I may in this connection recall the well-known dictum of Lord Halsbury in Quinn v. Leathem 1901 A.C. 490 that a case is authority for what it.... The views expressed by Hamilton J. need not be examined separately as he assumes that the dictum of the Judicial Committee in Katama Natohiar v. Moottoo Vijaya Ranganadha 9 M.I.A. 539 (P.C...M.I.A. 539 at p. 615: But the law of partition shows that as to the separately acquired property of one member of a united family, the other members of that family have. neither...


Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: Dec 8, 1948 Cited By: 15 Coram: 3
17

...Vallabha Taver. The zamindary in question was admitted to be impartible. The claims in the case were stated by Lord Justice Turner as follows :- (1) (1863) 9 M.I.A. 539 = 1 Suther, 520...-mentioned case of Ventana, follows it and Sivagunga in preference to the Tipparah case. (5) (1872) 9 B.L.R. 274 = 17 W.R. 316...Macnaghten in 32 I. A., as will be subsequently mentioned. Rajah Rup Singh v. Rani Baisni (9). This was a case between a widow and the nearest male heir. This decision is...


Court: Privy Council
Date: Feb 7, 1921 Cited By: 37 Coram: 4
18

...) 9 M.I.A. 539, 604, where, dealing with the question under what circumstances a decree against the widow may bind the rever-sioners, the Board expressed itself thus :- that, unless...now treat the decree, which was based on the award, as a nullity, and claim possession of these properties ad this distance of time. 9. After answering the first two questions in the...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: Nov 22, 1917 Cited By: 2 Coram: 2
19

...Ragunadha Bodha Gooroo Sawmy Periya Oodaya Taver . 1861-63 9 M.I.A 539.9. There can be no doubt on the facts, pleadings and judgment in this case that the widow was...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Dec 21, 1915 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
20

...litigation would bind the inheritance. Katamanatchier v. Raja of Shivagunga 9 M.I.A. 539 : at p. 604 : 2 W.R. 31 (P.C...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Sep 8, 1910 Cited By: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).