.... L. R. (1948) ALL. 532 (F. B.) and Nayudamma v. Sivaraju Dharmachand, A. I. R. (30) 1943 Mad. 515. 10. In proceedings, 16 Jan. 1872, 7 Mad. H. C. R. App. 1, the...application. 2. The learned civil Judge was of the opinion that in view of the language of Article 5 of Schedule 1, Court-fees Act (VII [7] of 1870) the...review application was made; in that case as amendment having come into force in between the two dates which had made substantial changes in the amount of court-fees payable. 7. The...

.... 7. Venkatarama v. Chinnathumbu (7 Mad. H C. Rep., 1) was a suit by a mortgagor to recover from a mortgagee a, sum paid (on redemption) to the latter in excess of what was..., that, according to Guduri v. Rapaka (7 Mad. H.C. Rep., 348), the law applicable to the admissibility in evidence of Exhibit 17 is the more recent Act (VIII of 1871); yet inasmuch as that exhibit is...the land, but as proof of the amount paid. Neither party denied that the mortgage lien had been extinguished. 8. Guduri v. Rapaka (7 Mad. H.C. Rep., 348), already mentioned, was a suit...

...v. Minatchi Ammal (7 Mad. H. C. R., 245) followed the ruling in Morun Moee Debeah v. Bejoy Krishto Gossamee (W. R., Sp. No. 121), although the learned Judges who decided that...)" -Dattaka Mimansa, Section VI, page 50. 7. This case is governed by the authorities of the Bengal school, and it is now settled that the law of inheritance in this school is based...

...last referred to, ILR 46 Cal. 60 : ( AIR 1919 Cal, 409) and 7 Mad H. C. R. XXIX and in ILR 14 Cal. 42 (FB), ILR...the Criminal Procedure Codes. 38. In the Appellate Side Proceedings, 7th November 1873 7 Mad HCR XXIX it was held...7 All 672, ILR 10 Bom 176 and 23 Mad LJ 371. The accused's claim must therefore fail if it is regarded as a review." 49. In...

...cited, Muthumadeva Naik v. Sivathmuthumadeva Naik 7 Mad. H. C. 160 is merely another example of the same principle. The cases of Vijaya Raghanadha Bodha v. Katamar Natchiar 11.... According to the case thus made, it appears therefore that the first plaintiff claims to be entitled in his own right by purchase to a 14 days' share, and jointly with his co-plaintiffs to a 7 days' share...applicable to the suit would begin to run. 6. The defence to the suit raised substantially the same questions as toe now raised by the pleas taken in appeal. 7. The...

...grievances by their Own act. Holloway J. in Madras High Court Proceedings 8-1-1873 No. 59, (1873) 7 Mad. H. C. R. App 35 relying upon this case said...attached cattle and placed this difficulty before the decree-holder, who allowed him to keen them in his enclosure. Next day at 7 a. m. the nine appellants went to the enclosure of the decree-holder armed..., that two of the buffaloes had been left by Tika appellant with Sunehri for grazing, that the buffaloes had not still piven birth to any young one, that at 7 a.m. the appellants went to the house of...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...199 (Mad) and CIT v. Mahalaxmi Rice Factory, [2007] 294 ITR 631 (P & H).7. In view of this long line of decisions of...the condition laid down in section 80-IA(7). section 80-IA(7) reads as under:“The deduction under sub-section (1) from profits and gains derived from an...provisions of section 80-IA(7) with regard to filing of the audit report along with the return were not mandatory and were merely directory. In coming to such conclusion, the...

.... Robinson v. Ayya Krishnama (1872) 7 Mad. H C R 37, Dharnidhar v. Bhagirathi AIR 1956 Orissa 89, and Perumal v...the law of gravity." 12. Coming to the Indian cases, in J. D. Robinson v. Ayyakrishnamma Cheriyar (1872) 7 Mad. H C R 37, rain water used to flow...Patent of this Court. 7. it was contended before us by the learned counsel for the appellant that even- if the respondents have the right to irrigate their fields from the water in...

...-/t L f t,. . _1:,:::j:.,::::Plot no.B-7, 5th Malla Re Mad h u ra na ga r, Hydera b'j"ii*if'll- Applicant 2. Telangana... 1. M/s. Joyce Industries, D. No.7 -24/7/8, Venkateswara colony, Sultanpur village, Ameenpur Mandal, Sanga Reddy district, Telangana - 502 110.... Represented by its proprietor G, Praveen Kumar, Mr. G. Praveen Kumar, s/o Sri Yesepu, aged major, occ: Prop of M/s. Joyce Industries, l/g H . N: . 9 - 3;l e t/ t 47...

....) : 7 Cal. 616 : 33 Cal. 812 : 3 M. H. C. R. 247 : 7 Mad. 702 : 23 M. 137 : 25 All. 581 (F.B.) : .... 6. The American Law regarding material alteration of negotiable instruments and its consequences is practically the same as in India and in England. 7. The short....” Gardnerv. Walsh 5 E. B. 83. Suffeek v. Bank of England 9 Q.B.D. 555. Master v. Miller I.S.M.L.C. 11th Edition 767 : 4 All. 63 : 9 Mad. 399 (F.B...

...view first propounded in — ‘Murugayi v. Veramkal (C)’. See ‘Koduthi v. Madu’, 7 Mad 321 (H), a case of Lingait Goundans. In....”7. So far as the other States in India are concerned the point has never been disputed that such re-marriage entails forfeiture of all interest in the deceased husband's estate. The earliest...entailed the forfeiture or divesting of the widow's estate. The earliest reported decision of the Madras High Court on the subject is — ‘Murgayi v. Verramkali’, 1 Mad 226 (C), a decision...

...substance to prevent a man from pursuing his legitimate calling. (Vide Rama Krishna v. Ranga, ILR 7 Mad 424 (H); Raja Shivapa v. Krishna Bhat...been recognised in suit No. 149 of 1938 of the court of the Munsif of Fatehabad at Agra, the suit having been filed by the present plaintiff against defendants Nos. 5, 6 and 7 for possession over...birt rights. It was contended in the plaint that after the decision in that earlier suit, defendants Nos. 1 to 4 had been drafted from a different locality to Fatehabad by defendants Nos. 5, 6 and 7 and...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

..., the decision referred is not without jurisdiction and is not a nullity. (See ILR 7 All 230 (FB) (C), .ILR 17 Cal 155 (D), ILB 14 Mad 183 (H.... ILR 14 Mad 183 (H) : ILR 15 Mad 241 (B)). We think these decisions are sound, and we doubt the correctness of the decision in ILR 13 Mad 273...) and ILR 13 Mad 273 (F), on the one hand and ILR 14 Mad 183 (H), ILR 15 Mad 241 (B) and ILR 23 Mad...

...been taken in three decisions of the Madras High Court and these are: Baba v. Timma, ILR 7 Mad 357 (FB) (H), ...Venkatappayya v. Raghavayya, AIR 1951 Mad 318 (J), ILR 7 Mad 357 (FB...Judges of the Madras High Court who decided ILR 7 Mad 357 (FB) (H) relied upon the authority of special texts for answering the question whether a Hindu father unseparated from his son...

...authorities on which these propositions are rested are in the former case, -- '1 Mad H C R 375 (A)'; -- '7 Mad 187 (C...wife will not entitle the first wife who is thus superseded to claim separate maintenance, gee -- '1 Mad H C R 375 at p. 378 (A)' 7 Mad 187 at p. 188 (C)'. It has...that a decree for restitution of conjugal rights cannot be refused on account of a second marriage by the husband and gives in the footnote as his authority for this proposition -- '7 Mad 187 (C); ...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.