Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Supreme Court Of India217
+ Delhi High Court164
+ Bombay High Court157
+ Allahabad High Court138
+ Orissa High Court123
+ Madras High Court100
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court80
+ National Green Tribunal66
+ Patna High Court57
+ Calcutta High Court50
+ Gauhati High Court48
+ Gujarat High Court44
+ Karnataka High Court41
+ Rajasthan High Court41
+ Kerala High Court38
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court35
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court33
+ Telangana High Court32
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court23
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange18
+ Jharkhand High Court16
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court11
+ Uttarakhand High Court9
+ Meghalaya High Court6
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal6
+ Armed Forces Tribunal5
+ Central Administrative Tribunal5
+ Sikkim High Court5
+ Tripura High Court5
+ CESTAT4
+ Chhattisgarh High Court3
+ SEBI3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity2
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal2
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India1
+ Company Law Board1
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ District Court1
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1
+ Manipur High Court1
+ RERA1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards504
From 2011 To 2020459
From 2001 To 2010164
From 1991 To 2000188
From 1981 To 1990169
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19601
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...incomplete statement of a witness. The decisions referred to above are R.J Lakhia… v. State Of Gujarat…., 1982 Cri LJ 1687 (Guj) and Amarjit Si...(1983) 1 SCC 1 : AIR 1983 SC 67 : (...

.... Reliance was placed on Amarjeet Singh v. State of Punjab, 1983 Cri LJ NOC 98.5. Before considering the point whether applicants were correctly summoned...Ambika Singh v. State, 1961 (1) Cri LJ 15 : (AIR 1961 All 38) Para 20 DB.)9. In the case of A...

...judgments. They are R.J Lakhia v. State of Gujarat 1982 Cri LJ 1687; Amarjit Singh v. State of Punjab 1983 ...Mondal v. Nazam Hossain 1987 Cri LJ 729 (Calcutta) and Mohan Lal v. State of U.P 1990 U.P...Margoobul Hasan v. State of U.P 1988 Cri LJ 1467, and that in yet another case coming again from the Allahabad High Court in...

...the non-petitioner cited the case Amarjit Singh @ Amba v. State of Punjab reported in (1983) 85 Pun LR 324 : (1983 Cri LJ NOC 98). This decision...decision of Assam and Nagaland High Court reported in AIR 1965 Assam 9 : (1965 (1) Cri LJ 144) State v. Ganga Ram...: (1967 Cri LJ 1632). This case has distinguished the aforesaid Assam case and in this case, it has been laid down as under...

...319 of the Code. This view finds affirmation in several decisions by this court, namely Amarjit Singh v. State of Punjab, 1980 Cri. LJ. NOC 98, Amarjit Singh alias Amba v. State of...court rendered in Gurtej Singh v. Jagrup Singh, 1983 Cri.L.J NOC 99...which can be read in evidence. In Guna Ram Tanti v. State of Assam, 1983 Crl. L.J 289 it was laid down that there was no doubt that the word “evidence” in Section 319...

...after the witnesses have been heard, i.e. evidence has been led in the Court. 11. In the decision in, Indu Bhushan Kumar's case 1983 Cri LJ NOC 128 (Pat) it has been pointed out t...Mahant Amar Nath's case, AIR 1983 SC 288 : (1983 Cri LJ 433) order passed...Gunaram Tanti v. State of Assam, 1983 Cri LJ 289 (Gauh) urges that the power under section 319 of the code to proceed against a person other th...

...Moorthy, J. in [Kaiser Otmar v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1981 Mad LW (Cri) 158 : (1981 Cri LJ (NOC) 208...Otmar's case (1981 Cri LJ (NOC) 208) are not in consonance with Section 46, Criminal P.C and the view taken by a Full Bench of this Court in Collector...Kaisar Otmar's case (1981 Cri LJ (NOC) 208) which led to this reference to this Full Bench, reads thus:—“Our legal system does not require that an arrest should be...

...1960 SC 633 : 1960 Cri LJ 1002, referred toThe terrorism, the Act (TADA...., (1970) 1 SCC 98 : 1970 SCC (Cri) 67...: 1966 Cri LJ 608; Sukhdev Singh v. Union...

...1984 Cri LJ 1535, (1983) 2 CHN 290 (Cal) the facts were somewhat similar. The accused was a teacher of the local village school and used to visit the ...Nilambar Goudo v. State 1982 Cri LJ NOC 172 (Ori).19. Only one judgment of the Patna High Court was brought to our notice, which appears...Section 376 IPC has taken the contrary view following the Calcutta High Court judgment in Jayanti Rani Panda 1984 Cri LJ 1535, (1983) 2...

...v. State 1983 Cri LJ 1748 (Mad), an occurrence took place on 2-3-1981. Investigation was completed by 6-5-1981 and the Magistrate took cognizance for offences punishable under.... 1983 Cri LJ 63 (HP), the offence in question alleged to have been committed by the accused was punishable under Section 33 of the Forest Act, 1927 of ill...Code, prosecution was barred by limitation.30. In Bipin Kalra v. State 2003 Cri LJ 51 (NOC) (Del) the High Court held that valid...

..., (1979) 1 SCR 392, 1978 Cri LJ 1741. Before that, he was a ‘prisoner under remand’ for two years.”4. On these facts, the argument advanced in this Court on...(1978) 4 SCC 494, AIR 1978 SC 1675, (1979) 1 SCR 392, 1978 Cri LJ 1741, Maneka Gandhi (...684, AIR 1980 SC 898, 1980 Cri LJ 636, Hussainara Khatoon...

...., (1961) 1 SCR 14 : AIR 1960 SC 1125 : 1960 Cri ...: 1983 SCC (Cri) 405; Sunil Batra v. Delhi Admn...: (1950) 51 Cri LJ 1383, held overruledThe third reason given in McDowell case is that the...

.... State of Maharashtra AIR 1968 SC 594 , 1968 Cri LJ 550 and subsequent judgment in...AIR 1968 SC 594 , 1968 Cri LJ 550 Hidayatullah, J. (as His Lordship then...AIR 1968 SC 594 , 1968 Cri LJ 550, AIR p. 599, para 15...

...State of Karnataka v. Khaleel 2004 Cri LJ (NOC) 10 (Kant) stated as follows: [Cri LJ (NOC) 10]...State of Kerala v. Kundumkara Govindan 1969 Cri LJ 818, 1968 Ker LJ 485. In this case, the Court observed as under...: (Cri LJ p. 823, para 19)The crux of the offence under Section 376 IPC is rape and it postulates a sexual intercourse. The word “intercourse” means sexual connection. It...

...Godse v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1961 SC 600 , (1961) 1 Cri LJ 736 , (1961) 3 SCR 440. The first question that was considered in that decision was: (AIR pp. 601-02, para 4..., (1961) 1 Cri LJ 736 , (1961) 3 SCR 440 held as under: (Maru Ram case...Godse AIR 1961 SC 600 , (1961) 1 Cri LJ 736 , (1961) 3 SCR 440, is that these equivalents are meant for the limited objective of computation to help the State exercise its wide powers of...

..., 1952 SCR 1091, 1953 Cri LJ 129, Dharambir Singh v. State of Punjab Cri. A. No. 98 of 1958...Swami v. Emperor AIR 1939 PC 47, (1939) 40 Cri LJ 364:“The circumstances must be circumstances of the transaction: general expressions indicating...SCR 1336, 1959 Cri LJ 108, Pakala Narayana Swami AIR 1939 PC 47, (1939) 40 Cri LJ 364, Shiv Kumar v. State of U.P Cri. A. No. 55 of 1966...

.... Satish Chandra 1954 SCR 1077, AIR 1954 SC 300, 1954 Cri LJ..., AIR 1963 SC 1295, (1963) 2 Cri LJ 329 The aforesaid decisions cannot possibly be relevant to appreciate the..., AIR 1954 SC 300, 1954 Cri LJ 865, (8 Hon'ble Judges) and...

...conclusion of the inquiry or trial. In other words, this order is subject to change as soon as the Court decides the case on merits at a later stage. A reference to 1983 Cri LJ 1194 (Ker) Vasu...hereinafter.6. Sh. Vijay Thakur while assailing this submission of Sh. S.S Kanwar has referred to the decision of the Gauhati High Court in 1980 Cri LJ NOC 6 (Radha...(Kant), U. Kariyappa… v. P. Sreekantaiah & Another…, 1983 Cri LJ 1584 (Ker...

...Cri LJ 329. relied onD.&F. The principles contained in Articles 39(a) and 41 must be regarded as equally fundamental in the understanding and interpretation of..., (1980) 1 SCC 98 : 1980 SCC (Cri) 40...: AIR 1960 SC 932 : (1961) 1 SCJ 98, distinguished...

..., Eradu v. State of Hyderabad AIR 1956 SC 316, 1956 Cri LJ 559.... AIR 1954 SC 621, 1954 Cri LJ 1645 it was laid down that where the case depends upon the conclusion drawn from circumstances the cumulative effect of the....”12. In State Of U.P v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava . (1992) 2 SCC 86, 1992 Cri LJ 1104 it was pointed out that...