CiteTEXT
...
Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna & Ors., (2003) 2 SCC 15.
.../defendants had confirmed the amount due vide Letter dated 31.03.2003 under the signatures of the respondent
1
no. 2.../defendant no. 2 who was the partner of respondent no. 1/defendant no. 1, a partnership firm.
2. The respondents/defendants did not appear before the trial court also...
.... R. Veeranna (2003) 2 SCC 15 has held that an unqualified acknowledgment of liability gives a fresh cause of action and a fresh period of limitation to file the suit for recovery. In this case, the...judgment of the trial Court dated 18.10.2003 dismissing the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 3,04,597.60/-.2. The facts of the case are that the appellant.../plaintiff granted a loan to the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 on 12.5.1978 This loan was granted because the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 needed moneys to subscribe to their portions of the share capital in the...
...Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna, 2003 (2) SCC 15 in support of the proposition that an unqualified acknowledgment of liability gives a fresh period of....2. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned judgment of the Trial Court dated...:-“THE TRANSLATION FROM HINDI TO ENGLISH OF THE LETTER FROM DEF. NO. 2 TO THE PLAINTIFF DATED 14.9.1999To,THE BRANCH MANAGER NSIC. LTD., LUDHIANAFSir...
...Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna (2003) 2 SCC 15. As per the judgment of the Supreme Court in this case, an unqualified acknowledgment of liability gives ....2. The defendant has contested the suit and pleaded that there was no running account but payment was made bill-wise. The defendant has referred to the fact that either each bill was cleared under a...2. Whether the suit has been filed by a duly authorized person?3. Whether the plaintiff's company supplied the requisite quantity of cement to the defendants?4. To...
..., (2013) 2 SCC 582, AIR 2002 Cal 223, ...2122, AIR 2010 SC 266, (2013) 2 SCC 574...Abhay Manohar Sapre, C.J:— Heard Mr. S.P Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondents.2. By filing this writ petition under...
...407 : I (2003) BC 376 (SC) : (2003) 2 SCC 15 : AIR ...., (1979) 2 SCC 396 : AIR 1979 SC 102 Para 15..., Bihar State Electricity Board v. Green Rubber Industries, (1990) 1 SCC 731, Central Bank of India, Bombay v. Sion Bakers and Confectioners Pvt. Ltd., Bombay, 2008 (...
.... Veeranna, VII (2002) SLT 407 : I (2003) BC 376 (SC) : (2003) 2 SCC ..., Margaret Lalita Samuel Mrs v. Indo Commercial Bank Ltd., (1979) 2 SCC 396...: AIR 1979 SC 102 Para 15, Bihar State Electricity Board v. Green Rubber Industries, (1990) 1 SCC 731, Ce...
...further add that the Supreme Court in the case of Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna, 2003 (2) SCC 15 has held that once there is acknowledgment...and future interest at 9% per annum simple.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff was the seller and the appellant No. 1.defendant company was the buyer of tubes and...Mechelec Engineers & Manufacturers v. Basic Equipment Corporation, 1976 (4) SCC 687. Para 8 of the said judgment lays down the tests in this regard and which paragraph reads ...
...the Honourable Apex Court reported in 2010 (4) CTC 856 (Indian Bank v. Blue Jaggers Estates Ltd.) and (2003) 2 SCC 15 (...cited by the learned counsel for the respondent reported in 2010 (4) CTC 856 (Indian Bank v. Blue Jaggers Estates Ltd.) and 2003 (2) SCC 15 are...Appellant for recovery of tis dues.19. In the judgment reported in 2003 (2) SCC 15 (Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna) in...
...reiterated in Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna and Ors. reported in (2003) 2 SCC 15. Again in...J.C. Budhraja v. Orissa Mining Corporation Limited & Anr. reported in (2008) 2 SCC 444, the Honble Apex Court held as under: 21. It is now well se...Company Limited- (Financial Creditor) is barred by limitation. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1073 of 2019 2. Application filed by the Financial Creditor seeking initiation...
...(2003) 2 SCC 15 Syndicate Bank versus r. Veeranna and Others" in which it was observed that if agreement makes express provision for en...: -
"10. No doubt that the loan was sanctioned in the year 2003 but the last payment made by the complainant according to the statement of account Ex. OP-2, the last...
BARNALA,
PUNJAB - 148101.
2. KAMLA DEVI
W/O KARAM CAHND & ANR R/O HOUSE # B-X111/211,
BABA FARID NAGAR, BARNALA...
...(2003) 4 SCC 675 are reproduced below:( & 682, paras 2, 4 & 14-15)“2. The question that falls for determination in the instant case is about the ambit of...(2008) 2 MLJ (Cri) 122 in law in setting aside the order WP No. 26874 of 2003 of the learned Single Judge quashing the first information report (for short “FIR”) on the ...B.S Joshi v. State of Haryana (2003) 4 SCC 675. Relevant paragraphs of B.S Joshi case...
...limitation, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna (2003) 2 SCC 15 has held in para 8, which reads thus.... (2004) 12 SCC 360 held in para 15, which reads thus:—
“15. The statement providing foundation for a plea of acknowledgement must relate to a present subsisting liability...in Civil Suit No. 19-A/1993, whereby the learned trial judge decreed the suit for specific performance in favour of respondents/plaintiffs.
2. Brief facts of the case are...
...Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna, VII (2002) SLT 407 : (...DRT rejected the said application.2. Aggrieved, the appellant defendant has preferred this appeal, and the respondent Bank filed a suitable reply opposing the same.3. I have...statement of accounts placed on record relates only to the period from 30.6.1995 to 6.2.1999 He also points out the averment in paragraph. 2 of the written statement, wherein it has been mentioned that...
...the Apex Court in the case of Syndicate Bank v. R. Veeranna reported in (2003) 2 SCC 15, relevant para 8 and 9 are quoted hereunder...by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State Bank Of India v. Yasangi Venkateswara Rao reported in (1999) 2 SCC 375, the relevant...v. Canara Bank reported in (1998) 2 SCC 317, relevant para 18 and 23 thereof is quoted hereunder:—“18. From the aforesaid rulings the following principles can be summarised. (a...
...SCC 511 , 2003 SCC (L&S) 1070, SAIL v. Madhusudan Das (2008) ...(2008) 15 SCC 560 , (2009) 2 SCC (L&S) 378, Union of India v..... Kishore (2011) 13 SCC 131 , (2012) 2 SCC (L&S) 84, State Of Haryana v. Naresh Kumar Bali . (1994...
.... (2003) 2 SCC 15 : AIR 2003 SC 2122.... 2003 2 SCC 15 wherein the Apex Court has held that once the defendant acknowledges...2. (1989) 4 SCC 514
Atul Mathur v. Atul Kalra
(Ref...
...said jurisdiction.”15. In Harbanslal Sahnia (2003) 2 SCC 107, Lahoti, J., (as His Lordship then..., Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. (2003) 2 SCC 107 and...(2003) 2 SCC 107 held:“22[24...
...judgment of Macson case (2008) 15 SCC 481, (2003) 158 ELT 424 was not applicable. On the contrary it is the law laid down in ...(2008) 15 SCC 481, (2003) 158 ELT 424 was specifically distinguished by this Court in Sicom Ltd. (2009) 2 SCC 121 holding tha...(2008) 15 SCC 481, (2003) 158 ELT 424, reference to which is also made in the notice dated 25-2-1984 that was served upon the appellan...
...) : (2003) 2 SCC 15 : AIR 2003 SC 2122; and(ii...M.C Jain, Chairperson:— This appeal has been filed by the defendant No. 2 of O.A No. 71/2002 against the final order dated 18.5.2005 passed by the Tribunal below in favour of the respondent...severally.2. The brief facts are these: The defendant No. 1 (respondent No. 4 herein) was a partnership firm. The present appellant (defendant No. 2) and present respondent No. 2...