CiteTEXT
...Section 1 of the Limitation Act of 1871 See Venkatachella Mudali v. Sashagherry Rau 7 Mad. H.C. 283; Molakatella Naganna v. Pedda Narappa 7 Mad....; Venkataramanier v. Manche Reddy 7 Mad. H.C. 298 and Chinnasami Iyengar v. Gopalacharry 7 Mad. H.C. 392 but see Madhavbhai Shiovbhai v. Fattesang Nathubhai 10 Bom. H.C. ..., both of the cases cited are adverse to the plaintiff's claim, and, if additional authority was necessary, I might refer to the case of Hempammal v. Hanuman 2 Mad. H.C. Rep. 472. In the present case...
....
6. The case of Chinnasami Iyengar v. Gopalacharry (7 Mad., H.C. Rep., 392) was a suit brought, after the 1st of April 1873, on a promissory note executed while Act XIV of 1859 was in force, but....
8. In the Madras case Chinnamami Iyengar v. Gopalacharya (7 Mad. H.C. Rep. 392) the period of limitation, fixed by Act XIV of 1859 for such a suit, not having elapsed...him as barred. That case, therefore, differed in a most important point from three other cases reported in the same volume: Vencatachella Mudali v. Sashagherry Rau (7 Mad. H.C. Rep. 283...
...Madura 5 Mad H.C. Rep. 6 and Kristna Ayyan v. Venkata Chella Mudali 7 Mad. H.C. Rep. 60 but neither of these has any application to the present case,.the circumstances of which are...
...on such a point before the indian evidence act came into force--see ex. gr., Dada Honaji v. Babaji Jagushet (2 Bom. H.C. Rep., 36), Guddalur v. Kunnattur (7 Mad. H.C. Rep., 189), and...
...Proceedings, 24th March 1873, 7 Mad. H.C. Rep., Appx. XVII) that the Legislature has, by most inapt words, extended the prohibition contained in Section 473 to the offence of giving false evidence, and that...proposition laid down in The Queen v. Navranbeg (10 Bom. H.C. Rep. 73), that the offence of giving false evidence is to be regarded as a contempt of Court. But [notwithstanding some rulings of the...
..., that, according to Guduri v. Rapaka (7 Mad. H.C. Rep., 348), the law applicable to the admissibility in evidence of Exhibit 17 is the more recent Act (VIII of 1871); yet inasmuch as that exhibit is...the land, but as proof of the amount paid. Neither party denied that the mortgage lien had been extinguished.
8. Guduri v. Rapaka (7 Mad. H.C. Rep., 348), already mentioned, was a suit....
7. Venkatarama v. Chinnathumbu (7 Mad. H C. Rep., 1) was a suit by a mortgagor to recover from a mortgagee a, sum paid (on redemption) to the latter in excess of what was...
...of appeal asking for the same relief as that asked for in the application for review." In the case reported in 7 Madras H.C. Reports 7 Mad. H.C. Rep., App. 1. it appears that the majority of the Court...
...relevant. We may refer to In the matter of the petition of the Government Pleader (
1874) 7 Mad. H.C. 339, where the Madras High Court held that a conviction of a particular offence...., 3, where the appellants had been wrongly convicted as abettors instead of as principals this High Court would not interfere.
4. In Beg. v. Raghoji bin Kanoji (1867) 3 Bom. H.C...
...amounting to culpable homicide," which occur in Section 304A, were considered and explained by Holloway J. in Beg. v. Nidamarti Nagabhushanam (1872) 7 Mad. H.C. 119, 120 in the...the provisions of Section 545 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
7. We are aware that a Full Bench of the Madras High Court, in the case of...Yalla Gangulu v. Mamidi Dali (1897) I.L.R. 21 Mad. 74 has held that compensation cannot be given to the widow of a deceased person in a...
...expressed by Holloway, J., in DeSouza v. Coles 3 Mad. H.C. 384.
5. The same view was taken by Morgan, C.J. and Innes, J. in Sami Ayyangar v. Gopal Ayyangar 7 Mad. H.C...being taken in Sichel v. Borch 33 L.J. Ex. 179; Allhusen v. Malgarejo L.R. 3 Q.B. 340 and Cherry v. Thomson L.R. 7 Q. 13. 573; the former in Jackson v. Spittal...v. E.I. Railway Co. I.L.R. 1 Mad. 377 Kernan and Kindersley, JJ. adopted, even in a case on the Original Side of the Court, the rules laid down in Gopi Krishna...
...Equity Jurisprudence (ed. 1877).
10. The rule was first enunciated in India by Mr. Justice Holloway in Ramu Naikan v. Subbaraya Mudali 7 Mad. H.C. Rep. 229 in which...mortgage paid off. Before leaving this question, however, I must refer again to some of the cases which I have already cited. The report of the case of Ramu Naikan 7 Mad. H.C. Rep. 229 is not very clear...1866 and other debts due by them to various creditors.
7. The object of this suit was to bring the four annas share to sale by enforcement of the lien created by the mortgage deed of...
.... Minatchi (7 Mad. H.C., 245) relate to the right of the adopted son to succeed to the estate of the relatives of the adoptive mother, which is not the question here. In the other cases cited, the question...few years after this decision Bhoobunmoye died; and there is no dispute between the parties that the estate then devolved upon Chundraboli, the mother of Bhowani Kishore.
7...B.L.R., 15). This definition is entirely in accordance with para. 38, chap. xi section 1, Dayabhaga, and para. 7, Chap. XI of Dayatattwa.
28. The conclusion at which the lower Court...
...the Madras High Court in Venkappa Chetti v. Akku 7 Mad. H.C. Rep. 219, also relied upon by the learned Counsel, have no application, as the two deeds in question in those cases were...Turner, C.J. on the same subject in Rama Sami Sastrigal v. Samiyappanayakan I.L.R. 4 Mad. 179, at pp. 183 and 184. We may add, as was also observed in Ali Ahmad v. Rahmat...intention of the contracting parties was when they entered into the transaction.
7. As we have stated above, Taluqa Pataila, the property which the plaintiff seeks to redeem in this...
.... Maheroolah (7 Cal. W.R. (F.B.), 21);
Karuppanna v. Nallamma (1 Mad. H.C. Rep., 209);
Narayanappa v. Bhaskar (7 Bom.
H.C. Rep. 125 A.C.J.); Navalmal...due. That contingency having happened on the 2nd October 1868, the plaintiff' became entitled to the whole of the money at once (7 Cal. W.R., 21 Civ. Rul., 7 Bom. H.C. Rep., 125 A.C.J.... 11 Idem. 155; 1 Mad. H.C. Rep., 209; 12 L.J.Q.B., 134). He might, accordingly, have sued for the whole amount any day after that date. His right to immediate payment thereof was not, under the note...
...Aminuddin Sahib v. Pyari Bi, 43 Mad. 633 : (A.I.R(7) 1920 Mad. 159). In the latter case a Division Bench of the Madras H.C held that Page: 389an applt. who is.... Court-fee on appeal be refunded to the applt.K.S7. Appeal allowed....
...other side to show that the doctrine of the Privy Council may be extended to succession ex parte maternâ.The case referred to in 7 Mad. H.C Reports shows that an adopted son cannot...an adopted son succeeding at all. See remarks of Pundit, J., in Morun Moee Debeah's case, W.R Sp. No. p. 124; and Chinnarama Kristna Ayyar v. Minachi Ammal, 7 Mad. H.C.R, 245...is not touched by any one of them. The cases of Morun Moee v. Beejoy Kisto, W.R, Special No. 121, and Ram Chinnara Kristna Ayyar v. Minatchi Ammal, 7 Mad. H.C.R, 245...
...view of the law. I concur in Parankusam Narasaya Pantulu V. Captain R.A.C. Stuart 2 Mad. H.C. Rep. 396, which was decided after consideration of Bird v. Jones 7 Q.B. 742, which...
.... Industrial Tribunal, Madras(H.C. Mad.)-2002(4)-LLN-1118.
5
7. S.T.P. Ltd., V/s. Second Labour Court 2002.... Association of Engineering Workers, Mumbai V/s. ATV Ltd., Mumbai and another (H.C. Bom.)-2002(2) LLN-
1052.... Hindustan Lever Ltd., V/s. Hindustan Lever Employees Union (H.C. Bom.)-1999-I-CLR-56.
6. Laxmi Vilas Bank Employees Union V/s. P.O...
...).
• Seshasayee Paper & Boards Ltd. (2000) 242 ITR 490 (Mad H.C.).
7. The....
• TTK LIG Ltd. vs. ACIT(Mad) 51 DTR 228.
• ARvee International vs. Addl. CIT (ITAT, Mum) 101 ITD 495....
• CIT vs. Nagesh Knitwears Pvt. Ltd. 345 ITR 135 (Delhi H.C.).
• Gee Vee Enterprises v. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax...
...- TIOL-813-H.C-Mad IT. 7. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. In the show cause notice there was no specific charges as relates to...substantial question of law arises in this appeal for determination by this Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed." 7 ITA Nos. 3705 & 3757/Del/2014 Thus, Additional...