CiteTEXT
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 the Division Bench vide its impugned judgment quashed the award passed by the Labour Court in fa...the High Court had erred in placing reliance on the judgment of this Court in Range Forest Officer (2002) 3 SCC 25 as, in the present case, the appellant workman had entered the witness box and had...termination of his service. In this connection, reliance was placed on the judgments of this Court in Range Forest Officer (2002) 3 SCC 25, Rajasthan...
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25. No proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or order or record in that regard was produ....3. The order was challenged before the Rajasthan High Court by filing a civil writ application bearing No. 2730 of 2002. A learned Single Judge at the first instance...Government of Rajasthan to the Labour Court, Shri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. The dispute of the workman, inter alia, was to the effect that though he was appointed as a daily-wage employee on 1-3-1990 and...
...Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 it was held as follows:“2. In the instant case, dispute was referred to the Labour Court that the respondent had worked for 240 days and his...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25. No proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or order or record in that regard was prod...regarding working for more than 240 days is concerned, as observed by this Court in Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 the...
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 which judgment was distinguished by the High Court in the impugned order by holding that unlike ..., neither the judgment of this Court in the case of Punjab National Bank (1978) 2 SCC 358 nor in Range Forest Officer (2002) 3 SCC 25 would assist the appellant in this case because of the proved...Industrial Disputes Act (the Act) and in violation of Sections 25-G and 25-H of the Act and on that basis he claimed his reinstatement with full back wages.3. The Bank in its turn...
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 it was held as follows:‘2. In the instant case, dispute.... (2002) 3 SCC 25. No proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or order or record in that regard was produced. Mere non-production of the muster roll for a particular period was not sufficient...concerned, as observed by this Court in Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 the onus is on the workman...
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25. In the said case, this Court while considering a similar issue observed as follows...Panchayat v. Dahyabhai Amarsinh (2005) 8 SCC 750 wherein this Court while referring to the decisions of this Court in Range Forest Officer (2002) 3 SCC 25 and Municipal Corpn., Faridabad (2004) 8...Officer (2002) 3 SCC 25.16. Mr Desai also contended that drawing an adverse presumption for non-production of evidence is not applicable in all cases where other...
...been delineated. In Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 it was held as follows...Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25. No proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or order or record in that regard was produced. Mere non-production of the muster roll for a...is concerned, as observed by this Court in Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 the onus is on the workman...
....”(See also Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25, ...employment for the purpose of Section 25-F of the Act, as has been held by this Court in Indian Cable Co. Ltd. 1962 Supp (3) SCR 589 We are aware...that the judgment of this Court in Indian Cable Co. Ltd. 1962 Supp (3) SCR 589 was rendered in the context of Section 25-G of the Act...
...Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 was pleased to state as below:“In our opinion the Tribunal was not right in placing the onus on the management without first..., in Mani Nariman Daruwala v. Phiroz N. Bhatena (1991) 3 SCC 141, AIR...not called for.3. The observations above, however, find affirmance in the decision of this Court in Nibaran...
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 it was held as follows:“2. In the instant case, dispute was ref.... These aspects were highlighted in Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25. No proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 the onus is on the workman.”The position was examined i...
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 it was held as follows:“2. In the instant case, dispute wa...aspects were highlighted in Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25. No proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or...Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 the onus is on the workman.”The position was examined in detail in the appellant's case in...
...onus to be discharged has been delineated. In Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 it was held as follows...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25. No proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or order or record in that regard was prod...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 the onus is on the workman.’The position was...
...discharged has been delineated. In Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 it was held as follows...in fact the claimant had worked for 240 days in a year. These aspects were highlighted in Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25. No.... (2002) 3 SCC 25 the onus is on the workman.”The position was examined in detail in Surendranagar...
...the employer who had retrenched him from service.6. In Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 this...was awarded 25% amount of his salary from 20-6-1996 onwards.3. The department had unsuccessfully challenged the order of reinstatement before the High Court. The High Court....5. In Mohan Lal v. Management Of M/S Bharat Electronics Ltd. . (1981) 3 SCC 225 it is said by this Court that...
...regarding working for more than 240 days is concerned, as observed by this Court in Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 the...Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (1997) 10 SCC 599 It was noted as follows:“3. The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the judgment of the High Court of...Morinda Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Ram Kishan (1995) 5 SCC 653 in para 3, this Court has dealt...
...that the workman has to prove that he has worked for more than 240 days. (See Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25; ...Deinki v. Rajiv Kumar . (2002) 8 SCC 400 and Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. v...petition filed by the appellant. In the writ petition challenge was to the award of the Labour Court, Amritsar (in short “the Labour Court”) dated 27-11-2002 whereby alleged termination of services of the...
...employer. The view is clearly contrary to what has been stated by this Court in Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25....effect from 3-4-1986 on consolidated pay of Rs 450 per month. On 25-9-1986 the Deputy Divisional Soil Conservation Officer transferred the respondent to Paranda with effect from 6-10-1986 to the office...-3-1986 the respondent was appointed as Surveyor on contractual employment, and on 25-9-1986 he was transferred to Sub-Divisional Soil Conservation Office, Paranda.4. As per...
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25, .... He claims to have served in that capacity till 31-3-1989 when his services were terminated. Aggrieved by the termination, the respondent raised an industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour...respondent had indeed worked as a Conductor with the appellant Corporation between 3-10-1987 and 31-3-1989. The Labour Court in the process rejected the appellant's case that the respondent had worked only...
....16. In Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 (SCC at p. 26...Mohan Lal v. Management Of M/S Bharat Electronics Ltd. . (1981) 3 SCC 225 this Court has said that sub-section (2) of Section 25-B comprehends a...the respondent, of following the procedure laid down in Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act.3. The respondent examined himself and deposed that he was employed for 10...
...Range Forest Officer v. S.T Hadimani . (2002) 3 SCC 25 and Essen Deinki v. Rajiv Kumar.... (2002) 8 SCC 400 wherein this Court took a view that when a question arises in regard to the right of an employee to claim compensation under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it is...not completed 240 days of work in a given year it was open to the management to terminate his services.3. When leave was granted in this appeal the same was confined to the...