Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court7
+ Central Administrative Tribunal2
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court1
+ Rajasthan High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Bombay High Court0
+ CESTAT0
+ Calcutta High Court0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Delhi High Court0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Gujarat High Court0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Karnataka High Court0
+ Kerala High Court0
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court0
+ Madras High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Supreme Court Of India0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards5
From 2011 To 20200
From 2001 To 20102
From 1991 To 20001
From 1981 To 19903
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...plaintiffs were not the co sharers in the suit land.2. Agreement of sale by Smt. Mehlo defendant No. 1 in favour of other defendants was entered into on June 9, 1982 in respect of 42 Kanals...others and the land of Khata No. 391 was shown in the name of Smt. Mehlo 1/3rd and Mian Singh etc. 2/3rd. Originally the entire land was shown in Khata No. 366, 367-min in which Smt. Mehlo was shown...Mange Ram vs. Tulsi Ram and others, 1989 (2) Recent Revenue Reports 1976: 1989 P.L.J 207. The aforesaid position of aw being not in...

....). 2. Vikash Prajapat S/o Govind Prajapat, Aged About 22 Years, R/o- Hanuman Nagar, Jhalamand, Sangariya, District Jodhpur (Raj.). ----Petitioners.... Saroj W/o Vikash Prajapat, Aged About 19 Years, Daughter Of Hema Ram, R/o- Kumharo Ka Bas, Mori Joshiyan, Jodhpur (Raj.) At Present Reside At Hanuman Nagar, Jhalamand, Sangariya, District Jodhpur (Raj... Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur (Raj...

.../2022 Date of decision: 19.01.2022 CORAM HON'BLE MRS. JASMINE AHMED, MEMBER (J) Ghanshyam S/o Shri Likhma Ram, aged 28 years, resident of Mehlo Ka Bas, Jajiwal Kallan.... 2. Chief Post Master General, Rajasthan Circle, Department of Post India, Sardar Patel Marg, Jaipur-302007. 3. Asstt. Director (Staff), Department of Post C/o Office...: Mr. K.S. Yadav, present through VC, after getting an advance notice from counsel for the applicant. 2...

..., the resolution authorising the filing of this petition was passed by the Municipal Committee on November 11, 1985. Even in this resolution, the earlier filing of the petition was not rectified. 2. Mr..., 1970 Curr. L.J 631 and Municipal Committee, Karnal v. Shri Mehlo Ram, 1976 P.LR. 453. Having perused these judgments, I find that...

...given from Civil Revision No. 1406 of 1981.2. The plaintiff instituted a suit for perpetual injunction for restraining the Municipal Committee, Bhatinda, defendant No. 1, from recovering.... Sh. Mehlo Ram…. 1976 78 PLR 453...

...has, therefore, been referred to us for determination. 2. The facts leading to this reference are thus: In a suit for permanent injunction filed by the respondent Sadhu Singh, a...to the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, and the rule laid down is that under Section 12(2) of the Punjab Agricultural University Act, the Vice-Chancellor is not...placed is in Municipal Committee, Karnal v. Sh. Mehlo Ram, (1976) 78 Pun LR 453, in which it was held that where the Municipal Committee...

..., aged about 30 years, resident of 84, Bijarniyo Ki Dhaniya, Pal Rural, Jodhpur. Presently working as MTS at HRO, RSM ST Dn., Jodhpur. 2. Chetan Prakash S/o Shri Multan Ram, aged...Ram, aged 28 years, resident of Mehlo Ka Bas, Jajiwal Kallan, District Jodhpur. Presently working as MTS at HRO, RSM ST Dn., Jodhpur. 4. Dileep Choudhary S/o Shri Gokul Ram, aged 26...(MTS) on 18.06.2018 and 22.10.2018 against the vacancy for the year 2017-2018 (Annexure-A/3 collectively). After completion of their probation period for 2 years on 19.11.2020, they became eligible...

....2. The substantive question of law which arises for determination in this appeal is whether ‘an Executive Officer is competent to file an appeal before the District Judge on the basis of a...-plaintiffs (for brevity ‘the plaintiffs’) No. 1 and 2 filed a suit for permanent perpetual injunction seeking to restrain the appellants-defendants (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the defendants’) on...”.6. In Garib Chand v. Municipal Committee Budhladha, 1979 (2) Punjab ILR it was observed as under...

...the appeal on the ground that the period of limitation had already expired on 18.7.1980 and the appeal was not competent.2. The substantive question of law which arises for...plaintiffs over the suit land. It was also averred in para 2 of the written statement that the earlier suit filed by the plaintiff regarding the suit land was dismissed by the Sub-Judge 1st Class, Bassi...Executive Officer from a retrospective date to file an appeal. The view taken by the learned District Judge is reflected in para 2 of his judgment dated 29.8.1981 which reads as under:“The...

..., Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 5. Respondents No. 6, 8, 9, 13, 15, 18, 20, 2, 22, 23...). 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 1 2...for convenience). 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiffs filed a civil suit before the learned Trial Court for seeking a...

...parties are ad idem that these appeals as well as the writ petitions can be disposed of by a common judgment. 2. These appeals have been filed under Section 54 of ‘the...4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894? (2) Whether the petitioners are entitled to any amount as enhanced compensation as alleged, if so to what extent? OPP...at IMT (wrongly again mentioned as Ex.R8) Ex.R1 2 Detail of supplementary award of village Kheri Sadh (wrongly again mentioned as Ex.R9) 13. Heard the...